Defend Israel

The Patriots Call
The Black Robe Regiment - The Patriots Call

Democrats party of Racism
Racism of the Democrat Party
Herman Cain - The DNC has BRAINWASHED most of the Blacks of this Nation
Racism - the Nemesis of the Democrat Party
Democrats invented racism and democrats HATE all blacks
The Snooper Report articles on Democrat invention of racism

The March on DC
Callin’ All the Clans Together
Sick and tired - marching towards the Constitution of the United States
We. Are. Finished. With.  DC.
We. Are. Finished. With. DC. - Addendum Part 1

Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It
Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It Part 2(?)
Civility: Leftinistra Own None Part Three
Obama, Civility and The Clansmen of Dumb
Brain Dead Leftinistra: Their Stoic Civility
Libtards Have No Class - Civility Escapes Their Brain Deadness
The States Will Be the Next Battlefield in the Fight Over ObamaCare
War Is Coming: Blood On Our Own Streets - Thanks Democrats
Civil War…
We Are In The Midst of Chaos and Civil War
Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die Trying
State’s Sovereignty or Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die - The Movement Marches On
The Country Surrounds The City

When They Came
Is The Left Still “Proud To Be a Left-Wing Extremist”?
Be It Known - Attention Unconstitutional Congress
Obama: One Big Ass Mistake America
Do Birthers Rock and Roll or Stop and Drool?
Good vs Evil…It Is Your Choice
I Apologize For My Nation
Obama’s Civilian National Security Forces (CNSF)
Obama’s Brown Shirts - Civilian National Security Forces
What Is It About The American Liberal?
The Plan To Destroy America
Another Soldier Has Been Given the Haditha Treatment!
Callin’ All The Clans Together
Callin’ All The Clans Together Show
A History of the List of 45
Constitutionality: The Movement
Vindication: Iraq’s Saddam and Al Qaeda Links Revealed
Redefining The Center or the Moderate
The HIC (Hoax In Charge) Going To Copenhagen
We Didn’t Start This Goddamn War!

Copy Cat Frauds of the IAVA

Contract With America
Snooper’s Declaration of Independence
Thanks Obama

Contract From America

Timothy McVeigh
Thoughts To Ponder and Reflect Upon
Snooper Report Vindication: Al Qaeda, TWA Flight 800 and OKC Bombing
Clinton alludes to 1995 bombing, says words matter

Missing 13th Amendment
TITLES OF “NOBILITY” AND “HONOR” - The Missing 13th Amendment

The Coup
Military Coup Against Obama

The United States Constitution
Our founding document wasn’t set in stone for a reason

Deepwater Horizon
Did Hugo Chavez Sink the Deepwater Horizon Oil Platform?

The New Right

Arizona Rising

Texas Wars

Editor's Choice


Powered by Squarespace



Wake Up GOP


Hillary: 'No Appetite' for Bush Impeachment

NewsMax must cause Hillary and her blind-as-bats followers much consternation. Hopefully, they suffer from sleep deprivation as well. Hillary, in her ever incessant appeasement mode, manages to aggravate and agitate many others in the various groups she seeks to garner support from. When she angers potential supporters in other groups as she pleases potential supporters in different groups, she has staff members making appearance schedules around the country soothing ruffled feathers.

This statement REALLY ruffled some feathers: "...Clinton said there does not appear to be the "appetite or support" in Congress to try to impeach Bush, but "we're going to have to reform the government and these unqualified cronies." And who would these unqualified cronies be? And what has the president done to deserve impeachment? Does she not read the Constitution? The guidelines therein are exactly explicit. I find it amazing, but not unexpected, that the fools touting impeachment procedures never back their allegations up with what constitutional violations the president has allegedly committed.

Perhaps this statement can shed some light onto the darkness of Queen Hillary..."If this president does not end this war before he leaves office, when I am president, I will..." This statement has one of those "sound good" qualities to those that have no understanding as to the reason(s) we are at war with terrorists. Also, Hillary, and others, offer no substantial or viable suggestions as to HOW "they will end the war". DO they? Has anyone ever heard an offering as to "how"?

"...We are ready to try to end this war in Iraq. I am so proud of your Senator Harry Reid..." Proud of Mr Defeatist himself? I bet she is waffling at this one. For an depth explanations as to why I say this, it is abundantly clear...she has made no comments in reference to the Surrender Monkey protests conducted at the Reid and Pelosi camps in three cities, a coordinated effort by Patriotic Americans. Do I question Hillary's patriotism? Well, for one thing, I am not sure as to where her allegiance is sworn to. If it is for her socialistic tendencies and beliefs, I would say she is no more an American Patriot than say King Assad was.

These statements of Hillary's were made waaaaaaaaay back in April 2007 and I am pretty sure she is trying to sweep them under her socialist rug in her skeleton closet.


Hillary: Socialism In Womens' Wages

Rich Lowry has written a piece entitled, "The Great Clinton/Obama Feminist Pander." Kind of catchy, isn't it? It opens up as follows: "The front-runners in the Democratic presidential race have discovered the power of an idea whose time has passed: socialism in women's wages. Its power is in pandering to feminist voters, and its time passed because it never made any sense even when it was a bright, shiny new bad idea some 30 years ago."

UH OH! a "shiny new bad idea some 30 years ago." Yeah. I remember those days. ERA. Bra burning. If it feels good, do it. Rampant immorality pretty much everywhere you looked or went. Anti-establishment. The counter THERE was a fine upstanding group of people right there, eh? Take a look at my avatar and you will see two perfect examples of the counter culture. One became president and the other is a wanna-be. Lord have mercy.

The two, Hillary and Obama but primarily Hillary, think that they can legislate morality or legislate good behavior. Socialists think this way, naturally. It is about control. Don't like something? Make a law. It matters not to Hillary and those like her that there are already laws on the books making it illegal to discriminate and commit prejudice. There's that morality legislation again. Does it work?

"...Hillary Clinton has renewed her push for her Paycheck Fairness Act, and Sen. Barack Obama has endorsed the Fair Pay Act. Whenever the word "fair" features so prominently in Democratic legislation, the odds are that it is economically illiterate..." He has a point. All this kind of legislation does is to create more costs for the employers. The laws already enforce equal pay for equal work but this, evidently, is not "good enough". Sometimes I think there is a secret government agency somewhere that sits around and creates new definitions of words. Like distorting the Constitution of the United States claiming it is a living and breathing document. I have seen the official display of the Constitution and I didn't see any life-support equipment hooked up to the vacuum sealed box it "lives" in.

"...What Clinton and Obama want to establish is the more nebulous concept of "comparable worth," or equal pay for different work in female- and male-dominated professions. The Obama-endorsed bill mandates equal pay for "equivalent jobs," while Clinton's bill would establish voluntary "guidelines to enable employers to evaluate job categories" -- all in the cause of increasing wages in female-dominated jobs beyond that determined by the market..." There's that socialism garbage again. Who is it that defines these terms the socialists invent to "sound good" or that "appeals" to the ignorant? The "voluntary guidelines" is another scary term which in the end, costs employers more funds, thus slicing into their profit margins. AH! Socialists don't like that evil profit thing unless it is theirs to have and to hold until death do they part. Hillary is a very dangerous woman, make no mistake.

The socialist Hillary suffers from bad data and wrong-headed thinking. My Dad used to call it stinkin'-thinkin'. She is under the delusion that women only make 77% of what men make. In my line of work, I haven't seen that in years and years and rightfully so. Baruch College economist June O'Neill finds -- adjusting for factors like schooling, lifetime work experience, and workplace characteristics -- that the gap almost disappears, with women making 95 percent of men's wages.

A "woman" said that, Miss Queen Hillary. Many more, the majority, of economists have similar figures so where oh where is this mythical "gap"?

"The main source of productivity differences between women and men stems from the lesser amount of time and energy that many women can commit to labor market careers as a result of the division of labor within the family," O'Neill writes. "Women continue to work part time more than men and to choose work situations such as work in nonprofit institutions and occupations that more easily can be accommodated with home responsibilities."

And therein lies the "gap" issue. Women CHOOSE "lesser" jobs to stay home and raise their children instead of allowing a Putrid (Public) School System raise their children thus, they have lesser paying jobs. It is "Rather" simple to see once you take Hillary's lies out of the equation.

The article ends thusly, sure to irritate the hell out of The Hillary: "Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama might wish this fact weren't so, but there's no way for them to legislate it out of existence, even with a very bad, dated idea."


Senator Wire-Tap

The DNC tenet of Double Standard as a norm should really come to no surprise to anyone, should it? I get a snicker-snicker/snort-snort every time I visit Hillary's blog.  Her blind bats follow her scent from place to place, being the trolls and uninformed that they are. Hillary can talk it up very well but being referred to as a compassionate and wonderful woman is an insult to every compassionate person and to every Rosie the Fruit Loop.  Alas!  As a friend of mine has said on another blog, I have digressed before even getting started.

Where to begin?  There are so many starting places.  I am referring to the title of this particular post, Senator Wire-Tap.  I have placed this post in the category of "Character" because Hillary has none. She shrills herself into prominence. She scares people into helping her.  She has a long history of utilizing unsavory characters, just like herself, to further her agenda of complete control over all around her.  Here is a place where one can spend some time learning about a man that Hillary has hired to help her "get ahead" of others.  Be prepared to spend some time there but don't let Hillary know...if you know what I mean.

Hillary's Shadow Team is a collection of thugs, creeps and folks you steer clear of when eye contact is made.  "When covering Clinton scandals, journalists in the know feared for their safety. The most widely publicized case of journalist-bashing on the Clinton beat involved L.J. Davis, a contributing editor of Harper's magazine.  New Republic Editor Andrew Sullivan dispatched Davis to Little Rock, Ark., to look into the Whitewater scandal. Davis produced a brilliant report titled, "The Name of the Rose.""  The gory details are in the wires and the internet which Hillary has been known to express great fear of.  I wonder why that would be?  Could it be that people like me are scared to death or gravely concerned to have such a dangerous person as Hillary as POTUS?

I wonder where Hillary's War Room is located at this moment? Who is on her Shadow Team and is she STILL using illegal wire-taps to get ahead of her enemies?  You know. Those pesky fellow Democrats with aspirations to be the next POTUS. Hillary doesn't know what the term "illegal" means.  GWB has authorized LEGAL wire-taps but Hillary and company call them illegal.  Typical Democrat is illegal and illegal is all depends on ones' point of view.

From FrontPage Magazine: Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Richard Poe, a New York Times bestselling author and cyberjournalist. Formerly the editor of, he is the author of the new book Hillary's Secret War: The Clinton Conspiracy to Muzzle Internet Journalists. Visit his blog at

Amazing...yes? The Naked Truth has stated, "...Former congressional investigator Barbara Olson, who was killed Sept. 11, 2001, wrote that, "In the political life of the Clintons, it was she [Hillary] who pioneered the use of private detectives.  It was she who brought in and cultivated the professional dirt-diggers and smear artists."

Hillary's detectives engaged in "a systematic campaign to intimidate, frighten, threaten, discredit and punish innocent Americans whose only misdeed is their desire to tell the truth in public," former Clinton adviser Dick Morris charged in the New York Post of Oct. 1, 1998..."

Do we really want Hillary as President?  Of what?  The dog pound?  Not hardly.


Without A Core

Bay Buchanan (The Extreme Makeover of Hillary (Rodham) Clinton), has nothing good to say about Hillary and rightfully so. Human Events has a small blurb about the book and we shall take a few "blurbettes" ourselves. We report, you decide.

Watch Her Perform

"Hillary Rodham Clinton is the Jocelyn Wildenstein of politics. It’s almost unbearable to watch her perform in public. Whether pandering to racial racketeer Al Sharpton’s congregation in Harlem with her stilted black-cent or wrapping herself in body armor to bolster her national defense credentials, Hillary’s façade is crumbling. Even Dr. 90210 can’t help this mess." Hillary reminds of a chameleon sometimes. In a flash, she can transform into anything to anyone. Amazing.

Myth of Hillary’s Competence and Brilliance

"No wonder Clinton took such pains in her autobiography to avoid credit for the speech that came out of her lips in 1969. Blecchh. Buchanan pierces the myth of Clinton’s competence and supposed political brilliance by spotlighting the various gurus and charlatans she has relied over the past three decades to fill her head and provide her with ideological gobbledygook -- from leftist radicals Saul Alinsky and Michael Lerner to healthcare schemer Ira Magaziner to psychic nut ball Jean Houston." One of the charlatans she associated with became her husband. Take a look at my avatar. This woman is a known socialist but this FACT is brushed aside. This will not go away, folks. Not on my watch.

Piercing Clinton’s Veil of Moderation

"Buchanan takes us on a grisly tour of the many faces of Hillary -- the woman, the wife, the lawyer, the feminist, the politician, the senator, and the aspiring presidential candidate. But perhaps no one has helped unmask Hillary more than her own former friends and allies. In her chapter on Hillary’s political candidacy, Buchanan analyzes her “Obama nightmare.” She quotes onetime Hill pal David Geffen, who infuriated the Clintons by throwing a Hollywood fund-raiser for Barack Obama. Hillary exploded. “Livid” was Geffen’s term. He excoriated the Clintons’ comfort level with lying. “Everyone in politics lies, but they do it with such ease, it’s troubling.” That's it? No hints as to how this activity of the theoretical best of the best can become HONEST? They lie with ease so we are just to accept that? They lie...move this the new mantra? How do we know when the political elites are telling the truth?

And this is just the tip of the iceberg:

"All the political Botox injections in the world can’t hide Hillary’s character and ideological flaws. But like Jocelyn Wildenstein, Hillary Clinton sees nothing but perfection when she looks in the mirror. Bay Buchanan’s devastating dossier gives us the true picture of a corrupted politician without a face or a core." But Hillary is so kind and loves everyone and why can't we all get along? I have no qualms with Hillary getting along, just as long as she gets herself along to France where she belongs.


Another Socialist Feather

Birds of a feather, as it were.  Here we go with some early endorsements for the first potential female socialist to be the next POTUS.  I guess the air is still too cold up in the NE and the blood flow to the cranial cavities runs like thick goo.

Exclusive: Clinton gets key New Hampshire endorsement

Wonderful.  The already LARGE-headed prima-donna will now be over elated that a fellow socialist has thrown in.  I wonder how much that cost the campaign and the American people?  What was promised?  We can only hope that the same result will  transpire with the last candidate which was endorsed by Sylvia Larsen.

"New Hampshire state Senate President Sylvia Larsen, of Concord, formally endorsed Hillary Clinton for president this afternoon, marking one of the biggest endorsements for the New York senator thus far.

The announcement came at a press conference shortly after 2 p.m. this afternoon in New Hampshire. The Globe had reported earlier in the day that Larsen was expected to formally voice support for Clinton.

Larsen has been one of the biggest players in New Hampshire Democratic politics for a decade. In 2004, she was the first person to endorse John Kerry's presidential campaign and helped guide him to his eventual victory in the New Hampshire Primary.

Larsen joins fellow state Senator Betsi DeVries, a Manchester Democrat, in her support of Clinton. Three other state senators have endorsed John Edwards's campaign and yesterday the Barack Obama campaign announced that state Senator Martha Fuller Clark, of Portsmouth, had agreed to serve as one of four co-chairs of his New Hampshire organization. Freshman State Senator Harold Janeway is also reportedly with Obama."


Hillary, Inc

The Nation This is a classic and should be shouted from the rooftops! Oh. Wait. It is.

"In a packed ballroom in midtown Manhattan, Hillary Clinton is addressing hundreds of civil rights activists and labor leaders convened by the Rev. Al Sharpton [the most bigoted and racist man in the United States. Now THERE is something to be proud of, isn't it?] for his annual National Action Network conference. The junior senator from New York starts slowly but picks up steam when she hits on the economic anxiety many in the room feel. [Feel? Is that opinion or fact?] "We're not making progress," she says, ["we" aren't? Which "we" is she speaking of? Could it be her socialist cronies and her racist and bigoted slackers like Sharpton?] her sharp [make that SHRILL] Midwestern monotone accented with a bit of Southern twang. "Wages are flat." [They are? Does she not pay attention to the financial markets? Unemployment is at its LOWEST in history. The economy is booming. What in the world is she babbling about?] Nods of agreement. [Because those nodding are dumber than a box of rocks...her type of muppet.] "This economy is not working!" [Silly woman. yes it is and she HATES it. The economy is doing so well that the socialists are losing their death-grip on the MAJORITY of Americans.] Applause. [from stupid people] She's not quite the rhetorical populist her husband was on the campaign trail, but she can still feel your pain. [Ya, sure. I have some ocean-front property for sale in Minot, ND] "Everything has been skewed," Clinton says, [The first thing she has said that is true in months...NAY!...years, I am sure. And she is one of the chief skewers. She is an EXCELLENT liar.] jabbing her index finger for emphasis, "to help the privileged and the powerful at the expense of everybody else!" [Hitlery REALLY does need psychiatric help. Isn't SHE one of those "privileged and the powerful"? Her ally Soros too? Sharpton? Name any other prominent liberal? Didn't she and her wanna-be First He-man just purchase ocean-front property in the Dominican Republic?]

OK. This is all of this article I can handle at the moment and it is only one paragraph. You will have to go there and read the rest and come back to make comments, should you survive the rest.

I'm done. This woman is dangerous.


Hillary the Catholic...or Is That Methodist?

Confused yet? Make no mistake. Hillary is a sly one. She must be sly because she caters to whomever she needs to cater to. This is what is known as People Pleasing and is a close kin to Codependency. What most do not realize or, do realize but will not accept, such mental deficiencies result in alienating themselves from everyone they try to appease...except for others like her.

It is said that her earliest religious and political mentor was a Methodist minister, Reverend Don Jones, now 75 years of age. I have found no references as to her change of denominational ties but I have found her venues of political slants, firmly based in socialistic tendencies. Those tendencies have developed into full-bore socialism mantras.

Then why are Catholic leaders angry with Hillary? Has she not made steps to attract them to her in droves? "A Catholic advocacy group is urging Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign to remove an image of Mother Teresa from a campaign video narrated by former President Bill Clinton." Why is this? One should ask what is meant by: Catholics to Hillary: Stop Using Mother Teresa in Ad. Is it because Bill the Apostate is narrating? Is it because Hillary is a Methodist?

Hat Tip to Miss Beth for her analysis:

"It is wholly inappropriate, disrespectful and disturbing that Hillary Clinton is using an image of Blessed Mother Teresa as a political tool, especially given their radically different views on abortion," said Fidelis President Joseph Cella.

He noted that Mother Teresa fought to protect unborn children, while Hillary Clinton "staunchly supports abortion on demand in all nine months of pregnancy, including partial birth abortion and taxpayer funding of abortion.

"Out of respect to Mother Teresa, and the Missionaries of Charity strict guidelines for the use of Mother's image, we call on the Hillary Clinton campaign to immediately remove her image from their campaign video," Cella said in a news release.

I saved the last comment here for a reason. It actually started Miss Beth's post but I have placed it here because it signifies the growing sentiment that millions are beginning to see and feel:

"Just when you think this wretched piece of female hatefulness couldn't stoop any lower:"

And there you have it. Hillary will stoop as low as she needs to stoop in order to win. It is all about the Almighty Power and Control. It isn't about "We The People". For Hillary, it is all about "Me The Hillary".


Porn Star endorses Hillary

In an interview with Porn superstar Jenna Jameson reveals she is a big an of Hillary Clinton and her husband (warning: slightly risqué pictures and mature content at the above link): Who's your favorite democratic front runner for 2008? Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton or John Edwards?

Jenna Jameson: I love Hillary. I think that in some ways she's pretty conservative for a democrat, but I would love to have a woman in office. I think that it would be a step in the right direction for our country, and there would be less focus on war and more focus on bettering society.

Not surprisingly Ms. Jameson is "extremely liberal" and a big fan of Hillary's hubby Bill: Is it safe to assume that you're a liberal and a democrat?

Jenna Jameson: Yes. I don't like to label myself as a democrat, but I'm certainly extremely liberal. Do you find that the climate of the adult industry changes when there is a Republican administration versus Democratic?

Jenna Jameson: Absolutely. The Clinton administration was the best years for the adult industry and I wish that Clinton would run again. I would love to have him back in office. I would love to have Al Gore in office. When Republicans are in office, the problem is, a lot of times they try to put their crosshairs on the adult industry, to make a point. It's sad, when there are so many different things that are going on in the world: war, and people are dying of genocide. It's sad that they feel that they have to target the sex industry, and not target the problems with insurance and the homeless and the AIDS epidemic. There are so many things that need to be cleared up before fucking pornography. I look forward to another democrat being in office. It just makes the climate so much better for us, and I know that once all our troops come home, things are going to be better and I think that getting Bush out of office is the most important thing right now.

Not sure this is the kind of support Hillary is looking for, but every vote counts right? I suppose compared to a porn superstar like Jenna, Hillary might claim to be conservative. But it seems to me that Hillary agrees with the sentiments expressed by Ms. Jameson and that her supposed conservatism is a thin act. If Hillary thought she could win as an "extreme liberal" she would run as one.

Hat tip Just Hillary


Hillary in the lead in Ohio

But with high negatives

A recently released Quinnipac poll has Hillary Clinton leading the Democratic presidential candidates in Ohio. She has the lead with 38% with Senator Barack Obama in second with 19% while Edwards and Gore lag behind with 11% and 10%.

Interestingly enough, another New Yorker leads on the GOP side as well with former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani leading Senator John McCain 23% to 17%. And Both McCain and Giuliani lead Hillary in a general election match-up; Giuliani 47-43 and McCain 45-44.

What is really interesting, and has to be troubling for Mrs. Clinton, is her high negatives. The former first lady has 45 unfavorable versus 46 favorable with only a net of plus 1. This is the lowest of any of the major candidates of either party.

How could this be? Must be that right-wing conspiracy Hillary is always talking about. How else could so many Americans have an unfavorable opinion about such a public servant? Perhaps they don't buy attempts to show the Senator's softer side with video chats and sweet talk. Maybe they remember her machinations in the White House (Health Care, travel office, billing records, etc.). Maybe they have a gut feeling that the velvet covering the iron fist is pretty thin. Maybe they are right . . .


Hillary?  Consistent?

Oh, absolutely! Hillary is absolutely consistently inconsistent! She was FOR consistency before she was against it. As a fellow blogger has stated, "What part, exactly, is consistent? Cutting off funding? Being against cutting off funding?"

Senator Clinton in an original move on Capitol Hill, "voted Wednesday to advance legislation cutting off money for the Iraq War, then refused to pledge to support the measure if it came to a vote, then said she would". This sounds "vaguely" familiar, yes?

"At lunchtime, the New York senator and presidential candidate was asked repeatedly by reporters whether she favored the troop withdrawal legislation that had just come up for a procedural vote on the Senate floor." UH OH! Someone has DARED to nail her down on a position. Again, this is akin to the John Kerry maneuver...or so it seems? I love her indicative of a deep psychological need to be a consistent liar."

Her answer: "I'm not going to speculate on what I'm going to be voting on in the future. I voted in favor of cloture to have a debate." Would that be a FUTURE debate or a debate that has already taken place, Hillary?

By supper time, she had a different answer.

"I support the underlying bill," she said. "That's what this vote on cloture was all about." Then, there is going to be a debate or is Speaker Pelosi going to squelch the opposing side, again?

You know? This would-be President sends so many mixed signals. Consistent? Stable? Not a chance. Then we have this...

"Clinton said she wants her vote to send a message to Iraqi leaders that they have to do more to stabilize their country before the United States will commit to a longer troop presence there. " Hello? Isn't that like a future thing? To be able to send a message somewhere, that would OR should imply that it hasn't taken place yet. Does time stand still for this woman, or what?

Good God! Mrs Non-Committal wants to send a message of stability? Mrs "I take Lessons From King Flip-Flop Kerry" Clinton is no more stable than I am an Irish Setter. As for Hillary looking or presenting herself as "presidential", I have heard someone say, "Looking like her husband" maybe, but not looking presidential.

I wouldn't trust this socialist to sweep out my garage let alone be the next POTUS.


Control, Control, Control...Where Will It Lead?

Bill Keeps Low Profile in Hillary Campaign

From News Max, we may have it inferred that the former POTUS is a "behind the scenes" type of campaign entity of his wife Hillary. I don't necessarily trust that assessment.

"By all accounts, former President Clinton is a powerful behind-the-scenes force in Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential campaign, ensuring the spotlight stays on his wife." Since when? Isn't it Bill that has aspirations of being King of The United Nations? He is going to take a backseat while his WINO (wife in name only) gets the spotlights? Democrats don't do such things...defer recognition and benevolence to others. Let me explain what I mean. Well, let me quote a friend of mine that posted this tidbit of information at the Gathering of Eagles forum: "If you will look at the world, you will see that people who are concerned primarily with their own desires and self interests are liberal in their world view. When they speak of helping others, this does not mean that they really care about the needs of other people, they just want to be "in charge" to provide a cover for their own greed. These are the people who want to give the hungry man a fish. People who are less selfish, less controlling are wanting to teach the hungry man how to fish so he can feed himself. These tend to be more conservative in their world view." Neither of the adult Clintons are conservative in doctrine, mantra or tenet by any stretch of the imagination.

Again, from NewsMax: "...No more promises of a two-for-one political bargain, especially since Bill has been so busy with charity work to be a full-time player in the 2008 race...". Oh? Again: "...But that all will change, says the New York Times...". Interesting. What does the NYT know that Hillary doesn't know? Let us see, shall we? Keep in mind the above quote from a friend of mine at the GoE...

"...The newspaper says there will be a point when Bill abandons his low-profile role and goes public "in a big way" as his wife gets closer to the White House in her own right: His own campaign plane, his own schedule of events, and campaign appearances separate from hers..." And there we have it. One of the top liberal news outlets has spilled the beans and my friend's quote comes true. See? We conservatives aren't so "out of touch", are we? We have known this about the liberals for years and especially with the Clinton Clan. William Jefferson Clinton has no intentions of sitting on his laurels while his wife of all things steals his tainted glory.

"...But Hillary's camp has been careful to control Bill's involvement in the campaign, reports the Times, aware that his participation is not risk-free. He does not participate in staff conference calls or call Hillary's aides directly. The goal? To avoid confusion over who's in charge, as well as leaks. ..". Control. That's the ticket. Even though Bill has eight years experience as a President of the United States, his offerings at planning and strategy meetings are not only not welcomed but shunned. It is the usual mantra, "I know how and you don't" or, "You did it all wrong" or, "I can do it better". They never offer anything as an alternative yet they whine and complain about everything. Simply amazing. Bill Clinton WON TWO presidential elections and even though I cannot stomach the thought of being in the same room with the charlatan that he is/was/is, I am pretty confident that he would have some valuable input in his WIFE'S campaign. But, Hillary says, "I am in charge". Ah. There's that "in charge" flaw in the character.

Uh oh! "...The Times says Hillary's advisers know Bill's political weaknesses and his past disappointments, especially the Monica Lewinsky scandal and the impeachment. They fear his undisciplined moments and worry that his "love for the cut and thrust of politics could unleash that side, especially if he believes her campaign is in trouble." Cut and thrust being used in the same paragraph as Monica Lewinsky is one of those weird literary faux pas incidents, yes? What would he do? Throw down on Hillary or one of the aids or one of the interns right there on the conference room table? The two of them are a mockery to anything decent and honorable in the White House. The more I think of it the "oogier" I skin crawls.

"..."When you’re dealing with the Clintons in ’08, you essentially have two candidates — her and him — and he’s going to have to have a Boy Scout report card given his history,” Douglas Brinkley, the presidential historian, told the Times. "He can definitely help her, but that also means he can hurt her.”...". STOP THE PRESSES! Bill with a Boy Scout report card? In which life? This one? The next one? The one before this one? WHAT? And I like the gobbledy-gook "he can definitely help her, but that also means that he can hurt her". What, are we 7 years old all of a sudden? Liberals. They jumble up a bunch of words together and they think they have all the answers. I asked my 12 year old to read this NewsMax article and give me a 30-second run down on the characters. The statement was/is precious: "Where do they get these people?" LOL!

"...Bill is laying low for now, partly because he thinks voters need to get to know his wife better. His belief is that the electorate will "warm up to her" eventually..." Not a chance there, slick. He is laying low because that voice of Hillary's is enough to shatter the glass in the Oval Office at 1,000 yards. Get a grip and say it like it is for crying out loud. No wonder he "stepped out" many times? Good Lord Almighty!

"He’s not just sitting in Chappaqua watching the game on TV and calling everybody in the campaign with advice,” Melanne Verveer, a close friend and adviser of Hillary, told the Times. "He brings enormous strength and assets but is in a very secondary role.” And just how "close" is this friend and adviser and to which one? Well, Bill could be down in the Dominican Republic checking out the suits on the beach of their new place, right? Secondary role? I betcha he just seethes and stews and wishes he could play with another cigar.



Senator Hillary (Rodham) Clinton

The would-be president of the United Sates. I have often wondered why an Elitist Socialist such as Hillary Clinton would want to be in the most powerful political position in the free and not so free world. My reasonings are many and I save most for my personal blog as it is my blog and I say as I please. I cannot place those thoughts here. Suffice it to say, Hillary has been reported to have temper tantrums and has a habit of throwing things. Over emotional, perhaps? It all depends. It depends on what your definition of over emotional is.

This socialist MUST be stopped This country cannot afford to have Hillary as the First Lady and Bill as the First Man. Are they going to "rule" from the Dominican Republic? What is THIS all about? May 15, 2007 -- 'IT IS enough that the arrows fit exactly in the wounds that they have made," wrote Franz Kafka. NOW HERE'S a little flash! Bill and Hillary Clinton have their eyes on the ball when it comes to 2008, but in the meantime, has anyone noted that they bought a piece of beach property in the Dominican Republic right next to the beautiful domain of designer Oscar de la Renta and his wife, Annette?

Wouldn't this money be better served if it was "given away"? Doesn't Hillary say that she is going to take from those that have and give it to those that don't? Oh. Wait. The Socialist Elitists will take YOUR money, YOUR property, YOUR "whatever it takes" and not THEIRS.

I never did like Robin Hood. And I don't like people that do. They are socialists and socialists are ruling elitists that have a special mantra...I have and you don't and won' don't know how to think for yourselves and I do.

That bothers me.

There is a new Sheriff in town. This blog is dedicated to stopping Hillary from advancing her unAmerican activities and philosophies. It is about time, too. It is about time that the American people know the truth because once "ye shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free" is learned and heeded, understood and taken to heart, one will see through the empty words of Hillary (Rodham) Clinton.


Hillary in Ohio

Hillary Clinton was in Ohio this weekend, raising money for her Presidential campaign and the Ohio Democratic Party. In typical fashion Hillary proved that she can still raise money with the best of them and that she is willing to tell the liberal base what they want to hear on Iraq.

In a speech Saturday Clinton lashed out at President Bush claiming that Americans were "ready to end this government by the few, of the few and for the few" in order to "get back to a balance in our country."

Yeah, that's exactly what I think of when I think of Hillary and Bill: balance. Funny how Bush garnered more votes than any candidate in history in the last election and yet he somehow heads a administration "by the few, of the few and for the few." I don't recall husband Bill ever garnering more than a mere plurality but he nevertheless always seemed to claim a mandate from "the people."

Hillary also threw out some red meat for the anti-war left: "Let me be clear," she said. "If this president won't end this war during his time in office, when I am president, I will." She must be talking about the war she voted to authorize and the one her party is intent on undermining at every turn.

Perhaps, Hillary could explain exactly how she plans to "end the war" without plunging the country into even more violence and bloodshed and giving Iran a free hand in the region. But don't look for strategic coherence from her campaign. Instead, expect her to continue to tell each side what they want to hear.

As Joe Hallet noted in the article, Clinton continues to try and paint herself as a moderate despite her rhetoric Saturday:

Despite the Democratic primary process's natural tug to the left, Sen. Clinton generally has sought to avoid the red-meat partisan rhetoric and continued to burnish credentials as a moderate.

So Hillary claims to be a sensible centrist politician but blasts President Bush and calls for surrender in Iraq when she thinks it will help her campaign. Hillary knows that there is a strong anti-war sentiment in Ohio - Sherrod Brown's anti-war rhetoric played a central role in his defeat of Mike DeWine - and that the liberal activist base is passionately anti-war. But because of her history as a hawkish Democrat, the base - particularly the online left - is suspicious and wary of Clinton. It will be interesting to see if she can convince the left that she will end the war, while at the same time retaining her image as a centrist, responsible leader in foreign affairs.

One thing that hasn't changed is her ability to raise money. Clinton raised $550,000 for the Ohio Democratic party on Saturday and more than $200,000 for her own campaign. It is also clear that Hillary will be spending a lot of time in the crucial state of Ohio:

If Clinton wins the nomination, she no doubt will all but take up residency in Ohio for the campaign. The state decided the 2004 race and is expected to be the epicenter of the 2008 presidential campaign. Last night's visit was her second in as many weekends to Ohio, and on June 10, her husband, former President Bill Clinton, will deliver the commencement address at Ohio State University.

Lucky us.



Welcome to the Stop Her Now Blog. As you might have guessed from the title, this is the blog component of the Stop Her Now website. We would like to think it will become the blog headquarters for the Stop Her Now movement and a regular stop for political junkies and average citizens alike.

We are just getting this off the ground so be sure to check back regularly for new content. And if you haven't already, be sure to check out the home page for more on how we can Stop Her Now.


A Smidgeon of the History of Hillary

Front Page Mag A brief history of Czarina Rodham

Hillary Rodham Clinton: Her Career and Agendas

Rodham was deeply influenced by a 1966 article titled "Change or Containment" that appeared in Motive, a magazine for college-age Methodists. Authored by the Marxist/Maoist theoretician Carl Oglesby, who was a leader of the radical Students for a Democratic Society, this piece defended Ho Chi Minh, Fidel Castro, and Maoist tactics of violence.

From that point forward, wrote Barbara Olson in her 1999 book Hell to Pay, "Republicans were the enemy and the enemy was allied with evil -- the evils of war, racism, sexism, and poverty."

While attending Wellesley, Hillary Rodham participated in a number of antiwar marches in the Boston area. In 1969 she wrote her 92-page senior thesis on the theories of radical Chicago organizer Saul Alinsky, author of Rules for Radicals (1971) and Reveille for Radicals (1947). A great admirer of Alinsky's ruthless activist tactics, Hillary personally interviewed the famed author for her project. She concluded her thesis by stating: "Alinsky is regarded by many as the proponent of a dangerous socio/political philosophy. As such, he has been feared -- just as Eugene Debs [the five-time Socialist Party candidate for U.S. President] or Walt Whitman or Martin Luther King has been feared, because each embraced the most radical of political faiths -- democracy.

Striving to neutralize what she considered the pervasive racism of the American legal system, "Hillary was," as Barbara Olson observed in Hell to Pay, "a budding Leninist.

Hillary's work for the Panthers earned her a summer internship at the Berkeley, California office of the hardline Stalinist attorney Robert Treuhaft in 1972. According to historian Stephen Schwartz, "Treuhaft is a man who dedicated his entire legal career to advancing the agenda of the Soviet Communist Party and the KGB."



During her years in the Senate, Mrs. Clinton has cast numerous important votes on the issue of immigration:

  • In March 2002 she co-sponsored a bill to extend the deadlines by which illegal aliens living in the United States would be required to obtain visas. "This is good news indeed," she said of the bill's passage. "Instead of being forced to return to their home country to apply for permanent residence status, many immigrants will be able to seek permanent resident status while working in the U.S."[15]

  • In October 2003 she favored granting temporary protected status to illegal Haitian immigrants.

  • In September 2004 she co-sponsored an agricultural jobs bill offering illegal farmworkers a speedy path to citizenship.

  • In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, she co-signed a September 2005 letter asking Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff to prevent the deportation of any illegal aliens whose immigration status came to the government's attention "after they [had] sought assistance" from the American taxpayers.[16]

  • In 2005 she opposed the REAL ID Act, which stipulated that all driver's license and photo ID applicants must be able to verify they are legal residents of the United States, and that the documents they present to prove their identity must be genuine. It also contained provisions to prevent terrorists from abusing asylum laws, and to streamline the deportation of immigrants convicted of terrorism-related offenses.

  • In June 2007, she voted against a bill that would have prohibited illegal aliens convicted of serious crimes from gaining legal status.

  • That same month, she voted in favor of a bill to establish restrictions on admission into the United States for immigrants who have previously been convicted of criminal gang activity, child abuse, human trafficking, obstruction of justice, domestic violence, or a felony count of driving under the influence.

  • Also in June 2007, she voted in favor of the Immigration Reform Act of 2007, which would have provided a path to legalization for all illegal aliens residing in the United States.

That will do for now. There is MORE if you have the stamina and moral fortitude to expose the Fraud of Czarina Rodham.

Hillary is a dyed-in-the-wool full-bore Neo-Communist con-woman.


Page 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17