The title of this article is from a Leftinistra hack, in all places, Texas. Bob Ray Sanders has been on my hit list for many years but I haven't written about him because his normal antics haven't been worthy of my time. However, this is not the case this time around. If this Leftinistra hack do-nothing nincompoop doesn't think that the United States Constitution wasn't ever set in stone, that means that this cretinous buffoon has never read the documents and thinks that a United States Supreme Court Justice thinks for us all and can make whatever Law they so seem to make. This means that Bob Ray Sanders has never read in the United States Constitution what SCOTUS can and cannot do. But, then again, I guess that's what is wrong with the USC, according to this buffoon from Texas. We need a "New Foundation".
Our founding document wasn't set in stone for a reason by Bob Ray Sanders, a classic asshat.
Let's take a look at this buffoonish outtake of the Founding Document of the greatest Nation around even though the Jihadi Obama is running the show - if we can say that without laughing our butts off about it.
President Barack Obama's latest nominee to the U. S. Supreme Court is still making the rounds on Capitol Hill as the Senate prepares for confirmation hearings.
U.S. Solicitor General Elena Kagan, by all accounts an outstanding legal mind, is being questioned by some for never having been a judge, and her conservative foes voice the complaint that she will not be a "strict constructionist" when it comes to interpreting the Constitution.
The very first problem here is calling Barack Hussein Obama "the president" which is about as ignorant as anyone can get seeing that he, Barack, an "avid constitutional lawyer", knowing what the USC says about the Natural Born status ... well, you know where I'd go with that one, right?
And what about US Solicitor Elena Kagan and her "outstanding legal mind" not being a judge? What of that?
On October 3, 2005, Harriet Miers was nominated for Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court by President George W. Bush to replace retiring Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Miers was, at the time, White House Counsel, and had previously served in several roles both during Bush's tenure as Governor of Texas and President.
Well, oh phooey. What did the American Leftinistra say about her? "Supreme Court nominee bows out, cites Senate document grab." Well, now. They were going after the Bush Papers and that's why she bowed out. So what is Obama doing at this very moment? "White House: Obama may use executive privilege to withhold Kagan documents." Harrumph, even. I wonder where all that is in the illustrious newsies. And, I wonder what this Leftinistra hack daddy Bob Ray thinks of Harriet Miers. More than likely, seeing that he is a Leftinistra hack daddy, he was criticizing Miers just like some alleged Conservatives were.
If Elena Kagan was of a sound mind on a legal setting, why is Obama going to use an Executive Order to cease and desist Kagan's papers from coming out? Don't We The People have the right to know? Oh. Wait. We The People don't count. Just ask Bobbie Ray.
Just to let everyone know about the United States Supreme Court. No one has to be a Judge and Harriet Miers was a Judge but the Leftinistra hated her because President Bush nominated her and for no other reason. A Supreme Court Justice doesn't even need to be an attorney. A SCOTUS Justice, according to the Founding Fathers could be just a regular person - you know, one of those We The People that don't count anymore. But wait. The Founding Fathers were just rich old white men...just ask Bobbie Ray.
And what about being one of those "strict constructionist" types. Seeing that the Leftinistra can't hardly stand the United States Constitution because that very document puts the kibosh on every single Leftinistra hack's job performance, every single Justice now needs to be a Leftinistra hack daddy and a marxist-sociopath. Right? A Supreme Court Justice, by the very nature of the United States Constitution of which they are all SWORN to defend and protect, are not allowed to be a Leftinistra, a Democrat, a Republican, an Independent, a marxist-sociopath but someone that does not interpret the United States Constitution but applies the United States Constitution. Period. End of story. SO what else is new to this Leftinistra hack daddy Bobbie Ray?
[...] By "strict constructionist" the detractors mean someone who, in their opinion, will interpret our sacred Constitution just as the Founding Fathers "intended."
Because you are going to hear a lot about that revered document in the coming weeks, I think it is important for us to note that just as the Founders were imperfect, so was that manuscript they produced and adopted as the foundation of our democratic republic. [...]
Judas H Priest. Can you get any more unconstitutional than this? First of all, Bobbie Ray, we are a Constitutional Republic, a Federal Republic and not a democratic anything. Try and find in the USC where the term "democracy" is ever used. It won't take very long to find out. Benjamin Franklin told an elderly woman way back when that "they gave us a republic if you can keep it". This moosetwit has fallen hook line and sinker for the marxist-sociopathic change up of our governmental philosophy. Pity that. He is apparently an over-educated idiot.
However, he almost got this part correct in tat the Founding Fathers were not perfect. Why? Because they are human beings. That's why they are not perfect. As for the rest of his convoluted disparities? Hogwash.
"That manuscript"? That manuscript? You mean the United States Constitution that can be changed by AMENDMENTS. Right? Idiot. That "manuscript" Bobbie Ray is in fact the Founding DOCUMENT of this great Nation and if you don't like it, move to the nearest marxist-sociopathic Nation of your choice, pal.
"Revered document"? Not in your wet dreams bud. Bobbie Ray hates the Founding Documents of this Nation so the only thing revered here is its utter destruction and that is exactly what Obama is trying to do.
[...] I thought about this more as I heard a local radio commentator railing against the late Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall who, in a speech in 1987, was making this same point much more eloquently than I. [...]
More eloquently than you, Bobbie Ray? Judas H Priest. How eloquent can a marxist-sociopath be, especially tainting yourself with a marxist-sociopathic nitwit like Thurgood Marshall? Man oh man could that guy rewrite history, couldn't he?
[...] When I reread that speech the other day, it occurred to me that every American -- especially those senators who will sit in judgment of Kagan, a woman who once clerked for Marshall -- ought to be familiar with what Marshall had to say during the 200th anniversary of the Constitution. [...]
Oh good Lord. We are familiar with what the idiot marxist-sociopath Marshall said and it couldn't be any more far from the Truth than you will ever be, Bobbie Ray. Iin essence this is what Thurgood Mashall had to say: everything in the United States Constitution is so bad and so wrong we need to rewrite all of our history and all of our laws and fashion ourselves with Black Liberation Theology and Karl Marx. He was nominated by LBJ one of the best marxist-sociopaths that had ever crossed the line of Presidential tomfoolery outside of Barack Hussein Obama. But, get a load of this crap...
[...] "To the contrary, the government they devised was defective from the start, requiring several amendments, a civil war and momentous social transformation to attain the system of constitutional government and its respect for the individual freedoms and human rights we hold as fundamental today. When contemporary Americans cite 'The Constitution,' they invoke a concept that is vastly different from what the Framers barely began to construct two centuries ago."
Sound arrogant? Bold? Out-of-touch? Un-American?
Well, Marshall explained that the first three words in the preamble to the document, "We the people," did not include the majority of Americans. It specifically stated that it applied to "the whole Number of free Persons." But on the basic right to vote, he pointed out, the Framers excluded Negro slaves, although they were counted for the purpose of congressional representation (at three-fifths), and it would be 135 years before women gained that right. [...]
Thurgood Marshall. Karl Marx must have laughing his ass off over this idiot.
Social transformation - sound familiar? What does Obama call it? Read it for yourself: Everything I Have Written On The Übermessias Obama. Of everything that idiot stated or will state in the future, he reeks of marxist-sociopathic stupidity. However, Marshall and this gasbag Bobbie Ray do say something that some today are just finding out - they do not know the United State Constitution because no one teaches it any more. They teach precedent law and case law. That's it. And that is changing. More and more people are getting into the United States Constitution and that is why men and women are losing in their primaries across this Nation and that's a good thing.
And yes, Marshall was an un-American as much as an un-American can get. And no, he wasn't arrogant al all. He was just too stupid to understand the USC that he swore to defend and protect. Funny how all these people that are sworn to defend and protect something never do. I suppose that is merely one of those moments of fluff these days.
Marshall's ramblings of We The People - something the marxist sociopaths hate with a passion - is nothing but a lot of ignorance seeing that he swore to defend and protect the United States Constitution and if he did mean what he said, he needed to be impeached from his office as most of them now, today. We The People means exactly what it says it means - We The People. Our Constitution was written for We The People and the Constitution can be changed - and it has been changed - by the Amendments processes, and not for We The Congress or We The Judiciary or We The Leaders or We The Ignorant Pompous Nitwits of the Media.
Oh. But wait. Bobbie Ray and Thurgood marshall are members of the Black Clans so the Amendments that took place don't mean anything to these asshats. Do they? They never happened and they are all slaves now. I see. My bad. Moron.
[...] In 1857, the infamous Dred Scott decision by the Supreme Court declared black people "property" and "beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race ...; and so far inferior, that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect ...."
Referring to that writing by Chief Justice Roger Taney, Marshall said, "And, so, nearly seven decades after the Constitutional Convention, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the prevailing opinion of the Framers regarding the rights of Negroes in America. It took a bloody civil war before the 13th Amendment could be adopted to abolish slavery, though not the consequences slavery would have for future Americans." [...]
I won't get into all of that because none of it means a damned thing. The Civil War wasn't fought over the Slaves. It was fought over States Rights. Do some homework, Bobbie Ray. Your stupidity is "Rather" evident. Leave all that nonsense with Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.
The next few paragraphs deal with the utter destruction of his own race and I'll let him simmer on that one. The last part is what has floored me and floored me good. Listen/read this...
[...] Marshall concluded his remarks by saying, "I plan to celebrate the bicentennial of the Constitution as a living document, including the Bill of Rights and the other amendments protecting individual freedoms and human rights."
In addition to drafting and adopting the Constitution, the next best thing that the Framers did was to provide a mechanism to change it.
We should keep this in mind always, but especially as we move forward with confirming a new Supreme Court justice. [...]
The United States Constitution is a Living and Breathing Document but that's because of the Amendments Processes and not some nitwit on SCOTUS that makes laws at will. But that's not the flooring matter here. This dingbat has stated time and time again how stupid the Framers were but here and now he states that those idiots made it possible to change the USC by Amendments. And yes, Bobbie Ray, we should keep that in mind always but actually do it...change the USC by Amendments and not what some joker in the judiciary says we should do.
Nitwit. For all the rest of the items I didn't cover in this article, one needs to go here and read all about it in a various number of articles. The marxist-sociopaths are wringing their hands and I know it. And so do they.
Was I harsh and mean spirited? I sure hope so. The time for talking nice-nice is over and done with.
The Snooper Report.
Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum