The Global Warming Fraud: The Unraveling Has Begun
Monday, November 30, 2009 at 8:42AM [...] "It was warming, John," Buchanan said. "It's not been warming since '98. Secondly, there's no known proof it's because of man and there's no known proof it's a great danger."
However, [Newsweek's Eleanor] Clift felt inclined to responded, rather emphatically. She said she believes U.S. policy should be proactive toward the issue. Her view is arguably indicative of the mainstream media's sentiment on the debate, and she equated it to blind faith when she told Buchanan there's no proof there's a God either, which didn't mean global warming wasn't a danger.
"It's no known proof there's God, either. How much proof do you need, Pat?" Clift replied. "Oh, it is a danger. It's a danger in many places." [...]
Like Smitty says: "There is also no conclusive proof that Pink Floyd wasn't channeling the Wizard of Oz when they recorded the Dark Side of the Moon. Their weak denials only underscore the shenanigans afoot."
Dittos.
[...] And for these reasons John, I think it's not going to get through the Senate and I think the, as I say, Al Gore's moment has passed. This whole thing was a bit of a hoax designed to transfer power from individuals and wealth to governments and from governments to trans-national, international corporations, global institutions. And that time has come and it has gone." [...]
Global warming is finished, folks. Finished.
Jim Hoft: India, China, Brazil Plan Joint Exit From Copenhagen Junk Science Talks
OOPSIES! I wonder why Obama is going to Copenhagen?
India, China, Brazil and South Africa plan to walk out of the international junk science meetings next month in Copenhagen. [...]
Times of India: Copenhagen conference: India, China plan joint exit
Where's our news agencies in all of this? Oh. Wait. They are all like the idiot Nancy Skinner. Yep. She sure needs to get skinned alright.
[...] The BASIC countries-Brazil, South Africa, India and China- decided to throw the gauntlet at rich nations by coming up with a counter-draft that will be presented at the conference. They agreed to let China, which initiated the exercise, to present the draft of the developing nations at Copenhagen.
“This BASIC draft fully meets India’s goals and aspirations. We hope it is made the basis of discussions at the conference,” Ramesh said.
The draft, which was originally prepared by China, was finalized after some changes during a 7-hour long meeting of BASIC countries-Brazil, South Africa, India and China besides Sudan as the chair of G-77. [...]
Amazing. There is no global warming so they want to force the rich nations to comply with it. Amazing.
From Pat Dollard: Climategate: NY Times Says “Not A Single Smoking Gun”
[...] Well, New York Times’ Paul Krugman (Nobel Prize winner, as George reminds us) says that the hacked emails were taken out of context, and proclaims most people don’t really understand how academic discussions and debates are held.
Yeah, we don’t really understand all that high-falootin’ fancy stuff there, now do we Paul? Is that how you earned your Nobel Prize?
Anyway, George Will finally sets Krugman straight on the impossible ambitions President Obama is purportedly going to agree to – that the United States will lower greenhouse gases to a level equal to that of – what we had in the 1870s. Yeah, that’s gonna happen. /sarc
By the way, you can read ALL the exposed CRU emails here. [END]
Now, remember. Global Warming does cause Global Cooling...in some parts of the country. It never ceases to amaze me that the libtards have no idea what "physics" means.
Jim Hoft: Bill Clinton: “Global Warming Could Make Some Places Colder” (Video)
Bill Clinton. The other asshat.
Michael Barone at the Washington Examiner: Global warming consensus: garbage in, garbage out
The CRU has been a major source of data on global temperatures, relied on by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. But the e-mails suggest that CRU scientists have been suppressing and misstating data and working to prevent the publication of conflicting views in peer-reviewed science periodicals. Some of the more pungent e-mails:
"I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow -- even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!"
"Can you delete any e-mails you may have had with Keith re AR4?"
"I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline."
"The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty we can't."
"I'm getting hassled by a couple of people to release the CRU temperature station data. Don't any of you three tell anybody that the UK has a Freedom of Information Act!"
You get the idea. The most charitable plausible explanation I have seen comes from the Atlantic's Megan McArdle. "The CRU's main computer model may be, to put it bluntly, complete rubbish." [...]
Rubbish? Try fraud.
The Snooper Report. Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly
Mark "Snooper" Harvey
Mark "Snooper" Harvey
Clive Crook: More on Climategate
In my previous post on Climategate I blithely said that nothing in the climate science email dump surprised me much. Having waded more deeply over the weekend I take that back.
The closed-mindedness of these supposed men of science, their willingness to go to any lengths to defend a preconceived message, is surprising even to me. The stink of intellectual corruption is overpowering. And, as Christopher Booker argues, this scandal is not at the margins of the politicised IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] process. It is not tangential to the policy prescriptions emanating from what David Henderson called the environmental policy milieu [subscription required]. It goes to the core of that process. [...]
Sen. Mitch McConnell Remains Silent on Climategate
Gingrich statement on Climategate said to be pending
The Green Mask Is Being Peeled Away From The CO²mmunists – All Eyes Now On Copenhagen
View Printer Friendly Version
Email Article to Friend