Navigation

DISSENT!

Defend Israel

The Patriots Call
The Black Robe Regiment - The Patriots Call

Democrats party of Racism
Racism of the Democrat Party
Herman Cain - The DNC has BRAINWASHED most of the Blacks of this Nation
Racism - the Nemesis of the Democrat Party
Democrats invented racism and democrats HATE all blacks
The Snooper Report articles on Democrat invention of racism

The March on DC
Callin’ All the Clans Together
Sick and tired - marching towards the Constitution of the United States
We. Are. Finished. With.  DC.
We. Are. Finished. With. DC. - Addendum Part 1

Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It
Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It Part 2(?)
Civility: Leftinistra Own None Part Three
Obama, Civility and The Clansmen of Dumb
Brain Dead Leftinistra: Their Stoic Civility
Libtards Have No Class - Civility Escapes Their Brain Deadness
The States Will Be the Next Battlefield in the Fight Over ObamaCare
War Is Coming: Blood On Our Own Streets - Thanks Democrats
Civil War…
We Are In The Midst of Chaos and Civil War
Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die Trying
State’s Sovereignty or Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die - The Movement Marches On
The Country Surrounds The City

When They Came
Is The Left Still “Proud To Be a Left-Wing Extremist”?
Be It Known - Attention Unconstitutional Congress
Obama: One Big Ass Mistake America
Do Birthers Rock and Roll or Stop and Drool?
Good vs Evil…It Is Your Choice
I Apologize For My Nation
Obama’s Civilian National Security Forces (CNSF)
Obama’s Brown Shirts - Civilian National Security Forces
What Is It About The American Liberal?
The Plan To Destroy America
Another Soldier Has Been Given the Haditha Treatment!
Callin’ All The Clans Together
Callin’ All The Clans Together Show
A History of the List of 45
Constitutionality: The Movement
Vindication: Iraq’s Saddam and Al Qaeda Links Revealed
Redefining The Center or the Moderate
The HIC (Hoax In Charge) Going To Copenhagen
We Didn’t Start This Goddamn War!

Copy Cat Frauds of the IAVA

Contract With America
Snooper’s Declaration of Independence
Thanks Obama

Contract From America

Timothy McVeigh
Thoughts To Ponder and Reflect Upon
Snooper Report Vindication: Al Qaeda, TWA Flight 800 and OKC Bombing
Clinton alludes to 1995 bombing, says words matter

Missing 13th Amendment
TITLES OF “NOBILITY” AND “HONOR” - The Missing 13th Amendment

The Coup
Military Coup Against Obama

The United States Constitution
Our founding document wasn’t set in stone for a reason

Deepwater Horizon
Did Hugo Chavez Sink the Deepwater Horizon Oil Platform?

MSLSD Lies
The New Right

Arizona Rising

Texas Wars

This is pretty much a bunch of crap, FYI.
Editor's Choice


REFERENCE MY NEW WEB SITE

Snooper Report dot org

CHRISTIAN WEB SITE





SEARCH HERE


Powered by Squarespace

1980

1984

Wake Up GOP

This is pretty much a bunch of CRAP, FYI HINT: “MOSTLY TRUE” is a “MOSTLY FALSE” deal which means “MOSTLY TRUE” is a LIE.
« Israel jets fly over E. Lebanon, head north over Beirut, after striking targets in Syria | Main | DOES WASHINGTON KNOW THE CAULDRON CALLED AMERICA IS ABOUT TO EXPLODE? »
Saturday
May042013

FEDERALISM: STATE VS. FEDERAL RIGHTS

from “Loki” of The Halls of Valhalla via Blog Talk Radio

On April 25, 2013 a new law became effective in Kansas. The law criminalizes the enforcement of federal gun controls in the state. United States Attorney General Eric Holder said, in a letter to Governor Sam Brownback, “In purporting to override federal law and to criminalize the official acts of federal officers, directly conflicts with federal law and is therefore unconstitutional.” Attorney General Holder continued by stating, “Federal officers who are responsible for enforcing federal laws and regulations in order to maintain public safety cannot be forced to choose between the risk of a criminal prosecution by a state and the continued performance of their federal duties.

Attorney General Holder cites the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which says federal law trumps conflicting state authority or exercise of power. The Attorney General is wrong. I can understand that the average American thinks that any Federal Law supersedes conflicting State Law because that is what we were taught in school. There is no excuse, however, for the Attorney General not to know what the Constitution states. He is the number one Law Enforcement officer of the United States Government and has to know “The Law!

Article VI, clause 2 of the United States Constitution says: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.” What people ignore is the part that is highlighted   “…shall be made in Pursuance thereof;…” Simply stated it means that if a Law, passed in Congress, is not made in pursuance thereof (i.e. Constitutional) it is NOT the Supreme Law of the land and therefore do not need to be followed by the states. To understand this one simply needs to realize that the States and not the Supreme Court are the final arbiters of the United States Constitution.

Unfortunately the Supreme Court being the final arbiter is commonly accepted by the legal community, as they are taught “Precedent Law” and “Case Law” and not what the Constitution actually says and means. When the delegates, from 11 states, met in May of 1787 to, “…form a more perfect Union…”, their goal was to severely limit the powers of the Federal Government but also allowing it to protect the Union as a whole and perform tasks that the States were ill equipped to handle. There were many at the Convention that argued against the establishment of a Federal Court because A Tyrannical Judiciary can strip a man of his Rights faster and more completely than a Tyrannical Legislature. Article III of the Constitution restricts the jurisdiction of the of the Supreme Court and the 11th Amendment (ratified in 1795) restricts that jurisdiction even more. It was Chief Justice John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison (1803) that said the Supreme Court has the power of Judicial Review even though it is not mentioned in Article III.

There is a growing wave across this Great Land of States re-exerting their 9th and 10th Amendment Rights and telling the Federal Government that they are not going to follow these Unconstitutional Laws and Mandates. Anywhere from Gun Laws to Obamacare. We have to be vigilant and continue to push forward. It is our responsibility to push the Federal Government back into the Constitutional lockbox. Hopefully it will be before blood spills.

Letter from the racist and unconstitutionalist Holder…

Letter from Kansas to Holder

Kansas tells Holder to KISS THEIR ASSES!

Good for Kansas.

The Snooper Report.
Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend