Navigation

DISSENT!

Defend Israel

The Patriots Call
The Black Robe Regiment - The Patriots Call

Democrats party of Racism
Racism of the Democrat Party
Herman Cain - The DNC has BRAINWASHED most of the Blacks of this Nation
Racism - the Nemesis of the Democrat Party
Democrats invented racism and democrats HATE all blacks
The Snooper Report articles on Democrat invention of racism

The March on DC
Callin’ All the Clans Together
Sick and tired - marching towards the Constitution of the United States
We. Are. Finished. With.  DC.
We. Are. Finished. With. DC. - Addendum Part 1

Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It
Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It Part 2(?)
Civility: Leftinistra Own None Part Three
Obama, Civility and The Clansmen of Dumb
Brain Dead Leftinistra: Their Stoic Civility
Libtards Have No Class - Civility Escapes Their Brain Deadness
The States Will Be the Next Battlefield in the Fight Over ObamaCare
War Is Coming: Blood On Our Own Streets - Thanks Democrats
Civil War…
We Are In The Midst of Chaos and Civil War
Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die Trying
State’s Sovereignty or Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die - The Movement Marches On
The Country Surrounds The City

When They Came
Is The Left Still “Proud To Be a Left-Wing Extremist”?
Be It Known - Attention Unconstitutional Congress
Obama: One Big Ass Mistake America
Do Birthers Rock and Roll or Stop and Drool?
Good vs Evil…It Is Your Choice
I Apologize For My Nation
Obama’s Civilian National Security Forces (CNSF)
Obama’s Brown Shirts - Civilian National Security Forces
What Is It About The American Liberal?
The Plan To Destroy America
Another Soldier Has Been Given the Haditha Treatment!
Callin’ All The Clans Together
Callin’ All The Clans Together Show
A History of the List of 45
Constitutionality: The Movement
Vindication: Iraq’s Saddam and Al Qaeda Links Revealed
Redefining The Center or the Moderate
The HIC (Hoax In Charge) Going To Copenhagen
We Didn’t Start This Goddamn War!

Copy Cat Frauds of the IAVA

Contract With America
Snooper’s Declaration of Independence
Thanks Obama

Contract From America

Timothy McVeigh
Thoughts To Ponder and Reflect Upon
Snooper Report Vindication: Al Qaeda, TWA Flight 800 and OKC Bombing
Clinton alludes to 1995 bombing, says words matter

Missing 13th Amendment
TITLES OF “NOBILITY” AND “HONOR” - The Missing 13th Amendment

The Coup
Military Coup Against Obama

The United States Constitution
Our founding document wasn’t set in stone for a reason

Deepwater Horizon
Did Hugo Chavez Sink the Deepwater Horizon Oil Platform?

MSLSD Lies
The New Right

Arizona Rising

Texas Wars

This is pretty much a bunch of crap, FYI.
Editor's Choice


REFERENCE MY NEW WEB SITE

Snooper Report dot org

CHRISTIAN WEB SITE





SEARCH HERE


Powered by Squarespace

1980

1984

Wake Up GOP

This is pretty much a bunch of CRAP, FYI HINT: “MOSTLY TRUE” is a “MOSTLY FALSE” deal which means “MOSTLY TRUE” is a LIE.
Friday
May092008

On Global Cultural Jihad

The following was at one time posted at A Newt One, now removed from the internet.

 

I have long written on this subject of Global Cultural Jihad and have long been criticized, castigated, ridiculed and experienced being a target of the most intolerant people on the face of the planet because of it. I have often asked myself why that is, knowing the answer long before I ever uttered the question. The attacks stem from not having the slightest concept of the threats our culture faces, our culture being Traditional Americana. Many people understand the threats "radical Islam" presents yet are painfully silent not wanting to make waves and they themselves being the brunt of intolerant rhetoric. So be it...they have fallen prey to the cancer of political correctness.

Recently, in an article in the Washington Times, I read the following:

"U.S. officials are being advised in internal government documents to avoid referring publicly to al Qaeda and other terrorist groups as Islamic or Muslim, and not to use terms like jihad or mujahedeen, which "unintentionally legitimize" terrorism."

This is nonsense coming from the US State Dept disguised as rational thought. I can understand the mindset of not wanting to legitimize terrorism but I don't have to accept the premise and neither should anyone else that understands the mind set of a terrorist and the leaders of such groups. It doesn't matter how you perceive them. They are what they are and diplomatic psycho-babble will not diminish the terrorists that have proclaimed that their end result and goal of their international Jihad is to wipe out Britain and the United States.

"We want to eradicate Britain and America, and to shatter the arrogance and tyranny of the infidels. We pray that Allah will enable us to destroy the White House, New York, and London. We place our trust in Allah. Soon, we will witness the miracles of jihad. I myself have experienced many miracles. Every time I was determined to do something, I prayed to Allah, and he made it possible. Our jihad is defensive jihad. Our determination is great, and it is directly entirely against Britain and America. The soldiers of heresy who have come here to oppress the Muslims - we will respond to their injustice and tyranny. One of the miracles of jihad will be that sooner or later, we will destroy their countries."

The very fact that we are embroiled within a war with "radical Islam" legitimizes their very existence. When the leaders of these groups, and there are quite a few of them all intertwined and networked one with another, call for the destruction of entire nations, how can we not take them seriously? All of the poli-speak known to man cannot take away from the fact that Islamic Jihad does in fact exist and has existed for as far back as I can remember in my lifetime. Also, from my studies in American Studies and from American History, America faced the Islamic Jihad during President Jefferson's Administration. The war involving the Barbary Coast is a matter of historical record and fact.

"When Jefferson became president in 1801 he refused to accede to Tripoli's demands for an immediate payment of $225,000 and an annual payment of $25,000. The pasha of Tripoli then declared war on the United States. Although as secretary of state and vice president he had opposed developing an American navy capable of anything more than coastal defense, President Jefferson dispatched a squadron of naval vessels to the Mediterranean. As he declared in his first annual message to Congress: "To this state of general peace with which we have been blessed, one only exception exists. Tripoli, the least considerable of the Barbary States, had come forward with demands unfounded either in right or in compact, and had permitted itself to denounce war, on our failure to comply before a given day. The style of the demand admitted but one answer. I sent a small squadron of frigates into the Mediterranean....."

Prior negotiations with Islamic Jihad in the late 1700s and early 1800s clearly did not work and there weren't any politicians demanding that we don't legitimize them by calling them what they were...Islamic Jihad Pirates. As then, so it is now, today in 2008. One cannot negotiate with "radical Islam" anymore than one can negotiate with a rabid hyena. They see that as a sign of weakness and capitalize on it for as long as anyone will let them.

Doug Ross writes at Director Blue:

"Did you know that -- during World War II -- the Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force (SHAEF) banned the use of the words Nazi, Reich and Führer when describing the enemy?

I'm guessing you never heard of such a thing. Because it never happened.

In today's politically correct environment, however, identifying the enemies of civilization is verboten."

Thus my theme of Global Cultural Jihad gains merit and credence and validity. When the enemy can create such a media coup as to force a Super Power to try and be nice by "not calling them names", they have won a battle. The first order of battle is to identify one's enemy. The enemy has our State Department pegged as soft and afraid of public opinion. They have us identified and know that politicians are gutless and live in fear of being considered as intolerant.

The enemy we are fighting at this moment of time had been, at one time, referred to as enemy combatants. Apparently, that was quite unacceptable to someone because we no longer hear the reference. We hear terminology such as "radical extremists" like that doesn't legitimize the enemy in some magical context.

What do you call an ideology that believes that it is quite natural and acceptable to strap on explosive vests on adults, children and indigents and instruct them to walk or drive into a populated area of non-combatants and self-detonate? What do you call the people that believe in and accept that ideology as the norm and a natural way of life - or death? How does one not legitimize the enemy when we are at war with terrorists and the terrorist ideology? The concept of not calling or labeling the enemy for what they are escapes myself and others capable of rational thought processes.

Last week, President Bush rendered a Press Briefing and after some reporters tried to team up on him and corner him, he himself used the term "jihadists" and I was pleased that he did because someone in a leadership position must inform the general public just who and what it is we are at war with.

The United States and the Western World whether they like it or not are at war with Islamic Jihadists. Not all Muslims are of this mindset but the ones that are have become capable of international operations due to years of regarding them as a backward people that are merely a nuisance in some other far away place. That all changed on 91101...lest anyone forgot.

As Andrew McCarthy once said, you cannot take Islam out of Islamic terrorism. Politically correct fought wars are not winnable - the Korean and Vietnam Police Actions being the shining examples. I have spoken to many a warrior still fighting and those not and they have told me that calling them Islamic Jihadists is being nice.

Robert at Jihad Watch is perplexed by these new internal guidelines at the State Department as well and he writes:

The argument, of course, is the old Streusand/Guirard claim that by using the word jihad, we're validating the jihadist claim to be waging jihad. Of course, it's ridiculous to think that the U.S. State Department carries any validating authority within the Islamic world to determine what is Islam and what isn't. This would be the first time that unbelievers have set the meaning of Islamic theology for Muslims.

As the enemy wages Global Cultural Jihad, our leaders are playing political football with our very way of life - our culture - in order to curry favor with our enemies. Political Correctness will be the death of us all. My eldest son now waiting for transport back home from Iraq after serving with the 101st Airborne has often asked me what our politicians back stateside are doing. I have no answers for him and he and his comrades are not pleased with them. Being the brunt of political correctness and playing nice with the enemy is unacceptable.

Sunday
Apr272008

I Have A Dream

What is the Leftinistra so mired in? Defeat? Hate? Self-loathing? Belief in a rewritten historical account of our nation? Brainwashing?

The Leftinistra hate this country or, they at least hate a form of government built upon a Federal Republic. And, therein, lies a deep rooted problem. “Liberals” are now “Progressives” and both translate into “socialist” and at worst, “communist” in their pathetic and poisoned rhetoric. Just one example of this can be found at SmolderingMuttBog:

[…] But here’s the deal. Of all the powers in your society, if you live in a democracy, only one is meant to try and help everyone. Only one was set up to do so.

That one is government. By the people, for the people - those words weren’t chosen at random. Government, in the end, is nothing more than a big co-operative. […]

Obviously, this self-proclaimed “liberal” is so far uneducated as to the make up and framework of this nation and should be disregarded as being an “intellectual” and is to be considered to be a fool’s fool. This ignoramus has no earthly clue as to how this nation was constructed and was more than likely taught in the government run re-education camps called Public Schooling and the alleged Higher Learning facilities.

First of all, our Federal Republic was most assuredly not designed to “help everyone”. Also, misquoting Lincoln is a sure fire indicator to the level of ignorance and willful bliss of being an idiot. The poor sot omitted “Of The People”. Leaving that phrase out is also an indication of the socialist mind set…empty and void of reason and logic.

The next part is also an indication of the socialist “liberal” stupidity: “Government, in the end, is nothing more than a big co-operative.” How sad is that? Pretty sad I am sad to say. If this ignoramus wants to live where the government is a “big co-operative”, I suggest the fool pick up stakes and go elsewhere.

However, the key to this pathetic post written by Ian Welsh is this: it thinks we are a “democracy”. We are not. The “progressives” would “Rather” we be a democracy but we were founded upon a Federal Republic, plain and simple. In the beginning, the government on the Federal level was not to be Big Brother and to take care of our every need. Quite the contrary.

The Framers were intent on individuality with the State Governments doing the basic “taking care of their citizens”. Period. The Framers never intended for the Federal Government to be taking care of all our needs. Period. Perhaps this child should read and study the List of 45? Yes. I do believe the List of 45 is the key to understanding fools like Ian and their pathetic rants of socialist squirrels.

I HAVE A DREAM


I have a Dream. I have a Dream of a Return to The United (still) States of America where True American Patriotism Reigns Supreme. I have a dream where the proponents of the USSA, the United Socialist States of America are defeated and ground into the earth under the boots of True American Patriots. I have a dream where this nation we call America is free of the Anti-Americanists of Code Pink, the Non Answer Coalition, the ACLU and other known socialist and communist groups financing such Marxist, Stalinist, Leninist and Anarchist dogma. I have a dream where the world is free of the Islamic Jihad Menace of which we face is utterly destroyed and the regions they occupy and live are pacified with their blood. I have a dream where Freedom is the New Social Order. I have a dream where the George Soros ilk are trod upon and placed into the Great Abyss of Obscurity in which they belong…for eternity.



I have a dream where the Federal Republic of the United States of America, for which she stands, rules the day and where politicians return to the Delegate Form of Government of which we were founded. I have a dream where the national news agencies actually reports the news without socialist bias and slant…without an agenda, no matter what that agenda may be.

I have a dream where the List of 45 is taught in our schools and in our homes and most importantly, within the Local, State and Federal Governments to remind them of what almost transpired in this country as we slept. The list was presented to Congress in 196[3] and how soon have we forgotten the threats from within.

I have a dream that the Silent Majority will turn off their televisions and get involved in the future of their nation before all is lost. I have a dream where True American Patriots rise up and say, “I am mad as hell and I’m not going to take this anymore!” I have a dream where the American Microwave Mentality is no more. I have dream where the average American Memory Span and Attention Span is longer than a week…perhaps even develop an ability and a desire for long-term memory and attention spans. Is this asking for too much? Perhaps but a man can dream.

Won’t you join me?

Further reading:
Democracy v Federal Republic…Which Are We?

 

Sic vis pacem para bellum

Fight Accordingly

Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum

(If you want peace, prepare for war.)

Sic Semper Tyrannis!

Death to Tyrants

 

“Be still and know that I am God: …” Psalm 46:10

 

Friday
Apr042008

War News: About Those Iraqi Benchmarks

For the record, the Iraqi Government has performedd magnificently when compared to our very own CONgress. I researched a little and found that our CONgress passed the minimum wage waste of time that will do more damage in the long run and they changed the name of some Post Offices. They also emboldened the enemy and they enabled our own anarchists ands other anti-Americanist groups within our own borders. That isn't anything to be proud of, is it?

John Boehner has a great post up today:

While Democrats Ignore Progress, Iraqis Continue to Meet Benchmarks - Latest Dem Defeatist Rhetoric on Iraq Disproved As "Oudated and Invalid" by New Analysis of Iraqi Political Gains

I find that amazing that the Iraqis have accomplished more since the Troop Surge has paved the way than our CONgress has done in 2 years. Don't you think that is an amazing thing? Under the threats of death via whatever means is available to the terrorists in Iraq, they still made progress on the political front.

As General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker prepare to testify before Congress next week, yet another Democratic talking point is becoming more untenable by the day. As security on the ground in Iraq continues to improve, Democrats have predictably fallen back on their next line of defense: that the surge has failed because the Iraqis have not taken advantage of the "breathing room" created by the success of American and Iraqi troops in order to move forward with necessary political reconciliation. But that talking point has been discredited as both "outdated and invalid," according to a new analysis by Fred Kagan, resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute:
"As the tally ... shows, the Government of Iraq has now met 12 out of the original 18 benchmarks set for it, including four out of the six key legislative benchmarks. It has made substantial progress on five more, and only one remains truly stalled. One can argue about the scoring of this or that benchmark, but the overall picture is very clear: before the surge began, the Iraqi Government had accomplished none of the benchmarks and was on the way to accomplishing very few. As the surge winds down, it has accomplished around two-thirds of them and is moving ahead on almost all of the remainder. To say in the face of these facts that Iraq has made 'little' or 'no' political progress is simply false-to-fact."

Go read the rest because it is a data bank of information the Leftinistra will not acknowledge.

Our dishonorable democrat leadership should hang their heads in shame for playing political football with our Troops and what they have accomplished for the Iraqi People.

Our friends at Flopping Aces writes: Iraq's Unheralded Political Progress
STACLU writes: Don't Tell Harry Reid, New Report Shows Progress in Iraq
Pirate's Cove: Spittle On The Monitor: Iraq Security Improves

Sunday
Jan132008

Hillary Takes Credit For The Troop Surge [UPDATED]

BITCH! BITCH! THE BITCH IS BACK! BITCH! BITCH! THE BITCH IS BACK!

 

OK. This is what we have been expecting for quite some time. As the Defeatocrats ignore the successes of the Troop Surge and Victory in Iraq is imminent, the Leftinistra have been consorting and their Spin Machines have come up with a plan...pretend they were for the Troop Surge and take all credit for the Victory in Iraq. I have written about this on my "old blog" Take Our Country Back and I will dig up those posts and place them here fairly soon.

HT to Gateway Pundit for the data here presented for our readers and subscribers:

It Has Begun...Hillary Takes Credit For Surge She Opposed!!

Imagine that. To set the damn record straight, please recall that the Defeatocrats INCLUDING Czarina the Budding Leninist opposed the Bush Troop Surge from the beginning. Hillary's "sudden" turn around and accepting the credit for the successes of the Bush Troop Surge requires the willful suspension of disbelief, as she herself said about General Petraeus' testimony before the CONgress way back in September of 2007. Remember that one? This is unbelievable but it has been expected.

From Gateway: (we at A Newt One concur)
Judith Apter Kliinghoffer at the History News Network posted this amazing attempt by Hillary Clinton on Meet the Press to take credit for the success in Iraq even though she opposed the Bush Surge that brought about this success:

MR. RUSSERT: If General Petraeus says, "Senator, in September you called the surge the suspension of belief. It has worked, and you know it's worked"--let me finish--"you can see on the ground. I'm saying to you, Senator, or president-elect Clinton, don't destroy Iraq. It's working, the surge is working. Keep troops there just a few more months to get this reconciliation complete."

SEN. CLINTON: ...The point of the surge was to quickly move the Iraqi government and Iraqi people. That is only now beginning to happen, and I believe in large measure because the Iraqi government, they watch us, they listen to us. I know very well that they follow everything that I say. And my commitment to begin withdrawing our troops in January of 2009 is a big factor, as it is with Senator Obama, Senator Edwards, those of us on the Democratic side. It is a big factor in pushing the Iraqi government to finally do what they should have been doing all along.
Amazing!She voted to surrender Iraq with the rest of the Democrats-- a move that would have brought total destruction to the country.
Now, she wants to take credit for its success!
Truly, amazing!

Today, Hillary Clinton also blasted antiwar Barak Obama on the War in Iraq.

And, yet here's a look at Hillary Clinton's many stands on Iraq:



.

I, Snooper, have willfully suspended my disbelief. Simply amazing how so many will swallow this creeps' bullshit lockstep and goosestep.

Hillary Clinton on October 2, 2002:

"So it is with conviction that I support this resolution as being in the best interest of our nation. A vote for it is not a vote to rush to war. It is a vote that puts awesome responsibility in the hands of our president."
Hillary Clinton on February 7, 2007:
"Nearly four years ago our president rushed us into war in Iraq."
Yet today, this troubled and dishonest politician is bashing antiwar Barak Obama for his stand against the war we are now winning.

Hillary also attacked Barak Obama for raising the race issue!

Who wants change?

This woman is certainly NOT ready for the Big Times and is clearly unfit for command.

Catch the wave at memeorandum right here...

Read Heading Right's take:
Hot Air:
Meet The Depressed video here:
Riehl World View:
Suitably Flip:
Wake Up America:
Flopping Aces:
Don Surber now steps in:
MacsMind:
The Astute Bloggers:
Weasel Zippers:
Snakes and Snails:
Right Voices:
Protein Wisdom:
Poligazette:
Amy Proctor:



I wonder why General David Petraeus sent a letter to Debbie Lee of Move America Forward a letter of thanks for supporting the troops and he didn't send one to Hillary?

Saturday
Jan122008

Unsung Heroes: Doing What Most Won't

There are three key operations in the ITO, three of many, but these most recent, which have brought about the beginning of the end of Al Qaeda in Iraq. Don't get me wrong here...the war is far from "over" but Victory is at hand.

 

Operation Phantom Phoenix, Operation Marne Thunderbolt, Operation Iron Harvest

 

These operations have exacted justice on the remaining hard-core pockets of AQI and mopping up exercises, albeit dangerous, is under way. The video of the latest Shock and Awe air strikes can be seen here or here. You can check out the excellent work of our troops at The Long War Journal.

As our own jackals in DC whine, piss and moan about how the Iraqi Political "benchmarks" go undone; as their own benchmarks and earmarks drain the citizenry dry; we find that unbeknownst to them and, rightfully so...God forbid the NYT finds out about it...the Iraqis have been working feverishly behind the scenes, more than likely under the tutelage of those "nasty and mean military people", to undermine the terrorist groups inside Iraq and they have succeeded. (Don't forget to send cards of condolences to the anti-Americanist groups within CONUS up to and including half of our CONgress.)


HEADLINE:

Iraq: We've Penetrated AQI -- But Apparently Not The American Media

 

Reid: STOP THE WORLD! I WANNA GET OFF! I CAN'T TAKE THIS ANYMORE!! Well, no. He hasn't said that openly but I bet he sure does think it and maybe even whines to his wife...if she can still stand him...and most assuredly to his partner in defeat Nanny Pelosi.
At the same time that the Iraqi National Assembly passed its long-awaited de-Ba'athification reform, the security services have apparently cracked al-Qaeda's organization in the country. Muslim World News, a Muslim news agency in India, reports that the Iraqi Interior Ministry formed a unit recently dedicated to attacking AQI and will shortly take out the entire structure (via AJ Strata):
OH MY!! It was a good thing that the NY Slimes and the Washington Compost didn't know about this ahead of time, eh? They would have tipped off their buddies in AQ!! Instead, Iraqis did the work themselves showing the dumb American idiots in CONgress that can't even do their own damn jobs how to succeed. Well done!


This story can be found here and here.

Iraqi official says Al-Qaeda in Iraq is penetrated, has become an open book Iraq Announces The Defeat Of al-Qaeda Is At Hand, Time To Celebrate

 

Now we know The Why and the How Did They Know in regards to the recent air strikes. I wonder if that idiot over at StupidMuttDrip feels like the idiot we all know it to be now?

I have often wondered when an AQ Tet Offensive was to come seeing that was their only chance since the Surge has routed them out from just about everywhere. Apparently, their regrouping into these areas may have been the beginnings of that and the Iraqi penetration stemmed that tide and nipped it in the bud. We shall see.

If ops like this keep happening day after day, I think Wizbang may be correct: Iraq may be moot point in campaign after Bush deal... read the story here as well...

 

Sorry, Barack, You've lost Iraq.

 

For the complete idiot and dumbest President we have ever had...so say the various anti-Americanist groups around the globe...GWB sure does outfox them at EVERY turn, doesn't he? I wonder if the idiots that get trounced by GWB on a regular basis still feel superior...
The Bush Administration expects to sign a new deal with the Iraqi government this summer which will replace the UN Security Council Resolutions in governing our relationship, and could also take Iraq off the table for the fall elections - as well as for the next Administration. Michael Hirsh reports for Newsweek: [...]

[...] Even on his way out the door, Bush wins again.
OUCH!! That will leave a mark...

As Ed at CQ states:
[...] If the Iraqi government has penetrated AQI, doesn't that mean something for their ability to fight terror and to stand on their own two feet? Isn't a free and stable Iraq the victory we have awaited, and doesn't this suggest that we're coming close to achieving it? Doesn't the joint military operations conducted in Iraq this week tend to confirm this Interior Ministry statement?

The silence is becoming deafening.
There's those damn crickets again...

Catch the buzz here...LOL!!
Wednesday
Dec052007

Sadly, NO!, Ignorance And The Ever Conspiratorial Stupidities

We reported on this the other day and as predicted, the Leftinistra Moonbats of the anti-Americanist Fruit Loop Brigades are having to change soiled panties seemingly on the hour.

Bush-Bashing Is Fun

But here's what you missed amid the Iranapalooza excitement. Some of the elusive and much sought-after political progress in Iraq: (read the rest...it won't disappoint)

The above is from Jules Crittenden. The below is from the disheartened and so mentally deficient losers of the left:

It has been a trying few days, as our animus to cry angrily and fearfully for vengeance against an unending succession of exaggerated foreign threats has been dampened by disappointing news regarding the supposed nonexistence of the Iranian nuclear threat, according to certain intelligence sources against whom our resentment is now rising. (read the rest and bring your tissues...I laughed so hard I thought I was going to snot myself)
The pathetic loons of Trolldom and Doom and Gloom have been beaten...again...by the dumbest man on the face of the Earth...GWB. I wonder what that tells "them".

Sunday
Jul012007

Democracy Addendum

This writing is an adjunct to a post I made which can be found in the featured post section under “Democracy…What Is It”.

I have read on the blogs at Townhall and elsewhere, where several terminologies are either being exagerated, abused and misrepresented.

I have been hearing we are a “Democratic Republic”. I have been hearing that we are a “Democracy”. I have been hearing that we are a “Republic”. It all started when an author posted the “Atheist Democracy” article. That was a good article, btw.

However, my article “Democracy…What Is It” was more or less a recap of 200+ years of history of this nation. It is a shortened version of the book I am writing and hopefully, one day, in my lifetime, I will finish the bloody thing.

With that being said, I will post here a tid-bit of data that will explain in not so much boring detail, the gist of what a Federal Republic is, in laymen’s terms.

The United States was founded as a Federal Republic. This means that is was to be a representative form of government. Many people do not know what this entails.

There are three forms of “representation”.

First, there is the Trustee form. This is where the elected official, theoretically, listens to the constituents and is trusted to use their best judgements to make decisions. (not a good plan)

Second, there is the Delegate representative who votes the way their constituents would want them to vote, whether or not the representative agrees with the majority of the constituents. (majority rule)

Third, there is the Politico representative which, flip-flops between the Delegate and Trustee forms of representation, depending on the issue(s). (not a good plan)

It is the Delegate form that is what the Framers had intended and it worked that way up until FDR. From FDR and on, our representation went to hell and hasn’t recovered yet. This form is what creates accountability in politics and we have not had much of that in decades, have we? Are we currently being represented by Delegates? In my estimation, most certainly not.

The Trustee form is what lazy and uninterested sheeple choose to live under and their “rights” can be stripped away because the Elected One “hears” them but tends to “ignore” them. Tyranny is the result.

The Politico form is a mish-mash form of socialized “keep-them-in-the-dark and feed them fish eyes” representation. There is ZERO accountability.

The Federal Republic was making a come-back during the Reagan and Bush years but was reverted back to the socialistic ways of FDR when Clinton gained control of the American Helm.
This MUST be reversed before it is too late. Should a Leftinistra gain the Throne of American politics, we will be very close to another American Civil War. Our country has not been this split since 1861.
Sunday
Jul012007

Democracy?

This is my take…I am just an old warrior, a grunt…

Feel free to correct me and/or leave comments…I am all ears…

What is democracy? What is Liberty? We hear all kinds of references to both these days, don’t we? The terms get thrown away and I fear that the majority of Americans haven’t a clue, really, what either term means. We won’t even get into the terms Federal Republic or Democratic Republic and related terminology. According to the Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, democracy has been given the defined as “government by the people; especially: rule of the majority”, among a few others. What does majority rule mean and why is that an important aspect of democracy? Is majority rule relevant? If so, then why? According to the same dictionary previously mentioned, majority rule has been given the definition as, “a political principle providing that a majority usually constituted by 50% plus one of an organized group will have the power to make decisions binding upon the whole.” Wow; such a gaggle of words. We can gather from the definitions of Democracy and Majority Rule that the principles derived from them pertain to a tool whereby decisions can be made and applied or enforced.

With that in mind, is Democracy a good thing or a bad thing? Consider this; you like strawberry milkshakes but the majority has voted and taken the decision as to whether you should like strawberry milkshakes under consideration. The majority votes that it will be vanilla milkshakes and the strawberry milkshakes will no longer be available. The same process can be applied to every aspect of your life. Is this good or is it bad? For you, the strawberry milkshake drinker, it is bad. You are in the minority so you lose that particular choice. The decision process has been removed from you. For the majority, there is no more issue. Vanilla milkshakes it is. That “sounds” a little like tyranny, doesn’t it? Does this mean that Democracy is a form of tyranny?

Yes, it is. However, this form of tyranny is an elected type of tyranny. What then, is tyranny? It is back to the dictionary for a definition, “oppressive power exerted by government.” Really? We just had an election and the majority voted for vanilla milkshakes. The majority rules in a Democratic society so why is this considered to be tyrannical? This issue isn’t as simple as some would lead us to believe.

The Father of our Constitution, James Madison had this to say about a pure Democracy, “there is nothing to check the inducement to sacrifice the weaker party or the obnoxious individual.” So, then, we may gather that a Democracy, in its purest form can lead to tyranny. So, is Democracy good then? Ask John Adams. He had this gem to express, “Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself. There was never a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.”

Other wise men have made observations about democracy and several have compared democracy to a republic and have determined that the differences between the two are similar to the differences between chaos and order. Isn’t that a wondrous commentary to ponder? People of the world and world leaders prattle on about Democracy and all they want is tyranny, chaos and order? This can sound rather contradictory can it not? Why would other peoples want this?

You see, our Founding Fathers were really smart men. They had lived through various forms of government and watched many come and go. They knew the pitfalls and the snares and the traps. Unfortunately, our modern leaders have lost their way.

Our Founding Fathers had every intention on protecting the people of the new Nation of America. They did not want a tyrannical form of government. They did not want a king. They did not want a dictator. They intended to create a republican form of government. We will need to define this form of government so, it is back to the dictionary, “a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law.” This is a far cry from Democracy is it not?

Personally, I don’t know why our politicians in this country as well as others make a big deal over Democracy. It is certainly superior to Socialism or Communism but we will discuss those issues another day. Would it not be better to spread our Founding Fathers’ dream and experiment? Yes it would. However, we would have to return to it in order to proclaim it and spread the good news around.

That brings us to Liberty. What is Liberty? It is the “freedom to do as one pleases (anarchy) and quality or state of being free and free from arbitrary or despotic control.” Our form of government as envisioned by our Founding Fathers was a Federal Republic, ruling over the “various states” and ensuring continuity and protection from foreign and domestic enemies.

It was a combination of Democracy, Tyranny, Republican, Anarchy and Liberty. Combine them all into one form and you achieve a Federal Republic where the PEOPLE govern and the politicians carry out the demands of the PEOPLE, not the other way around. The people are free to CHANGE the government at will. (remember that) Combining these five elements and deriving law and order, a healthy society will emerge.

Today, in America, the politicians have become the governing body and “We The People” are their serfs. We have become a form of government our Founding Fathers feared the most. The people are no longer the ruling body.
The Snooper Report.
Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly
Page 1 ... 710 711 712 713 714