Defend Israel

The Patriots Call
The Black Robe Regiment - The Patriots Call

Democrats party of Racism
Racism of the Democrat Party
Herman Cain - The DNC has BRAINWASHED most of the Blacks of this Nation
Racism - the Nemesis of the Democrat Party
Democrats invented racism and democrats HATE all blacks
The Snooper Report articles on Democrat invention of racism

The March on DC
Callin’ All the Clans Together
Sick and tired - marching towards the Constitution of the United States
We. Are. Finished. With.  DC.
We. Are. Finished. With. DC. - Addendum Part 1

Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It
Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It Part 2(?)
Civility: Leftinistra Own None Part Three
Obama, Civility and The Clansmen of Dumb
Brain Dead Leftinistra: Their Stoic Civility
Libtards Have No Class - Civility Escapes Their Brain Deadness
The States Will Be the Next Battlefield in the Fight Over ObamaCare
War Is Coming: Blood On Our Own Streets - Thanks Democrats
Civil War…
We Are In The Midst of Chaos and Civil War
Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die Trying
State’s Sovereignty or Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die - The Movement Marches On
The Country Surrounds The City

When They Came
Is The Left Still “Proud To Be a Left-Wing Extremist”?
Be It Known - Attention Unconstitutional Congress
Obama: One Big Ass Mistake America
Do Birthers Rock and Roll or Stop and Drool?
Good vs Evil…It Is Your Choice
I Apologize For My Nation
Obama’s Civilian National Security Forces (CNSF)
Obama’s Brown Shirts - Civilian National Security Forces
What Is It About The American Liberal?
The Plan To Destroy America
Another Soldier Has Been Given the Haditha Treatment!
Callin’ All The Clans Together
Callin’ All The Clans Together Show
A History of the List of 45
Constitutionality: The Movement
Vindication: Iraq’s Saddam and Al Qaeda Links Revealed
Redefining The Center or the Moderate
The HIC (Hoax In Charge) Going To Copenhagen
We Didn’t Start This Goddamn War!

Copy Cat Frauds of the IAVA

Contract With America
Snooper’s Declaration of Independence
Thanks Obama

Contract From America

Timothy McVeigh
Thoughts To Ponder and Reflect Upon
Snooper Report Vindication: Al Qaeda, TWA Flight 800 and OKC Bombing
Clinton alludes to 1995 bombing, says words matter

Missing 13th Amendment
TITLES OF “NOBILITY” AND “HONOR” - The Missing 13th Amendment

The Coup
Military Coup Against Obama

The United States Constitution
Our founding document wasn’t set in stone for a reason

Deepwater Horizon
Did Hugo Chavez Sink the Deepwater Horizon Oil Platform?

The New Right

Arizona Rising

Texas Wars

Editor's Choice


Powered by Squarespace



Wake Up GOP

« Brain Dead Leftinistra: Their Stoic Civility | Main | BREAKING NEWS: Rush Limbaugh Rushed to Honolulu Hospital With “Chest Pains” »

The Term “Enemy Combatant” No Longer Exists in America, Thanks to Obama

From MsUnderestimated...go read the post!  I have the opening segment below with the video.  This is really too much.

Or so says Tamara Holder, defense attorney. On the O’Reilly show last night, guest-hosted by Eric Bolling, Tamara was on and embarassed herself thoroughly in front of the entire country; and simultaneously made our enemies hopeful. You see, Tamara said that Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab could not POSSIBLY be called an “enemy combatant,” because after all, Obama said so. [...]

Obama.  He is a Jihadi Scum Bag.  This idiot Tamara Holder must be taking her "splendid" advise from that other idiot Obama.

The Snooper Report.
Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (8)

she's referring to the Tokyo Convention which delineates jurisdiction for whenever shit goes down on an international flight. The US has jurisdiction as Detroit was the destination.

"Enemy combatant" is a made up term. It is a John Yoo and little alberto gonzales creation.

Look, GWB created Gitmo detention center and ordered special military tribunals there in November 2001.

Our little richard reid, the shoe-bomber, tried to blow himself and others in December 2001 - yet Reid was not treated as an enemy combatant and he wasnt sent to Gitmo. He was tried in Federal Court (and "lawyered up"), convicted and sentenced to life.

