[...] The BBC was sent the Climategate files a month ago but refused to cover the story.
The Daily Mail reported: [...]
The controversy surrounding the global warming scandal today deepened after a BBC correspondent admitted he was sent the leaked emails more than a month before they were made public.
Paul Hudson, weather presenter and climate change expert, claims the documents allegedly sent between some of the world’s leading scientists are of a direct result of an article he wrote.
In his BBC blog two days ago, Hudson said: ‘I was forwarded the chain of emails on the 12th October, which are comments from some of the world’s leading climate scientists written as a direct result of my article “Whatever Happened To Global Warming”.’
That essay, written last month, argued that for the last 11 years there had not been an increase in global temperatures.
It also presented the arguments of sceptics who believe natural cycles control temperature and the counter-arguments of those who think it’s man’s actions which are warming the planet.
The leaked files – which show 4,000 documents which have allegedly been sent by scientists over the past 13 years – were apparently taken from servers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit, which is a world-renowned centre focused on studying climate change. [...]
They can all run but they cannot hide. The six-week leaked emails coincides with Singapore making their announcement, doesn't it? Singapore said they were not going to Copenhagen for the original reasons but The One is still going now right after he said he wasn't. Looks like he is trying to ignore that the myth that global warming is in fact a myth.
We all knew this was going global, right?
[...] The house of cards is falling, climate alarmists. It will be interesting to see what happens when NASA and the Goddard Center are forced to release their raw data. Look, we “skeptics” and “deniers” do not deny that there has been warming since the end of the Little Ice Age. We deny that Mankind is mostly, or solely, responsible for it, and, if you were really interested in real science, rather then agenda based science, you would have our same opinion. You’ve created a tenuous link between CO2 release and rising temps, and, when that didn’t pan out fully, what with the cooler years, you started calling it climate change, to somehow hide how the release of greenhouse gasses, things that hold in, to put it imprecisely, heat, can cause a decline or stagnant temps. You’ve faked links to all around, such as with Mt. Kilimanjaro. Perhaps it’s time for you to be honest, and get interested in real science, eh? [...]
Poor climate fools. They have ALL been had and got had real bad.
Cetainly this myth is in fact "global". Is called the Global Warming Myth so I wonde if Al Gore is going to apologize to everyone. Ja.
The New Zealand Government’s chief climate advisory unit NIWA is under fire for allegedly massaging raw climate data to show a global warming trend that wasn’t there.
The scandal breaks as fears grow worldwide that corruption of climate science is not confined to just Britain’s CRU climate research centre.
In New Zealand’s case, the figures published on NIWA’s [the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric research] website suggest a strong warming trend in New Zealand over the past century: [...]
The fraudsters have some explaining to do ladies and gentlemen. Right?
[...] Make no mistake that this is a huge scandal and is unraveling faster than Obama's plan for the economy. Again the question is whether or not lawsuits will be filed by those who have been harmed by this junked and now officially debunked science. [...]
Democrats: FRAUDS! Democcrats In Drag: FRAUDS! All within ClimateGate: FRAUDS! Al Gore: FRAUD.
More at Memeorandum...