Navigation

DISSENT!

Defend Israel

The Patriots Call
The Black Robe Regiment - The Patriots Call

Democrats party of Racism
Racism of the Democrat Party
Herman Cain - The DNC has BRAINWASHED most of the Blacks of this Nation
Racism - the Nemesis of the Democrat Party
Democrats invented racism and democrats HATE all blacks
The Snooper Report articles on Democrat invention of racism

The March on DC
Callin’ All the Clans Together
Sick and tired - marching towards the Constitution of the United States
We. Are. Finished. With.  DC.
We. Are. Finished. With. DC. - Addendum Part 1

Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It
Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It Part 2(?)
Civility: Leftinistra Own None Part Three
Obama, Civility and The Clansmen of Dumb
Brain Dead Leftinistra: Their Stoic Civility
Libtards Have No Class - Civility Escapes Their Brain Deadness
The States Will Be the Next Battlefield in the Fight Over ObamaCare
War Is Coming: Blood On Our Own Streets - Thanks Democrats
Civil War…
We Are In The Midst of Chaos and Civil War
Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die Trying
State’s Sovereignty or Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die - The Movement Marches On
The Country Surrounds The City

When They Came
Is The Left Still “Proud To Be a Left-Wing Extremist”?
Be It Known - Attention Unconstitutional Congress
Obama: One Big Ass Mistake America
Do Birthers Rock and Roll or Stop and Drool?
Good vs Evil…It Is Your Choice
I Apologize For My Nation
Obama’s Civilian National Security Forces (CNSF)
Obama’s Brown Shirts - Civilian National Security Forces
What Is It About The American Liberal?
The Plan To Destroy America
Another Soldier Has Been Given the Haditha Treatment!
Callin’ All The Clans Together
Callin’ All The Clans Together Show
A History of the List of 45
Constitutionality: The Movement
Vindication: Iraq’s Saddam and Al Qaeda Links Revealed
Redefining The Center or the Moderate
The HIC (Hoax In Charge) Going To Copenhagen
We Didn’t Start This Goddamn War!

Copy Cat Frauds of the IAVA

Contract With America
Snooper’s Declaration of Independence
Thanks Obama

Contract From America

Timothy McVeigh
Thoughts To Ponder and Reflect Upon
Snooper Report Vindication: Al Qaeda, TWA Flight 800 and OKC Bombing
Clinton alludes to 1995 bombing, says words matter

Missing 13th Amendment
TITLES OF “NOBILITY” AND “HONOR” - The Missing 13th Amendment

The Coup
Military Coup Against Obama

The United States Constitution
Our founding document wasn’t set in stone for a reason

Deepwater Horizon
Did Hugo Chavez Sink the Deepwater Horizon Oil Platform?

MSLSD Lies
The New Right

Arizona Rising

Texas Wars

This is pretty much a bunch of crap, FYI.
Editor's Choice


REFERENCE MY NEW WEB SITE

Snooper Report dot org

CHRISTIAN WEB SITE





SEARCH HERE


Powered by Squarespace

1980

1984

Wake Up GOP

This is pretty much a bunch of CRAP, FYI HINT: “MOSTLY TRUE” is a “MOSTLY FALSE” deal which means “MOSTLY TRUE” is a LIE.
« Senator John Barrasso (R-WY) Responds To Baucus Bill Audit | Main | Take Off The Pajamas And Get Real »
Monday
Oct122009

Confidence Men On Obama's Birth

Many people have revealed the online debacle that was PROVEN to be a farce by the moron at the Daily Kosmonoffs.  Get over it.  He may or may not be a citizen of this Nation but he is FOR SURE NOT a "naturalized citizen" of this Nation.  In order to be a NATURALIZED AMERICAN CITIZEN, BOTH parents must be AMERICAN CITIZENS.  Hussein is NOT a natural born anything to this nation except for being a naturalized pain in the arse to each and everyone of us constitutionalists in this nation.

His Dad, if that is his Dad, was a Kenyan.  That means he was of BRITISH decent and a BRITISH citizen.  Get over it and deal with it.

From Political Pistachio: Molotov Mitchell: Proof Positive : Confidence Men

No.  The Birthers are here to stay.

The Snooper Report.  Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (10)

Snooper, please show me either in US Code or in the Constitution itself where "natural born" is defined. You can't because it isn't.

Please don't point me to Vattel, because Vattel isn't law - it's an opinion. Blah, blah, the Founders all had a copy. Whoopie. I've read Soul on Ice. Guess what - I'm not a Black Panther. If the Founders were as sure about Vattel as you suggest, they would have made the position crystal clear - in writing - in the Constitution itself.

Further, BHO doesn't "inherent" British citizenship. His father was Kenyan. Let's put it this way - British citizenship didn't attach or pass to natives. That's why the Brits are considered racist - geddit? Because white people of British ancestry born in Kenya were british - but that was never for the locals.

Otherwise, the UK would be over-run with the entire African continent and Hong Kong.

Besides, even if Obama Sr was a white Kenyan, BHO Jr would have to APPLY for British citizenship. I don't think there is any evidence that any such appliation has been made.

What concers me Snooper, is you are swallowing Orly Taitz's "arguments" hook, line and sinker.

Orly Taitz doesn't know her ass from her elbow. You will end up following that ditz all the way to her CA disciplinary hearing for her repeated breaches of CA Bar code of conduct.

October 12, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterkris

You'll just have to get over it. Vattal on NATURAL-BORN = BOTH parents HAVE to be CITIZENS. It's the Law the Founders relied upon. The Founders DID NOT use British Common Law. Why? Because we had just fought a WAR over British Common Law.

You'll just have to get over it. Obama is NOT a NATURAL-BORN anything and I thought that YEARS before Orly Taiz said anything to anybody...about 5 years ago.

McCain has a Senate summit over HIS "natural born" citizenship. Where's Obama's?

If Obama HAD a natural born citizenship, don't you think he would reveal it?

He doesn't so he won't.

October 12, 2009 | Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey

prove that Vattal is the law the Founders relied on.

The Founders did not make Vattal law - neither has congress. Sorry.

If the Founders didn't use "British" common law - then why is there a reference to common law in the Constitution? The Founders did not make up a brand new American common law. American common law developed through the judiciary. That's what "common law" is, Snooper: Stari Decisis, binding precedent - not a fricking textbook writtren by a Swiss international law academic. (I thought you didn't believe in interational law anyways).

Can we at least agree that the damn kid was/is not eligible for a British passport?

As for your formulating the view 5 years ago that BHO wasn't natural born - I take may hat off. I didn't even know who the f&cker was until he beat my girl Hillary!

October 12, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterkris

Sorry...you are all hung up on SCOTUS Law and Federal Judge "rulings" which are opinions and not law.

British Common Law is not the Law of The Land...the United States Constitution is. The Founders (read Madison's notes on the constitution) and you will find Vattal's Law of Nations was most explicitly used and NOT the British Common Law BS.

October 12, 2009 | Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey

Using the United States Constitution AS WRITTEN and not supplanted and text in its ORIGINAL state:

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations; (capitalization means what?)

http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/freedom/constitution/text.html

And read this one. If the SCOTUS is all so Supreme in all things, naturally...

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/minorvhapp.html

October 12, 2009 | Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey

In the USC, not ONE "version" of British Common Law was EVER used. Period. End of discussion.

October 12, 2009 | Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey

Lol - are you telling me that the Constitution's reference to "the law of nations" is reference to Vattal's book of the same name? Come on.

As much as you hate SCOTUS and their opinions, I would have thought you'd be trotting out "the Venus" as Authority for Vattal as "law. http://supreme.justia.com/us/12/253/case.html God knows the lawyers running these dimwit cases are.

On close examination of the Venus, you will see the issue is whether a merchant seaman can acquire US citizenship - not whether a POTUS with only a theoretical one American parent (because in your world it's debatable whether he was born in Hawaii) makes him natural born. The precedent these lawyers crave is nowhere to be found.

Snooper, John Jay may have written letter regarding Indians and Marshall may have been guided by Vattel, among other things, in his Venus Opinion, but if the Founders wanted Vattel's textbook directly imported into US law -they would have explicitly said so.

October 14, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterkris

The issue in Minor v Happerset is whether the Constitution (14th amendment) gave women the right to vote - erm, before women were given the right to vote. The facts of that case can be distinguished from the facts in Barry's case.

If you are going to use cases (and this is where Attorney Tatiz gets it hung 'round her neck) you need to be looking at the Ratio and not some random obiter.

Like I always say, lots of people can understand code or a particular case - what separates the girls from the women is the ability to apply the law.

October 14, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterkris

And that's the problem...the unconstitutional (these days) of the 14th Amendment. History shows this.

the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments were for what? The Civil War. Just because there is no more Civil War the Amendments don't get ti change their meanings...do they? So, knock it off with the 14th Amendment.

ALL of the Rules of Congress are in Section 8 of the USC. And yes, the CAPITALIZED Law of Nations means something, does it not? In today's language the Law of Nations is stipulated as law of nations. Gee. I wonder why that was done and accomplished? Gee. I wonder.

Obama's unconstitutional possession of the Marxist House is firmly established and I don't care if you voted for the nitwit.

I suppose you haven't read Madison's notes at all or is it the SCOTUS is all true and up to speed?

October 14, 2009 | Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey

One other thing, Kris...you can knock off the condescending remarks. They do not work here.

October 14, 2009 | Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>