John 8:32 — And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
Do you know the Truth or is your Truth what you feel it is?
Does the Politico know what the Truth is? No, they do not.
Does ABC know what the Truth is? Perhaps only one at ABC knows.
Does the White House Marxist House know what the Truth is? Well, it all depends upon what they know what Truth is, doesn’t it?
Does the State Department know what the Truth is? Have they ever known?
Does the AmeriKan “progressive” know what the Truth is? Truth? To a “progressive”? No. They only know what the demons of this globe tell them what truth is.
[…] If you recall, during Wednesday’s whistle-blower hearings, Thrush was part of the MSNBC News roundtable rebutting the testimony in real-time.
Thrush is a big deal at Politico, so expect his left-wing outlet, and therefore much of the rest of the media, to work furiously over the next few days to do everything in its wicked power to downplay the now incontrovertible fact that the White House has been lying to to national media and the American people for over eight months. […]
Truth? What is Truth to your basic “progressive”, no matter where they are?
[…] Karl now has proof that what Carney told White House reporters is a bald-faced lie. Whether Carney knew it was a lie or not is one thing, but that it was a lie is now no longer in question.
After Karl’s report exploded online this morning, ABC News reporter Steven Portnoy tweeted, “Today’s [White House] briefing will be one to watch. Emails make it clear WH was fully aware of CIA/FBI’s belief #Benghazi was an attack involving AQ.”
Thus far the media has been laughably reluctant to not only push for the truth on Libya but also to do anything that might damage the White House politically.
Let’s see if a red-hot smoking gun is enough to finally change that. [END]
Do you know what the Truth us? Joe Corn Dog Carney doesn’t…
[…] Many have disagreed with the Carney’s claims, pointing to claims that the talking points had references to Al Qaeda in them at one time—references which the CIA allegedly deleted.
Carney says such claims about the edits are part of an attempt “to politicize the talking points…to chase after what isn’t the substance here.” [END]
Listen to the State Department lie…again. The State Department…AmeriKa’s Fourth Branch of the federal government.
I have written many times about the rewriting of history, including the rewriting of the United States Constitution and this has happened since the turn of the century back in the 1900s.
[…] If there was ever a moment in time when the American people could collectively glean knowledge from a “teachable moment,” the Obama Administration’s handling of the al Qaeda-related attacks on the US consulate in Benghazi, Libya is surely one.
From the moment the public became aware of what can only be perceived as an act of war, perpetrated at the hands of an enemy that has officially declared war on the United States and the West, the Obama Administration—Progressives one and all—have engaged in one of their favorite tactics of political opportunism: re-writing history. In this instance, they are doing it in real time—right in front of our faces.
From the moment US Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice took to the airwaves to insist that the attacks that took the lives of a US Ambassador and three of his colleagues were, in fact, not a coordinated and planned terrorist assault of a US target of interest, but, rather, a “spontaneous” uprising turned violent, spurred by a third-rate video that literally no one had ever seen, the American people were being subjected to fact manipulation for political purposes. With an election coming up, a terrorist attack did not fit the Obama Campaign’s narrative that, “Osama bin Laden is dead and al Qaeda is on the run.” If the al Qaeda was on the run on September 11, 2012, it was running forward, bayonets fixed, with death in their eyes.
But re-writing history is nothing new to the Progressive Movement. During the time of Woodrow Wilson, Progressives perfected the art of propaganda to such an extent that many in the fascist movements of Europe—Hitler, the hierarchy of the Nazi Party and even Italy’s Mussolini—took notice; impressed at the effectiveness and results achieved by Wilson’s Administration. […]
Michael Savage is saying what we have been saying since this tragic even took place in Benghazi on 11 SEPT 12…this is much worse than WaterGate. Always remember this one thing…”Progressives” never make mistakes; they never make errors. Why? Because they know nothing about what history is. When they wake up, history begins. When they go to sleep, history ends. History for the “progressive” begins at the start of their day. That’s why Hillary said, “What difference does it make”.
[…] The “buck” only stops on the President’s desk - any President’s desk - when he knows there’s a dollar bill in circulation looking for a home.
That covers Obama on the night of the attack, but it doesn’t let him off the hook for the way his Administration responded to it.
Going back to Secretary Hillary Clinton’s testimony on the attack, I believe it is now legit to view her anger and frustration not at the questioners - but borne of her knowledge that her Department had lied - or had orchestrated the lies of Susan Rice - to the American people.
Why? To protect the Obama campaign narrative that he had Al-Qaeda on the run and national security was not nearly as important an issue as whether or not Mitt Romney’s dog liked riding on the top of the family car.
I have no idea where this will end up. It does not appear that it - in spite of many of your fondest wishes - rises to the level of impeachment of the President, but it may put an indelible stain on the reputation of Hillary Clinton. […]
And who are the February 17 Martyrs Brigade?
Elements of the February 17 Martyrs Brigade, the Libyan militia hired by the U.S. State Department to station members as residents inside the U.S. compound in Benghazi and to protect the U.S. diplomats there, were “complicit” in the Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attack that killed Amb. Chris Stevens and three other Americans, according to the testimony of Greg Hicks, who was the department’s second-ranking diplomat in Libya at the time of the attack.
“Certainly, elements of that militia were complicit in the attacks,” Greg Hicks, the State Department’s former deputy chief of mission in Libya told the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Wednesday. “The attackers had to make a long approach march through multiple checkpoints that were manned by February 17 militia.” […]
So why did the State Department hire KNOWN Jihadi scum bags to protect Americans when the terrorists have sworn Fatwahs designed to kill Americans?. Peculiar, isn’t it? Perhaps it is because the Obama, the “messiah”, has stated that AQ is on the run and the war on terror is over?
Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-Ohio) promised there will be more hearings on the Benghazi terrorist attack — following Wednesday’s dramatic hearing with three whistleblowers — because the White House is “blocking access” to the truth about what really happened during that Sept. 11, 2012 assault.
“The goal here is to get to the truth,” Boehner said during a press conference on Capitol Hill on Thursday. “Four Americans lost their lives. Their families want to know the truth. The American people want to know the truth. And I believe it is Congress’ obligation to get to the truth.”
The Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya left four Americans dead, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens.
On Wednesday, May 8, three whistleblowers, including Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Counterterrorism Mark Thompson and the former Deputy Chief of Mission in Libya Gregory Hicks, testified before the House Committee on Government Oversight and Reform.
Their testimonies raised questions of inadequate security at the compound and why the White House insisted an obscure anti-Islamic video was to blame for the attack in its aftermath.
Boehner said Congress is committed to getting answers to make sure it “doesn’t happen again.” […]
[…] There are still more questions than answers and there will be more hearings, but the final inescapable conclusion to be drawn from this initial hearing is that the Administration, the vast majority of the Democrats in Congress, and most of the mainstream media don’t want the American people to know the truth. Their only interest is in protecting King Obama and his throne, and protecting his possible successor, Hilary Clinton. Instead of asking pertinent The Democrats on the committee spent most of their time attacking the Republicans and the valiant whistleblowers. […]
Protecting the throne. Just like what Jay Corn Dog Carney is doing right now on Fox News in its press conference. Protecting the LIAR Hillary.
Listen to these videos, please.
The “president” calls the shots Ashamed
We are in the midst of an unfolding and growing scandal, which even the New York Times has been forced to admit in an online report which raises serious doubts about the administration’s spin after the embassy attack. Indeed, they emphasized in their headline the demotion of Gregory Hicks for daring to tell the truth — that from the get-go, everyone in the Benghazi compound described the event as an attack, and never mentioned a protest or a video. Mr. Hicks testified that State Department officials disciplined him for not sticking to the phony narrative told by Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton.
The Times story, then, is a major breakthrough from the MSM’s regular pattern of ignoring the contradictions and treating the event as a non-issue.Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina is certainly correct when he states that the scandal is “every bit as damaging as Watergate.” And we know what happened as a result of that cover-up: the impeachment and resignation of the presidency by Richard M. Nixon.
What the future portends depends a great deal on how the regular media treats it.
We must remember that the entire nation does not watch Bret Baier’s nightly panel on Fox, which has given Benghazi the most complete coverage and whose panelists regularly discuss developments as they occur. Fox, as expected, led with the hearings and their importance.
Wednesday, the three major MSM networks led their nightly news reports with the kidnapping of the three women who were freed after ten years, putting the Benghazi hearings as their second story. […]
Always remember this: The Snooper Report tries hard to present the Leftinistra and its views of the politically dumb…
New York Times reporter Mark Landler reported on the ongoing controversy over Benghazi on Friday, as House Republicans demanded the White House release what they consider an incriminating email showing officials knew Islamic terrorists were responsible for the attack, yet blamed an anti-Islamic Youtube video instead: “Benghazi Debate Focuses on Interpretation of Early E-Mail on Attackers.” […]
The Leftinistra will at all times, protect their Darling Princess Hillary the Rodham Budding Leninist Clinton. Period.
The Snooper Report.
Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants