Defend Israel

The Patriots Call
The Black Robe Regiment - The Patriots Call

Democrats party of Racism
Racism of the Democrat Party
Herman Cain - The DNC has BRAINWASHED most of the Blacks of this Nation
Racism - the Nemesis of the Democrat Party
Democrats invented racism and democrats HATE all blacks
The Snooper Report articles on Democrat invention of racism

The March on DC
Callin’ All the Clans Together
Sick and tired - marching towards the Constitution of the United States
We. Are. Finished. With.  DC.
We. Are. Finished. With. DC. - Addendum Part 1

Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It
Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It Part 2(?)
Civility: Leftinistra Own None Part Three
Obama, Civility and The Clansmen of Dumb
Brain Dead Leftinistra: Their Stoic Civility
Libtards Have No Class - Civility Escapes Their Brain Deadness
The States Will Be the Next Battlefield in the Fight Over ObamaCare
War Is Coming: Blood On Our Own Streets - Thanks Democrats
Civil War…
We Are In The Midst of Chaos and Civil War
Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die Trying
State’s Sovereignty or Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die - The Movement Marches On
The Country Surrounds The City

When They Came
Is The Left Still “Proud To Be a Left-Wing Extremist”?
Be It Known - Attention Unconstitutional Congress
Obama: One Big Ass Mistake America
Do Birthers Rock and Roll or Stop and Drool?
Good vs Evil…It Is Your Choice
I Apologize For My Nation
Obama’s Civilian National Security Forces (CNSF)
Obama’s Brown Shirts - Civilian National Security Forces
What Is It About The American Liberal?
The Plan To Destroy America
Another Soldier Has Been Given the Haditha Treatment!
Callin’ All The Clans Together
Callin’ All The Clans Together Show
A History of the List of 45
Constitutionality: The Movement
Vindication: Iraq’s Saddam and Al Qaeda Links Revealed
Redefining The Center or the Moderate
The HIC (Hoax In Charge) Going To Copenhagen
We Didn’t Start This Goddamn War!

Copy Cat Frauds of the IAVA

Contract With America
Snooper’s Declaration of Independence
Thanks Obama

Contract From America

Timothy McVeigh
Thoughts To Ponder and Reflect Upon
Snooper Report Vindication: Al Qaeda, TWA Flight 800 and OKC Bombing
Clinton alludes to 1995 bombing, says words matter

Missing 13th Amendment
TITLES OF “NOBILITY” AND “HONOR” - The Missing 13th Amendment

The Coup
Military Coup Against Obama

The United States Constitution
Our founding document wasn’t set in stone for a reason

Deepwater Horizon
Did Hugo Chavez Sink the Deepwater Horizon Oil Platform?

The New Right

Arizona Rising

Texas Wars

Editor's Choice


Powered by Squarespace



Wake Up GOP

« The Corruption Class: Quite A Record | Main | Hillary Ain't Done Yet »

Hillary The Rodham Clinton The Unconstitutional Secretary of State

Judicial Watch Announces Hillary Clinton Constitutionally Ineligible to Serve as Secretary of State (12.2.08)

Judicial Watch Files Lawsuit Challenging Hillary Clinton Appointment on Behalf of State Department Foreign Service Officer (1.29.09)

The issue is The United States Constitution but, don't let that get in the way, because as Gabriel Malor states over at Ace of Spades: (there is precedent)

[...] Is the case going to get anywhere? Doubtful. They let William Saxbe get away with it in the 1970s, so there's precedent. Also, who has standing? As with the Obama Birther lawsuits, it's difficult to find someone who has suffered injury to a protected interest. [...]

So, because something was done unconstitutionally and illegally before, it is OK to do it again?  That kind of round-robin buffoonery is what has gone wrong in this Nation.  The attitude now is, "Hey.  We did it before so it is OK to do it now."  I'll remember that when I get my next speeding ticket.  All I need to do is go to court and say, "Hey.  I was speeding last week and it was fine.  What's the difference?"

What does the US Constitution expressly state?  Article 1, Section 6:

The Senators and Representatives shall receive a compensation for their services, to be ascertained by law, and paid out of the treasury of the United States. They shall in all cases, except treason, felony and breach of the peace, be privileged from arrest during their attendance at the session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any speech or debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other place.

No Senator or Representative shall, during the time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil office under the authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time: and no person holding any office under the United States, shall be a member of either House during his continuance in office.

The "it's difficult to find someone who has suffered injury to a protected interest" meme is pathetically ill-conceived and stated.  In addition, that statement is flawed from its conception.  What's wrong with abiding by the United States Constitution?  The people that have "suffered injury" are the American People.  When the political leadership usurps the US Constitution to suit an end, why then should We The People abide by the US Constitution?  What are our constraints and obligations to it?  Because our elected cockroaches don't give a damn we shouldn't either?

And, the very selection of The Rodham is flawed.  She "promised a new era in American diplomacy".  Gateway Pundit wants to know if her prior "new era" is going to be the same as the "new new era".  I would say that The Rodham will be tomorrow as she has always been in the egotistical budding Leninist.  I wonder what she will do with the philanderer?

Every Senator that voted for her confirmation needs to be replaced and I don't care who they are.  If we cannot trust our elected cockroaches to abide by the US Constitution, we can go one of two ways.  Do as they do and ignore the Law of The Land and do as we please or replace them with strict Constitutionalists.  Which way would be more productive?  If you have an answer, feel free to place them in the comments section.

I reject the "Saxbe fix".  It was unconstitutional then.  It is unconstitutional now.  Nowhere in the Constitution does it authorize the bypass of the stated text and context by "undoing an emolument".

In a previously published observation, those enamored by and supporting The Rodham have simply been beguiled.

As a matter of record, I will add to this post via the "update" function, the Judicial Watch articles in full.  The above is simply my observations.

References (2)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.