Several Marxist web sites today, including that libtard democrat in drag Andrew Sullivan, are trying in a sad manner to depict themselves and identify themselves as Ronald Wilson Reagan. The next thing you know, the other FRAUD conservative at Little Green Turtle Turds will be chiming in on the libturd side as well. What the fraud conservatives haven't figured out yet is that they are being used by our enemies within. I wonder if they are getting paid by Soros, too.
Surely, Reaganus Maximus is turning in their graves because at one time, President Reagan said this about the liberals:
It isn't that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so much that isn't true.
The quote they have cherry picked in their mentally deranged Bush Derangement Syndrome, fuled by their total FAILURE in getting their beloved impeachment of Buch-Cheney for crimes INVENTED and never proven is as follows:
Each State Party is required either to prosecute torturers who are found in its territory or to extradite them to other countries for prosecution.
OBVIOUSLY, this was about the Geneva Convention that TERRORISTS do not qualify for. OBVIOUSLY, three terrorists were water boarded which was NOT defined as torture and if it is torture, than Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama will need to be prosecuted by retroactive prosecution as well.
Libtards. Ignorant panty waist assholes with an evil agenda. Surely there is a special place in hell for them all. I only wish that I can help with that one day.
Here is what Reagan also said and the libturds merely brush it aside and claim that Reagan was an FBI anti-Communist plant. Yes, they have said that.
I find it absolutely amazing just how out of context they have, once again, taken what someone said and apply it in their stupor state of stupidity.
Back in 1927, an American socialist, Norman Thomas, six times candidate for President on the Socialist Party ticket, said that the American people would never vote for socialism but he said under the name of liberalism the American people they would adopt every fragment of the socialist program.
But at the moment I'd like to talk about another way because this threat is with us and at the moment is more imminent. One of the traditional methods of imposing statism or socialism on a people has been by way of medicine. It's very easy to disguise a medical program as a humanitarian project. . . . Now, the American people, if you put it to them about socialized medicine and gave them a chance to choose, would unhesitatingly vote against it. We have an example of this. Under the Truman administration it was proposed that we have a compulsory health insurance program for all people in the United States, and, of course, the American people unhesitatingly rejected this.
The doctor begins to lose freedom. . . . First you decide that the doctor can have so many patients. They are equally divided among the various doctors by the government. But then doctors aren’t equally divided geographically. So a doctor decides he wants to practice in one town and the government has to say to him, you can't live in that town. They already have enough doctors. You have to go someplace else. And from here it's only a short step to dictating where he will go. . . . All of us can see what happens once you establish the precedent that the government can determine a man's working place and his working methods, determine his employment. From here it's a short step to all the rest of socialism, to determining his pay. And pretty soon your son won't decide, when he's in school, where he will go or what he will do for a living. He will wait for the government to tell him where he will go to work and what he will do.
Government is like a baby. An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other.
Welfare's purpose should be to eliminate, as far as possible, the need for its own existence.
One legislator accused me of having a nineteenth-century attitude on law and order. That is a totally false charge. I have an eighteenth-century attitude. That is when the Founding Fathers made it clear that the safety of law-abiding citizens should be one of the government's primary concerns.
There are those in America today who have come to depend absolutely on government for their security. And when government fails they seek to rectify that failure in the form of granting government more power. So, as government has failed to control crime and violence with the means given it by the Constitution, they seek to give it more power at the expense of the Constitution. But in doing so, in their willingness to give up their arms in the name of safety, they are really giving up their protection from what has always been the chief source of despotism — government. Lord Acton said power corrupts. Surely then, if this is true, the more power we give the government the more corrupt it will become. And if we give it the power to confiscate our arms we also give up the ultimate means to combat that corrupt power. In doing so we can only assure that we will eventually be totally subject to it. When dictators come to power, the first thing they do is take away the people's weapons. It makes it so much easier for the secret police to operate, it makes it so much easier to force the will of the ruler upon the ruled.
Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first.
They tell us we must learn to live with less, and teach our children that their lives will be less full and prosperous than ours have been; that the America of the coming years will be a place where — because of our past excesses — it will be impossible to dream and make those dreams come true. I don't believe that. And, I don't believe you do either. That is why I am seeking the presidency. I cannot and will not stand by and see this great country destroy itself. Our leaders attempt to blame their failures on circumstances beyond their control, on false estimates by unknown, unidentifiable experts who rewrite modern history in an attempt to convince us our high standard of living, the result of thrift and hard work, is somehow selfish extravagance which we must renounce as we join in sharing scarcity. I don't agree that our nation must resign itself to inevitable decline, yielding its proud position to other hands. I am totally unwilling to see this country fail in its obligation to itself and to the other free peoples of the world.
[Evolution] has in recent years been challenged in the world of science and is not yet believed in the scientific community to be as infallible as it once was believed. But if it was going to be taught in the schools, then I think that also the biblical theory of creation, which is not a theory but the biblical story of creation, should also be taught.
Depression is when you’re out of work. A recession is when your neighbor’s out of work. Recovery is when Carter’s out of work.
With regard to the freedom of the individual for choice with regard to abortion, there's one individual who's not being considered at all. That's the one who is being aborted. And I've noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born.
You and I are told increasingly that we have to choose between a left or right, but I would like to suggest that there is no such thing as a left or right. There is only an up or down — up to a man's age-old dream; the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order — or down to the ant heap totalitarianism, and regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would trade our freedom for security have embarked on this downward course.
Reagan is so anti-liberal it isn't funny and, yet, the libtards will use whatever thay can find to advance their lunacy. By the way, Andy Dullidunce, Bush is not as conservative by any stretch of the imagination. He is a democrat in drag, just like you and Charlie.
The Snooper Report. Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum