Navigation

DISSENT!

Defend Israel

The Patriots Call
The Black Robe Regiment - The Patriots Call

Democrats party of Racism
Racism of the Democrat Party
Herman Cain - The DNC has BRAINWASHED most of the Blacks of this Nation
Racism - the Nemesis of the Democrat Party
Democrats invented racism and democrats HATE all blacks
The Snooper Report articles on Democrat invention of racism

The March on DC
Callin’ All the Clans Together
Sick and tired - marching towards the Constitution of the United States
We. Are. Finished. With.  DC.
We. Are. Finished. With. DC. - Addendum Part 1

Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It
Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It Part 2(?)
Civility: Leftinistra Own None Part Three
Obama, Civility and The Clansmen of Dumb
Brain Dead Leftinistra: Their Stoic Civility
Libtards Have No Class - Civility Escapes Their Brain Deadness
The States Will Be the Next Battlefield in the Fight Over ObamaCare
War Is Coming: Blood On Our Own Streets - Thanks Democrats
Civil War…
We Are In The Midst of Chaos and Civil War
Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die Trying
State’s Sovereignty or Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die - The Movement Marches On
The Country Surrounds The City

When They Came
Is The Left Still “Proud To Be a Left-Wing Extremist”?
Be It Known - Attention Unconstitutional Congress
Obama: One Big Ass Mistake America
Do Birthers Rock and Roll or Stop and Drool?
Good vs Evil…It Is Your Choice
I Apologize For My Nation
Obama’s Civilian National Security Forces (CNSF)
Obama’s Brown Shirts - Civilian National Security Forces
What Is It About The American Liberal?
The Plan To Destroy America
Another Soldier Has Been Given the Haditha Treatment!
Callin’ All The Clans Together
Callin’ All The Clans Together Show
A History of the List of 45
Constitutionality: The Movement
Vindication: Iraq’s Saddam and Al Qaeda Links Revealed
Redefining The Center or the Moderate
The HIC (Hoax In Charge) Going To Copenhagen
We Didn’t Start This Goddamn War!

Copy Cat Frauds of the IAVA

Contract With America
Snooper’s Declaration of Independence
Thanks Obama

Contract From America

Timothy McVeigh
Thoughts To Ponder and Reflect Upon
Snooper Report Vindication: Al Qaeda, TWA Flight 800 and OKC Bombing
Clinton alludes to 1995 bombing, says words matter

Missing 13th Amendment
TITLES OF “NOBILITY” AND “HONOR” - The Missing 13th Amendment

The Coup
Military Coup Against Obama

The United States Constitution
Our founding document wasn’t set in stone for a reason

Deepwater Horizon
Did Hugo Chavez Sink the Deepwater Horizon Oil Platform?

MSLSD Lies
The New Right

Arizona Rising

Texas Wars

This is pretty much a bunch of crap, FYI.
Editor's Choice






DONATE and or read this book

SEARCH HERE
PLEASE DONATE. KEEP THE SNOOPER REPORT GOING. THANKS. Any donations are acceptable from $1 to $100! Donate
SHOP HERE!

Powered by Squarespace

1980

1984

Wake Up GOP

This is pretty much a bunch of CRAP, FYI HINT: “MOSTLY TRUE” is a “MOSTLY FALSE” deal which means “MOSTLY TRUE” is a LIE.
« THEY'RE ONLY WORDS, SO GET OVER IT | Main | Quote of The Day »
Tuesday
Mar102009

Coup D'etat On Catholicism

Separation of Church and State does not exist in the United States Constitution. No one can find it in the United States Constitution. People have tried. The run away Judiciary has tried to find it. The communist-based ACLU has tried to find it. No one has found it yet but that doesn't stop people from saying it's there. Then again, various hallucinogenic narcotics will let you see anything. Having alcoholic withdrawals will also enable an already warped imagination to run amok as well.

Having said the above, what then do we make of the developments in the State of Connecticut? If there is in fact such a thing as Separation of Church and State, what in the world were a Democrat Party (go figure) State Senator and a State Representative trying to accomplish by replacing the leadership of the Catholic Church with elected State Officials, evidently for the "better good", whatever that is and wherever that is found in the United States Constitution. Doesn't that seem to be just a little odd? How can a Democrat justify "interfering" with a "religion" when there is a theoretical Separation of Church and State?

Let's take a look at the Constitution of the State of Connecticut:

ARTICLE FIRST. DECLARATION OF RIGHTS. That the great and essential principles of liberty and free government may be recognized and established, WE DECLARE: SEC. 3. The exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination, shall forever be free to all persons in the state; provided, that the right hereby declared and established, shall not be so construed as to excuse acts of licentiousness, or to justify practices inconsistent with the peace and safety of the state.

That right there is wide open but, what is "licentiousness"? Licentiousness: 1) promiscuous and unprincipled in sexual matters. 2) ARCHAIC: disregarding accepted rules or conventions, esp. in grammar or literary style.

Be all that as it may, I would like to point out the following; the Federal Government was not trying to do this. It was the State of Connecticut trying to do this so all of the outrage about the United States Constitution is a moot point, actually. Why, all of a sudden, are people all fired up about the United States Constitution? Where were these people when it comes to the TRILLIONS of dollars being slated to be spent unconstitutionally on unconstitutional socialist give-away programs? I do not understand why in this instance, all of a sudden people are citing the United States Constitution and not the STATE of Connecticut Constitution. Just in case they missed it, the latest escapades of the spend-thrifts in DC, for the last 50 years have done so in direct conflict with the United States Constitution.

So, to fight this attack on the Roman Catholic Church in the State of Connecticut, one MUST fight it with the proper Constitution and the US Constitution ain't it.

Having read just about everything there is to read on this subject, the one thing these Democrats failed to establish is the last part of Section 3: "...shall not be so construed as to excuse acts of licentiousness, or to justify practices inconsistent with the peace and safety of the state."

The articles mentioned a Priest that stole money but that doesn't excuse anything nor does it affect the peace and safety of the state. Then again, it all depends on how one defines peace and safety. Correct?

I am not trying to exonerate the two Democrats that attacked Catholicism and religion (Christianity) in general. It is shameful and there is no evidence that they cited their own Constitution. What I am saying is this: we have to fight the Democrats on the proper level and the correct Founding Documents. The State Politicians did not violate the Federal Constitution. End of story.

What took place in Connecticut and the reactions and responses of the People of Connecticut was proper and just and the coming protests will be sure to drive the point home and will be sure to cause the Democrats in Connecticut to be saddened that the People said, "HELL NO YOU DON'T!"

I would LOVE to see We The People do the same damn thing on a Federal Level. So, all of you folks saying the United States Constitution was violated are barking up the wrong tree. Period. It wasn't. It was the STATE Constitution which was violated.

And, this attack will become more and more frequent. This event is a litmus test. Mark my words. We have Islamic footbaths in our FEDERAL Airports and our GOVERNMENT institutions of higher learning but we cannot have a Christmas Tree or the Ten Commandments. Wake the hell up and get excited in the RIGHT direction. Stop citing Constitutions that do not apply to the situation.

The Snooper Report. Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

References (11)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments (4)

Considering we had a perjurious impeached President that didn't know what the meaning of "is" was -- that these cretins don't understand basic English is a surprise? Seems to me most of our elites are educated beyond their intelligence!

March 11, 2009 | Unregistered Commenterbrityank

And THAT is a fact brityank!

March 11, 2009 | Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey

Thanks for setting everyone straight on this one. I love brityank's statement "Seems to me most of our elites are educated beyond their intelligence! Soooo true.

March 11, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterFaultline USA

Probably all a bunch of lawyers acting like a dog that chases it's tail yet has no clue why.
Bunch of slap-head maroons.

March 11, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterNo.9
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.