Defend Israel

The Patriots Call
The Black Robe Regiment - The Patriots Call

Democrats party of Racism
Racism of the Democrat Party
Herman Cain - The DNC has BRAINWASHED most of the Blacks of this Nation
Racism - the Nemesis of the Democrat Party
Democrats invented racism and democrats HATE all blacks
The Snooper Report articles on Democrat invention of racism

The March on DC
Callin’ All the Clans Together
Sick and tired - marching towards the Constitution of the United States
We. Are. Finished. With.  DC.
We. Are. Finished. With. DC. - Addendum Part 1

Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It
Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It Part 2(?)
Civility: Leftinistra Own None Part Three
Obama, Civility and The Clansmen of Dumb
Brain Dead Leftinistra: Their Stoic Civility
Libtards Have No Class - Civility Escapes Their Brain Deadness
The States Will Be the Next Battlefield in the Fight Over ObamaCare
War Is Coming: Blood On Our Own Streets - Thanks Democrats
Civil War…
We Are In The Midst of Chaos and Civil War
Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die Trying
State’s Sovereignty or Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die - The Movement Marches On
The Country Surrounds The City

When They Came
Is The Left Still “Proud To Be a Left-Wing Extremist”?
Be It Known - Attention Unconstitutional Congress
Obama: One Big Ass Mistake America
Do Birthers Rock and Roll or Stop and Drool?
Good vs Evil…It Is Your Choice
I Apologize For My Nation
Obama’s Civilian National Security Forces (CNSF)
Obama’s Brown Shirts - Civilian National Security Forces
What Is It About The American Liberal?
The Plan To Destroy America
Another Soldier Has Been Given the Haditha Treatment!
Callin’ All The Clans Together
Callin’ All The Clans Together Show
A History of the List of 45
Constitutionality: The Movement
Vindication: Iraq’s Saddam and Al Qaeda Links Revealed
Redefining The Center or the Moderate
The HIC (Hoax In Charge) Going To Copenhagen
We Didn’t Start This Goddamn War!

Copy Cat Frauds of the IAVA

Contract With America
Snooper’s Declaration of Independence
Thanks Obama

Contract From America

Timothy McVeigh
Thoughts To Ponder and Reflect Upon
Snooper Report Vindication: Al Qaeda, TWA Flight 800 and OKC Bombing
Clinton alludes to 1995 bombing, says words matter

Missing 13th Amendment
TITLES OF “NOBILITY” AND “HONOR” - The Missing 13th Amendment

The Coup
Military Coup Against Obama

The United States Constitution
Our founding document wasn’t set in stone for a reason

Deepwater Horizon
Did Hugo Chavez Sink the Deepwater Horizon Oil Platform?

The New Right

Arizona Rising

Texas Wars

Editor's Choice


Powered by Squarespace



Wake Up GOP

« Cranial Rectilitis: Obama's 100 Days | Main | The Economy Hits Home: What Makes the Economy Grow? »

Obama and the Dismantling of Due Process

This is, as the information age goes, old news.  However, seeing that with the confirming of Kathleen Sebelius, a person that holds Obama's views of murdering the unborn and leaving a live baby from a botched abortion to die in a closet alone, this needs to get repeated as often as we possibly can.

Obama, the alleged constitutional professor, the fraud that stated that the constitution doesn't go far enough in giving the federal government enough power and provides for those "negative rights", wants to eliminate constitutioinal due process.

There are two articles that I have read and both got their data from the Telegraph UK.  Not an American news outlet but one in England.

Hot Air: Obama to end representation in interrogations?

Apologies to Glenn Reynolds, but they said if I voted for a Republican in 2008, I’d wind up with an autocratic administration determined to wipe out civil rights — and they were right!  The Obama administration has argued for the end of the Michigan v Jackson ruling that requires police to provide an attorney for a suspect once one has been requested.  They argue that the benefits are “meagre,” as the Telegraph puts it: (read the rest - it is all about eliminating the Sixth Amendment)

All American Blogger: Obama Administration Wants Supreme Court to Limit Defendents’ RIghts

[...] Disappointing is an understatement. When you look at what the Obama administration is trying to do here, you have to wonder why they would what to eliminate this.

There really is no purpose in limiting the rights of the defendent. They are assumed innocent still, right?

Yep.  That damn Constitution is in the way.  Especially that POS Sixth Amendment.

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

MICHIGAN V. JACKSON, 475 U. S. 625 (1986)

[...] Indeed, after a formal accusation has been made -- and a person who had previously been just a "suspect" has become an "accused" within the meaning of the Sixth Amendment -- the constitutional right to the assistance of counsel is of such importance that the police may no longer employ techniques for eliciting information from an uncounseled defendant that might have been entirely proper at an earlier stage of their investigation. Thus, the surreptitious employment of a cellmate, see United States v. Henry, 447 U. S. 264 (1980), or the electronic surveillance of conversations with third parties, see Maine v. Moulton, supra; Massiah v. United States, 377 U. S. 201 (1964), may violate the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel even though the same methods of investigation might have been permissible before arraignment or indictment. [Footnote 5] Far from undermining the Edwards rule, the difference between the legal basis for the rule applied in Edwards and the Sixth Amendment claim asserted in these cases actually provides additional support for the application of the rule in these circumstances. [...]

Miranda Rights

Your "Miranda Rights" are named after the U.S. Supreme Court case, Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966).

Obama wants to do away with these constitutional Rights, people.  And that is for everyone.  Even the people that voted for him, supported him, worship and work for him.  Everyone.  Period.

And the BDS dwellers said Bush II shred the US Constitution?  Show me.


According to these enemies within, no one has any Rights unless they say so.  And McCain was Bush III?  If GWB was shredding the Constitution, what do you call what Obama is doing?

The Snooper Report.  Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (4)

Just one question...

When in the hell do the people of this nation wake up and realize that America Is in the process of becoming a socialist haven?? One that will be even more oppressive than NAZI Germany if not stopped, and soon??

April 28, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterTexasFred

I haven't a clue Tex. Scary, ain't it?

April 28, 2009 | Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey

Perhaps when they have to wait for hours or days to receive health care, or when they go to the grocery store and discover you can only buy one loaf of bread per week, or when 80 - 90% of their paychecks go to the government, or when they get arrested for speaking out against government incompetence.
The list could go on and on and on.

April 28, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterNo.9

When they discover that the Sixth Amendment no longer applies because it has been unconstitutionally legislated out of the way ...

April 29, 2009 | Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey
Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.