Defend Israel

The Patriots Call
The Black Robe Regiment - The Patriots Call

Democrats party of Racism
Racism of the Democrat Party
Herman Cain - The DNC has BRAINWASHED most of the Blacks of this Nation
Racism - the Nemesis of the Democrat Party
Democrats invented racism and democrats HATE all blacks
The Snooper Report articles on Democrat invention of racism

The March on DC
Callin’ All the Clans Together
Sick and tired - marching towards the Constitution of the United States
We. Are. Finished. With.  DC.
We. Are. Finished. With. DC. - Addendum Part 1

Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It
Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It Part 2(?)
Civility: Leftinistra Own None Part Three
Obama, Civility and The Clansmen of Dumb
Brain Dead Leftinistra: Their Stoic Civility
Libtards Have No Class - Civility Escapes Their Brain Deadness
The States Will Be the Next Battlefield in the Fight Over ObamaCare
War Is Coming: Blood On Our Own Streets - Thanks Democrats
Civil War…
We Are In The Midst of Chaos and Civil War
Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die Trying
State’s Sovereignty or Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die - The Movement Marches On
The Country Surrounds The City

When They Came
Is The Left Still “Proud To Be a Left-Wing Extremist”?
Be It Known - Attention Unconstitutional Congress
Obama: One Big Ass Mistake America
Do Birthers Rock and Roll or Stop and Drool?
Good vs Evil…It Is Your Choice
I Apologize For My Nation
Obama’s Civilian National Security Forces (CNSF)
Obama’s Brown Shirts - Civilian National Security Forces
What Is It About The American Liberal?
The Plan To Destroy America
Another Soldier Has Been Given the Haditha Treatment!
Callin’ All The Clans Together
Callin’ All The Clans Together Show
A History of the List of 45
Constitutionality: The Movement
Vindication: Iraq’s Saddam and Al Qaeda Links Revealed
Redefining The Center or the Moderate
The HIC (Hoax In Charge) Going To Copenhagen
We Didn’t Start This Goddamn War!

Copy Cat Frauds of the IAVA

Contract With America
Snooper’s Declaration of Independence
Thanks Obama

Contract From America

Timothy McVeigh
Thoughts To Ponder and Reflect Upon
Snooper Report Vindication: Al Qaeda, TWA Flight 800 and OKC Bombing
Clinton alludes to 1995 bombing, says words matter

Missing 13th Amendment
TITLES OF “NOBILITY” AND “HONOR” - The Missing 13th Amendment

The Coup
Military Coup Against Obama

The United States Constitution
Our founding document wasn’t set in stone for a reason

Deepwater Horizon
Did Hugo Chavez Sink the Deepwater Horizon Oil Platform?

The New Right

Arizona Rising

Texas Wars



Wake Up GOP

Powered by Squarespace

Entries in JB Williams (7)




I have been preaching and teaching this is far as I can remember but JB Williams is obviously better at the verbiage than I am…do a search on this web site for Natural Born Citizen for my verbiage…

Buy the way, I own a copy of Vattel’s Law of Nations as most of you should own…if you care about this nation that was once America but now known as ameriKa…

…and I served this nation only to find out that the mutants in DC serve themselves and their own pocketbooks…

Read on…


By J.B. Williams

March 29, 2015

Following the War of Independence separating America from Great Britain and establishing a new free sovereign nation, our Founders set a course to establish a Constitutional Representative Republican form of self-governance, of, by and for the people of the newly formed United States with the passage of the U.S. Constitution.

Ever since, political powers here and abroad have sought to undermine, dismantle and destroy the United States and eliminate it as the world’s most free, prosperous and powerful nation on earth.

Two hundred years later, trapped in a growing global shift towards a One World system of global governance based on communist principles of social justice, the United States would soon find itself in a silent battle for its sovereignty and security emanating from within…

Fast forward to 2004 – when a totally obscure new Illinois State Senator was paraded on to the national stage by none other than Sen. Ted Kennedy, (who had very close ties with Vladimir Putin, then head of the Russian KGB) – strangely upstaging the intended star of the show, Democrat presidential nominee John Kerry. Four years later, the man with no verifiable past would become the first truly anti-American occupant of the Oval Office under color of fraud.

His name is Barack Hussein Obama and Barry Soetoro and Barack Hussein Obama Soebarkah. He was born to a Kenyan Father and a young American mother, in Hawaii as the story goes, and grew up an Indonesian citizen for a time. He has more than twenty Social Security numbers attached to his name[s] – and six years later, all records sealed, not one American citizen can tell you for sure who or what this person really is…

But we have watched him destroy our country at light speed for six years – stirring up racial divides, seizing more and more dictatorial executive powers, taking over entire private economic sectors, importing illegal aliens and illegal Islamic “refugees” at a record pace, driving our nation to nearly $20 trillion in debt, setting records in Military KIA and WIA under suicidal ROE, losing Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Syria, Pakistan and numerous others, undermining every constitutional concept, installing Muslim Brotherhood members throughout federal offices and national security agencies, as well as in numerous Middle Eastern nations by directly interfering in their elections, and swapping old U.S. allies for old U.S. enemies and placing our oldest Middle Eastern ally on the chopping block, Israel.

If the goal is to destroy the United States, no one has ever done it better than Barack Hussein Obama.

Our Founders made it possible for us to prevent such events, by placing very narrow and specific requirements for the Oval Office in Article II of the Constitution… all the American people had to do to prevent this disaster was enforce the Constitution.

The Founders kept it very simple… to be eligible for the Oval Office, President or Vice President; one has to meet the following conditions -

1. One must be a natural born Citizen of the United States, a True Citizen

2. One must be at least 35 years of age

3. One must have held U.S. residency for at least 14 years prior

That’s all, three very simple requirements established to prevent someone like Barack Hussein Obama from ever entering the Oval Office, someone with unknown, foreign, dual or divided national loyalties. Barack Obama has demonstrated for six years now that he is loyal to global interests, not U.S. interests.

Barack Obama met condition number two and three, but he did not and cannot meet condition number one, the natural born Citizen requirement. That is the condition that should have prevented him from ever stepping foot in the people’s Oval Office six years ago. It didn’t stop him, because the people failed to enforce Article II of the U.S. Constitution, or even hold their representatives accountable for sitting silent as it happened.

Many Americans, millions, wanted the constitutional crisis addressed and resolved over the past six years, filing law suits, FOIA requests seeking information on who Barack Obama really is and where he really came from, calling for impeachment, both for the fraud that allowed him to seize the White House and the many treasonous acts he has committed while in that office.

But the political will of the masses was just not there. Million’s more would be focused only upon removing him from fraudulent power via the election booth, without realizing that he was now in control of everything, including elections and was rapidly turning the nation on its head.

Back in 2012, a new young up and coming hot shot Republican was emerging in the great once very conservative state of Texas. He was, like Obama, a Harvard trained lawyer, except he actually had more on his résumé than communist community organizing.

In a campaign interview during his freshman senate race, a GOP Texas State Committee member sat down with the young candidate to ask a few poignant vetting questions, and here are the questions and answers from that interview… (Redacted information is to protect the witness at this moment, but the witness is willing to offer sworn testimony)

Interviewer: “Hello Mr. Cruz, it’s a pleasure to meet you. My name is (redacted). I am a (redacted) County GOP Precinct Chair and you have my support and vote. I have one question for you if I may?”

Cruz: “Sure, go ahead.”

Interviewer: “What is your understanding of how one becomes a natural born Citizen?”

Cruz: “Two citizen parents and born on the soil.”

Interviewer: “Not exactly, but as I don’t have enough time to fully explain how one does become an natural born Citizen, based on your understanding, would you agree that Barack Obama is ineligible to be POTUS?”

Cruz: “I would agree.”

Interviewer: “So when we get you elected, will you expose him for the usurping fraud he is?”

Cruz: “No, my main focus will be on repealing Obamacare.”

Interviewer: “But Mr. Cruz, if he is exposed as the usurping fraud he is, everything he has done will become null and void. Everything!”

Interviewer: “At that point, Cruz reiterated his main concern, so it was obvious the conversation was over as far as Cruz was concerned. I thanked him for his time and wished him success in the runoff.”

That senate race was highly unusual. Redistricting had caused setbacks delaying the elections and election results. Cruz was running to replace Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison who had just retired and vacated her seat. At the originally scheduled time for the primary, Republican Cruz opponent Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst was well ahead in the polls. But by the time the election took place, Cruz had had enough time to slip ahead with more name recognition, in the end defeating his opponent and going on to defeat Democrat Paul Sadler in the general election, becoming only one of three Latino’s in the U.S. Senate.

That was 2012, and in July of 2013, Sen. Ted Cruz was beginning to make a name for himself, a somewhat outspoken freshman senator, sometimes frustrating GOP establishment RINOs like Sen. Mitch McConnell with his on camera grandstanding, much to the delight of his growing fan base in the Tea Party movement.

Members of the Tea Party, once focused on Constitutional Government, were beginning to see Cruz as more than just a U.S. Senator. In their search for a “real true constitutional conservative” to help regain control of an out of control runaway federal juggernaut under Obama, he seemed a breath of fresh air for millions of Republicans and Libertarians across the country.

That’s when calls for him to seek the Oval Office in 2016 started to take shape, and that’s when Sen. Ted Cruz became very concerned about a fact that he knew, but had never disclosed to the public, including during his Senate campaign a year earlier… Ted Cruz was born a Canadian citizen at birth, and remained a legal citizen of Canada, all the way up until May14, 2014.

In short, Sen. Ted Cruz was a legal citizen of Canada when he ran for and became a U.S. Senator, without ever having disclosed his Canadian citizenship to Texas voters, which under both Texas and U.S. Election law, is an act of fraud. Ted Cruz had committed election fraud by failing to disclose to Texas voters that he was a Canadian citizen in 2012.

No one can say for certain, but I think it is a very fair guess, that had Ted Cruz disclosed to Texas voters in 2012, that he had always been and remained at that time a legal citizen of Canada, his Republican opponent, Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst, would have won that race and become the next U.S. Senator from Texas.

Ted made a huge mistake… He messed with Texas!

Soon, it was the Tea Party wave of support that caused Sen. Ted Cruz to take an interest in running for president in 2016, forcing Cruz to now deal with a fact that was sure to become public in a presidential campaign… he was a Canadian citizen.

On August 18, 2013 the Dallas Morning News published a copy of the birth records released by Sen. Ted Cruz, his Canadian birth records. The story opened the debate over Cruz eligibility for the Oval Office and unlike Obama, who had issued a number of forged certifications of live birth to support his eligibility claim, Cruz had just proven that he was a Canadian citizen at birth by releasing his Canadian birth record.

Many immediately scrambled for damage control, alleging that maybe he was a “dual citizen” at birth via his American born mother. But there were no U.S. documents supporting that claim to be found…

Enter the Harvard lawyers… the same lawyers that had been protecting Barack Hussein Obama for six years… Cruz was advised by his legal friends to immediately renounce his Canadian citizenship, which he did, on May 14, 2014…

…and by June of 2014, friends and supporters at Fox News were beginning to clear his path to the White House by floating the idea that Ted was now a natural born Citizen of the United States, based upon renouncing his Canadian citizenship.

Of course, two critical problems remained… Renouncing his Canadian citizenship affected his Canadian citizenship, but not his citizenship records in the United States, which so far, appear not to exist even today.

As Ronald Reagan would say, here we go again, with a freshman Senator, a Harvard Lawyer, with Harvard law friends and no U.S. documentation to prove that Ted Cruz is a U.S. citizen of any type. A man with known foreign origins, and the son of a Father, Rafael Cruz Sr. who was at no time in his life a legal citizen of the United States until 35 years after Ted’s birth in Canada, when he renounced his Canadian citizenship and naturalized to the United States in 2005.

The problems were quite obvious… unlike Obama, who had taken great care to forge a false documented past before running for office, Ted had already proven to the world that he was not a natural born U.S. Citizen at birth, but rather a documented Canadian citizen at birth.

Not only had he committed election fraud by not disclosing to Texas voters that he was a Canadian citizen in 2012, now he was about to join Barack Hussein Obama in an even greater national effort to defraud all American voters by seeking the U.S. Oval Office less than a year after renouncing his Canadian citizenship.

Back on December 18, 2013, the North American Law Center was anticipating this sad moment in history when they directed a certified letter to Sen. Ted Cruz essentially begging him not to step out on this political limb, as he has many enemies ready to saw it off. Cruz never responded to that letter…

Enter the Harvard lawyers again… On March 11, 2015 – two Harvard law friends published a Harvard Law Review opinion declaring both Ted Cruz and Barack Hussein Obama “natural born Citizens” of the United States.

The key opinion in the entire legal wordsmithing document is this…

“While some constitutional issues are truly difficult, with framing-era sources either nonexistent or contradictory, here, the relevant materials clearly indicate that a “natural born Citizen” means a citizen from birth with no need to go through naturalization proceedings.”

What the Harvard experts are saying is this, gee, we just can’t find any documents to confirm the Founders intent of the term natural born Citizen, and so, we think it means this… a “citizen at birth” is a “natural born Citizen.”

Never mind that Harvard and Yale law buddies had already decided that “illegal aliens” are really just “undocumented citizens,” or that they long ago twisted naturalization laws to make “illegal aliens” born on U.S. soil “anchor babies” who are also considered to be “citizens at birth.”

The legal experts have now expanded all of our naturalization terms to mean “natural born Citizen,” using naturalization amendments, cases and statues to do it. In so doing, they are eliminating the true meaning and purpose of the Article II natural born Citizen requirement from our Constitution without having to endure the cumbersome process of actually amending the Constitutional legally.

And, what was once a long fought leftist battle to eliminate all Constitutional foundations for sovereign government by a sovereign nation and of its sovereign citizens, has now been joined by Republicans like Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal, none of whom are actually eligible for the Oval Office, and all of whom know it.

Only days later, on the heels of the Harvard opinion piece, Sen. Ted Cruz stood among 12,000 Liberty University students forced to attend the event, and announced he was running for the office of President.

If you ask the average American citizen what natural born Citizen is, they do not know. Even many, who think they know, do not know. Since Barack Obama, numerous definitions based on numerous political agendas have been floated, making what was once a very common simple term too ambiguous to enforce.

The people have allowed the lawyers to amend the Constitution by simply publishing a legal opinion.

And today, we are witnessing the death of the American Presidency… from this point forward, any person born anywhere on earth to any foreign Father or Mother can be president of the United States in direct violation of the U.S. Constitution.

The only documentation Obama ever proffered was a forged COLB (Certification of Live Birth, not birth certificate) from Hawaii, which Hawaii prints off and hands out like bingo cards at a Saturday night church social… and the only documentation Ted Cruz has proffered is proof that he was born a Canadian citizen at birth and remained such until May 14, 2014… on this basis, Harvard Law experts say both can be president…

Now, what does natural born Citizen really mean and why did our Founder’s choose that term in an overt effort to prevent people like Barack Obama, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Vladimir Putin and bin Laden’s son from ever gaining access to the Oval Office?

The answer is found in the Founders statements identifying the source of the term, Vattel’s international treatise on Natural Law, The Law of Nations, book 1 – Chapter XIX. Every American can easily find it, read it, understand it and know it. There is nothing at all ambiguous about it… unless you let your political agenda drive your facts.

The true definition of the natural born Citizen requirement for the Oval Office as described throughout the entirety of Chapter XIX can be summed up in this section from 212…

“As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”

Barack Obama’s Father was never a U.S. Citizen. Ted Cruz’s Father was never a U.S. citizen either, until he naturalized 35 years after Ted’s birth. Ted remained a legal citizen of Canada until he renounced his Canadian citizenship on May 14, 2014. Without any U.S. documents, Ted is now a man without a country, according to any authentic documentation. Is Ted Cruz just an “illegal alien” holding a U.S. Senate seat and running for President?

Nothing pertaining to naturalization pertains to natural born, nothing. Naturalization is the process by which an alien (non-citizen) becomes an American citizen.

Natural born Citizenship is a Natural Law term describing a condition that either exists or does not exist at the moment of birth. There is nothing anyone can do to become a natural born Citizen, once they were not born a natural born Citizen. Lies offered by Ivy League lawyers to the contrary are offered with the explicit intent to alter the Founder’s intent, and once again, they know it… It is a Common Law practice they all learned in law school. Common Law is the legal British practice of openly subverting Constitutional Law.

So, people with no U.S. documentation, “undocumented citizens” according to Ivy League lawyers, are “natural born Citizens” and average citizens must rely upon Ivy League Law experts (or judges, political appointees) to help Americans figure out what the true meaning of “is” is… a term the average American is not intelligent enough to figure out for themselves. This is not a new tactic, Hitler did it with the help of Goebbels, Marx did it, Castro did it, Stalin and Lenin did it, even Hugo Chavez did it…

If allowed to succeed, again, the American people will have participated in the end of the American Presidency. Their silence will be their consent…

That is the worst part of this entire saga in the demise of the United States… The people put their politics ahead of their Constitution and as a result, they are about to let it all slip away, their freedom and liberty, all of it.

The mission to globalize the United States is only possible once it is no longer a requirement that only a True American, a natural born Citizen, can hold the office of Commander-in-Chief. The people appear willing to accept this now.

AUTHOR NOTE: Everything presented in this column is verifiable fact. Now we will see how many American patriots care about these facts.

© 2015 JB Williams - All Rights Reserved

Click here to visit home page.

JB Williams is a writer on matters of history and American politics with more than 3000 pieces published over a twenty-year span. He has a decidedly conservative reverence for the Charters of Freedom, the men and women who have paid the price of freedom and liberty for all, and action oriented real-time solutions for modern challenges. He is a Christian, a husband, a father, a researcher, writer and a business owner. He is co-founder of action organizations The United States Patriots Union, a civilian parent organization for The Veteran Defenders of America. He is also co-founder of The North American Law Center, a citizen run investigative legal research and activism organization preparing to take on American’s greatest legal battles. Williams receives mail at:

Web site 1:

Web site 2:



Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants

“Be still and know that I am God: …” Psalm 46:10


What Progressives Hate About Free Will - by JB Williams

I added some bold-faced type in the article below…because I felt like it…

What Progressives Hate About Free Will

Simply stated, they can’t control freedom, liberty, or any society which enjoys these inalienable rights. The fundamental desire of all progressives (aka Democratic Socialists) is to control all others for their own benefit. This is the opposite of freedom.

In sum, freedom (aka free will) allows every individual to make winners or losers of themselves, the right to self-determination. Leftists want the power to create winners and losers, always based upon making winners of those who support their political agenda, and losers of those who stand opposed.

In America, freedom and liberty are not luxuries afforded by our elected officials at the whim of their political ambitions. Freedom is not a gift from congress, the White House or the Supreme Court.

It is a gift from a “free will” God, protected by our founding documents known as our Charters of Freedom, and paid for with the blood of heroes who give all in defense of these concepts. An undying belief in a “free will” God is the cornerstone of all freedom and liberty, period.

This is why leftists insist upon a false premise of “separation of church and state,” a term or phrase which does not appear anywhere in our nation’s founding documents. The aim is to separate morality and ethics from government, leaving in place an immoral, unethical and unrestrained government free to rule over all mankind for benefit of their own tyrannical ambitions.

This also explains why the first objective of communism and socialism (aka progressive Marxism) is the destruction of all free religious expression via creating “religion free zones” such as education, government and even public areas. It explains the full court press to feed sexual perversions into every facet of society, insisting that women have a constitutional civil right to murder their own offspring.

But a society which places its trust in a higher power will always know better than to trust simple men with dominion over mankind. As our Founders stated quite clearly, freedom and liberty are suited only for a moral people.

This is not to promote any form of theocracy. Once again, Amendment #1 of our Constitution strictly prohibits the government from establishing any theocratical form of government. It protects the open individual exercise and expression of all peaceful religions and the right to peacefully assemble.

Click to read more ...


Greece Today – USA Tomorrow - Under Obama

Like I have said earlier and JB Williams so states in this article below, the troubles in Greece will flow Westward and it is coming to the USA sooner than one thinks and/or realizes.

Greece Today – USA Tomorrow - Under Obama

By JB Williams

As Rasmussen reports – “New Jersey and California are just two of the states that are wrestling with high numbers of well-compensated unionized public employees as they try to reduce growing budget deficits.  But a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that Americans are generally favorable toward these unions…”

Dow Jones Newswire reports – “Greek Police Clash With Protesters As March Turns Violent  - police have fired tear gas and stun grenades as groups of angry youths rampaged through the city center smashing shop windows, overturning garbage bins, and setting fire to at least two businesses.”

The Greek protests are led by government employee labor unions. In the states, we know SEIU (Service Employees International Union) under the AFL-CIO. And as the New York Times reported back in January, most U.S. union members now work for the government.

“The clashes come as tens of thousands of protesters gathered to protest the government's recently announced austerity measures in one of the largest protests in recent years, and coinciding with a nationwide general strike that has paralyzed the country.”

Overtaxed and still over spent, Greece’s public sector labor unions are revolting against government cutbacks. Obama and SEIU have the good ole USA poised to follow that utopian trail into national bankruptcy. In both countries, the majority of union employees now hold taxpayer funded government jobs, the only kind of jobs that government can create.

The labor union protests in the streets of bankrupt Greece are in opposition to forced cutbacks in government spending and related services, all necessary to securing additional bailout funds from the EU and IMF in excess of $100 billion to keep Greece from sinking into complete anarchy.

Protesters who have already bled the nation dry of resources in their endless demand for socialist government handouts, are angry over the fact that it is government jobs, protected by public employee labor unions and paid for by Greek taxpayers, that must be cut in order to stop the excessive deficit spending that left Greece the first of many nations to collapse under the weight of socialized economics.

California and New Jersey are the first to follow in the economic-suicide footsteps of Greece and if it weren’t for ongoing multiple federal bailouts of these two states, all at U.S. taxpayer expense, streets in the U.S. would look just like the streets of Athens.

To no surprise, states with the most labor union influence are first to belly up in America. So-called “right to work” states (aka, states where workers can reject labor unions) seem to be faring much better, even in the economic downturn.

Still, according to Rasmussen, 53% of U.S. citizens support labor unions for public employees, without connecting the dots between labor union demands for ever shrinking worker productivity and ever increasing pay and benefits, and the fact that the U.S. economy is only months behind Greece, Iceland and much of the EU, at best…

Americans Had Better Connect the Dots Soon!

Labor unions have destroyed manufacturing in America. They made U.S. students the most under-educated lot on earth. Now they are driving the cost of government through the roof, just like in Greece and there is NO way for this to end well.

When labor unions demand every increasing wages and benefits for government employees, the taxpayer takes a direct hit every time. When the economy stumbles, and tax revenues shrink, the cost of government and welfare services in particular, become unsustainable.

Protesters in Greece are right about one thing - it is the lowest people in the economic pecking order which will get hurt the most when oversized government has no choice but to shrink in size and scope. Said another way, government dependents don’t know what to do when the public trough runs dry.

But they fail to make the connection between lack of productivity, increasing cost and shrinking resources. The end is inevitable for any government that tries to become all things to all people, while robbing the most productive members of society of their rightful earnings to keep it all afloat.

In the end, no nation has access to a bottomless well of resources.

For the record, Greece was already one of the highest taxed nations on earth, with 33.5% of GDP burned up in taxes. The United States is not far behind with 28.2% of GDP swallowed up in taxes, while red ink still runs all over the page in unfunded promises as far as the eye can see, with more unfunded promises made daily.

Only a handful of communist/socialist nations have a higher tax rate than Greece, yet Greece was unable to sustain its government no matter how much money they robbed from their productive members of society.

Yet many Americans don’t seem to have the critical thinking skills to connect these dots and predict their own demise, even as other nations begin to collapse under the weight of excessive government and related taxation without real representation for taxpayers.

No FREE Lunch

The FREE-LUNCH mentality of the “entitlement generation” in America is driving the United States right off the same cliff that Greece just fell off.

However, Americans, unlike any other people on earth, have an equal birthright NOT to big screen TV’s, fancy cars and homes they can’t afford, but to thrive, survive or fail of their own choosing. To live FREE, making their own life choices, be they good, bad or indifferent.

The effort to trade freedom for a free-lunch will always fail in the end, no matter the momentary euphoria from a utopian campaign promise to destroy “the rich” in favor of “the poor.”

The Unites States was once the most prosperous and powerful nation on earth, largely because it was the only nation on earth that didn’t fall for the false promise of equal free stuff. But today, our “entitlement generation” has fallen for the lie and they won’t be set free until they are once again able to separate fact from fiction.

Bottom line… if we don’t do away with public sector labor unions, we cannot reel in our runaway government or the high cost of bailing out the unions while the nation goes under.

Just ask the folks in Greece!

JB Williams
"I have come to believe that the one flaw in our framers design is our freedom to destroy ourselves. It may have been a mistake to ask average people (who don’t have the time, the energy, the inclination, the selflessness, the moral foundation or the good sense to run their own lives), to run the greatest nation on earth." - JB circa 1992

Just ask Greece.  Hell.  Just ask Obama.  That jackass will lie to you and tell you all is well.

The Snooper Report.
Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly


Without the Consent of the Governed

Without the Consent of the Governed

by JB Williams

Obama's Unconstitutional Health Care Treachery is just the beginning of a dark and sinister age in American history. Now that Obama & Co. have found the legislative mechanisms to subvert the Law of the Land on the federal health care grab, they intend to rush forward with the passage of “financial reform” – “energy reform” – and “Immigration reform” – none of which are any type of “reform.”

All of these measures are massive federal power and resource grabs, moving the vast resources of the United States from private sector control to public sector control. It is called socialism, by way of democratic process.

All of it will be done over the next few months without the consent of the governed, before the November election when leftists expect to lose their fifteen minutes of power in the voting booth. They plan to advance their anti-American agenda no matter how many stand opposed, and in such a manner that it can never be reversed.

As I pointed out very clearly in my most recent column, for any federal law to be “constitutional,” it must meet this minimum standard…

  1. It must be within the limited federal powers enumerated in the Constitution
  2. It must enjoy the support of the vast majority of “the governed,” from which all federal powers are derived
  3. It must not infringe upon the unalienable individual rights of any citizen
  4. It must not infringe upon the rights of any state, protected by the Tenth Amendment
  5. It must become law by way of legal legitimate legislative process

Obama’s Health Care treachery violates all five of these standards and as a result, it cannot be allowed to stand. They are just getting started. This is about much more than health care, yet health care is where the people must put a stop to all of it.

How the rest of the world runs is of no consequence to Americans. In the United States of America, “the people” are the government, and our federal government derives every ounce of its power strictly from the “consent of the governed.” Our elected officials are not Kings - they are “servants.”

Implied Consent in the Election

Leftists claim, while they are in power of course, but not when they are not in power -- that winning an election “implies full consent” from the people and authorizes anything the newly elected want to do on the basis of the election results alone.

This is false, and even leftists know it when it is not leftists in charge. In the Unites States, even the majority does not have the authority to run roughshod over the minority, even when that minority is a single individual. So the notion that any minority has the authority to run roughshod over a vast majority is blatantly false.

Unlike any other nation on earth, the United States of America is a “representative republic,” which is to say that our elected officials must at all times “represent” the “will of the people.” Not the will of any minority, but the will of all Americans, defined by a “majority” of legal U.S. citizens.

Further, our representative republic is limited in scope and power, to the enumerated powers granted the federal government via the U.S. Constitution. Then federal powers are even further limited by certain “unalienable individual rights” – further defined in the Bill of Rights.

As noted above in the five minimum standards, our federal government derives all of its power from the consent of the governed – all elected officials have taken an oath to uphold and defend these principles as their first obligation of office – and they are further prohibited from acting at odds with “the governed” by way of “unalienable individual rights” and extended specific limits found in the Bill of Rights.

Winning an election in no way releases any elected official from their oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, or represent the will of the governed. Leftists scream this loudly when they are not in power.

Thomas Jefferson explained why we do NOT have a “democracy” – “A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.”

Karl Marx explained why this is a problem – “Democracy is the road to socialism…”

Obama & Co. answer only to their powerbase, which is found in the Congressional Progressive Caucus and Congressional Black Caucus, both of which are taking orders from their parent organization, the Democratic Socialists of America.

Today’s Democratic Party is not “like socialism,” it is “democratic socialism.”

As even USA Today was forced to report, candidate Obama campaigned on his health care overhaul with a price tag of only $50-$65 billion. President Obama signed a health care seizure bill estimated to cost more than ten times that amount, at $938 billion.

Politicians lie on the campaign trail. They promise what they think the people will buy, and then act differently once elected. This is why all politicians are limited in power to the “consent of the governed.” Winning an election does not make one King in America.

A Velvet Revolution

We the people – town hall – 912 and Tea Party folks all over the country are involved in a “velvet revolution” in defense of individual freedom and liberty. A peaceful resistance against the rushing tide of anti-American Marxist principles, values and policies oozing out of the White House, Pelosi and Reid.

The left is working around the clock to paint every resister a “domestic terrorist” despite the well-known fact that it is demonstrators on the left, ACORN, SEIU and Teamsters who have a long history of violence.

It’s the leftist green movement and even the leftist anti-war movement which has again and again resorted to violence to get their message across.

Last September, more than a million American patriots showed up for the 9/12 March in DC and there was not one arrest, not one broken window, not one reported act of violence, no burning streets and in fact, not even any garbage left behind.

In contrast, when Obama’s inaugural event ended, it looked like Woodstock had just left town, with piles of garbage in the wake. When a handful of Berkeley students heard that their college “entitlements” might be reduced in this tough economy, the streets of Berkeley burned once again.

To be certain, if the left keeps pushing for a fight with the pro-freedom American right, one day they are likely to get a fight for which they are ill prepared. But few Americans seek violent revolution, preferring the constitutional tools put in place to make protecting freedom and liberty a peaceful process in this country.

Without Consent

There are two sides to every fight and despite modern leftist psychobabble on the matter -- there is a significant difference between the attacker and the victim.

Whether foreign enemy or domestic enemy - when people attack the Unites States of America at the core, at its foundation - they are the aggressor - the agitator - the provocateur. It short, they caused the fight to happen and they are responsible for whatever consequences follow…

They cannot pick a fight and then legitimately accuse their victims of “violence” in response. Every individual has an unalienable right to self-defense, and every American has both a right and a responsibility to the defense of the nation and all that it stands for…

What Obama & Co. are doing today, they are doing without the consent of the people, which is to say, beyond the scope of power given them in the U.S. Constitution. That is a silent means of picking a fight with the pro-liberty right.

What we see today is that Americans are VERY tolerant people. They tolerate a whole laundry list of anti-American nonsense that they cannot really afford to tolerate.

But because they are a peaceful and optimistic bunch by nature, they persist in the search for peaceful solutions and resist the urge to resort to violence.

They can be provoked to violence however… and I don’t recommend it.

Calling them names won’t do it - the left has been calling them names for decades now. Disagreeing with their views won’t do it either.

But keep attacking their freedom and liberty in a heavy-handed manner, shoving them into an economic corner and making them believe that there is no peaceful solution to the daily assault on everything they believe in, and you just might get them fighting mad sooner or later.

If the people of this country become convinced that their elected “servants” are going to destroy their nation and their children’s future no matter how many citizens stand opposed peacefully, they very well could resort to non-peaceful action to save the things they care about most.

If any elected politician or political party thinks that they are more important than the US citizen they are sworn to serve, they are sadly mistaken.

If you won’t listen to the American majority, and can’t be reigned in or replaced by peaceful processes, then what comes next won’t make anyone happy.

This isn’t Europe or North Korea. This is the Unites States of America and this country belongs to the governed, not the elected servant.

Elected officials come and go.

Thomas Jefferson said it best – “When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.”

America is the beacon of freedom and liberty all over the world. If America is not free, no place on earth will be free. So tread carefully in Washington DC.

The American people will not live in fear of their government for long. It’s not in our DNA.

Am I “inciting” violence?” – I work around the clock to promote peaceful solutions.

But I have no hesitation in predicting violence. Violence is what happens when all peaceful solutions for conflict have been eliminated.

No matter one’s political ideology, if your agenda does not enjoy the consent of the majority of citizens, don’t do it. You are picking a fight you don’t want…


JB Williams

"A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government." - Jefferson

The Snooper Report.
Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

Throw Rocks


Obama’s Unconstitutional Health Care Treachery

Obama’s Unconstitutional Health Care Treachery

by JB Williams

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed… - From our Declaration of Independence

For any law to be “constitutional” – it must first and foremost enjoy the support and consent of a majority of the governed, from which all U.S. government powers are derived.

Obama’s seizure of one-sixth of the US economy via the Health Care industry grab, does NOT enjoy the consent of the governed and on this basis alone, it is an unconstitutional law.

A current CBS reader poll demonstrates just how unconstitutional ObamaCare is…

Do you approve or disapprove of the entire health care reform overhaul as presented by President Obama and congressional Democrats?


What do you think should happen next in the health care debate?

Both parties should "start over" as Republicans are calling for:

Have President Obama and congressional Democrats explained their ideas well to the American people?


Has President Obama done enough in the name of bipartisanship in his final health care bill?


Most Americans do not want the federal government in any way involved in their health care, much less in charge of their health care. Most Americans prefer private sector solutions to daily challenges and have come to have no faith in the federal government to do anything right, after a long history of government doing things wrong.

As the CBS poll clearly confirms, more than 70% of Americans oppose ObamaCare in any form. They oppose the criminal methods used to strong arm the nation into socialized medicine behind closed doors even more.

The morning after Pelosi railroaded America in her House subversion of the constitution, CBS reported that Democrat approval ratings had hit a new low.

Nancy Pelosi’s approval rating had slipped to only 11% and Harry Reid’s approval rating was bottoming out at only 8% approval. They are officially the most unpopular congress in U.S. history, on the morning after their “historic” assault on U.S. freedom and liberty.

The National Writers Syndicate explains in detail why so many Americans have such a low opinion of the Democrat controlled congress. – In point of fact we will increase the deficit by $2.4 Trillion dollars, and to try to pay for all of this pie in the sky there will be $500 Billion dollars worth of cuts in Medi-Care, along with substantial tax increases and reductions in Medic-Aid (read that rationing) there is a whole lot more we could go into but it would take up too much space and make steam shoot out of your eyes, ears, nose, and throat.”

Even the New York Times wants to make certain that every member of congress responsible for this unconstitutional act be on-record. It reads like crib notes for who to fire in November.

Thirteen states Attorney Generals filed suit on the same day Obama signed the new bill into law, with many other states looking to join that suit over the coming days. For this effort to succeed, we need 38 states to join that suit before it reaches the Supreme Court, which means American patriots have a lot of work to do in their home states.

Numerous states are rushing to pass a Health Freedom Act rejecting ObamaCare at their state lines under their Tenth Amendment right to tell the federal government where to go when the Fed reaches beyond its scope of authority in a heavy handed act of tyranny.

Senator Jim DeMint (R) instantly filed a bill to repeal the new law before the ink was even dry. - "All of this was done in the face of overwhelming public opposition and bipartisan opposition in Congress," DeMint wrote in a USA Today op-ed. "This process has been an insult to our democracy."

The problem is much bigger than Health Care in America. We have a runaway government acting at odds with the vast majority of citizens, via unconstitutional and unethical processes, moving the nation away from freedom and liberty and towards Marxism, at an alarming pace…

The U.S. federal government controlled only 13% of the U.S. economy when Obama took office a short fourteen months ago. Today, after consuming the auto industry, the bank and investment industry, the insurance industry and the health industry, the Fed will control roughly 50% of the U.S. economy.

For those who don’t know how to properly interpret such a massive maneuver, I refer you to Obama’s base of support, the Democratic Socialists of America. -

“Democratic socialists believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically—to meet public needs, not to make profits for a few. To achieve a more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed through greater economic and social democracy so that ordinary Americans can participate in the many decisions that affect our lives. Democracy and socialism go hand in hand. All over the world, wherever the idea of democracy has taken root, the vision of socialism has taken root as well…”

This is the “social justice” and “spreading of wealth” that Obama promised during his campaign in 2008. He has kept that promise, to as Marx put it, - “Take from some according to their ability, and give to others according to their needs.”

Obama has advanced the international socialist ball in a BIG way and the vast majority of American citizens are scrambling to figure out what to do about it.

For any federal law to be “constitutional,” it must meet this minimum standard…

  1. It must be within the limited federal powers enumerated in the Constitution
  2. It must enjoy the support of the vast majority of "the governed," from which all federal powers are derived
  3. It must not infringe upon the individual rights of any citizen
  4. It must not infringe upon the rights of any state, protected by the Tenth Amendment
  5. It must become law by way of legal legitimate legislative process

Obama’s Health Care treachery violates all five of these standards and as a result, it cannot be allowed to stand. This is about much more than health care.

This is about a government allegedly of, by and for the people. A government which acts against its people cannot be a government of, by and for the people. That government is beyond broken - it is “unconstitutional” at its core.

Such a government has become “destructive” towards the very fundamental purpose of that government, to secure the unalienable individual right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

“ - whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

The people are not safe living under a government that operates with such little regard for the Law of this Land, the US Constitution.

What Democrats (socialists) did on their own, against the will of the vast majority of American citizens, cannot stand. If it is allowed to stand, then the people and their states have allowed their nation to be stolen by a relatively small cabal of Chicago thugs operating beyond the scope and authority granted them by the governed.

This is about much more than health care. This is about an overtly tyrannical government hell-bent upon altering the fundamental American foundations and shoving citizens into a future of slavery, in which their right to earn and own property no longer exists.

The people must find a way to unite and fight this tyranny, or they will doom all future generations to a life of communal servitude and equal indigence.

Communism and socialism have failed everywhere they have been tried. America cannot survive these principles either.

The Obama administration has acted far beyond its limited powers and the people have only a limited opportunity to reverse it all and block further erosion of the American ideals. May God bless those willing to stand, unite and fight for freedom.


JB Williams

"A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government." - Jefferson

The Snooper Report.
Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly


What About the United States Constitution?

Is the Constitution a Partisan Document?

By JB Williams

From all outward appearances, one would think that the U.S. Constitution is a partisan document loved and revered by the political right, so-called republicans, conservatives or constitutionalists, and hated or at least treated like an old worn out shoe no longer of any use by the political left, often referred to as democrats, liberals or progressives.

But how true is that first glance impression?

As a lifelong study of history and the Constitution, I have come to believe the Constitution as both a conservative and a liberal document.

Because it is based upon certain specific limited enumerated powers afforded the federal government, it is obviously a very conservative document in terms of limiting the scope and power of the federal government, made crystal clear by the Tenth Amendment which states – “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

It’s hard to take a more conservative view than that. But this means that the Constitution is also a very liberal document in terms of affording individual citizens and the states a maximum degree of freedom and liberty, free from elitist federal intrusions.

