Benghazi - the End of An Era
Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:43
Mark "Snooper" Harvey in Benghazi hearings 8 MAY 13, Benghazi murders, arrest Hillary, arrest obama, enemy at our gates, terrorism exists

John 8:32 — And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

The opening of the Benghazi hearings.  After the “Democrats” heard these men speak up, hearing them pledge their allegiance to the United States Constitution and before God Himself, their panties were all scrunched up and wadded up around their earballs…

Yesterday, I watched the entire Benghazi Show on CSPAN3 and I was not impressed.  The reason(s) I was not impressed are as follows:

01) There were no “Democrats” that was interested in the Truth

02) There were no “Democrats” that was even remotely interested in the Truth

03) All the “Democrats” were interested in the “Republican” errors that removed funding for Benghazi

04) There was one “Democrat” that blamed the Sequestor for the Benghazi attacks

05) All of the “Democrats” were interested in protecting their Darling Leninist Princess Hillary Clinton

06) Every time a “Republican” asked the right questions, there was ALWAYS a “Democrat” that spouted out retarded talking points

07) Every “Democrat” had to “READ” their comments from a piece of paper and NEVER offered up anything that was remotely sane

After the show, I noticed that there were far and few that were talking about this on the news shows except for Fox News and even that was paired down quite a bit.

I am not impressed at all.

This is what we MUST know: WHO WAS IT THAT “PULLED THE TRIGGER” ON  NOT GETTING ASSISTANCE IN BENGHAZI?  There were elements that COULD have gotten there but they were TOLD to STAND DOWN.  Who pulled that trigger?  WHO?

We all know who it was that pulled that trigger and that trigger was being operated by the Obama-Clinton Clans of the Mentally Retarded.  Perhaps more whistle-blowers will come forward but this “investigation” must be moved OUT of Congress and into a SPECIAL GRAND JURY.  Period.

A Friend of mine at Facebook left me this message:

I don’t blame you for taking a nap after that! I watched most of it! Couldn’t stand it … every Demoncrat! They must have all met at the White House the night before in football style huddle … with every move choreographed starting with head pig Cummings running!

Yes, indeed.

Cummings.  Why this meathead is even in Congress I will never know.  And this fool is a “preacher”?  Please correct me if I am wrong about its preachership.

So far, The Snooper Report has issued 7 articles on this current Benghazi Murder of 4 Americans and this Spook must know the Truth, with this article being #8.

Liberty News has a video which says quite a bit but it will fall on the deaf ears of the once issuers of news media, now defective mutants of the progressive (marxist, socialist, pathetic) Leftinistra.

Turning point or burial notice? In today’s LNTV report, Norvell Rose says, with the new Benghazi hearings, that’s the critical question facing the “ShameStream Media”

Shame Stream Media?  I have named them the Lame Stream Media.

If we cannot get The “messiah” Obama on this, we certainly can get the Leninist Hillary…

Mother Of Slain Benghazi Victim Rips Hillary Clinton: “I Blame Her”

If Hillary “had no idea” and screams “why does it matter now” then why in the hell was she in that position other than to advance her presidential aspirations?

I am most positive that other whistle-blowers will come forward.

Only President Could Have Made ‘Stand Down’ Call On Benghazi

A source with intimate information about the events that happened on the ground in Benghazi the night the U.S. Consulate and the CIA annex was attacked by terrorists told Breitbart News that, ultimately, only the President of the United States, or someone acting on his authority, could have prevented Special Forces either on the ground or nearby from helping those Americans who were under deadly assault.

According to the source, when the attack on the Consulate occurred, a specific chain of command to gain verbal permission to move special-forces in must have occurred. SOCAFRICA commander Lieutenant Col. Gibson would have contacted a desk officer at the time, asking for that permission.

That desk officer would have called Marine Corps Col. George Bristol, then in command of Joint Special Operations Task Force-Trans Sahara. From there, Bristol would have made contact with Rear Admiral Brian Losey, then Commander of Special Operations Command Africa. Losey would have contacted four-star General Carter Ham, commander of U.S. AFRICOM at the time.

“Ham answers directly to the President of the United States,” said the source. It wasn’t a low-level bureaucrat making the call, the source adamantly added.
[…]

[…] “I have a hard time thinking it was Hillary alone. Hillary may have tried to circumvent the counterterrorism board and deal with this. I think in order for her to tell General Ham, ‘No, you’re not going to get involved,’ she would have had to talk to the president. The president would have had to say, ‘No, take your commands from Hillary.’ He would have had said something, because Ham does not work for the Department of State; he works directly for the president,” the source explained. […]

That is IF we even have a President, which we do not.

So where is this 4th whistle-blower?  The first three were ram-rodded into oblivion by the “Democrats” that really don’t give a damn…

Fourth Benghazi witness gagged by red tape …YA THINK?

Obama administration officials are finally letting the attorney for a Benghazi whistle-blower get a security clearance — but the clearance is at such a low level that it will probably slow the congressional probe of how the administration handled last year’s terrorist attack on the embassy in Benghazi, Libya.

Victoria Toensing represents an unnamed government official who can help explain the reaction of top government officials to the jihadi attack on the U.S diplomatic site in Benghazi and killed four Americans last Sept. 11.

The official may also be able to explain if officials rewrote intelligence reports and took other actions to minimize media coverage of the administration’s errors and the perceived role of Al Qaeda jihadis.
[…]

Remember that this Obama slob said to the world that terrorism is at its end?  I do.  And that is why Benghazi happened.  These pukers are so afraid admitting that they were so wrong.  Period and it is that simple.

Here is just one of the “Democrats” that is telling the world that it is money that caused the Benghazi attacks.  Idiot that it is…this is “Mr Clay”…moron.

And this is merely one “Republican” that gets it.  This is Mr Gowdy…

Dick Cheney slams Obama administration’s Benghazi performance as ‘a failure of leadership … I cannot understand why they weren’t ready’ —- are you serious?  Listen, Dick…here’s the deal.  The “Democrats” have said that terrorism is over so this attack just had to be because of a video made by an idiot that is still in jail over the video that it made.  Come on, Dick.  Let loose of the PC crap and tell the Truth.

GOP chairman denied Benghazi files —- and?  Go read that article and you tell me what’s wrong with this nation.

Political correctness, multiculturalism and identity politics…the CANCERS of the human race.

Obstruction of justice by State Dept.?

Explosive testimony was given today before the House Oversight Committee concerning the Benghazi massacre during which U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and his security detail were murdered by terrorists. As expected the whistleblowers contradicted official accounts by the Obama administration concerning what took place on that fateful night in Libya when Muslim terrorists stormed the U.S. consulate and tortured and killed U.S. diplomats. Most of what the whistleblowers told Congress today had already been leaked to the media. But new information surfaced today indicating that the State Department has possibly engaged in obstruction of justice by attempting to thwart Congressional investigators who are charged with discovering the truth. Gregory Hicks, Deputy Chief of Mission for the United States in Libya, testified before the House committee that he was told by State Dept. officials not to provide testimony to Congress. He further stated that State Dept. attorneys insisted on being present at every private meeting he had with Congressional investigators. […]

Remember what I said in my article yesterday that the “Democrats” will soon begin the smear campaigns aginst those that are telling the Truth?  Well, here it is…

Team Obama Begins Smear Campaign Of Benghazi Whistleblowers

It’s on. As the White House grapples with a growing backlash over its Libya lies and lapses, President Obama’s apologists are gearing up for battle. Put on your hip-waders. Grab those tar buckets. Get ready for Operation Smear Benghazi Whistleblowers.  Capitol Hill hearings this Wednesday on the deadly 9/11 consulate attack by jihadists will feature three compelling witnesses, all State Department veterans: Gregory N. Hicks, deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Libya and highest-ranking U.S. diplomat in the country at the time of the Benghazi jihad attacks; Mark I. Thompson, a former Marine who now serves as deputy coordinator for operations in the agency’s Counterterrorism Bureau; and Eric Nordstrom, a diplomatic security officer who was the top security officer in Libya. Nordstrom first testified last fall about how State Department brass spurned his requests for increased security at the compound. Hicks and Thompson are coming forward publicly for the first time this week with more damning evidence contradicting Team Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s claims about the administration’s response the night of the attack and in the ensuing months of cover-ups. According to the House Oversight Committee, Hicks reportedly will refute Team Obama’s claims that nobody was told to stand down and that all military resources available were used in the rescue efforts. As Special Forces prepared to fly from Tripoli to Benghazi to save lives during the attacks, Hicks says the team received a phone call from the U.S. Special Operations Command Africa telling them “you can’t go” and that the decision was “purely political.” […]

Video: Obama Could Be Indicted For War Crimes

On October 2, 2002, Barack Obama burst onto the national scene with his famous anti-war speech at the Federal Plaza in Chicago. Mysteriously—or not so mysteriously per the 2008 Obama presidential campaign—video of the speech was “lost” except for thirteen seconds (shown in the below video). Many believe it was lost because the panning camera would have revealed a who’s who of radical leftists, anti-Semites, and “social justice” (that is socialist) unions  in the audience. It was only one step then from the 2004 Democratic Convention keynote speech to the presidency. Along the way, Obama continued to rally his anti-war shock troops, complete with “Bush is a war criminal” posters and frothing protesters reminiscent of the anti-Vietnam War movement. Oddly, or not so oddly, these anti-war protesters suddenly disappeared once Obama ascended to the presidency. But lo and behold, when the Occupy Wall Street movement got under way, the same radicals who were part of the anti-war movement were now part of the “pay your fair share” movement. But “antiwar” President Obama proved himself nothing of the kind. He embraced the use of Orwellian doublespeak and secrecy to conduct endless wars that has made George W. Bush look like a pacifist. The non-war war in Libya wasn’t a war because Obama never invoked the War Powers Act—or more correctly, he refused to seek approval for the war from Congress. Then-Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta famously told Congress that seeking “international permission” from NATO was sufficient for action against Gaddafi.  Obama’s rationale, on the other hand, for not seeking Congressional approval, was because we didn’t have any boots on the ground. Because we pulverized Gaddafi with a blitzkrieg of air power instead of a standing army, then, technically, war was never declared. According to this line of reasoning, the attack on Pearl Harbor was not actually a declaration of war. Because of Obama’s non-war war in Libya, we have much of Libya (and North Africa for that matter) controlled by al-Qaeda, which led directly to the attack on the Benghazi consulate on the anniversary of 9/11. Why didn’t Obama send in help to save Americans when the Benghazi consulate was attacked? We now know at least one stand down order was given. It is a forgone conclusion it was because Benghazi was ground zero for another one of Obama’s non-war wars—in Syria—in which Obama had been secretly shipping weapons to the Syrian “rebels” (and sending in help would have revealed this.) […]

Amerika Doesn’t Give A Damn About Benghazi Obama’s Praetorian Media:  Silence on Benghazi Cover-up as the MarxoFascist Democrats attack and discredit the ‘Whistleblowers’

As I feared, after watching the Benghazi testimony from Issa’s committee hearings on the slaughter of Americans on 9-11-2012 and the cover-up by the Obama regime – not only is nothing going to come as a result of these hearings, the media is ensuring that Obama’s Amerika doesn’t give a damn about what happened there.  They are either totally silent and ignoring the testimony altogether, or slandering the entire investigation as a ‘GOP’ attack on Obama.  Along with Hillary Clinton’s “What difference does it make?!” answer to why did they leave 4 Americans to die and blame the Jihad attack on a youtube video:  (0:34) … the Marxofascists are now adding insult to injury asserting to those testifying that “Death is a part of life” IOW – this is NO BIG DEAL, SHUT UP and move on: Elijah Cummings (Marx-MD), ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, tells Benghazi witnesses that “death is a part of life.” I would bet that this talking point the MarxoFascist Democrats are rallying around does not apply to events like Sandy Hook, Aurora Colorado, Boston Marathon bombing, etc.  Imagine if some Conservative said “What difference does it make what kind of gun was used, death is a part of life!”  Not so with the Obama Leftists.  Their treason and dereliction of duty is met with ridicule and lecture while they absolve themselves. Then of course, the Propaganda media/Obama’s Praetorian are doing all they can to marginalize, slander and then ignore any damaging testimony that makes Obama or his regime look bad or incompetent. […]

Stupid bitch…

How Obama Betrayed America

A policy of appeasement and intervention abets our enemies.  “If we have to use force, it is because we are America. We are the indispensable nation. We stand tall. We see farther into the future.” - Madeleine Albright, secretary of state (1997–2001), Clinton administration. It is a judgment on Barack Obama’s timorous, apologetic, and irresponsible conduct of foreign affairs that Madeleine Albright’s words, spoken little more than 15 years ago, now sound as antique as a pronouncement by Harry Truman at the onset of the Cold War, the great challenge America confronted bravely and without equivocation generations ago. Obama has set in motion policies meant to make America far from indispensable — a diminished nation that “leads from behind,” if at all; a nation with a downsized military, chronically uncertain about its meaning and its mission as it skulks in the wings of the world stage. […]

New Been-hazy Hearings in Congress: More Bluster as Continued Cover-Up?

Contrary to the buzz over today’s congressional hearings on Benghazi, I’d humbly suggest the following priority for investigation: 3. The White House’s “hateful video” cover-up and media complicity (and is Basseley Nakoula effectively a political prisoner, still?)  2. Abandoning our US personnel to be murdered  1. The whos, whats, whens, wheres, whys, and hows of American involvement in overthrowing the leaders of sovereign nations in Libya (and Egypt) and U.S. participation in the entire, hideous Arab Spring conspiracy.  Why are we promoting revolutionary jihadi regimes that under Muslim Brotherhood seek caliphate empire. […]

Hillary perjured herself on Benghazi? More of her testimony called into question

JERUSALEM – Did former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton lie under oath when she testified in the January Benghazi hearings that no one within the government ever recommended the closure of the U.S. facilities in the Libyan city?  In her Jan. 23 testimony, Clinton stated: “Well, senator, I want to make clear that no one in the State Department, the intelligence community, any other agency, ever recommended that we close Benghazi. We were clear-eyed about the threats and the dangers as they were developing in eastern Libya and in Benghazi.” […]

One always has to place what the Leftinistra have to say.  In the below transcript, the Leftinistra will now try and say that this whistle-blower is upset because he was demoted.

Diplomat Says Questions Over Benghazi Led to Demotion

A veteran diplomat gave a riveting minute-by-minute account on Wednesday of the lethal terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, last Sept. 11 and described its contentious aftermath at a charged Congressional hearing that reflected the weighty political stakes perceived by both parties.

During a chaotic night at the American Embassy in Tripoli, hundreds of miles away, the diplomat, Gregory Hicks, got what he called “the saddest phone call I’ve ever had in my life” informing him that Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens was dead and that he was now the highest-ranking American in Libya. For his leadership that night when four Americans were killed, Mr. Hicks said in nearly six hours of testimony, he subsequently received calls from both Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and President Obama.

But within days, Mr. Hicks said, after raising questions about the account of what had happened in Benghazi offered in television interviews by Susan E. Rice, the United Nations ambassador, he felt a distinct chill from State Department superiors. “The sense I got was that I needed to stop the line of questioning,” said Mr. Hicks, who has been a Foreign Service officer for 22 years.

He was soon given a scathing review of his management style, he said, and was later “effectively demoted” to desk officer at headquarters, in what he believes was retaliation for speaking up.
[…]

Hillary Clinton’s Big Benghazi Lie

Testimony given Wednesday on Capitol Hill by Greg Hicks, Benghazi whistleblower and deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Libya, exposed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as a liar.

Hicks, who was on the ground in Libya on September 11, 2012, said Clinton called him around 2 a.m. from Washington to ask “what was going on.” Hicks responded by saying the consulate was under attack. He never told her about a protest outside the consulate because there wasn’t one.
“The only report that our mission made through every channel was that this was an attack,” Hicks said. “No protest.”

In his recollection of events the night of September 11, 2012, Hicks stated that U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens called him and said, “We are under attack,” just before he was brutally murdered and dragged through the streets. Again, no mention of a protest.

“The video was not instigative of anything that was going on in Libya,” Hicks said. “We saw no demonstrations related to the video anywhere in Libya.”

Hicks also noted that Twitter feeds were being monitored and showed Ansar al-Sharia took credit for the terrorist attack and had control of the hospital where Ambassador Stevens was taken.

Despite knowing Benghazi was a terrorist attack from the very beginning, after all she was briefed by Hicks who was on the ground, Clinton shamelessly stood in front of the flag draped caskets of dead Americans and blamed a YouTube video anyway.  […]

As I mentioned earlier, Hicks was demoted…Hicks: Higher-ups at State told me not to talk to GOP congressman about Benghazi; Update: “Effectively demoted”

Benghazi survivor ‘embarrassed’ by Susan Rice’s TV appearances - with video

I have spent about 6 hours collecting all of this data and there is much, much more.  So, today, I will search for more and it won’t be hard.  Unfortunately, the Lame Stream Media will yawn and turn away from their own malfeasance.

The Snooper Report.
Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants

Update on Thu, May 9, 2013 at 6:22 by Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey

From Gateway Pundit…sorry I missed this earlier…

Article originally appeared on Snooper's Take Our Country Back (http://snooperreport.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.