PEACE! PEACE! Obama To Pay Off the Taliban!
Monday, October 12, 2009 at 7:17AM ABSOTIVELY! The fellas involved in ATTACKING the USA on 91101 are going to get bought off and placed in Afghanistan as part of the corrupt government? WTFO?
Times Online: Barack Obama ready to pay Afghan fighters to ditch the Taliban
To DITCH the Taliban? By making them a proponent to Afghanistan's government? WTFO?
The Obama administration is considering outbidding the Taliban to persuade Afghan villagers to lay down arms as it struggles to find a new approach to a war that is fast losing public and congressional support.
Despite five war councils in two weeks, President Barack Obama has so far failed to come up with a strategy for the conflict that may define his presidency. Fierce infighting continues between his own generals and advisers.
Obama has been handed three options by General Stanley McChrystal, commander of the US forces in Afghanistan. These range from 20,000 to 60,000 more troops, which would almost double the US military presence. McChrystal is said to favour an increase of 40,000 men, without which he warns the mission will fail.
The White House is uneasy about sending so many on top of an extra 21,000 already dispatched this year, fearing this could escalate the war which has already claimed the lives of 241 American soldiers this year. [...]
What a SICK way of peace!
[...] Obama’s delay in coming to a decision has led generals to warn that the Taliban will see it as lack of resolve and take advantage. The Taliban stepped up attacks last week with a bomb in Kabul, which killed 17 people, and an onslaught against a US military post in which eight Americans died. [...]
REALLY? Morons. Sounds an aweful lot like Iraq, doesn't it? Gee. I wonder how that all worked out. From Gateway Pundit: Peace Winner Obama Ready to Pay Off Taliban
[...] When you believe that the Taliban is only fighting the infidels to put food on their table, this makes perfect sense. [END]
Yeah. Us Conservatives are REALLY "incivil". Morons of the left. I swear. See Michelle Malkin: WaPo Page A1 breaking news: Conservatives are horrible ogres, Part 99,999
The Sunday edition of the Washington Post featured a massive, front-page article by Ann Gerhart decrying the “incivility” of conservatives. “The nation’s political discourse seems sour, angry, even dangerous,” Gerhart frets.
The introduction of the article spotlighted an e-mail from yours truly to Obama-philic author and Jamestown Project member Charisse Carney-Nunes.
Does the e-mail contain incivil rhetoric, profanity, or threats?
No. [...]
Look. ANY "bad" response to The One, the Messiah, the Obama is incivil. Well, SCREW OBAMA.
The Snooper Report. Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly
Donald Douglas: Intelligence Assessments: Al Qaeda/Taliban Cohesion Greater Than Pre-9/11
From the Department of I-Told-You-So, here comes McClatchy's report, "Are Obama Advisers Downplaying Afghan Dangers?":
Recent U.S. intelligence assessments have found that the Taliban and other Pakistan-based groups that are fighting U.S.-led forces have much closer ties to al Qaida now than they did before 9/11, would allow the terrorist network to re-establish bases in Afghanistan and would help Osama bin Laden export his radical brand of Islam to Afghanistan's neighbors and beyond, the officials said.
A real Gomer Pyle moment there, you think? [...]
No shit!
From Hot Air (we posted this yesterday but here it is again)
Obama must send more troops, says … Dianne Feinstein?
Frankenfeinstein is in Campaign mode...yes?
Fox News:
-
Obama Under Pressure for Troops
Senators escalate call for Obama to grant commander's request for troops in Afghanistan as debate continues
• Afghan Outlook Bleak as Taliban Grabs Territory
• Did Weapons Fail U.S. Troops During Afghan Assault?
• NEW! FOX News Interactive Presidential Polls
Obama. Asshat.
Mark "Snooper" Harvey Comments Off | 














