Navigation

DISSENT!

Defend Israel

The Patriots Call
The Black Robe Regiment - The Patriots Call

Democrats party of Racism
Racism of the Democrat Party
Herman Cain - The DNC has BRAINWASHED most of the Blacks of this Nation
Racism - the Nemesis of the Democrat Party
Democrats invented racism and democrats HATE all blacks
The Snooper Report articles on Democrat invention of racism

The March on DC
Callin’ All the Clans Together
Sick and tired - marching towards the Constitution of the United States
We. Are. Finished. With.  DC.
We. Are. Finished. With. DC. - Addendum Part 1

Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It
Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It Part 2(?)
Civility: Leftinistra Own None Part Three
Obama, Civility and The Clansmen of Dumb
Brain Dead Leftinistra: Their Stoic Civility
Libtards Have No Class - Civility Escapes Their Brain Deadness
The States Will Be the Next Battlefield in the Fight Over ObamaCare
War Is Coming: Blood On Our Own Streets - Thanks Democrats
Civil War…
We Are In The Midst of Chaos and Civil War
Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die Trying
State’s Sovereignty or Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die - The Movement Marches On
The Country Surrounds The City

When They Came
Is The Left Still “Proud To Be a Left-Wing Extremist”?
Be It Known - Attention Unconstitutional Congress
Obama: One Big Ass Mistake America
Do Birthers Rock and Roll or Stop and Drool?
Good vs Evil…It Is Your Choice
I Apologize For My Nation
Obama’s Civilian National Security Forces (CNSF)
Obama’s Brown Shirts - Civilian National Security Forces
What Is It About The American Liberal?
The Plan To Destroy America
Another Soldier Has Been Given the Haditha Treatment!
Callin’ All The Clans Together
Callin’ All The Clans Together Show
A History of the List of 45
Constitutionality: The Movement
Vindication: Iraq’s Saddam and Al Qaeda Links Revealed
Redefining The Center or the Moderate
The HIC (Hoax In Charge) Going To Copenhagen
We Didn’t Start This Goddamn War!

Copy Cat Frauds of the IAVA

Contract With America
Snooper’s Declaration of Independence
Thanks Obama

Contract From America

Timothy McVeigh
Thoughts To Ponder and Reflect Upon
Snooper Report Vindication: Al Qaeda, TWA Flight 800 and OKC Bombing
Clinton alludes to 1995 bombing, says words matter

Missing 13th Amendment
TITLES OF “NOBILITY” AND “HONOR” - The Missing 13th Amendment

The Coup
Military Coup Against Obama

The United States Constitution
Our founding document wasn’t set in stone for a reason

Deepwater Horizon
Did Hugo Chavez Sink the Deepwater Horizon Oil Platform?

MSLSD Lies
The New Right

Arizona Rising

Texas Wars

Editor's Choice






SEARCH HERE


Powered by Squarespace

1980

1984

Wake Up GOP

Entries in Obama Stacking SCOTUS (5)

Sunday
May312009

Sonia Sotomayor, Free Speech and Activism

The would-be SCOTUS Justice doesn't like the term "douche-bag" for some reason yet she certainly does think her defecation doesn't have any odor.  (How's that you PC Nazis?)

I ran across this story the other day: "Sotomayor Ruled in 'D-Bag Case'"  Apparently, a teenager used the term douche-bag and got herself into trouble with a school district.  You know.  That indoctrination system where the captive-held audience is "schooled" in what is right to say and that which is left to say.

[...] She sided against a student in the infamous “douche bag” case, and that has upset some free-speech advocates. [...]

Free speech advocates?  Free speech advocates?  Exercising one's constitutional rights to express oneself is now an advocasy group?  And here I thought all this while that a constitutional right was merely one of those inalienable rights things.  However, to be fair, the article did mention "some" free speech advocates.  From that, we can extrapolate that the "other" free seech advocates are limited in their definitions of free speech and aparenty, Sonia is in that "other" category.

Click to read more ...

Friday
May292009

Texas US Senator John Cornyn Needs To Resign

As many of you know, I at one time supported John Cornyn.  Not any longer.  He made an announcement a while back that he was throwing his weight behind Arlen Specter a few days before Specter made his way back to the Party of his first love.  Then, he threw his weight behind Charlie Crist over a staunch conservative in Florida, Marco Rubio.

Today, Sen Cornyn said: "I think it's terrible."  What does he think is so terrible?  I am glad you asked.  here it is.

A top Senate Republican is taking aim at recent statements from conservative commentators Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich suggesting Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor is a "racist." [...]

I suppose it would be a good idea, then, that whenever Sen Cornyn says the sky is blue we had all better go look for ourselves to be sure.  I suppose calling a shovel a shovel just might be offensive to the shovel.  Bringing out the fact that Sonia Sotomayor is in fact a racist might be considered to be offensive to her racism taint.  So, extrapolating, it could be offensive to Sen Cornyn classifying him officially as a Democrat in Drag.  Too bad.  I am through with Senator Cornyn and have notified him accordingly and, once again, I will forward him this link as I have the others.

Click to read more ...

Wednesday
May272009

On Critiques of Sonia Sotomayor

Headline at Hot Air: Gibbs warns: Be "exceedingly careful" in how you criticize Sotomayor

David Frum headline:  "WATCH WHAT YOU SAY"

CNN's PoliticalTicker: Steele: GOP must be careful on Sotomayor

ABC's Polital Punch: Gingrich Calls Sotomayor "Racist"

Obama's little boy Gibbles and Bits...

Obama's little boy Gibbles and Bits - click for video

OK.  Going out on a limb here on my critique of the racist, bigot and libtard hack activist sycophant of Obama which, by the way, would more than likely be willing to kill to be the #1 Obama Seat Cushion Sniffer.

60% of her decisions are overturned by the Court she so aspires to be a Jurist on.  I guess there are no alterior motives on her part or that other moron that nominated a fellow racist and bigoted Marxist buffoon.

More critiques at Memorandum...

My initial critique can be found here:  Sonia Sotomayor Nominated to the SCOTUS

My initial critique was developed by the very person doing the nominating and the Obamedia scurrying and flitting about trying to get in front of the line to sniff the seats Sonia farts in.  I know that isn't very scientific but, my 41 years of following American politics just lends viability of my critiques.

The Snooper Report.  Join us as we Take Our Country Back.
Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

Tuesday
May262009

Sonia Sotomayor Nominated to the SCOTUS

Updated on Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:58 by Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey

Updated on Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:10 by Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey

Updated on Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:46 by Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey

Updated on Tue, May 26, 2009 at 16:39 by Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey

Updated on Tue, May 26, 2009 at 17:03 by Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey

Updated on Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:16 by Registered CommenterMark "Snooper" Harvey

Well, there it is.  An individual that came out and said a few weeks ago that the court of appeals make national policy via the bench is now a nominee to the Supreme Court of the United States.  More at Memeorandum...

Obama presented the usual song and dance about the sob stories and failed to mention the qualifications of his nominee.  Thanks to all the people of "principle" that brought this about.

See CQ Politics ...

Click to read more ...

Monday
Feb232009

Obama Will Pack the Supreme Court!

THE SUPREME COURT RENEWAL ACT OF 2009

The proponents do not all agree on all of them, but are unanimous that Congress should soon reconsider the law applicable to the Supreme Court of the United States:

The Microsoft Word document is about 77kb and contains a set of four proposed “reforms” .  The “reform” of greatest concern is one to pack the court.

proposal i: regular appointments to
the supreme court

The following is quoted from the narrative accompanying the proposed code.

One question to be considered is the prospect that as Justices retain power for extended lengths of time, appointments to the Court are made so infrequently as to diminish the likelihood that the Court’s many important policy decisions will reflect the moral and political values of the contemporary citizens they govern.

The first reform presented here therefore provides for regular biennial appointments of new Justices selected by the then sitting President and Senate in order to assure timely rotation within the membership of the Court. To assure a Court of nine Justices, this will require a modification of the duties of Justices who have remained on the Court for more than eighteen years. A variation on this specific proposal was advanced and widely discussed in 2005. It won approval from many, including bar leaders and former judges. Most opposition rested on a constitutional argument that any term or age limits imposed by Congress would violate Article III and require a constitutional amendment. But no proposal for such an amendment has been advanced, and we see no serious constitutional problem in legislating regularized appointments with diminished but continuing roles for those Justices holding office for very long terms.

Click to read more ...