“If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of survival. There may even be a worse case: you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.” -- Winston Churchill
The Founding Fathers created a Republic, but 60 Senators are poised to take it away. With the pending disaster of the passage in the Senate of a bill nationalizing one sixth of the U.S. economy and our entire healthcare system at a cost of over $2.5 trillion, we are faced with a crucial question: are the Republican senators using every means at their disposal to stop this looming, tyrannical abuse of power? Unfortunately, the answer appears to be “no.” [...]
They, the GOPers, do not know how to fight. For decades the alleged "holier than thou" democrats have for told the GOPers to be nice and stop making so much hay about nothing. Now, the GOPers spend most of their time trying not to make the democrats angry. As this was all taking place, the Marxist-sociopaths infiltrated and took over the DNC and, little by little, were taking over the GOP. No wonder Pelosi said many months ago for everyone "not to fear a one-party system". The List of 45 was coming true.
[...] “If the Republicans want the news media to cover what they are doing to educate the American people even further about the atrociousness of this bill, they have to create drama on the floor of the Senate.” [...]
Drama? How about some constitutionalism running around on the House and Senate floors? That would cause some drams I am quite sure. Where has our constitution gone?
Some would have us believe that some judge someplace said that we were founded on British Common Law which, by the way, is a very true fallacy. Our Founding Fathers sought for their deliberate consideration of the United States Constitution Monsieur De Vattel's legal documentation called the Law of Nations. Why? Because we were at war or had been at ar with British Common Law and we used the French to help us defeat British Common Law. When one looks into the original USC one notices that the Law of Nations was capitalized and the very capitalization meant something, as capitalization means something now, today.
And thus is the problem of today. We have "judicial reviews" which have turned into making law from a bunch of men and women that wear their black pajamas to work every day. Show me within the USC where any of this exists and I'll lean into your direction of unconstitutionality.
The USC is very easy to understand and we do not need "judicial review" to tell us how we are to say and feel about the most simplified document hereby created. It isn't the question as to "how do we know what it says" anymore or at least never. It's this simple: if the "whatever it is you want to pass a law on" is not in the United States Constitution, the issue goes to the States and there it remains. However, if the Nation wants the United States Federal Government to get involved, there is a process called AMENDMENTS and therein is the Law of the Land thereby conferred.
Welfare? Unconstitutional and I don't care how many judges have said differently.
Unemployment insurance? Unconstitutional and I don't care how many judges have said differently.
Driver's Licenses? Unconstitutional and I don't care how many judges have said differently.
You name me one "federal program" which does not fit the Enumerated Powers within the USC and I will show you a totally incompetent and unconstitutional federal government. When does it end?
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;--And
To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
There are absolutely no references within the United States Constitution where British Common Law is mentioned. No place. No where. The Law of Nations? Absolutely. I even have it emphasized for your general welfare...
Be this as it may be, Erick has a great article which all must read. Believe it or not, Howard Zinn is calling for a frontal assault on this Nation. Where will you be? Hiding behind some judge under some ill begotten form of review? Not me. Not on my watch. Not on my time.
You can consider this a War Warning.
The Snooper Report. Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum