Defend Israel

The Patriots Call
The Black Robe Regiment - The Patriots Call

Democrats party of Racism
Racism of the Democrat Party
Herman Cain - The DNC has BRAINWASHED most of the Blacks of this Nation
Racism - the Nemesis of the Democrat Party
Democrats invented racism and democrats HATE all blacks
The Snooper Report articles on Democrat invention of racism

The March on DC
Callin’ All the Clans Together
Sick and tired - marching towards the Constitution of the United States
We. Are. Finished. With.  DC.
We. Are. Finished. With. DC. - Addendum Part 1

Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It
Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It Part 2(?)
Civility: Leftinistra Own None Part Three
Obama, Civility and The Clansmen of Dumb
Brain Dead Leftinistra: Their Stoic Civility
Libtards Have No Class - Civility Escapes Their Brain Deadness
The States Will Be the Next Battlefield in the Fight Over ObamaCare
War Is Coming: Blood On Our Own Streets - Thanks Democrats
Civil War…
We Are In The Midst of Chaos and Civil War
Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die Trying
State’s Sovereignty or Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die - The Movement Marches On
The Country Surrounds The City

When They Came
Is The Left Still “Proud To Be a Left-Wing Extremist”?
Be It Known - Attention Unconstitutional Congress
Obama: One Big Ass Mistake America
Do Birthers Rock and Roll or Stop and Drool?
Good vs Evil…It Is Your Choice
I Apologize For My Nation
Obama’s Civilian National Security Forces (CNSF)
Obama’s Brown Shirts - Civilian National Security Forces
What Is It About The American Liberal?
The Plan To Destroy America
Another Soldier Has Been Given the Haditha Treatment!
Callin’ All The Clans Together
Callin’ All The Clans Together Show
A History of the List of 45
Constitutionality: The Movement
Vindication: Iraq’s Saddam and Al Qaeda Links Revealed
Redefining The Center or the Moderate
The HIC (Hoax In Charge) Going To Copenhagen
We Didn’t Start This Goddamn War!

Copy Cat Frauds of the IAVA

Contract With America
Snooper’s Declaration of Independence
Thanks Obama

Contract From America

Timothy McVeigh
Thoughts To Ponder and Reflect Upon
Snooper Report Vindication: Al Qaeda, TWA Flight 800 and OKC Bombing
Clinton alludes to 1995 bombing, says words matter

Missing 13th Amendment
TITLES OF “NOBILITY” AND “HONOR” - The Missing 13th Amendment

The Coup
Military Coup Against Obama

The United States Constitution
Our founding document wasn’t set in stone for a reason

Deepwater Horizon
Did Hugo Chavez Sink the Deepwater Horizon Oil Platform?

The New Right

Arizona Rising

Texas Wars

Editor's Choice


Powered by Squarespace



Wake Up GOP

Entries in Media Bias (15)


Trump Calls for Boycott of CNN Parent Company To Combat ‘Fake News’

Remember when AT&T was sued for their MONOPOLY of the phone industry DECADES ago? It needs to be done again! Google, FraudBook, Twitter, Yahoo and several others MUST be broken down in shame as well. At least the Justice Department is working on that at the moment.

I haven’t watched CNN since 1991.


After arriving in the United Kingdom for a state visit on Monday, President Donald Trump called for a boycott of CNN’s parent company, AT&T. “Just arrived in the United Kingdom. The only problem is that @CNN is the primary source of news available from the U.S. After watching it for a short while, I turned it off,” the president tweeted. … (go read the rest)

Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants

“Be still and know that I am God: …” Psalm 46:10


The Liberal Media Lie and the Paultard Liars

President Elect Sarah PalinI know Ron Paul.  He may not know me by now but I most certainly do know Ron Paul and he is an idiot.  He may know how to say and spell "CONSTITUTION"  but he most assuredly votes against the Constitution of the United States on a regular basis.  He may be right about getting rid of the Fed but that is all he is good at.  Even the marxist-sociopaths are good a very few things but who needs them and who in the hell wants a Ron Paul?  The Leftinistra do and I dare say that about 75% of the Paultards are in fact members of the Leftinistra.  Remember NY26?



Yesterday, Rush Limbaugh informed us that "Sixty-one percent of American adults -- including some who describe themselves as 'pro-choice' -- told Gallup in a survey conducted May 5-8 that abortion should be illegal in all or most circumstances".

For years, the liberal mainstream media have been telling us Conservatives to stay away from social/moral issues; they say such matters are losers for our side. While in reality, most of the country agrees with us conservatives. The libs are the real fringe loonies, not us.

The liberal media's lie regarding abortion caused me to think, "I wonder what else is the liberal media lying about?" For example, Sarah Palin.

The left and Republican elite say Sarah Palin would be our worst shot at winning the White House. OK, you Ron Paul supporters and Palin haters, please don't beat me up.  I am just talkin' here. Do not take this as an official endorsement of Palin.

I am simply saying, the liberal media keeps telling us the craziest most stupid thing we could do is select Palin as our 2012 presidential nominee. If the liberal media truly thought Palin could not beat Obama, wouldn't they be encouraging their despised tea party enemies to rally around the sure loser?  Why does the liberal media keep shoving republicans who are "lukewarm about the tea party" in our face calling them "serious" presidential candidates?

If the liberal media lied to us about the nation's feelings about abortion, why should we believe their rhetoric regarding the un-elect-ability of Palin?

These Leftinistra maroons did this same thing in NY26.  Get over it.
Sarah Palin WILL beat Obama and if anyone out there says any thing differently, they most assuredly are the Leftinistra...or a Paultard.
The Snooper Report
Join us as we Take Our Country Back
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

Media Bias - Byrd was Respected Voice of Senate, Thurmond was Foe of Integration

It is always amazing how the Leftinistra media always leave the facts out that Byrd was a KKK puker.

A tale of two obituaries.

The Snooper Report.
Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly


Marjah Offensive - Biggest Battle For Afghanistan

Dan Riehl: Afghanistan: Soldiers Seal Off Escape Routes As Major Battle Looms - CBS News: U.S. Troops Seal Off Taliban Escape Routes - Christian Science Monitor: Marjah offensive: Q&A on why it matters to Afghanistan war - Erik Wong: Marjah, The Fallujah Of Afghanistan: Largest Offensive Of Afghan War Launched - Daniel Foster: D-Day for the Afghanistan Troop Surge - Ace: Big, Big Offensive Begins in Afghanistan-- Largest Since Start of War - Justin Fishel: U.S., Afghan and NATO Forces Begin Offensive Against Taliban - Pat Dollard: Marjah: New Model War - New York Slimes: Afghan Offensive Is New War Model - Pat Dollard: “Substantial Progress Without Casualties” - Pat Dollard: Marjah - Ed Morrissey: Operation Moshtarak under way in Afghanistan’s Helmand province - Pat Dollard: One Marine KIA, One Brit KIA, In Marjah Offensive - Pat Dollard: All Marjah Objectives Met - But Toughest Fighting Lies In Mop Up - New York Slimes: Allied Troops Seize Taliban Posts; Fighting Is Sporadic - Drew M: Afghan Offensive Day 2 - Douglas V Gibbs: And Now Some Breaking News From Afghanistan. . . - Yahoo News: Anti-Taliban offensive on track: officials - Feed from Michael Yon at Instapundit - Mark Noonan: Latest News From Afghanistan - Erik Wong: GTFO: Afghani Civilian Exodus On Eve Of Massive US Advance -

NATO.  Obama.  Two strikes against anything good coming out of Afghanistan and that's just my assessment.  It will be up to the American Military to get the job done.

Whenever I had the duty to talk to a NATOite and/or a UNite, my stomach crawled.  I have all the Faith I need to have with the Soldiers and Marines and the SP people in place.  GO GET 'EM BOYS!

The news so far is good and "only" two have Fallen and God Bless them both.  I just hope the delays didn't let the little Taliban maroons get away.

I just wonder if the Obamedia will cover Afghanistan like they covered Iraq.

While another is geared towards war

this is Obama's war

The Snooper Report.
Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly


What The Hell Happened to MSLSD?

Memeorandum...Greg Sargent from the The Plum Line:  Meme Alert: MSNBC, Left Wing Equivalent Of Fox, Proves White House Hypocrisy?

The White House’s hard pushback against Fox News has spawned a backlash meme of sorts: That whatever the excesses of Fox, the Obama administration has no trouble benefitting from an equally biased network on the left, MSNBC.

Come on, this is B.S. Bias is a very difficult thing to quantify or measure, but it’s a real stretch to claim that MSNBC, while left-leaning in many ways, is Fox’s left-wing equivalent.

This meme got a boost last night when CNN’s Cambell Brown grilled White House senior adviser Valerie Jarrett on the Fox affair. After Jarrett said that “of course” Fox is biased, Brown pushed back: “Do you also think that MSNBC is biased?” Jarrett demurred. Ben Smith dubs this the White House’s “MSNBC problem.”

Sure, MSNBC has Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow, and Ed Schultz. But it’s debatable, to begin with, that they are polar opposites — in terms of their ideology or their relationship to reality — of Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck.

Put that aside, however. More to the point, it’s plainly obvious that there’s a much brighter line between reporting and commentary at MSNBC than there is at Fox.

Consider MSNBC’s daytime content. Morning Joe is hardly a liberal program. Throughout the day you get lots of reporting and commentary from Chuck Todd and David Shuster. Todd fits squarely in the “nonpartisan Beltway analyst” category. Shuster? Sure, he’s aggressive in debunking conservative attack lines, but agree with him or not, Shuster calls them as he sees them on the facts, and he’s fundamentally a reporter.

More to the point is MSNBC’s news judgment throughout the day, which contrasts sharply with that of Fox. You’d be hard pressed to argue that MSNBC’s choice of stories to report on is as ideologically driven as Fox’s editorial choices. There’s simply no equivalent on the MSNBC news side of Fox’s constant “news” coverage of the tea partiers, the czars, the ACORN story, the crusade against gay education adviser Kevin Jennings, etc. etc. The point is that Fox’s news judgment is far more ideologically motivated than MSNBC’s is.

I’d be very interested to know what other reporters and journos think on this one. Again, measuring “bias” is a very dicey thing to get into. But this one seems like an easy call.

The above article is one of those, "You've GOT to be kidding me" stories.  Right?  I mean, RIGHT?  Media bias in the news rooms.  Oops.  MSLSD?  Biased?  LOL!

Ben Smith at the Politico: The MSNBC problem

If the White House is going to adopt the pose as the enemy of ideological cable TV -- as opposed to just the enemy of its enemies -- the problem, Campbell Brown notes, will be MSNBC: [...]

I think I need to puke.

Then again, Obama's date nights are really sad...something about $74,000 diner dates.

“The notion that I just couldn’t take my wife out on a date without it being a political issue was not something I was happy with.”

Shut up Czarboe.

The Snooper Report.  Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly


Obamedia: Media Bias In The Networks

Hear Ye Hear Ye Hear Ye!

Balloon Story: Mika Brzezinski Says That Everyone At CBS She’s Known In The Last 10 Years Has Been A Liberal. Except One.

All "network news" groups, except one person, are why the Fox News outbreak?  They are CRITICAL of the Obamedia.

Screw this Fox News crap.

For years and years I have made mention of the news media's LAME DNC takes and their viscious assaults on ANYONE going up against them all.

More at Memeorandum...

The Snooper Report.  Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly


Jacob Weisberg: Obama's New Sycophant

This is frikkin' unbelievable...Newsweek: The O’Garbage Factor (Fox News isn't just bad. It's un-American)

Oh please.  I wonder if NBC is democratic enough, whatever democratic means.  The same goes for CBS, ABC, CNN or any other network news agency that USED to be MSM but now the LSM and why the Obamatards news agencies are TANKING!  And I mean tanking badly!  No wonder the Maoist Anita Dunn is attacking Fox News.  What did Murdoch do?  After letting all know just how MIRACULOUS his agencies ratings were, he FIRED an Obamatard!  GO GO FOX NEWS!

Here's the ObamaSycophant:

Last week, when White House Communications Director Anita Dunn charged the Fox News Channel with right-wing bias, Fox responded the way it always does. It denied the accusation with a straight face while proceeding to confirm it with its coverage.

Consider Fox's Web story on the episode. It quotes five people. Two of them work for Fox. All of them assert that administration officials are either wrong in substance or politically foolish to criticize the network. No one is cited supporting Dunn's criticisms or saying that it could make sense for Obama to challenge the network's power. It's a textbook example of a biased journalism. [...]

Can you believe this crap?  Gee.  I wonder if Olbermann gets to say his piece with no one asking him any questions and I wonder how many "spectators" the fool gets?

Jacob Weisberg.  Asshat.  Where do we get all of these asshats from?  The poor slob ends his tiny and intellectually free diatribe this way:

[...] Whether the White House engages with Fox is a tactical political question. Whether we journalists continue to do so is an ethical one. By appearing on Fox, reporters validate its propaganda values and help to undermine the role of legitimate news organizations. Respectable journalists—I'm talking to you, Mara Liasson—should stop appearing on its programs. A boycott would make Ailes too happy, so let's try just ignoring Fox, shall we? And no, I don't want to come on The O'Reilly Factor to discuss it. [...]

We journalists?  ROFLMAO!  I guess this jerk-off forgot all about the Articles of Journalism.  Silly Jacob.  How's that insecurity you have bellowing, eh?

But, heh!  I forgot the Gray lady in her hour of low ratings and readership...

The NY Slimes: The Battle Between the White House and Fox News

David Carr "seems to have" a decent voice but the only thing I can think of is that Fox News is winning this one.  It is a decent article but it ends this way...

[...] People who work in political communications have pointed out that it is a principle of power dynamics to “punch up “ — that is, to take on bigger foes, not smaller ones. A blog on the White House Web site that uses a “truth-o-meter” against a particular cable news network would not seem to qualify. As it is, Reality Check sounds a bit like the blog of some unemployed guy living in his parents’ basement, not an official communiqué from Pennsylvania Avenue.

The American presidency was conceived as a corrective to the royals, but trading punches with cable shouters seems a bit too common. Perhaps it’s time to restore a little imperiousness to the relationship. [END]

And there's a good dig on bloggers but, Mr Carr, WE ARE THE NEW MEDIA so bite me.

There's two places at Memeorandum for this and here...

I'm just wondering if anyone in the LSM ever gives a rat's ass about MSLSD?

The Snooper Report.  Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly


McClatchy News Watch: Contains Omissions, Misstatements and Lies

I am going to take some liberties in the name of Free Speech, Truth, Justice and the America Way while I rewrite an article written by Jonathan S. Landay and Warren P. Strobel with the McClatchy Newspapers.  The article was written on Thursday May 21, 7:10 pm ET.  These pathetic lightweights are obvious Obama Drones ala The Borg.  And, for your entertainment, I have two audio clips that describe the Obama Goons in the Obamedia.  The first one is from my friend Joshua P Allem.  The second clip is one I made.  Enjoy

Now, down to business.  The original article can be found here.  The original title of the article is, "Cheney's speech contained omissions, misstatements".  I haven't renamed the article yet because it would be too lengthy.  Suffice it to say that the authors of the piece are indeed Obama Drones and if it were possible to isolate the Honesty Gene, one would not be found in either author.

Click to read more ...


No bias here, just move along

via Right Wing News

Very good video of the merging of the Left Wing Blogs and the Main Stream Media.  

Cross Posted at Stix Blog


We Have Moved From Fact-Based Reporting to Savior-Based Reporting.

The title of this piece was swiped from Michelle Malkin's web site and can be found at the very bottom of her piece. She got it from Gov. Mark Sanford. Stephen Kruiser calls it Slobber-Jobbing.

Drool Catch UnitThe powers that be should really put an NC-17 rating on the next soft-core MSM porn that gets passed off as a presidential press conference.

The performance of the press during the conference was disturbingly devoid of any…what’s the word…oh, yeah…journalism.

Tony Blankley runs down what actually happened at the Most Perfect First Presidential Press Conference Ever in his syndicated column today. [...]

Yes. The "depressed" need to have their bibs issued before groveling at the loins of the Übermessias Obama. Or, is that [p]resident Clouseau? Do you think that if GWB had either tried to walk through a window or bumped his head on his chopper the media would have lambasted him for it? Oh. Wait. They did. Remember what the media said about President Ford? Amazing. However, thou shalt not mock the Übermessias Obama.

And, don't forget the "real" Obama/Lincoln connection:

Click to read more ...


ODS In Seattle Runs Deep - Obama's Fire Side Chats For the Modern Age?

This is, like Crazy Eddie would say, INSAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANE!  I have heard the expression before in the blog grapevines but I never really took the time to actually read about this until just a few moments ago.

Obama Fire Side Chats?  And there are some that claim the FDR tag on Obama originated from the Right?  Please.  STFU.

So, in FDR fashion and style (once again not an original thought to himself and always having to steal a persona from some where or someone else) the Czar is going to speak to "his people".  I hope so because he sure as hell isn't talking to me.  He has nothing to offer me that amounts to anything at all.  Then again, perhaps bravo sierra is now a commodity.

Maria Christensen writes at the Seattle Examiner, "President Obama to give first prime time press conference on Monday".  That sounds innocuous enough until the very first sentence.

Click to read more ...


Flipping The Partisan Switch

Where does friendship end and objectivity begin? Politico reported on January 27th about group phone calls between Clinton administration pals, and the comraderie the reporter spent a long time celebrating was quite heartwarming. Rahm Emanuel, chief of staff to the president, was brainstorming with friends like George Stephanopolous; ABC political anchor, about all things political. When Brent Bozell of the Media Research Center called out George Stephanopoulos as a tool of the Obama political machine, the charge was hardly surprising, and weakly rebuffed. Stephanopoulos, who served in the Clinton administration as a political advisor, is a professional Democrat just like Chris Matthews and others who worked in Democratic campaigns and moved easily into mouthpiece roles on major media outlets. The difference here is that Bozell claims that the specter of obvious collusion (as opposed to the collusion that is obvious by shared platitudes and perspectives among like-minded liberals) that makes ABC an arm of the White House propaganda machine. Bozell writes:

“What’s worse than the liberal media’s sycophantic coverage of President Barack Obama? ABC’s George Stephanopoulos actively helping design and deliver the Administration’s strategy and message - which he is then charged with reporting.

“Will Stephanopoulos be critical of the White House’s plans when he spends every morning helping to craft them? Not likely. He must from this point forward recuse himself from any reporting involving the Obama Administration.

“For Stephanopoulos, the line between journalist and liberal strategist would be completely obliterated were it not for the fact that it apparently never existed at all. He didn’t fail in his attempt at transformation from liberal operative to journalist – he never made the effort.”

ABC has sent out their spokeswoman to deflect the insinuations that something nefarious is underfoot. But listen to the words she uses:

“George Stephanopoulos has never advised Rahm Emanuel nor anyone else in the administration,” Lenzner said in a statement to on Jan. 30. “He speaks to Rahm as a friend and as a source. He speaks to several sources from both sides of the political aisle every day. And no, there is no conflict.”

Lenzner disputed parts of the Jan. 29 MRC release, specifically the following: “Tuesday’s Politico broke the news that ABC News' Chief Washington Correspondent and the host of ABC's Sunday morning news show This Week, George Stephanopoulos has daily phone discussions with White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel during which he helps formulate and shape the thoughts of and messaging for Emanuel and the Barack Obama Administration. And that he has had these conversations with Emanuel throughout his tenure at ABC.”

Lenzer told, “To say he helps formulate policy, that is absolutely not true.”

Lenzer expects us to believe that hyper-partisan liberals should be trusted to refuse using great advantages to ensure political success. She insists that like all journalists, Stephanopoulos is objective when the camera light goes red or the pen hits paper. But political animals, of either stripe, cannot simply turn off the partisan switch when it comes to framing the debate. We're not talking journalists here - though they try to have the influence they were never willing to work in a campaign to earn - we're talking ex-officials and administration hacks that find their way on to the media stage to promote their party's policies. George Stephanopoulos is using his vaunted position as host of This Week to protect and promote the current administration; he doesn't have to "formulate" policy, that's not his mission.

Brent Bozell argues that Stephanopoulos has to recuse himself on reporting news regarding this administration, and while that is impossible, it's about the only way to save the last shreds of credibility ABC holds when it comes to objectivity.

In a Feb. 4 letter to ABC's David Westin, Bozell said, “In a public statement on Thursday, we called on Mr. Stephanopoulos to give an explanation and to recuse himself from coverage of the Obama Administration if the Politico story is true. And we were clearly not alone in our indignation; we subsequently learned that your phone banks were shut down that same Thursday by who knows how many people who called to register their outrage over the report and this obvious breach of integrity.”

“With each passing day, ABC’s failure to speak to and about this issue tarnishes further your network’s reputation as a legitimate news entity,” Bozell’s letter reads. “We are calling on you now, as President of ABC News, to publicly address and resolve this issue. If the charges are false, provide the evidence. We will gladly accept it and consider the matter closed. If the charges are correct, then ABC News must address this publicly and comprehensively.”

The senior vice-president of ABC Kerry Smith says they've answered the charges sufficiently.  Judging from the evident bias that runs rampant in the main stream media, I think the issue will never be resolved.  The lesson here is that there's just one more reason to dismiss anything that is reported by ABC.


Americanized Marxism Recognized by NBC? (video)

As Gateway Pundit says, "Things must be really bad...Even the NBC hosts are turning on him.  (I thought NBC wanted socialism?)  NBC Host Jim Cramer Compares Obama to Lenin (Video)


That's some interesting developments there.  MANY times we brought up the personality traits if The One and placed side-by-side pictures of Obama and his mentor Lenin.  We were called all sorts of names by the people that whined about being called names.


Think Digress - Communist Proclaimer - B&M - Freepers - IHTM -



First Czar Obama Can Walk On Water But Not Through Windows

Going into his second week as the Marxist occupier of the White Marxist House, Obama's attention span is already waning.  I recall when the anti-Reagan sycophants started making fun of his medical conditions in his later years.  I wonder what their excuses are going to be for Obama not knowing that sliding glass doors have to be in the O.P.E.N. mode in order to pass through the "opening".  In a report in the NY Daily News via Jammie Wearing Fool, we are informed of the following:

It looks like President Obama hasn't gotten acquainted to his White House surroundings. On the way back to the Oval Office Tuesday, the President approached a paned window, instead of the actual door -- located a few feet to his right.

Doors didn't open automatically for Obama’s predecessor either. While making a hasty exit from a 2005 press conference in Beijing, former President George W. Bush tugged on the handles of a door, only to find it locked.

Bush laughed off the blunder, but the pictures still live on as part of Bush's lame duck legacy. However, there was little note taken of Obama's rookie mistake.

Obama, who was returning from meeting with Congressional leaders, may have been distracted by Republicans' icy reception to his $825 billion stimulus package, which is poised to pass on Wednesday even without a groundswell of Republican support.

OOPS!  At least President Bush knew that there was a door there and couldn't be traversed without actually opening it and that was in China!  This is the White Marxist House in DC for crying out loud.  What a putz.

One more thing.  The media is real quiet about this.  Übermessias Obama did a dumb and tainted his "Übermessias" rancor.


Hillary Takes Credit For The Troop Surge [UPDATED]



OK. This is what we have been expecting for quite some time. As the Defeatocrats ignore the successes of the Troop Surge and Victory in Iraq is imminent, the Leftinistra have been consorting and their Spin Machines have come up with a plan...pretend they were for the Troop Surge and take all credit for the Victory in Iraq. I have written about this on my "old blog" Take Our Country Back and I will dig up those posts and place them here fairly soon.

HT to Gateway Pundit for the data here presented for our readers and subscribers:

It Has Begun...Hillary Takes Credit For Surge She Opposed!!

Imagine that. To set the damn record straight, please recall that the Defeatocrats INCLUDING Czarina the Budding Leninist opposed the Bush Troop Surge from the beginning. Hillary's "sudden" turn around and accepting the credit for the successes of the Bush Troop Surge requires the willful suspension of disbelief, as she herself said about General Petraeus' testimony before the CONgress way back in September of 2007. Remember that one? This is unbelievable but it has been expected.

From Gateway: (we at A Newt One concur)
Judith Apter Kliinghoffer at the History News Network posted this amazing attempt by Hillary Clinton on Meet the Press to take credit for the success in Iraq even though she opposed the Bush Surge that brought about this success:

MR. RUSSERT: If General Petraeus says, "Senator, in September you called the surge the suspension of belief. It has worked, and you know it's worked"--let me finish--"you can see on the ground. I'm saying to you, Senator, or president-elect Clinton, don't destroy Iraq. It's working, the surge is working. Keep troops there just a few more months to get this reconciliation complete."

SEN. CLINTON: ...The point of the surge was to quickly move the Iraqi government and Iraqi people. That is only now beginning to happen, and I believe in large measure because the Iraqi government, they watch us, they listen to us. I know very well that they follow everything that I say. And my commitment to begin withdrawing our troops in January of 2009 is a big factor, as it is with Senator Obama, Senator Edwards, those of us on the Democratic side. It is a big factor in pushing the Iraqi government to finally do what they should have been doing all along.
Amazing!She voted to surrender Iraq with the rest of the Democrats-- a move that would have brought total destruction to the country.
Now, she wants to take credit for its success!
Truly, amazing!

Today, Hillary Clinton also blasted antiwar Barak Obama on the War in Iraq.

And, yet here's a look at Hillary Clinton's many stands on Iraq:


I, Snooper, have willfully suspended my disbelief. Simply amazing how so many will swallow this creeps' bullshit lockstep and goosestep.

Hillary Clinton on October 2, 2002:

"So it is with conviction that I support this resolution as being in the best interest of our nation. A vote for it is not a vote to rush to war. It is a vote that puts awesome responsibility in the hands of our president."
Hillary Clinton on February 7, 2007:
"Nearly four years ago our president rushed us into war in Iraq."
Yet today, this troubled and dishonest politician is bashing antiwar Barak Obama for his stand against the war we are now winning.

Hillary also attacked Barak Obama for raising the race issue!

Who wants change?

This woman is certainly NOT ready for the Big Times and is clearly unfit for command.

Catch the wave at memeorandum right here...

Read Heading Right's take:
Hot Air:
Meet The Depressed video here:
Riehl World View:
Suitably Flip:
Wake Up America:
Flopping Aces:
Don Surber now steps in:
The Astute Bloggers:
Weasel Zippers:
Snakes and Snails:
Right Voices:
Protein Wisdom:
Amy Proctor:

I wonder why General David Petraeus sent a letter to Debbie Lee of Move America Forward a letter of thanks for supporting the troops and he didn't send one to Hillary?