Navigation

DISSENT!

Defend Israel

The Patriots Call
The Black Robe Regiment - The Patriots Call

Democrats party of Racism
Racism of the Democrat Party
Herman Cain - The DNC has BRAINWASHED most of the Blacks of this Nation
Racism - the Nemesis of the Democrat Party
Democrats invented racism and democrats HATE all blacks
The Snooper Report articles on Democrat invention of racism

The March on DC
Callin’ All the Clans Together
Sick and tired - marching towards the Constitution of the United States
We. Are. Finished. With.  DC.
We. Are. Finished. With. DC. - Addendum Part 1

Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It
Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It Part 2(?)
Civility: Leftinistra Own None Part Three
Obama, Civility and The Clansmen of Dumb
Brain Dead Leftinistra: Their Stoic Civility
Libtards Have No Class - Civility Escapes Their Brain Deadness
The States Will Be the Next Battlefield in the Fight Over ObamaCare
War Is Coming: Blood On Our Own Streets - Thanks Democrats
Civil War…
We Are In The Midst of Chaos and Civil War
Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die Trying
State’s Sovereignty or Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die - The Movement Marches On
The Country Surrounds The City

When They Came
Is The Left Still “Proud To Be a Left-Wing Extremist”?
Be It Known - Attention Unconstitutional Congress
Obama: One Big Ass Mistake America
Do Birthers Rock and Roll or Stop and Drool?
Good vs Evil…It Is Your Choice
I Apologize For My Nation
Obama’s Civilian National Security Forces (CNSF)
Obama’s Brown Shirts - Civilian National Security Forces
What Is It About The American Liberal?
The Plan To Destroy America
Another Soldier Has Been Given the Haditha Treatment!
Callin’ All The Clans Together
Callin’ All The Clans Together Show
A History of the List of 45
Constitutionality: The Movement
Vindication: Iraq’s Saddam and Al Qaeda Links Revealed
Redefining The Center or the Moderate
The HIC (Hoax In Charge) Going To Copenhagen
We Didn’t Start This Goddamn War!

Copy Cat Frauds of the IAVA

Contract With America
Snooper’s Declaration of Independence
Thanks Obama

Contract From America

Timothy McVeigh
Thoughts To Ponder and Reflect Upon
Snooper Report Vindication: Al Qaeda, TWA Flight 800 and OKC Bombing
Clinton alludes to 1995 bombing, says words matter

Missing 13th Amendment
TITLES OF “NOBILITY” AND “HONOR” - The Missing 13th Amendment

The Coup
Military Coup Against Obama

The United States Constitution
Our founding document wasn’t set in stone for a reason

Deepwater Horizon
Did Hugo Chavez Sink the Deepwater Horizon Oil Platform?

MSLSD Lies
The New Right

Arizona Rising

Texas Wars

This is pretty much a bunch of crap, FYI.
Editor's Choice


REFERENCE MY NEW WEB SITE

Snooper Report dot org

CHRISTIAN WEB SITE





SEARCH HERE


Powered by Squarespace

1980

1984

Wake Up GOP

This is pretty much a bunch of CRAP, FYI HINT: “MOSTLY TRUE” is a “MOSTLY FALSE” deal which means “MOSTLY TRUE” is a LIE.

Entries in Barack Hussein Obama (10)

Saturday
Feb212009

Obama Secretly Approves Shari'a Law For Pakistan (with video)

Here's some great news.  After Sufi Muhammad was set free for renouncing violence, he has returned to the field to promote Global Jihad and to install Shar'ia Law throughout the world.  He was jailed for sending thousands of volunteers to Afghanistan to fight the U.S.-led invasion in 2001.

On 2.16.09, the New York Slimes reported that Pakistan had made an agreement with the Taliban (forced from power in Afghanistan) to create Shar'ia Law in seven States in the wastelands in Pakistan.  Once this was agreed upon, Sufi Muhammad immediately began a campaign to spread Shar'ia Law even farther.

Other political leaders stated that this agreement was not acceptable.

[...] The concessions to the militants, who now control about 70 percent of the region just 100 miles from the capital, were criticized by Pakistani analysts as a capitulation by a government desperate to stop Taliban abuses and a military embarrassed at losing ground after more than a year of intermittent fighting. About 3,000 Taliban militants have kept 12,000 government troops at bay and terrorized the local population with floggings and the burning of schools. [...]

Back in May of 2008, this process began its long trek of realization as reported by MEMRI.

Click to read more ...

Friday
Jan232009

Obamination: Hypocrisy & Deceit

I commenced my dissection of President Obama’s Inaugural Address with his message to Muslims. In this episode, I return to excerpts
From the President’s Prepared Remarks, as published by the Miami Herald.

Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred.

On this day, we gather because we have chosen hope over fear, unity of purpose over conflict and discord.

On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn out dogmas, that for far too long have strangled our politics.

We remain a young nation, but in the words of Scripture, the time has come to set aside childish things.

Starting today, we must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and begin again the work of remaking America.

We will build the roads and bridges, the electric grids and digital lines that feed our commerce and bind us together. We will restore science to its rightful place, and wield technology’s wonders to raise health care’s quality and lower its cost. We will harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories. And we will transform our schools and colleges and universities to meet the demands of a new age. All this we can do. And all this we will do.

The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works - whether it helps families find jobs at a decent wage, care they can afford, a retirement that is dignified.

As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. Our Founding Fathers, faced with perils we can scarcely imagine, drafted a charter to assure the rule of law and the rights of man, a charter expanded by the blood of generations. Those ideals still light the world, and we will not give them up for expedience’s sake.

And so to all other peoples and governments who are watching today, from the grandest capitals to the small village where my father was born: know that America is a friend of each nation and every man, woman, and child who seeks a future of peace and dignity, and that we are ready to lead once more. Recall that earlier generations faced down fascism and communism not just with missiles and tanks, but with sturdy alliances and enduring convictions. They understood that our power alone cannot protect us, nor does it entitle us to do as we please. Instead, they knew that our power grows through its prudent use; our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint.

  • Our nation is at war, against a far-reaching network of violence and hatred.

That sentence does not fit in with those which follow it. He fails to elaborate, without naming the enemy, without specifying the theaters of war or evaluating the status of the war effort.  Why did he raise the issue of war so briefly only to drop it to hint at his Socialist agenda? The objective clause is problematic because it exemplifies an effort to distract us and divert our attention from the identity & nature of the enemy.

Islam is the enemy. Islam’s canon of scripture expresses and its Imams inculcate hatred of all who do not submit to Allah’s writ exactly as they do. We are described as the “worst of living creatures“, will abide in Hell, the “worst of creatures“. Allah curses us and commands Muslims to make war on us.  President Obama perpetuates the lie spewed by his predecessors: the claim that our enemy consists of a tiny minority of radicalized extremists who belong to Al-Qaeda and similar organizations spawned by Al-Ikhwan Al-Islamiyya.  His assertion is far removed from objective factual reality.  Islam’s permanent war is sanctified by Allah’s Qur’an and codified in Sharia. 8:39 & 9:29 contain the eternal commands to fight. 9:123 reinforces them. They are codified in Book O, Chapter 9, Paragraphs 8&9 of Reliance of the Traveller. [Search for O9.8.]  Muslims are commanded to conquer the entire world for Allah and they have been  engaged in that conquest since 623.  Muslims who seek to live in peace without joining Jihad are not good Muslims; they are hypocrites whom Moe cursed and assigned to Hell.  Allah commanded Muslims to fight the hypocrites along with us.

  • On this day, we gather because we have chosen hope over fear, unity of purpose over conflict and discord.

The ceremony at which he spoke was not ad-hoc, it is a traditional part of our system of peaceful turnover of power by elected officials.

  • On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn out dogmas, that for far too long have strangled our politics.

Here we have a prime example of a narcissistic, arrogant demagogue so confident of his ability to hypnotize his victims that he tells them in plain language what he has done to them. His was a campaign of petty grievances and false promises; the worn out dogmas of Socialism.

  • We remain a young nation, but in the words of Scripture, the time has come to set aside childish things.

Childish things like sense of dependency & a sense of entitlement? Those are part of his campaign pitch, how can he abandon them now?

  • Starting today, we must pick ourselves up, dust ourselves off, and begin again the work of remaking America.

The statement is ambiguous and dangerously broad.  What is he talking about? Is he calling for a new Constitutional Convention to undo the Bill of Rights? Does he intend to increase the powers and thereby the dangers inherent in government?

  • We will build the roads and bridges, the electric grids and digital lines that feed our commerce and bind us together. We will restore science to its rightful place, and wield technology’s wonders to raise health care’s quality and lower its cost. We will harness the sun and the winds and the soil to fuel our cars and run our factories. And we will transform our schools and colleges and universities to meet the demands of a new age. All this we can do. And all this we will do.

That indicates physical infrastructure. Building roads and bridges requires vast sums of money and  years to plan and execute. It involves lawyers and engineers, skilled equipment operators, machinery and trucks, asphalt and cement production. How many years does it take to turn out an engineer, and what will he do with his degree when the roads & bridges are finished?  A massive make work project will result in shortages & inflation, not in new jobs.  It will balloon the national debt beyond control.

Electric grids & digital communications are private industries, not government monopolies. Does President Obama intend to nationalize them or to subsidize electric utility  & telecommunications companies?  Or does he intend to burden them with new, higher cost structures so as to drive them out of business or inflate the rates we must pay?

What is the “rightful place” of science? Who displaced it, when and how?  The technological wonders that improved health care are extremely expensive and increased the fixed cost structure of the industry, pushing up the cost of health care. How do you lower cost by more of the same? Who gets screwed in this process?

Sunlight and wind power can not replace hydrocarbon fuels for land transportation.  Solar cells are too expensive and not sufficiently efficient.  Issues of scope, scale, efficiency and cost are always overlooked  by dreamers & schemers peddling snake oil.

Everybody promises to wave a magic wand to transform the educational system; nobody fulfills the promises. In Chicago, President Obama’s buddy ran the school system into the ground instead of improving it.  There are problems involving money, and there are problems involving people, both administrators and unions. None of those problems are easily soluble. The most important factor is beyond the President’s control: the abilities and attitudes of the students.  So long as the students are focused on video games, movies,  the idiot box, beer, sex and drugs, you can throw all your money at the schools without improving the outcome.

  • The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works - whether it helps families find jobs at a decent wage, care they can afford, a retirement that is dignified.

Take a long, cold look at the Constitution; where does it assign those tasks to the federal government?  This is part of the culture of  dependency & unreasonable expectations which got us into the present mess. President Obama seeks to expand the role and power of government, the result will be less liberty, less prosperity, increased poverty and reduced security.

  • As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals. Our Founding Fathers, faced with perils we can scarcely imagine, drafted a charter to assure the rule of law and the rights of man, a charter expanded by the blood of generations. Those ideals still light the world, and we will not give them up for expedience’s sake.

Rights are only enjoyed by those who seize, hold and zealously enforce them.  It would be right for all men to be free & prosperous, without slavery, repression & discrimination. Unfortunately, the world does not work that way. Many parts of the world are ruled by tyrants, the people living there do not share our freedoms. They can’t until they seize them as our forefathers seized them from King George.  The idea that murdering Muslims have a right to maim and kill our servicemen and contest their capture & detention in our courts of civil law is the absolute peak of suicidal idiocy.  There is no right to make war on us and get off Scott free. They have neither signed nor complied with the Geneva Conventions.  The idea that terrorists should enjoy privacy in their communications just because one party to the conversation is in America exposes the suicidal insanity of its holders.  The President is erecting and knocking down a straw man.

  • And so to all other peoples and governments who are watching today, from the grandest capitals to the small village where my father was born: know that America is a friend of each nation and every man, woman, and child who seeks a future of peace and dignity, and that we are ready to lead once more. Recall that earlier generations faced down fascism and communism not just with missiles and tanks, but with sturdy alliances and enduring convictions. They understood that our power alone cannot protect us, nor does it entitle us to do as we please. Instead, they knew that our power grows through its prudent use; our security emanates from the justness of our cause, the force of our example, the tempering qualities of humility and restraint.

Future of peace and dignity? Its ok if they seek war and rapine here and now, but we’re their friend and benefactor if they seek peace in the future? Yeah, wrong!  War is the condition while any part of the world is in Kuffar control. Peace will obtain after Islam completes total world conquest.  What was sturdy about our temporary alliance with Stalin?  Without power, we have no protection. If we have power but are unwilling to use it, we have no protection.  Old Harry had the power and the will to use it, so WW2 came to and end with victory over Japan.

This last quoted paragraph exemplifies President Obama’s hypocrisy. He was going to put away petty grievances and false promises. He expects us to forget that and accept his old campaign shibboleths.  When an enemy declares genocidal intent and attacks you, there is no role for restraint. Humility has no place in this debate. Our ideals are superior, our rights are superior and our force is superior. We have a right to defend ourselves and our way of life. Those who made war upon us must pay its penalties.

Thursday
Dec112008

Open Letter to the Electoral College

Open Letter to the Electoral College


Ladies and gentlemen, as electors, you are charged with the duty of selecting a President to preside over the executive affairs of this nation for the ensuing four years.

The peculiar institution whose powers you will exercise on December 15 was intended to avoid both the intrigues & cabals involved in election by the legislature and the impulsive passions & ignorance to which popular election would be subject. Your office results from one of the most important compromises made by the Constitutional Convention.

The present circumstances bring an enhancement to the gravity of the responsibility of your office. Inadequate vetting & journalistic scrutiny of one charismatic candidate have joined with a popular fervor for his candidacy resulting in a majority popular vote for one:


  • whose policy positions are ambiguous

  • who encouraged the voters to make unfounded assumptions that he would grant them impossible benefits

  • whose alliances with racists, domestic terrorists & supporters of international terrorism bring his judgment into question

  • whose alliance with a convicted felon and indicted Governor bring his morality under a dark shadow of suspicion

  • whose apparent acceptance of illegal foreign campaign contributions brings the legitimacy of his campaign under question

  • whose agents met with officers of a terrorist group at war with our ally in apparent violation of the Logan Act

  • and whose refusal to produce authentic documentation of his having been born in this country brings his eligibility under question.


At a time when our nation is at war on two foreign battlefronts, challenged by a resurgent Russia and threatened by Iran's approaching ascension to nuclear armament, we need a President whose judgment and integrity are unquestioned.

At a time when our economy and that of the world are turning downward, through recession toward depression, we need a President who is free from the taint of scandal, able to act decisively and lead; not subject to the water torture of drips & dribbles of facts from the investigation & trial of his political ally.

This is the occasion for which your office was created; a time when popular passion & ignorance resulted in the selection of an unqualified person neither worthy nor well prepared for the duties of high office when our nation is at peril on multiple fronts.

As a citizen, I therefore challenge you to be true and faithful to the oath of office you have sworn and give ample consideration to the security, welfare, prosperity & happiness of this nation by rejecting the error of popular impulse and electing the McCain / Palin slate in its stead.


To our international visitors: please leave a comment advising us of the reason for your interest in this esoteric subject matter.

To our American activist readership: dbsolo alerted me by email to the existence of a chatroom which has posted contact information for the Electors. This link is to the Michigan page: http://www.democratic-disaster.com/index.php?topic=479.0.

Democratic Disaster has more interesting information for your education & enjoyment, it is well worth a visit.

Saturday
Dec062008

What does Electing Obama Say to Muslims?

An Obama donor quoted as quoting Obama.

“imagine if on January 20, 2009 a guy named Barack Hussein Obama was sworn in on the US Capitol steps as the President of the United States, what that would say to the world, especially the Muslim world, about our nation.”

This was cited by NMJ, and earlier by Ben Stein at Politico.

Our national elections are intended to elect leaders, not send messages.  We are not a tribe, nor do we send smoke signals. If the world infers a message from the outcome of the Nov. 4 '08 election, it  will be this.


  • The majority of the participating American electorate are ignorant, narcissist damned fools who can not discern the difference between ambiguous slogans pandering to their selfish desires and sound public policy.


The answer to the second half of the question is contained in the question itself;  in the act of propounding it. Propounding that question to a group of fat cat political donors implies that  electing Obama would send a positive message to Muslim aliens: that one of their own had been elected to the office of President, where he would enact policies favorable to their Jihad.

  • Obama is a closet Muslim; a stealth candidate falsely claiming to be Christian in hopes that the Christian majority will vote for him. As a Muslim, he is one of the attackers, not a defender.

    • We have elected one of the enemy to mislead us into defeat, destruction & dhimmitude.



    • Reinforcing Muslim hopes of  destroying America so as to ease the process of conquering the rest of the world is a good thing.

    • As President, Obama will not mount an effective defense against Islamic conquest.

    • As President, Obama will not mount any offense against Islamic conquest.




As a consequence of the concealment of Obama's arrogant boast before his fat cat donors, and its revelation subsequent to the election, when it can have no direct effect upon the election, it is necessary that reasonable members of the electorate; those who care about the preservation of liberty, rise up and demand that the Electoral College disqualify the Obama/Biden ticket  as  traitors and elect the McCain/Palin ticket in their stead.

Tuesday
Oct282008

Obama: Racist/Socialist

The news of the day reveals an audio tape of a radio interview Senator Obama did in 2001, while he was a law school lecturer. World Net Daily posted a video containing a substantial portion of the interview.

WBEZ claims to have an audio tape; I could not make the download work. I transcribed the following from the version posted at WND.

If you look at the... victories and failures of the civil rights movements, ... and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously
dispossessed peoples so that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at a lunch counter an order as long as I could pay for it I'd be ok. But the Supreme  court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and  sort of more basic issues of political and  economic justice in this society and uh to that extent and as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, uh it wasn't that radical, it didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by by the founding fathers in the Constitution at least as it's been interpreted and the Warren Court interpreted it in the same way that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties, says what the States can't do to you; says what the Federal Government can't do to you, but it doesn't say what the Federal Government or the State Government must do must do on your behalf, and that hasn't shifted and   I think one of the tragedies of the civil rights movement was , because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think
there was a tendency to lose  track of the political and community organizing activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change and in some ways we still suffer from that.

I'm not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts, the institution just isn't structured that way.  You just look at very rare examples where during the desegregation era, the court was willing to, for example,  order uh, changes that cost money to a local school district; and the court was very uncomfortable with it, it was hard to manage, it was hard to figure out; ah, you start getting into all sorts of separation of powers issues in terms of the court monitoring or engaging in a process that essentially is administrative and takes a lot of time... . The court's just not very good at it, and politically, its just, its very hard to legitimize opinions from the court in that regard, so I think that although you can craft theoretical justifications for it legally,   I think any three of us sitting here could come up with a rationale for bringing about economic change through the courts.


The reference to the civil rights movements sets the context: Obama is focused on race relations: Black vs White, just like the focus of the church he attended for twenty years. The first reference to redistribution of wealth establishes the subject. Barrack Hussein Obama was talking about empowering the Federal Government to take money from 'rich' Whites and give it to 'poor' Blacks. He was making a pitch for Black votes at our expense. What could be more racist?

The subsequent reference to 'economic justice' confirms the obvious, removing all doubt. Next, Obama dives into the Warren Court's interpretation of the Constitution, saying that it was not radical because "it didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed    by the founding fathers in the Constitution". No court in its right mind, faithful to its oath of office, would break free from those essential constraints. We must assume that Barack Hussein Obama would appoint Justices who would perform that act of unconstitutional injustice.

Obama continues on the Constitution: "but it doesn't say what the Federal Government or the State Government must do must do on your behalf". For a Constitutional lawyer, he seems singularly unaware of the significance of the philosophy held by the founders. The Federal Government is not your mother: it does not wipe your ass & nose.  The Federal Government is not Santa Clause: it does not bring you presents. Those are not its functions.

Now we must listen between the lines: I think one of the tragedies of the civil rights movement was  because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think there was a tendency to lose  track of the political and community organizing activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change and in some ways we still suffer from that. The Civil Rights movement was about obtaining civil & legal equality, not redistributing wealth. Obama switches its focus retroactively to convert it into a means of obtaining money from Whites.  It should have shunned litigation and brought about redistribution of wealth through organizing coalitions of power. Armed robbery, perhaps?  Or racial politics, in which a minority would convert the Federal Government for robbery by proxy?

Next, Obama reveals his strategic objective: I'm not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts, the institution just isn't structured that way. We know what he wants to do.  It ain't just, moral nor constitutional. Now we know what he will set out to do legislatively.

We have learned that Obama is a divider, a racial divider, not a uniter. We have learned that he intends to take our income and give it to his Black constituency in the slums of Chicago.  We have learned of his intense contempt for the Constitution and the principles upon which it is founded. We can only conclude that his political career must come to an end with his first term in the Senate, for which he is both unworthy & unqualified. God forfend and voters forbid he should ever cross the threshold of the White House!

Tuesday
Oct142008

Obama: Muslim or Christian; What's the Difference?

Is he or ain't he? Only Barack Hussein Obama knows for sure. Whats the difference?

If he is a genuine convert to Christianity, the threats he poses are limited to the consequences of his:


  • Communist ideology

  • alliances:

    • terrorists

      • Ayers

      • Khalidi



    • racists

      • Wright



    • racketeers

    • vote fraud practitioners

      • Acorn





  • inexperience

  • incompetence.


If his conversion from Islam to Christianity was a scam perpetrated for political expediency, then electing him is, in effect installing an enemy agent as Commander in Chief.   Abysmal ignorance of the doctrines of Islam recorded in the Qur'an & Hadith prevents many members of the American Electorate from comprehending the adverse consequences of electing a Muslim to high office.
22:41. Those (Muslim rulers) who, if We give them power in the land, (they) order for Iqamat-as-Salât. [i.e. to perform the five compulsory congregational Salât (prayers) (the males in mosques)], to pay the Zakât and they enjoin Al-Ma'rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm orders one to do), and forbid Al-Munkar (i.e. disbelief, polytheism and all that Islâm has forbidden) [i.e. they make the Qur'ân as the law of their country in all the spheres of life]. And with Allâh rests the end of (all) matters (of creatures).

The phrases highlighted in red above basically mean that a Muslim who obtains power will  impose Sharia. The translator's comment, highlighted in purple, confirms that fact.  Do you really want to give that power to the enemy?  A Muslim President would pack the court system with Muslims & Dhimmis, life time appointments that can not be rescinded.
24:55. Allâh has promised those among you who believe, and do righteous good deeds, that He will certainly grant them succession to (the present rulers) in the earth, as He granted it to those before them, and that He will grant them the authority to practise their religion, that which He has chosen for them (i.e. Islâm). And He will surely give them in exchange a safe security after their fear (provided) they (believers) worship Me and do not associate anything (in worship) with Me. But whoever disbelieved after this, they are the Fâsiqûn (rebellious, disobedient to Allâh).

(And those who believe and do righteous good deeds,) meaning, their hearts were truthful and their limbs obedient with the righteous acts they were commanded, [The Reward of Righteous Believers]

Righteous good deeds: code words for Jihad. What righteous acts were they commanded to perform? 8:39, 9:29. They intend to take power, by force or by stealth; why should we give it to them? Why should we yield our hard won liberties? How will we ever recover our hard won liberties when the enemy has taken control of our armed forces?
12:40. "You do not worship besides Him but only names which you have named (forged), you and your fathers, for which Allâh has sent down no authority. The command (or the judgement) is for none but Allâh. He has commanded that you worship none but Him (i.e. His Monotheism), that is the (true) straight religion, but most men know not.

Only Islam's demon has the right to rule. Legislation contrary to his Qur'an or Moe's sunnah is not allowed.
33:36 It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger, he has indeed strayed in a plain error.

Allah rules. His Messenger and his Caliphs decide and that is the end of the matter.  That is not how our Constitution works. Why do you want to risk losing our Constitution?  Why are you willing to risk imposition of Islamic theocratic tyranny?

Under Islamic law, any child born to a Muslim father is Muslim.  Renouncing Islam and converting to a real religion is a capital offense.  Apostates must be killed if they do not recant & revert.  Why then do Muslims; even Islamic terrorists, want Barack Hussein Obama to be elected? Why aren't they issuing and attempting to carry out fatwas against him?  Obviously, they believe that his conversion was a sham. Obviously, they believe that his policies will be favorable to them.

They may be right. We can't take that chance.       If Barack Hussein Obama truly abandoned Islam and converted to Christianity, let him curse and condemn the damnable doctrines of Islam which sanctify & mandate aggressive conquest against Pagans & 'people of the book', genocide & terrorism.

If he is a closet Muslim, he won't abjure those doctrines because he believes them.  In that case, we don't want him.  If he is a Christian, but unwilling to offend Muslims by telling the truth about their curse worthy doctrines & practices, then he has no salt or savor, and is unworthy of high office.

In either case, Barack Hussein Obama must be rejected because he can not be trusted with the high office he seeks.

Monday
Jul282008

Damn Fool Abroad: Obama in London

Amerisrael has an extremely important analysis of Senator Obama's Meet the Press interview.  Recent remarks by King Abdullah of Jordan are included in the interview and analysis.  What did King Abdullah say that is is significant to an American Presidential election?

"I think the lack of peace [between Israel and the Palestinians] is the major threat.  I don't see the ability of creating a two-state solution beyond 2008, 2009.  I think this is really the last chance.  If this fails, I think this is going to be a major threat for the Middle East:  Are we going to go for another 60 years of `fortress Israel,' or are we going to have a neighborhood where Israel is actually incorporated?  That's our major challenge, I'm very concerned that the clock is ticking, that the door is closing on all of us."

What is magical about two states?  There is war between 57 states and a territory against Israel. Exactly how would converting the territory into a state put an end to the war?

  • `fortress Israel,' :  what is the meaning of this expression? Why is Israel obligated to drop her defenses and allow herself to be eradicated?

  • a neighborhood where Israel is actually incorporated Ahmadinejad said "a world without Israel. Is the King ready to accept the existence of Israel,  in her homeland, as a Jewish state or not? Israel is incorporated, but not accepted. Why not?  Because she reconquered land conquered by Muslims in 638.  Lets examine Art. 11 of the Hamas Charter.


The Islamic Resistance Movement believes that the land of Palestine has been an Islamic Waqf throughout the generations and until the Day of Resurrection, no one can renounce it or part of it, or abandon it or part of it. ...This is the status [of the land] in Islamic Shari'a, and it is similar to all lands conquered by Islam by force, and made thereby Waqf lands upon their conquest, for all generations of Muslims until the Day of Resurrection.

Senator Obama fell into the same trap President Bush & Senator McCain  fell into before him:
If we can solve the Israeli/Palestinian process, then that will make it easier for Arab states and the Gulf states to support us when it comes to issues like Iraq and Afghanistan.


  1. The only process is one of genocide & policide: the destruction of Israel.

  2. Islam is a way of life; the Ummah is a brotherhood, Muslims support each other against Kuffar. The Gulf states can not and will not support us in Iraq and Afghanistan without risking their thrones.


If we've gotten an Israeli/Palestinian peace deal, maybe at the same time peeling Syria out of the Iranian orbit, that makes it easier to isolate Iran so that they have a tougher time developing a nuclear weapon.

There can be no real peace because Islam can never tolerate the existence of Israel. Israel violated Sharia by reconquering her ancient patrimony which was seized by Muslims in the 7th century. Allah promised victory. Have you not read Al-Anfal 65-66?  Israel's continued existence proves Allah to be an impotent idol. No Muslim can tolerate that. The reconquest of Israel must continue:

  • Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allah, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. [9:29]

  • jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist) [Abu Dawud 14.2526]

  • "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him." [Bukhari 4.52.177]


No way in Hell; it can not happen, it will not happen, and those who deny this fatal fact are wandering in the wilderness with their heads up their asses.  Israel obtains peace and security when Islam is eliminated, not before.
....I think the next president has to start very quickly in moving both on the peace process forward...

War is the peace process. Only victory by the defender obtains a just peace. Only the extinction of Islam can obtain lasting peace.
That the Palestinian people are having a very tough time right now economically, and it is in U.S. interests to make sure that they have a sense of hope and opportunity and a Palestinian state.


  • They hope to destroy Israel, to perform genocide & policide. How is it in our interest to give them that hope?

  • The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan is in 'Palestine'  and is composed largely of 'Palestinians'. Why should it not be considered the "Palestinian state'? Why give them a staging area for continued Jihad against Israel?


And what I've said is that we're going to make sure that the Palestinians have the--a state that allows them to prosper as long as we also have certainty that Israel's security is not being compromised.


  • How can the Falestinians prosper when they pour everything into corruption and Jihad?

  • Israel's security is compromised so long as one Muslim is alive on the face of the earth.


It is essentially necessary that everyone takes a clear eyed look at  Islam's canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence; to become familiar with doctrine & history so that we can detect dieing liars when they speak and write about  these life and death issues.

The Muslim Student Association makes three parallel translations of the Qur'an  and four major hadith collections available in their Compendium of Islamic Texts. This blog post includes two direct links to ahadith from those collections. www.tafsir.com  makes Ibn Kathir's Tafsir accessible to everyone. I have included a direct link to one tafsir topic in this post. www.qtafsir.com  has the same text  accessed through a search engine. The Reliance of the Traveller is the all purpose handbook of Sharia. It is one big  text file, but you can use the Windows search function [Ctrl F]  to find what you are seeking. Book O deals with matters of 'justice' and Chapter 9 deals with the law of Jihad. Go read O.9.8 and see what is really going on in the world. To see the source of those laws, go to Riyad-us-Salaheen and read Book 11, Chapter 234 : Obligation of Jihad.

These are matters of great importance: life & death, liberty & oppression. Do not risk your life and liberty by taking anyone's word for these important matters. Follow the links, do your research.  And, on November 4, be careful when voting and make no mistakes. Do not vote for anyone who does not explicitly denounce the damnable doctrines of Islam which cause & perpetuate  Jihad, genocide & terrorism!

Sunday
Jul272008

Your Amerika...Not My America

Dean is frustrated by the superficiality and bias of news coverage and the electorate's ignorance and careless attitude toward the very important decision facing them November 4.  Please read his message and share it with others. Are you part ofthe problem or part of the solution?

Your Amerika...Not My America

By Dean, July 27, 2008

This election brings my America to a crossroads. The viral maniacs on the left can't wait to turn this country upside down with their newly elected Fuhrer...er...president....the great, the wonderful Barak Hussein Obama....gee...ain't he pretty. And hey he makes you feel good too. Wow. I just can't wait.

Mr. Eurobama, the worlds president, appeaser of nations, leader of fools, reading canned deception from his teleprompter, and followed around by his groupies from the MSM like a bunch of gaga eyed teenagers following their rock idol.

Get ready for the "change" that will be ushered in by this maniacal leftist and while you're at it take a good look around at my America, for it's the last time you will see her. The new Amerika is on the way aided and abetted by the usual suspects.

Now I could go into a long list of these criminals but I ask you what's the point? Are you paying attention??

America seems more concerned about who will be the next "American Idol" or what's playing at the movies or can I get a double Mac with cheese please, than what's going on inside our own country.

While you sit at home watching all your propaganda news programs passing time or running around the mall looking for the next best deal, your local leftist propagandists are busy converting you and your progeny into 'bots...good little sheeple.

Are you a Democrat? Really? Will you vote strict party lines? If you answered yes to these questions then I must tell you that YOU are my enemy and as long as you remain a faithful follower of the Democrat mantra YOU will remain my enemy and I will fight you.

Why do we still call you Democrats anyway? Your socialist circle is nearly complete. The "cat is out of the bag". The Democrats want to control health care, oil and free markets. Next will be housing and food. When salary caps, wage controls, and mass housing are under their thumb there will be no stopping them peacefully.

Democrats? More like Marxists if you look closely at their agenda.

You can read this article at American Thinker; Why Do We Call Them Democrats: http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/06/why_do_we_call_them_democrats.html

This one; The Soviet Art of Brain Washing: http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/7006/psychopolitics.html

And this one; The Devouring Dragon of Socialism Eating America: http://swordattheready.wordpress.com/2008/07/22/the-devouring-dragon-of-socialism-eating-america/

Perhaps the most important of them all my friend Snoopers "The List of 45" here; http://www.anewtone.com/2008/01/list-of-45-something-you-should.html

Read it, understand it, and remember it when you vote. My America and yours is at stake.

I would be remiss if I didn't issue this warning to you socialist scum. Visit my house at your own peril.

You are my enemy and I will deal with you as such...I don't hesitate...and I don't miss.

Take that any way you like.

Wednesday
Jun182008

Daffy Schmuck Lets Snake out of the Bag

An article at Sons of Apes And Pigs alerted me to remarks made by the Libyan dictator, commemorating President Reagan's bombing raid. MEMRI has a video clip & transcript. I have taken quotes out of context and added emphasis. {Italics indicate sarcasm.}

It has been proven that there is no democracy in [the U.S.]. Rather, it is a dictatorship no different than the dictatorships of Hitler, Napoleon, Mussolini, Genghis Khan, Alexander the Great, and the rest of the tyrants....

There are elections in America now.

Perhaps the elections are a sham, or Mu'ammar Al-Qadhafi is contradicting himself. Which is it?
Along came a black citizen of Kenyan African origins, a Muslim, who had studied in an Islamic school in Indonesia. His name is Obama.

Does al-Qadhafi know something the rest of us don't? Is he calling Obama a liar; Mekkan candidate?


All the people in the Arab and Islamic world and in Africa applauded this man. They welcomed him and prayed for him and for his success, and they may have even been involved in legitimate contribution campaigns to enable him to win the American presidency.

Muslims want Obama to be elected Dictator of America. Why is that? What is their interest?
But we were taken by surprise when our African Kenyan brother, who is an American national, made statements that shocked all his supporters in the Arab world, in Africa, and in the Islamic world. We hope that this is merely an elections "clearance sale," as they say in Egypt -- in other words, merely an elections lie. As you know, this is the farce of elections -- a person lies and lies to people, just so that they will vote for him, and afterwards, when they say to him: :"You promised this and that," he says: "No, this was just elections propaganda." This is the farce of democracy for you. He says: "This was propaganda, and you thought I was being serious. I was fooling you to get your votes."Allah willing, it will turn out that this was merely elections propaganda. Obama said he would turn Jerusalem into the eternal capital of the Israelis. This indicates that our brother Obama is ignorant of international politics, and is not familiar with the Middle East conflict.

We thought he would say: "I have decided that if I win, I will monitor the Dimona nuclear plant, and the other WMDs in Israeli's possession."

We expected him to say: "If I win, I will implement the one-state solution...

We expected Obama to say: "I've decided to return millions of Palestinian refugees to the land of Palestine, from which they were expelled in 1948 and 1967." This is the "change" that the peoples applaud, the change that the American people -- and the black people in America -- want.

A statement that Jerusalem should not be divided shocked his Muslim supporters, who hope that it was only a campaign tactic, pandering to voters of Jewish descent. Now we know what they are hoping for from their Mekkan candiate: selling Israel down appeasement creek.

What is the basis for their assumptions about Obama? It can only be his skin color and his religion, primarily the latter.

The thing we fear most is that the black man suffers from an inferiority complex. This is dangerous. If our brother Obama feels that because he is black he doesn't have the right to rule America, this would be a disaster, because such a feeling would make him behave whiter than the white, and go to an extreme in his persecution and degradation of the blacks.

Of course, Obama, being Muslim, should be aware of his superiority and should enjoy Allah's right to rule, passed down to him by Moe. After all, he will head a dictatorship.


We still hope that this black man will take pride in his African and Islamic identity, and in his faith, and that [he will know] that he has rights in America, and that he will change America from evil to good, and that America will establish relations that will serve it well with other peoples, especially the Arabs.

We know from his books that Obama takes pride in his African identity, but he denies Islamic identity, which Al-Qadhafi assumes for him. Since the assumption is made by a Muslim who conferred with Obama's spiritual mentor, it may be that the statement is based on knowledge, not assumption.

What rights does a black man have in our dictatorship, where blacks are an oppressed minority? Al-Qadhafi hopes that Obama will appease the Muslims by abandoning Israel and our self defense. We now know why he harbors that hope.

Thursday
Mar132008

Obamanation: Bad Association!

Sean Hannity played excerpts from Jeremiah Wright's sermons. I found them revolting; they brought the N word to mind.
Now ABC News has printed excerpts  on the web.

"We bombed Hiroshima, we bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon, and we never batted an eye," Rev. Wright said in a sermon on Sept. 16, 2001.

Those who hate America fail to discriminate between aggression and defense. We Nuked Japan to end a war they started. There is nothing immoral about that nuking!
"We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost," he told his congregation.

The Falestinians are engaged in state sponsored terrorism. Israel only seeks to defend herself against their policidal attacks. Wright's accusation is false and groundless, a token of race hate echoing Islam's.

In another excerpt, Wright curses America.  Do we want to elect a President whose spiritual mentor raves like a maniac, cursing America from his pulpit ?  Senator Obama has been a member of Trinity United Church of Christ for 20 years, and is a close friend of Wright. He took the title of his book from one of Wright's sermons.  Something is wrong here!  Would anyone not in sympathy with those racist and treacherous rants remain affiliated so long.

I need to hear convincing denunciations of Wright, Farrakhan & Islam from all the candidates.  My challenge still stands. Lets rub their  snouts in it.