It isn't too much of a "show"...in Obama's mind anyway.
None of us saw this coming when Holder announced that KSM and the other 9/11 jihadis would get trials in civilian court in New York City just blocks from where the World Trade Center once stood, eh? [...]
Naw! They're just going to pleasd not guilty because of their "constitutional rights" and drag everything up all over again and demand to rape America. After all, according to the Democrats and their DIDs, America sucks.
All these pukes are doing is promoting other terrorists(?).
A great piece by Praveen Swamiin in India's the Hindu that lists the dozen or so terrorist busts in the US in the last few months that included plans to attack not only the United States but other countries as well.
What struck me as I read this article was that we have not seen this kind of "big picture" coverage of terrorism anywhere in the American media that I have noticed. When examined from the standpoint that these arrests can be seen as diligent attempts by al-Qaeda and their offshoots to inflict large scale attacks on America, you realize what a huge mistake the Obama administration is making in downplaying the very idea of a "War on Terror." [...]
There is no more "War On Terror", Rick. Remember? They are man-made incidents, or something as inane as all that. But here's the worst part...
Isn't that just a grand thing to contemplate?
Andrew McCarthy, with whom I had the pleasure and honor of participating in a panel discussion on free speech along with Steve Emerson yesterday at Restoration Weekend, explains why moving the trial of the 9/11 masterminds to New York is so wrongheaded. "How Obama is courting danger: Civilian trials set back the war on terror," by Andrew C. McCarthy in the New York Daily News, November 22: [...]
The article is a must read. Go do it.
The Snooper Report. Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Lessons well learned by Obama.
Go read it.