What is the difference between then and now?

December 31, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterkris

The USC. Enemy Combatant wasn't "made up" "recently". It was "made up" in the Geneva Convention and is still included in version IV.

Little shoe bomber was in fact, in according to the Geneva Convention which the Jihadis DO NOT follow was in fact an enemy combatant and should have been taken to Club Gitmo just like this asswipe in Detroit. It is that simple.

December 31, 2009 | Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey

Haj should be treated with the same respect they treat us. F*** them. U.S taxpayers bear the cost of putting these numbnuts on trial and then feeding the bastards for the rest of their worthless lives. All they deserve is very long dirt nap.

The cost of a 7.62 X 51mm or .45 ACP round is far cheaper and quick too. Very humane when applied to appropriate body part.

December 31, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterNo.9

Exactly so No. 9!

December 31, 2009 | Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey

Thanks for calling me an idiot - I've been called a lot worse. I'd just like to clarify a few things:
1) I never said I supported Obama's delineation of the word "enemy combatant." I simply stated that he did so and, as a result, we cannot call the terrorists that name. Call them whatever you want: murderers, terrorists, worthless human beings....; also, I'm not a Geneva Convention expert but I believe that terrorist organizations are not protected under the Geneva Convention; thus, cannot be called "enemy combatant" even if Obama kept the term.

2) Under George Bush, Jose Padilla was held for 3 years in military custody. Then, Bush changed his mind and he was charged in American federal courts. The man was given just 17 years in prison. I think that's a pretty low sentence, don't you?

3) Richard Reid, the shoe-bomber, was also charged in American courts and is now serving a life sentence in federal prison. This also occurred under the Bush administration.

4) I found no evidence of the Republicans disputing Bush's decision to try these men in America, instead of in a military tribunal.

5) Back to your label of me as an "idiot" -- I have been very open about my disappointment in the Obama administration. In fact, I don't think I have written one favorable blog about any of his decisions, particularly in regard to health care and the war in Afghanistan. I am someone with a growing amount of "buyer's remorse."

6) Don't blame me for stating facts. If I misstate the facts, I deserve to take the heat.

7) I wrote a blog detailing my position on O'Reilly at

8) Happy New Year!

December 31, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterTamara Holder

Absolutely! Terrorist belong at Club Gitmo no matter the residing President or in this case, the Rezident.

Give it up. I supported Bush for two very good reasons. IO was NOT voting for John F'n Kerry not was I voting for the Climate Dumbass Gore.

So, in your video, you lied like a rug.

Happy New Year.

December 31, 2009 | Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey

kids, no where in Geneva is the term "unlawful combatant" used. It is a John Yoo and Alberto Gonzales creation.

If you think it's in Geneva, please provide us chapter and verse. I won't hold my breath, as you may be some time.

The 6th Amendment of the Constitution does not appy only to "US citizens". It states:

In ALL criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed..."

Exploding scrotum bomber's crime was committed in the US. The US has jurisdiction and he gets basic due process.

There is no two tier justice system in the US. As long as the crime was committed on US soil, our trial procedure is the same whether you are a citizen or not.

If you want to treat exploding underpants as a Prisoner of War under Geneva, I can understand that - but the "unlawful" combatant category does not exist in Geneva. That was GWB's whole point in creatingunlawful combatants - he did not want to grant them PoW status.

But then again, if you can point me to the bit in one of the Geneva Conventions showing me I'm wrong - I'll be happy to stand corrected.

December 31, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterkris

It applies to the USC NOT because some damned judge says so or doesn't say so. It so stipulates in the USC as AMERICAN CITIZENS. DAMN! Pat attention and STOP relying on some retarded Judge spouting off about what he does or doesn't know. Judas H Priest. And, I AM looking at the Geneva Convention and it does in fact so stipulate enemy combatants.

I have in my possession all FOUR parts of the Geneva Convention and you obviously do not. I served this Nation for 28 years and have been studying the USC for the last 41 years of my life,

You Kris, have no earthly idea what you are yakking about. Perhaps being familiar with the UCMJ just MIGHT give you a clue.

Happy FUCKING New Year.

December 31, 2009 | Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.