So, why do conservatives and liberals find themselves at odds when the U.S. Constitution was written in such a way as to represent the stated goals of both groups? A very limited government restricted to specific enumerated powers for conservatives, which provides a maximum degree of individual liberty for liberals?

As is always the case, the devil is in some of the modern day details, beginning with a very narrow and for the most part inaccurate definition of today’s political forces.

True conservatives are those who “seek to conserve” the founding principles and values of limited federal powers and maximum individual freedom. True liberals are those who seek a maximum degree of individual freedom, in the spirit of Thomas Jefferson, which requires limited federal power.

These two should find themselves on the same side of every political fight today, yet they don’t. Why?

In short, because everyone who calls themselves a conservative is not really a conservative and everyone who calls themselves a liberal is not really liberal today. If they were, they would all be on the same side of the fight against a runaway federal government.

The rub comes when we separate how we seek to govern others from how we seek to be governed by others.

Nobody wants to be governed by others. But too many see the need to govern others, as if that has no bearing on the scope and power of government, or what individual rights have to be traded in for the “greater common good” of governing others.

As an example, the line between those who support socialized medicine and those who don’t runs right down the line that separates those who will have to pay for it from those who don’t think they will. People expected to pay for socialized medicine oppose the notion, but people who don’t expect to pay for it like the idea.

Since individual health care is not an enumerated power of the federal government, according to the Tenth Amendment, it is not within their power and conservatives who oppose it are correct. But Jefferson liberals should oppose it as well, based upon the fact that the federal government must rob individuals of liberty in order to provide it.

My guess is, with more than 70% opposed to ObamaCare, both liberals and conservatives do oppose it. This explains why you see Republicans, Democrats and Independents throwing a fit at town hall meetings and marching in Tea Party and 912 events.

So, who are the 30% who support it and why do they support it? They are not conservatives and they are not liberals either.

They are Mother Jones “progressives” carrying forward the agenda of the Democratic Socialists of America, which is the joint political venture of international socialists and communists.

Being progressive is not about progress. Progressive is the new name and face of Marxism and this movement represents the 30% of Americans who prefer “free stuff” over freedom.

The other 70% of Americans are registered Republicans, Democrats and Independents, and they can be found in the “anti-establishment” movements known today as the Tea Party, 912 and town hall groups. They are conservative, liberal, libertarian, independent and concerned about constitutional restraints upon their runaway government.

Collectively, they are the vast majority of Americans and they have the power to shut down the agenda of the international left if they can find a way to cast off all of the political rhetoric of the past, aimed at keeping them all fighting each other instead of fighting the anti-American assault on freedom and liberty.

Bottom line – the U.S. Constitution protects the conservative and the liberal, the libertarian and the independent, the Republican and the Democrat. But if progressives (aka Marxists) succeed in replacing the Constitution, the law of this land, with the greater communal good of BIG government Marxism, then no American is safe from the tyrannical agenda of the international left.

Sooner or later, all Americans who want to live free in a constitutional republic will unify to defend this nation. At some point, they will have no choice but to do so. However, by then, there will be little left to save.

The challenge is to bring them all together now, while there is something left to save and a peaceful means by which to save it.

"A wise and frugal government, which shall leave men free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned - this is the sum of good government." - Jefferson

More at Memeorandum...

The Snooper Report.
Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly


The Future of Freedom and the 4th Branch

Here is another from JB Williams: read it, pass it along and PAY ATTENTION

Is it possible that the future of freedom rests in the hands of a Monroe County Tennessee Grand Jury? In an era of strange and hard to explain daily events, it might be more than possible.

We often speak of the three branches of the federal government and the hypothetical separation of powers between them – a separation no one could prove today.

For more than a hundred years now, we assumed that these three administrative branches, the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches, would provide adequate protections for the people and their future of freedom and liberty via checks and balance put in place by our nation’s Founders for that very purpose.

We assumed wrong… and the Founders were correct to assume that one day, a generation or two of Americans would fail to keep their elected officials in check, which is why they often spoke of a 4th branch of government, a branch seldom mentioned in America today.

The 4th branch of the federal government is “the people.”

When the other three branches of government fail to keep themselves in check, within the confines of the powers afforded them by the people and the states under the US Constitution, the 4th branch, the people, have the power and the obligation to put them back in check. But when is the last time you heard anyone speak of the 4th branch?

The final buck stops with us, “the people.” We are held accountable for what happens to this nation.

“The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive.” – Thomas Jefferson

We have come to expect Washington DC elites to live outside of the laws they pass - to institute laws they have no Constitutional authority to pass – and to see themselves as omni-powerful rulers operating with immunity, beyond the reach of the commoners.

We have forgotten our role in government, as the 4th branch, the final arbiter of truth and justice, and the final defenders of freedom and liberty, wherein the people take control of the situation whenever the other three branches of government become destructive of these ends.

Now, here is where the real lesson begins…

The 4th branch is the final wall of defense that stands between a future of freedom and a future of tyranny and slavery. When elected officials fail to keep themselves in check and the Supreme Court fails to step in and uphold the US Constitution as the law of this land, only the people, the 4th branch, can derail the destruction of our free republic.

“The republican is the only form of government which is not eternally at open or secret war with the rights of mankind.” – Thomas Jefferson

Today, we find ourselves in the presence of a runaway federal government. All three branches are working in concert towards the total destruction of the free republic. Not even the US Supreme Court, which has the power to reach down and take up the constitutionality of the actions taken by the legislative and executive branches, is willing to do so today.

That leaves the future of freedom and liberty squarely in the hands of the 4th branch, the people.

Some have been taught to believe that we have a government of, by and for the people, and that the people must live with the consequences of elections, even when elections are fraudulent and the people have been manipulated into that corner. They believe that no 4th branch exists, or that the 4th branch has no peaceful remedy beyond waiting for the next election cycle.

They are wrong on both counts…

The three branches of government exist to “serve” the people and the states, not to “rule”  over anyone. Our Declaration of Independence clearly states –  “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

The people have the power under this clause alone. But is this the only remedy left when all three administrative branches of the federal government become destructive of the nation?

The Bill of Rights begins with –  “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

If the people have the right to “peaceably assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances,” this means that the people, the 4th branch, have a remedy short of all out revolution. But what is it?

What is the mechanism by which the people can assemble and petition their government for redress?

  • Are the people limited to only a violent solution?
  • Are the people stuck with tyranny until the next election?
  • Are the people limited to public protests?
  • Are the people limited to letter, fax and email campaigns?
  • Are the people limited to signed petitions?

Are any of these things what the Founders had in mind when they wrote and ratified the Charters of Freedom?

A runaway government is not likely to hear any of these forms of dissent. An elite ruling class is not likely to concern themselves with such toothless measures. We have seen that these peaceful petitions for redress mean nothing to them.

The People’s Grand Jury is the Device

To petition the government is to do so within the legal system, to ask a court to step in and rule on the constitutionality of governments actions. I’m not referring to the Citizen Grand Juries being formed outside of the justice system in desperation, although they are constitutionally grounded in those efforts. I’m talking about the court appointed Grand Juries.

Justice Powell, in United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 343 (1974), stated: "The institution of the grand jury is deeply rooted in Anglo-American history. [n3] In England, the grand jury [p343] served for centuries both as a body of accusers sworn to discover and present for trial persons suspected of criminal wrongdoing and as a protector of citizens against arbitrary and oppressive governmental action. In this country, the Founders thought the grand jury so essential to basic liberties that they provided in the Fifth Amendment that federal prosecution for serious crimes can only be instituted by 'a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury.”

Clearly, the People’s Grand Jury is intended to serve the purpose of keeping the federal justice department in check related to wrongful oppressive prosecution of citizens for political witch hunts. But does the power of the People’s Grand Jury stop there?

“Cf. Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359, 361- 362 (1956). The grand jury's historic functions survive to this day. Its responsibilities continue to include both the determination whether there is probable cause to believe a crime has been committed and the protection of citizens against unfounded criminal prosecutions. Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 686-687 (1972)."

This means that the Grand Jury has TWO functions and TWO powers. To protect citizens from wrongful prosecution, and to review evidence to determine whether or not probable cause exists to determine if a crime has been committed.

Different states have different laws in place in this regard. Some states allow only a government prosecutor to present evidence to the Grand Jury. Other states allow any citizen to appear before the Grand Jury to present evidence of a crime.

This begs the question, who does the People’s Grand Jury belong to? Supreme Court Justice Anthony Scalia seems to answer this question in United States v. Williams…

In discussing that power and unique independence granted to the grand jury, the United States Supreme Court, in United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 at 48 (1992), Justice Scalia, delivering the opinion of the court, laid down the law of the land: " '[R]ooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history, Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420, 490 (1960) (Frankfurter, J., concurring in result), the grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It "'is a constitutional fixture in its own right.'" United States v. Chanen, 549 F.2d 1306, 1312 (CA9 1977) (quoting Nixon v. Sirica, 159 U.S. App. D.C. 58, 70, n. 54, 487 F.2d 700, 712, n. 54 (1973)), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 825 (1977). ' " - Justice Scalia also stated, that "the grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not preside."

This means that the People’s Grand Jury belongs to the people, as a means of keeping government in check. According to Justice Scalia, it "'is a constitutional fixture in its own right.'" - "the grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not preside."

The People’s Grand Jury is again, the people’s last legal line of defense against an abusive government, providing a peaceful legal remedy and a place for the people to assemble peaceably and petition for redress of grievances.

Monroe County Tennessee

On December 1, 2009, Ret. Lt. Commander Walter Fitzpatrick III sat before a Grand Jury screening panel of four men and presented evidence of obstruction within the Monroe County justice system – obstruction intended to prevent Commander Fitzpatrick from presenting evidence of the highest crime in our land, the crime of Treason and the accused is the sitting president of the United States.

Tennessee law allows any citizen to appear before the Grand Jury and present evidence of a crime. The Grand Jury has a fiduciary responsibility to review that evidence in good faith and determine whether or not sufficient evidence has been presented to justify further investigation and prosecution.

Other states like Wisconsin have what is called “John Doe Proceedings” in which the identity of the citizen is kept secret, like the identity of the Grand Jury members, especially when evidence of crimes by the government are being presented.

Jury Foremen Gary Pettway was accused of obstruction. Yet it was Pettway who “leaked” false information to Knoxville News WVLT, stating that the Monroe County Grand Jury would issue a finding on Monday December 7th. That never happened…

On December 3rd, the local paper, the Monroe County Advocate, published false information about the events of December 1st. – “Fitzpatrick is claiming President Obama is actually Barry Soetoro and was not born in the United States and is therefore serving illegally. - Fitzpatrick has made his case before the Monroe County grand jury before, but Tuesday was the first time that an indictment might have been returned. The grand jury indictments will be sealed until Dec. 7,”

Fitzpatrick was not allowed to present to the Grand Jury on that day. He was only allowed to present to a four person partial panel of the Jury, as Gary Pettway ushered the other Jury members out of the chamber before Fitzpatrick entered the room. They state that “indictments will be sealed until Dec. 7,” indicating that indictments will be handed down, even though Fitzpatrick was blocked from presenting evidence to the full Grand Jury.

On December 8, the day after the Jury was supposed to “unseal indictments,” the Monroe Advocate issued a second round of false claims – “Despite a brief media frenzy, indictments sought against President Obama, a grand jury foreman and an assistant district attorney were not returned by the Monroe County grand jury.” – when in fact, the Jury had neither indicted, or notified Fitzpatrick that no indictment would be coming.

Where is the Monroe County Advocate getting its information? Gary Pettway perhaps? – As of this writing, the Monroe County Grand Jury has issued no formal public statement about the Treason charges still pending in Monroe County Tennessee.

The People’s Grand Jury

Whether they know it or not, the future of freedom and the 4th branch may rest with the Grand Jury of Monroe County Tennessee today. Thank God it doesn’t rest with the Monroe County Advocate, which can’t seem to get their facts right.

The people’s first amendment right to redress rests at the People’s Grand Jury. Because no court appointed jury has acted upon a mountain of evidence against Barack Hussein Obama, some citizens have taken to forming Citizen Grand Juries in a desperate attempt to find justice in America. Others have convened Continental Congress meetings, just like the original Continental Congress, in their desperate effort to take their nation back from tyrannical thugs.

But if the Monroe County Grand Jury finds the mountain of evidence against Obama sufficient to order further investigation, the people’s jury might just stop what could come if the people find that they have NO RIGHT of REDRESS anywhere in the US legal system…

I pray that some court or jury somewhere in the country finds a way to let the people’s evidence be heard, because I worry about what happens to my country in the coming days and weeks, if the people’s right of redress is limited to a full scale revolution.

Our right of redress must not be limited to violent revolt. More than 60% of American citizens oppose everything going on in Washington DC today. I pray that the courts have the capacity to remedy the situation, before angry citizens decide that there is no peaceful solution.

So, what are we waiting for?

The Snooper Report.
Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly