Defend Israel

The Patriots Call
The Black Robe Regiment - The Patriots Call

Democrats party of Racism
Racism of the Democrat Party
Herman Cain - The DNC has BRAINWASHED most of the Blacks of this Nation
Racism - the Nemesis of the Democrat Party
Democrats invented racism and democrats HATE all blacks
The Snooper Report articles on Democrat invention of racism

The March on DC
Callin’ All the Clans Together
Sick and tired - marching towards the Constitution of the United States
We. Are. Finished. With.  DC.
We. Are. Finished. With. DC. - Addendum Part 1

Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It
Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It Part 2(?)
Civility: Leftinistra Own None Part Three
Obama, Civility and The Clansmen of Dumb
Brain Dead Leftinistra: Their Stoic Civility
Libtards Have No Class - Civility Escapes Their Brain Deadness
The States Will Be the Next Battlefield in the Fight Over ObamaCare
War Is Coming: Blood On Our Own Streets - Thanks Democrats
Civil War…
We Are In The Midst of Chaos and Civil War
Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die Trying
State’s Sovereignty or Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die - The Movement Marches On
The Country Surrounds The City

When They Came
Is The Left Still “Proud To Be a Left-Wing Extremist”?
Be It Known - Attention Unconstitutional Congress
Obama: One Big Ass Mistake America
Do Birthers Rock and Roll or Stop and Drool?
Good vs Evil…It Is Your Choice
I Apologize For My Nation
Obama’s Civilian National Security Forces (CNSF)
Obama’s Brown Shirts - Civilian National Security Forces
What Is It About The American Liberal?
The Plan To Destroy America
Another Soldier Has Been Given the Haditha Treatment!
Callin’ All The Clans Together
Callin’ All The Clans Together Show
A History of the List of 45
Constitutionality: The Movement
Vindication: Iraq’s Saddam and Al Qaeda Links Revealed
Redefining The Center or the Moderate
The HIC (Hoax In Charge) Going To Copenhagen
We Didn’t Start This Goddamn War!

Copy Cat Frauds of the IAVA

Contract With America
Snooper’s Declaration of Independence
Thanks Obama

Contract From America

Timothy McVeigh
Thoughts To Ponder and Reflect Upon
Snooper Report Vindication: Al Qaeda, TWA Flight 800 and OKC Bombing
Clinton alludes to 1995 bombing, says words matter

Missing 13th Amendment
TITLES OF “NOBILITY” AND “HONOR” - The Missing 13th Amendment

The Coup
Military Coup Against Obama

The United States Constitution
Our founding document wasn’t set in stone for a reason

Deepwater Horizon
Did Hugo Chavez Sink the Deepwater Horizon Oil Platform?

The New Right

Arizona Rising

Texas Wars

This is pretty much a bunch of crap, FYI.
Editor's Choice


Powered by Squarespace



Wake Up GOP

This is pretty much a bunch of CRAP, FYI HINT: “MOSTLY TRUE” is a “MOSTLY FALSE” deal which means “MOSTLY TRUE” is a LIE.

Entries in Obama (55)


Obama: Racist/Socialist

The news of the day reveals an audio tape of a radio interview Senator Obama did in 2001, while he was a law school lecturer. World Net Daily posted a video containing a substantial portion of the interview.

WBEZ claims to have an audio tape; I could not make the download work. I transcribed the following from the version posted at WND.

If you look at the... victories and failures of the civil rights movements, ... and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously
dispossessed peoples so that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at a lunch counter an order as long as I could pay for it I'd be ok. But the Supreme court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society and uh to that extent and as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, uh it wasn't that radical, it didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by by the founding fathers in the Constitution at least as it's been interpreted and the Warren Court interpreted it in the same way that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties, says what the States can't do to you; says what the Federal Government can't do to you, but it doesn't say what the Federal Government or the State Government must do must do on your behalf, and that hasn't shifted and I think one of the tragedies of the civil rights movement was , because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think
there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change and in some ways we still suffer from that.

I'm not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts, the institution just isn't structured that way. You just look at very rare examples where during the desegregation era, the court was willing to, for example, order uh, changes that cost money to a local school district; and the court was very uncomfortable with it, it was hard to manage, it was hard to figure out; ah, you start getting into all sorts of separation of powers issues in terms of the court monitoring or engaging in a process that essentially is administrative and takes a lot of time... . The court's just not very good at it, and politically, its just, its very hard to legitimize opinions from the court in that regard, so I think that although you can craft theoretical justifications for it legally, I think any three of us sitting here could come up with a rationale for bringing about economic change through the courts.

The reference to the civil rights movements sets the context: Obama is focused on race relations: Black vs White, just like the focus of the church he attended for twenty years. The first reference to redistribution of wealth establishes the subject. Barrack Hussein Obama was talking about empowering the Federal Government to take money from 'rich' Whites and give it to 'poor' Blacks. He was making a pitch for Black votes at our expense. What could be more racist?

The subsequent reference to 'economic justice' confirms the obvious, removing all doubt. Next, Obama dives into the Warren Court's interpretation of the Constitution, saying that it was not radical because "it didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution". No court in its right mind, faithful to its oath of office, would break free from those essential constraints. We must assume that Barack Hussein Obama would appoint Justices who would perform that act of unconstitutional injustice.

Obama continues on the Constitution: "but it doesn't say what the Federal Government or the State Government must do must do on your behalf". For a Constitutional lawyer, he seems singularly unaware of the significance of the philosophy held by the founders. The Federal Government is not your mother: it does not wipe your ass & nose. The Federal Government is not Santa Clause: it does not bring you presents. Those are not its functions.

Now we must listen between the lines: I think one of the tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change and in some ways we still suffer from that. The Civil Rights movement was about obtaining civil & legal equality, not redistributing wealth. Obama switches its focus retroactively to convert it into a means of obtaining money from Whites. It should have shunned litigation and brought about redistribution of wealth through organizing coalitions of power. Armed robbery, perhaps? Or racial politics, in which a minority would convert the Federal Government for robbery by proxy?

Next, Obama reveals his strategic objective: I'm not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts, the institution just isn't structured that way. We know what he wants to do. It ain't just, moral nor constitutional. Now we know what he will set out to do legislatively.

We have learned that Obama is a divider, a racial divider, not a uniter. We have learned that he intends to take our income and give it to his Black constituency in the slums of Chicago. We have learned of his intense contempt for the Constitution and the principles upon which it is founded. We can only conclude that his political career must come to an end with his first term in the Senate, for which he is both unworthy & unqualified. God forfend and voters forbid he should ever cross the threshold of the White House!


Obama's Fakery

Obama’s Religious Ruse: ‘I’ve Always Been a Christian’ (Part 1 of 3), Alexander LaBrecque.

I just finished reading this excellent essay at Family Security Matters, and I write to you with an urgent need to share LaBrecque's clear and tight analysis of Obama's deception. While I eagerly await parts 2 & 3, I urge you to read part one and give it careful consideration, then share it with your friends and family.

What we have here is a baptized Marxist who denies the biographical reality of his Muslim background, takes pride in his skepticism, is the center of his universe, is posing as a Christian, esteems the power of the christ myth, and seeks the most powerful position of authority in the world.

Get a tight grip on this brilliant conclusion.

The Audacity of Hope? Obama has the audacity to claim he has always been a Christian while disbelieving the Christian hope and its foundation, the reality of Jesus’ resurrection, whereby Jesus is Lord of all. His definition of "Christian" includes being an agnostic and a skeptic. Not only is he a pseudo-Christian -- he’s a messianic poser.


Just Words: Obama-Biden Conflict Each Other



Barack Obama And Joe Biden Cite Entirely Different Numbers In Making The Same Attack ... You Know It's A Lie When They Can't Get Their Story Straight

ARLINGTON, VA -- Today, in New Mexico and Virginia, Barack Obama and Joe Biden accused John McCain of trying to cut Medicare services and benefits. Yet, it is clear that they are just making the attack up when Barack Obama and Joe Biden cite two entirely different numbers in making the same attack. Please see below when Barack Obama and Joe Biden pull numbers out of thin air:

STORY #1: Barack Obama Cites A $882 Billion Number
Barack Obama: John McCain Will Cut $882 Billion. OBAMA: "But the Wall Street Journal recently reported that it's actually worse than we thought. It turns out, Senator McCain would pay for part of his plan by making drastic cuts in Medicare -- $882 billion worth. $882 billion in Medicare cuts to pay for an ill-conceived health care plan, even as Medicare already faces a looming shortfall." (Barack Obama, Remarks As Prepared For Delivery, Roanoke, VA, 10/17/08)
STORY #2: Joe Biden Cites An Entirely Different Number - $3.2 Trillion
Joe Biden: John McCain Will Cut $3.2 Trillion. BIDEN: "And now we find out Gov. that John wants to cut has to cut over the next ten years $3.2 trillion out of Medicare in order to pay for his program. So, he's going to pay for this voucher for people who are already doing relatively well by taking it away from Medicare." (Joe Biden, Remarks, Mesilla, NM, 10/17/08)

The Bottom Line: Barack Obama And Joe Biden Are Launching A False Attack And Making Up Their Numbers
Isn't it just wonderful this internet that Gore made but didn't but Nancy Pelosi said he did after everyone knows that he didn't?

One of these days Obama and Biden are going to get together and get their stories straight.

The above via email, more details at link here...


Obama Lacks the Character and Temperament To Be President and Biden Is Simply A Token Hack


This piece is in rebuttal to the completely off the wall and over the top piece penned by Chistopher Hitchens at Slate. Buzz on this is at Memeorandum...

John McCain has more character in the dirt between his toes after walking through a rice paddy than Obama will ever dream of having. As a matter of fact, Obama has no character whatsoever. Christopher Hitchens will never be able to hold a candle to Barack Obama and Barack Obama is a mental midget in comparison to John McCain. Period.

He suffers from PDS - Palin Derangement Syndrome - and McCDS - McCain Derangement Syndrome. It is indeed pathetic to say the least. Sorry to burst his bubble but the stench coming from it needs to be eliminated.

I so love how people like Chrissy ramble on like good libtards do. They spew vitriolic hatred without any substantiation to their lame claims. Behold:

[...] And the only public events that have so far featured his absurd choice of running mate have shown her to be a deceiving and unscrupulous woman utterly unversed in any of the needful political discourses but easily trained to utter preposterous lies and to appeal to the basest element of her audience. [...]
Ummmm...what "lies" might that be, silly boy? What "needful political discourses" would that be, lad? At the VP debate, Sarah Palin mopped the floor with Biden. The photo to the left was Biden's view point right after the debate ended.

Character? You say Obama has more character than McCain? Are you daft? Obama has been proven to be a liar and his dismal record in the duty of public office in the Illinois Senate and the US Senate is laughable. What has he accomplished in life to elevate his character above that of a gnat's anal aperture?

The rest of that waste of verbiage Chrissy penned is equally inane as that which I cited. Chrissy has always been a glorified moonbat and anything he has to say about anything has always been suspect.

Obama has more character than McCain? PHFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT! Idiot.

I wonder if this Chrissy upstart is going to move off of the Earth like what's her face of SNL when McCain-Palin take the White House. If so, I will help them relocate.


In The Real World - Taxes and Socialism Are Killers


A while back Donald Douglas wrote an article about Barack's crisis of confidence. The article reminded me of many training exercises and mission actuals. Over confidence breeds error in judgment. I suppose that is why I have kept it in my Daily Reads in my reader warehouse. After this post however, it will no longer reside there. Sometimes, there are as much as 400 articles in there that I may of may not ever get there. Most of the time I read everyone.

The article I have linked to was posted on 07 OCT '08, almost a week ago as of this writing. It is more appropriate now than it was then making Donald Douglas a prophet. I say prophet due to what The One Messiah (so named by Louis Farrakhan) uttered today on the campaign trail. He actually stated that he would redistribute the wealth and everyone will be better off for it. That right there is a statement of defeat. And, if taken advantage of, McCain can make the socialist agenda of the Marxist stick. That and telling people that he is going to raise taxes, in the real world, is a deal breaker. Ask Mondale. Then again, we live in upside down land.

The Doug Ross piece was a post he penned and published after the debate last week. He focused on the question in regards to sacrifice:

[...] After a few initial questions on the economy and the federal role in helping Americans through the hard times, moderator Tom Brokaw posed an Internet question on national sacrifice:
Since World War II, we have never been asked to sacrifice anything to help our country, except the blood of our heroic men and women. As president, what sacrifices - sacrifices will you ask every American to make to help restore the American dream and to get out of the economic morass that we're now in?
Senator Obama's response offered a revealing window to his essential dismissal of traditional American optimism and the nation's history of up-by-the bootstraps perseverance:
You know, a lot of you remember the tragedy of 9/11 and where you were on that day and, you know, how all of the country was ready to come together and make enormous changes to make us not only safer, but to make us a better country and a more unified country.

And President Bush did some smart things at the outset, but one of the opportunities that was missed was, when he spoke to the American people, he said, "Go out and shop."

That wasn't the kind of call to service that I think the American people were looking for.

And so it's important to understand that the - I think the American people are hungry for the kind of leadership that is going to tackle these problems not just in government, but outside of government.

And let's take the example of energy, which we already spoke about. There is going to be the need for each and every one of us to start thinking about how we use energy.

Take note of this ...

Obama says each and every one of us must "start thinking about how we use energy." [...]

I watched the debate three times and each time I was wondering why Barack never answered the question with anything substantive or even viable. That reveals a lack of confidence shrouded in the air of over confidence as far as I am concerned. What is totally interesting about his answer is his omission as to what he himself said eight days after the 91101 attacks on American soil. He didn't talk of sacrifice at all. In part, the verbiage below is what he said:
[...] “Obama’s comments about legitimate causes’ of terror groups and ‘root problems of causes and dangers’ seems to echo little-noticed remarks the presidential candidate made eight days after 9/11 in which he said the attacks were carried out because of a lack of “empathy” for others’ suffering on the part of al-Qaeda, whose terrorist ideology ‘grows out of a climate of poverty and ignorance, helplessness and despair.’

“Obama went on to imply the Sept. 11 attacks were, in part, a result of U.S. policy, lecturing the American military to minimize civilian casualties in the Middle East and urging action opposing ‘bigotry or discrimination directed against neighbors and friends of Middle-Eastern descent.’

“Even as I hope for some measure of peace and comfort to the bereaved families, I must also hope that we, as a nation, draw some measure of wisdom from this tragedy,” Obama wrote in a piece about 9/11 published Sept. 19, 2001, in Chicago’s Hyde Park Herald.” [...]

The above can be found at Canada Free Press. There is much more in the article but, suffice it to say, the answer he gave the American People at the last debate was yet another example of a typical Democrat Party Leader answering a question with pretty rhetoric. He knows nothing of sacrifice as is revealed by McCain's answer:
[...] During tonight's debate, John McCain - in great contrast to Obama - spoke with assurance on the "sacrifice question," noting:
Look, we can attack health care and energy at the same time. We're not - we're not - we're not rifle shots here. We are Americans. We can, with the participation of all Americans, work together and solve these problems together.
In other words, there's nothing we can't do if we set our minds to it. Americans have risen to the challenge, time and again; and when facing rough times, we keep our chins up and barrel through the hard patches. [...]
Barack, as a good socialist would say, told the American People that we suck as a nation and as a People whereas McCain said that our future is ahead, better days are ahead and we are Americans, dammit, and we can overcome. We always have.

Barack's confidence is artificial at best. He is entirely out of his league and his handlers know it. His statements of raising taxes and taking money from one American and giving it to another is a deal killer. Mark my words. This video here explains it all. Feel free to distribute the video to everyone you know.

Barack's judgment is flawed in many ways and the only ones that should be voting for him are friends and family members just because they know him. Anyone of any moral stature will dismiss him out of hand. He has no moral compass. If he does, the magnets are out of alignment or the oil is low and the gimbal bearings are shot. On top of that, if he wasn't trying out for the Presidency and had he applied for a position requiring a top secret clearance, he would not pass muster in the background checks. Especially since he has multiple Logan Act violations and quite possible multiple Smith Act violations. He didn't even write his own memoir.

He is a Marxist color-coded in socialism to make him taste better - because socialism is much better than communism - that wants to raise taxes on everybody and take from those that have worked hard and give it to those that aren't worth a grain of salt. Socialism is a step or two closer to communism and that is what Barack's handlers want.

Some would say that the country would be better off with Barack as President for 4 years or even eight to revive the Nation. That kind of stinkin' thinkin' is absurd. That is like taking your mind off of your infected hang nail on your big toes by poking your eye out with a crow bar. That is neither intelligent nor is it a viable option.


The Dishonesty and Untrustworthiness of The One


Louis Farrakhan labeled Obama as The Messiah. It wasn't anyone within the VRWC by any stretch of the imagination although the members of the Leftinistra would have you believe the mean Republicans did it. For some reason, the term stuck and the more he tries to shake it, the more it sticks. Perhaps he knows that he isn't the Messiah so he is trying to distance himself from those that think he is...not sure. However, he is The One and The One has some issues.

Siggy has an interesting data filled post entitled, "The Man Who Wants To Be President: How Barack Obama ‘Lost’ Eight Years Of Financial And Other Records". Would the Messiah "lose" or "misplace" crucial records? If so, how can he expect to be trusted with keeping up with Presidential "stuff"? Is he that lackadaisical and irresponsible? Or, is he that deceitful?

Barack Obama, who’s been scolding Hillary Rodham Clinton for not hastening the release of records from her time as first lady, says he can’t step up and produce his own records from his days in the Illinois state Senate. He says he hasn’t got any. “I don’t have - I don’t maintain - a file of eight years of work in the state Senate because I didn’t have the resources available to maintain those kinds of records,” he said at a recent campaign stop in Iowa. He said he wasn’t sure where any cache of records might have gone, adding, “It could have been thrown out. I haven’t been in the state Senate now for quite some time.” [...]
If anyone is that stupid to actually believe such utter nonsense, I don't know what to tell them. I still have records from High School and I graduated in the early 1970s. I have also been involved in Community Organization "stunts". Maybe I should run for President. At least I can document most everything.

I wonder what is in all these "missing" records that "might have been thrown away"? Could it be that his documented associations with ACORN are among them? The evidence of his ACORN elbow rubbing has been hitting the air waves and You Tube circuits for quite some time but, I wonder what we don;t know yet. With the investigations all over the Nation in regards to ACORN voter fraud and intimidation going on, it is no wonder that the piece written by Stanley Kurtz for the NY Post has the ACORNers in a tizzy.

[...] Meanwhile, instead of repudiating ACORN's intimidation tactics, Rep. Kennedy berated Roukema for arresting one of his constituents and accused the Republicans of preparing for "an all-out attack on CRA." He also promised to introduce legislation to expand the CRA's coverage to mortgage bankers and large credit unions.

THIS little slice of political life from 1995 had a variety of ripple effects. Above all, ACORN's intimidation tactics, and its alliance with Democrats in Congress, triumphed. Despite their 1994 takeover of Congress, Republicans' attempts to pare back the CRA were stymied.

Instead, Democrats like Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) and Reps. Kennedy and Waters allied with the Clinton administration to broaden the acceptability of risky subprime loans throughout the financial system, thus precipitating our current crisis.

ACORN had come to Congress not only to protect the CRA from GOP reforms but also to expand the reach of quota-based lending to Fannie, Freddie and beyond. By steamrolling the GOP that March, it had crushed the last potential barrier to "change." [...]

I find that interesting as well. No wonder there have been pieces published that are trying to distract from the current financial non-crisis declared a crisis for political gain. I have said from the beginning that this was a contrived crisis. Now that the evidence has backfired on those responsible - the Democrat Party - now all of a sudden, it is the crisis everyone thought it was? Please.

We also know that the "rescue plan" has failed. We also know that the cretins in DC are working on a rescue plan for the rescue plan and the other idiots are working on a second "stimulus package" to "help the economy". Wasn't that the reason for the first "stimulus package" that the democrats were dead set against? And now, they are all for another one that won't work either?

Where is all of this money that we don't have coming from?

With the articles revealing data ACORN and Obama don't want anyone to see, read or know about are hitting the streets, perhaps this is why Obama is paying ACORN to "get out the vote". We'll see. The bottom line is this, Obama has no credibility. ZERO. NONE.


Barack Hussein Obama: Unfit To Command


Barack Hussein Obama is unfit to command the United States Armed Forces. He is, however, fit to command a nation's military that operates under Marxist ideals and principles of enslavement of its people.

Barack Hussein Obama is unfit to lead a country unless that country operates under Marxist ideals and principles of enslavement of its people.

Approximately two years ago, I identified Barack Hussein Obama as a socialist that was influenced by Marxist ideals and principles in his upbringing. I was wrong...he isn't a socialist. He is a die hard Marxist. Stalin would have been proud of Barack Hussein Obama.

It isn't all that difficult to connect the dots. All the evidence one needs is here in my collection. Just be sure to understand what a "progressive" is and who the members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus members are. If you are having problems connecting the dots, that would be your problem and not mine.

One can catch the wave at Memeorandum...or here...

Not convinced yet? It doesn't take a college degree to figure it all out but it does require a knowledge of history that spans at least 232 years.

And, it would behoove everyone that is seriously interested in preserving Traditional America to write the RNC and ask them why they are ignoring these facts about Obama.


Everything You Wanted To Know About William Ayers


I have an ongoing collection of posts, articles and pieces from all over the net stored right here. Have a nut. In the meanwhile, Czarbie the fraud and liar Marxist says he didn't know anything about him. Yeah. Right. And I am voting for the moron.
Barack Obama's top political adviser said today Obama “didn't know the history” of unrepentant bomber William Ayers' activities in the violent Weather Underground movement when the candidate attended a political event at Ayers' home in 1995. [...]
If anyone actually believes that, I have some ocean front property for sale. It is located in Allen, Texas. I am offering it for a special price of $35K an acre in 1-acre lots.

How about a history lesson?

Barack Obama says that he knows thousand of people but they didn't give him a job in charge of millions of dollars so he could buy votes...Bill Ayers did.

He claims and confirms that the job Ayers gave him qualifies him for political office.

Rezko hired Obama to set up fraud low-income housing scams.

Barack's political career was launched in 1995 at an important "Meet the candidate" event in the home of Bill Ayers.

Ayers then created, personally, the Chicago Annenberg Challenge with a $50M grant received from the Annenberg Foundation

Ayers then hired Obama with only a community organizing background as Chairman of The Board of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge

They then worked together on the Woods Fund and also conduct several forums together to fight legislation.

Obama proceeds to pay out large amounts of money to political allies through organizations he and Ayers controlled.

Rev Meeks, Father Pleger, Rev Wright and Trinity United Church of Christ all got Obama-Ayers money and the mega-churches all deliver thousands of votes in return.

Ayers gave an unqualified Obama the job that bought Obama's political career.

He didn't know of him?


And, where are his shining results that he can point to? What succeeded and what failed? Oh. Wait. That was a racist statement. Oh. Wait, again. Ayers is a law-abiding citizen now and a school reformer now reformed. I forgot. But wishes he placed more bombs...and killed more people. For the war, naturally. And which war was that again?


Some Things Make Me Wonder  UPDATED


As the title suggests, some things cause me to pause to consider and others cause me to nearly spew coffee across my screen and keyboard. The soon to be linked post almost caused coffee bean abuse and thus rile my ire. Behold:
John McCain lost the election Sept. 24 and Barack Obama will be the next president of the United States. Nothing that is likely to happen between now and Nov. 4 can change this outcome.

Since Sept. 24, polls have increasingly pointed toward a Democratic landslide. Obama not only has an outside-the-margin advantage in nearly every national poll, but leads strongly in enough battleground states that if the election were held today, the Electoral College vote would be 353 for the Democrat, 185 for the Republican. Even Karl Rove's electoral map now shows Obama winning. [...]

It is a good thing this person that wrote this defeatist nonsense isn't in charge of anything worthy. Hell. Even the Little Red Train has more positive outlooks on life and the possibilities thereof. Normally, the folks at American Spectator are upbeat and rational. This piece, however, reminds me of that nut at WND I wrote about yesterday. This is yet another example of a fool being taken in by the retarded pollsters. Polls, folks, are designed to bring about an outcome - influence voters. That way, when all is said and done, they can claim, "See?" Now Rasmussen is usually two weeks behind and this is even stated on their web site. So, the author, Robert Stacy McCain, is one of those Dip Dunks I spoke about earlier.

In one of two pieces at TAT that I will link soon, shine a different light. Take into consideration McCain's track record in regards to elections and campaigns. Many called him dead in the water earlier this year. Others, such as myself, have been anxious for the McCain Camp to at least pretend they were in this race. McCain does things at his time and not ours. We witnessed that fact this past weekend, did we not?

So, here is one of the pieces at TAT:

Even with their stumbles over the past two weeks, John McCain and Sarah Palin still have time to win the election and save our country. To do so, McCain must commit to taking the steps necessary to truthfully frame the issues in a way that will resonate with the voters, and then relentlessly take action against the two obstacles in his way -- the daily messages being spouted by Obama and the mainstream media.

Senator McCain must focus on getting several key points across to the American public. At the same time, he must emphasize the fact that it is the media who is trying to elect Barack Obama -- in essence, asking the public if they are comfortable allowing the liberal media to choose the country's next President. [...]

Whereas I can agree with most of that article, here is the other one at TAT entitled, "What if McCain knows what he's doing?"
Sometimes, if I'm puzzled by someone's actions, I like to ask myself "if he's really smarter than I am, why would he be doing what he's doing?"

You can learn a lot that way. Unfortunately, the American Chattering Classes often operate on the opposite assumption: "if I don't see the point of this, that other guy must be an idiot."

As a case study, let's consider the McCain campaign in the month since my piece on McCain's apparent use of the OODA loop was published here in American Thinker. God knows it's been a rough month: after the rush of the Palin selection, we had a couple of disappointing experiences with major media interviews, and worse -- much worse -- we had the credit market freeze and the fight to get a rescue package working.

Of course, then we had the Vice Presidential debate, which certainly restored a certain amount of respect for Sarah Palin. (It must have: there has been another flood of Palin rumors.) But then we had some more inexplicable actions on the part of McCain's campaign: the announcement that they intended to get tough on Obama... real soon. The announcement that they were pulling out of Michigan ... or were they? The Michigan GOP didn't like it, and Sarah Palin said to send her and her husband. It became clear McCain didn't exactly have complete control of the moose-hunting governor. [...]

Naturally, the rest of the article explains in greater detail what might be going through the head of The Maverick. In a previous article here, I alluded to what McCain needs to do now and in a nutshell, I said that the gloves must come off. Apparently that has happened. I say that because all of the libtards have been whining about a poll - go figure - that has Czarbie a measly 4 points ahead. Now, when a leftist news organization can only place their guy 4 points ahead with the MILLIONS spent - 10 to 1 over McCain - that is indicative of a lost campaign. The poll was produced by CBS and CBS just a few days ago had Czarbie 9 points ahead. Do you see why I nearly wet myself with laughter as I hear folks saying, " THE POLLS ARE COMING! THE POLLS ARE COMING!! THE POLLS ARE COMING!!!"? Screw the polls and use your mind and pay attention.

The coming onslaught of Truth Revealed between now and 11/4/08 is going to frazzle Czarbie that cannot stand up to pressure. This, I believe, has been McCain's strategy from the start. He knows The One. And, he knows how to take Czarbie down. There is nothing that Czarbie can do to take McCain down. He has been down since the beginning. I recognize a flanking maneuver when I see one and Czarbie is about to be overrun.

The problem for Czarbie is, he doesn't know what a flanking maneuver is, let alone recognize one. Neither does his idiot advisers.

With the military 45 points ahead in favor of McCain, why do you think the military votes won't be counted...again? The shipped ballots will be "late" or "lost" again. They always are.


Jules Crittenden nails the American Spectacle article...he calls it The Other Election...and I quote:

It’s over, McCain lost. The Other McCain channeling his own American Spectator article re the election they held today:

John McCain lost the election Sept. 24 and Barack Obama will be the next president of the United States. Nothing that is likely to happen between now and Nov. 4 can change this outcome.

I’m sorry, make that the election they held Sept. 24. Could be true, and he might yet, but they didn’t, and it isn’t, so he doesn’t, yet. While the Other McCain’s instincts re celeb cleavage are spot on, if the other other McCain gave up as easy as the Other McCain does, he’d still be able to comb his own hair.

More important news about the election they are holding today here. Memo to pundits. There’s this fat lady. She gets to sing. That happens on Election Day. Which is Nov. 4. That said, there is no call for eff you responses to the Other McCain for pointing out what he thinks is wrong with the picture. That’s a totally leftosphere move. Can’t we all just get along? OK, cleansing celeb cleavage via the Other McCain. Lefty, of course, in the interest of D-partisanship:


New Definition of Barack Obama: Bogus


Not only is Barack a Marxist, among other things, he is also bogus. He is a fraud coupled with a liar. Some call him an empty suit but it is much worse than that. He has no soul. He is a walking void. What little he knows or understands came from others better than he and those "betters" were as anti-American as any anti-American can be. This is why everything he has to say is written for him and placed on a teleprompter. When he shoots from the hip, all he draws are blanks.

As I have said for decades, the only way a Democrat can win an election is to lie, steal, cheat, mislead, deceive, defraud or any of the above in any number of combinations. For instance, as Don Surber states:

Was Democrat Barack Obama so money-hungry that he accepted bogus Internet money from Seymour Butts and I.P. Nightly? People had their suspicions about the loot that Obama raised online. But now the public is learning about what a slipshod money-raising organization Obama ran. Remember, he bragged about how he ran a campaign and that was more executive experience than actually being a mayor or a governor. [...]
CBS News has an earlier report on other "less than honorable" contributors.

Amanda Carpenter has the details of the RNC complain in regards to questionable campaign contributions of The Used To Be The One. If you recall, we spoke of this several months ago and the weeks following on our Blog Talk Radio Shows. We knew then that something smelled fishy. And that is a matter of record. I am glad to see that someone is questioning this crook Czarbie. Suitably Flip has a fantastic graphic which, as usual, is spot on. The graphic is to the left. Is that priceless or what?

Yesterday, Doug Ross had a post up (posted at TAB also) demonstrating what he wished the McCain Camp would do in regards to campaign ads. It looks like he got his wish. The McCain Camp came out fighting today and the hits are hard with no sign of relief in sight. Naturally, the opposition is calling "fowl". I am loving it. For far too long, the GOP have been pansies. For decades, all in the name of nice-nice, the GOP has been playing by the rules, defined by the socialists, while the socialists have continued to move the bar and redraw the line in the sand as the GOP sat back and sat on their hands with both thumbs firmly inserted into their anal orifices.

CNN also ran a story yesterday questioning their lovely Obama. I found that peculiar to say the least. It was perhaps due to the Newsweek piece but one will never know. Naturally the spin was in Obama's favor but the Newsweek piece, not so much. Either way, both have a history of Czarbie Tanks.

Pamela Geller, the never ending Citadel of Truth, Justice and the American Way, has been questioning Czarbie's crap for months. In her steadfastness, she caused the GOP to blink and we thank her for her efforts and her Xena Warrior Princess manner. Now, if we can get Czarbie to comply with the Court Order to produce a valid Birth Certificate.........?? Naturally, Czarbie and his idiots are claiming that all this is is a distraction. Perhaps for him but for honest Americans, we demand the Truth. You can read the originating story in The Hill.

More at Memeorandum...


Why Czarbie Will Lose The Election


HT Right Truth


To The Enemies of The State, Truth Revealed Equals Smear


Absolutely. We live in upside down land. When the Truth is revealed about the upstart and inexperienced fraud and Marxist Obama, the racists in the Nation pull the Race Card and accuse his opposition of being a racist. So be it if they are too cowardly to face their own Demons. For example...
Established in March 2008, Progressives For Obama (PFO) was co-founded by Tom Hayden (a Students for a Democratic Society organizer who collaborated with North Vietnamese Communists during the Vietnam War and organized riots at the 1968 Democratic Party Convention in Chicago); Danny Glover (an actor and leftist ideologue who has ardently supported the regimes of Venezuela's Hugo Chavez and Cuba's Fidel Castro); Barbara Ehrenreich (Honorary Chairwoman of the Democratic Socialists of America, or DSA); and Bill Fletcher, Jr. (a former Maoist and current DSA leader who serves as executive editor of Black Commentator, and who co-founded the Black Radical Congress, which has close ties to the Communist Party USA).

PFO's initial mission was to help Senator Barack Obama defeat his chief Democrat rival, Hillary Clinton, in the quest to win the party's presidential nomination. Said PFO at its inception:

"Clinton's most bizarre claim is that Obama is unqualified to be commander-in-chief. Clinton herself never served in the military, and has no experience in the armed services apart from the Senate armed services committee. Her husband had no military experience before becoming President. In fact, he was a draft opponent during Vietnam, a stance we respected. She was the first lady, and he the governor, of one of our smallest states. They brought no more experience, and arguably less, to the White House than Obama would in 2009."
After Mrs. Clinton conceded defeat to Obama in the summer of 2008, PFO turned its attention to beating Republican presidential candidate John McCain. [...]
Please go read the rest and get ready to take notes. I have been writing of this and speaking of this for decades, people. The above people have formed an alliance to support Obama and they also promote socialism/Marxism by any means required to become the Law of The Land in the United States.

In other news and knowing that Obama is really the American Gorbachev, I find it amazingly ironic how the alleged "more intelligent people" in this nation and the world just blew off the Sunni Cleric Sheik Muhammad Abu Al-Qat' when he he says that an American Gorbachev will destroy America - from within. Do you remember that? Do you also remember which USSR leader stated the same thing as he hammered dais with his shoe? And people wonder why I claim that there is no difference between the current crop of DNC leaders, terrorists and Marxist/Communists? Remember what Lenin and other communist leaders have said; when you control the economy, you control the people. Here is a video of Czarbie saying exactly that but in other words.

Another indicator is the communist site called CPUSA is all in the tank for Czarbie. His associations with the terrorists, home grown or not, is really nothing in comparison. In yet another indicator of the Clear and Present Danger can be found at Smoldering Cur Wadi: they are asking people to take the "Be A Bold Progressive" pledge...

What does taking the pledge mean? It means that when Democratic "leaders" tell Americans we must settle for watered-down solutions while bold back-benchers in the House or Senate are pushing strong progressive alternatives, we will clamor for those bold alternatives together until they are passed into law.
Just in case you are not aware, a "progressive" is the new term for liberal which actually means either a socialist, communist or Marxist...take your pick. They are one in the same.


Libtards Just Don't Get It and They Never Will


Read the title again please because I am about to tell you why. Done? Good. They don't get it because they are dumber than a box of turtle turds. That's why. Case in point? Behold.

Marc Ambinder wrote a piece entitled, "Wm. Ayers v. Todd Palin: Tales from GBA-Land". In that article one will find the following:

[...] Conservative groups have spent more than ten million dollars on ads tying Obama to Ayers, and so far, Americans don't seem to give a heck. (This tells us what about how we're going to make that mortgage payment?) [...]
Without going into the details at the moment, a retarded libtard idiot at the KOSmonoffs - go figure - had this to say about the article:
Still, it's all they have left, so they'll stick with it. And yup, no one gives a damn.
The poor fool can believe that if the sot wants to. I could care less. The problem is, some other idiot dumber than that one just might believe its idiocy. That's where we come in.

The pathetic blithering idiot obviously got nothing from the remainder of the article and chose instead to cherry pick something that unwrinkled its panties. What Marc was talking about was the lame attempts of the Leftinistra to compare the Obama-Ayers associations with the Mr Palin-Mrs Palin associations with each other seeing that at one time, Todd Palin was associated with the Alaska Independence Party. Such is the case to one of my commenters which can be read here.

Many states in our Union have considered secession from the Union, Oklahoma being one of the most recent. However, they are not running around blowing things up nor are they saying that their only regret is having not done enough or more. Therein lies the difference. For the record, I am in favor of Texas divorcing itself from the Union. We are the only State that can do this very easily...Texas joined up via Treaty and can withdraw that treaty by the same quorum it took to join. We are also the ONLY State in the Union that can fly the State Flag - The Lone Star Texas Flag - at the same height as the American Flag. That was part of the Treaty. Does that make me a domestic terrorist and do I run around blowing stuff up like the domestic terrorist Ayers did? Not hardly.

For the past 3 weeks, I have been offering $500 to students at various college campuses to prove me wrong about the Obama-Ayers connection. When I first bring the subject up, I get various responses and reactions and most of them are derogatory in nature. Then - THEN - I break out 5-each crisp $100 bills and I lay them down on a table or a bench and I say, "Support your position without a reasonable doubt and the $500 is yours." You should see them scramble. Some of them have asked if they can use my computer and I let them. So far, I still have that $500. They learned that the Czarbie-Ayers associations are factual, credible and unacceptable. I have swung many voters away from Czarbie and I am damned proud of that.

Americans DO care, Mr Dumbass Kos. I see it everyday on the college campuses I frequent. One Moonbat Spider Hole at a time, we are Taking Our Country Back. Of that you can rest assured. I just wish that more Americans actually gave a damn and do what I and others are doing...going after the folks at the bottom and working our way up.

When the time comes, and it will should we collectively do nothing, what will you tell the demons when they come?

More at Memeorandum...


Palin Has No Gloves - The Leftinistra Tremble


We all have heard by now that the Marxist fraud Czarbie (Obama as a Barbie doll appearance and his desires to be First Czar of the United Socialist States of America) has been utilizing the legal system to shut down adverse "attacks on his character". First of all, he has to have some semblance of a decent character to begin with in order for his character to be attacked. Seeing that he has no honorable character to start with, the silliness of his lameness is "Rather" apparent.

Gaging from the reactions of the Leftinistra directly following the Palin-Biden smack down, and since then, where Sarah Palin absolutely made mince meat of the pathological liar Biden, I have noticed the fear in their verbiage. They fear facts and as I have been stating for a very long time now, facts repel the Leftinistra much as citing Holy Scripture does.

Even more telling are the posts over at Talk Left. Whereas the mutants at the KOSmonoffs are comical at best and only the Moonbat Fruit Loop Brigades pay them any attention, they are to be regarded in disdain. Irrelevant is their name. However, at least Talk Left can speak rationally even though they are wrong nearly all the time. Facts are facts and the emerging fact is this - Sarah Palin scares the hell out of the Leftinistra. Another thing that scares them is they cannot silence the folks exposing Czarbie's ties to known terrorists and his track record of aiding and abetting the enemy in a time of war for political gain.

Yes indeed. The gloves are coming off and the Leftinistra tremble. Why do they tremble? They have no integrity. They have no honesty. They are Marxists and any form of Marxism cannot be reconciled with the United States Constitution. Ever. One or the other must emerge as the Law of The Land because neither can coexist with the other in the same nation. They are diametrically opposed one with the other.

The poor creatures over at Wizbang Blue are especially in the shadow of fear of Sarah Palin. The fear is so deeply ensconced into their framework, the only thing I feel is complete hilarity.

Now, on to some serious posts without the fear mongering that the Leftinistra are so accustomed to using yet blaming others for it.

As Czarbie's Hitler Yoots similarity becomes more and more evident, more and more people are catching onto his antics of Social Engineering that even Saul Alinsky would be proud of. Do recall my reports on the Czarbie Civilian National Security Forces. Question: what would happen if McCain or Palin tried these tactics?

Another Fear Factor for the moonbat brigades is the odd happenstance that NOW has endorsed Sarah Palin. Check the GretaWire for the complete details. Expect to see and hear much wailing and gnashing of teeth over this one folks.

ANM has a good analysis of the NY Slimes piece as they tried to whitewash (no pun intended - should have been either black wash or gray wash or hybrid wash actually) the Obama-Ayers connection.

You’ll excuse me if I don’t get all gooey over this heartwarming tale of a domestic terrorist gone good. The New York Times and its writers are so full of crap that I often wonder how anyone shows up to work there without gagging to death from the smell. If I were truly cruel that thought could turn into wishful thinking. But I don’t want them to die. I just want them to go away to some place where their talents could be put to better use, like the Cuban government. [...]
And ye shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free.

Ace brings us: McCain/Palin Ramp Up Attacks On Obama And His Terrorist Pals

Lots of interesting bits today on where the presidential race is heading with less than a month to go. Today’s Washington Post has a story quoting campaign sources as saying McCain is going to focus more on Obama’s liberal policies... [...]
Donald Douglas brings us: Obama's Terrorist Connections
The big controversy today continues to be the New York Times' pro-Obama propaganda piece claiming that Barack Obama and William Ayers "do not appear to have been close." Stanley Kurtz, who is at present probably the foremost expert on the Obama-Ayers relationship, called the Times' article a "white-wash": [...]
There's that pun again.

Dr Bill brings us: The Lowdown on ACORN

ACORN, one stop shopping for all of your voter fraud and predatory lending needs.
Catch the video therein. Czarbie has a history of voter fraud. Go figure. That is the only way a Democrat can win...cheat and lie. Come to think of it, that is what Marxism-Socialism teaches.


Palin comes out swinging and starts telling the folks what's at stake here. Why McCain is so damn polite when the very country is at stake confounds me. These are dangerous people and we need a leader, unafraid of the media, unafraid of the leftwing bullies -- we are counting on you McCain and you are failing us. Palin OTOH is opening up and telling folks what we on the blogs have been reporting for over a year now - Obama's nefarious radical alliances. The media is having a two year old temper tantrum but even the deeply leftarded Rolling Stone agrees. This from February 2007 - thanks to Joe In the tank for Obama early and often, Rolling Stone was enthralled back then at the thought of Obama, with "as openly radical a background as any significant American political figure has ever emerged from," (p.3) becoming a force for change on the national stage. The reference is to Wright, rather than to Ayers, but the politics are ultimately the same. I bring this up not because the article sheds any new light on Obama, but rather because of its tone. Obama's radicalism was a selling point with which leftist journals like RS were trumpeting just last year and attempting to bury now. [...]
This is what has the enemy within scrambling in fear folks...they are being exposed and there is no relenting in sight no matter how they try and shut us down. The more they scream, whine and complain, the more we apply Truth, Facts and Pressure. Sooner or later, they will fall and break. Sooner would be better, naturally. This election is their last HOORAH!

Be sure to catch Ben Smith's blog here and The Caucus blog here. Unlike the Leftinistra hacks, we like to show all sides of an issue and let the reader decide. That is called fair and balanced. Naturally, I will place my take on the issue.

Gateway Pundit brings us:

Sarah Palin better watch it. After writing three front page stories on minor Bristol Palin the New York Times finally reported on (whitewashed) Barack Obama's connections to terrorist Bill Ayers today. But, that didn't mean they wanted the popular Alaska governor to go around and start talking about Obama and his radical friends. [...]
Who cares what the Lame Stream wants...ROFLMAO! Oh. Yeah. There's that pun again. Czarbie is filthy dirty in the tank with anti-Americanists. Of that there is no doubt whatsoever.

In another piece at Gateway Pundit: Sarah Palin: "Just Once It Would Be Nice If Barack Obama Said He Wanted Us to Win"

[...] Ace of Spades is liveblogging the rally. Palin is hammering Obama!
Here's a great line-- Palin:
"There's a special place in hell for women who don't support women...

Just once it would be nice if he said he wanted our country to win!
She also nailed him again for palling around with terrorists! Go Sarah!

Maybe there is hope for America, yet! [END]

In the Soros-Hillary rag Media Matters for America, they vainly try and compare William Ayers and G Gordon Liddy. Wow. Such fear they reveal. Simply amazing. Try again numbnuts.

From Fox Blogs:

Our opponent though is someone who sees America it seems as being so imperfect, imperfect enough that he’s palling around with terrorists who would target their own country. Americans need to know this. Talk about taking the gloves off, I too being that outsider and only being a part of this for 5 weeks now, I think ok we gotta get the word out. This is in fairness to the electorate we gotta start telling people what the other side represents.
Like ET says..."OUCH!"

There are two locations at Memeorandum to follow this discussion. One is for Hugh Hewitt's piece and the other is for the AP piece.


Everything Obama - Goons, Thugs and Worms


So. We have the Obama Goons, the Civilian National Security Forces (CNSF), Obama Channel, Obama Coins, Obama Liar, the Obama Resume, Obama Exposed, the Obama Test, Obamalot and everything else Obama or, as I like to refer to the Marxist whore, Czarbie.

Does anyone else see what the hell is going on here?

Oh. Wait. I forgot about the Obama Camps...

"The next tip is to be absolutely ruthless," Jocelyn Woodards tells the campers. "We want you to be determined, ambitious, take a risk." [...]

[...] Obama is not like other candidates, and part of this training is learning to mimic the methods he used before he was an elected official -- back when he was a community organizer in Chicago following the textbook of legendary agitator Saul Alinsky. [...]

And there we have it. Czarbie is advocating the overthrow of the United States Government. Now. If we can only get him to conjure up his birth certificate...maybe we will find something else out about the fraud.


The Grey Lady and Obama-Ayers


The NY Times is looking into the Obama-Ayers connection? What took them so long? Oh. Wait. Never mind.

More at Memeorandum...

Hot Air's take...move along, nothing to see here so says the Slimes...surprised? No.


BREAKING: Czarbie Was Asked To STOP Wearing That Bracelet


Gateway Pundit has the scoop as reported at Newsbusters. Apparently, the family of Sgt Ryan David Jopek has previously asked the fraud Czarbie to NOT wear their son's bracelet. However, due to political expediency, Czarbie disregards a family's request for political gain. What a schmuck.

Here is the pathetic Marxist at the McCain thrashing...(vote it up at Digital Journal)

[UPDATE] (by request and rightfully so)

It is the opinion of this author that Barack Obama needs to immediately honor the request of the family and stop wearing their son's bracelet. Barack does the name of Sgt Jopek dishonor in using his death as a political football and his very insensitivity to the family is unacceptable.

As a DAV, I find Barack's insincere rhetoric a blight on this nation's good name. Then again, Obama is the consummate fraud so we really shouldn't expect anything less from such a shallow community "disorganizer".

Barack Obama - you are a disgrace to the very uniform that you lied about not wearing. As you "contemplated" joining the military to "serve honorably" but didn't think that there was enough going on in the world to justify joining the rank and file of the United States Armed Services, there were guys like myself in Iran trying to rescue the American hostages. Some we got out and some we could not.

If one is to wear a fallen's bracelet, the least one can do is remember the man's name without having to look at the bracelet to remember.


McCain 1 - Obama 0


Some call the first Presidential debate a draw and some are calling it a win for McCain. Naturally, the Leftinistra are calling it a win for Obama. Obama's performance can be clasified as a win if one is a socialist and vague dunce.

The only segment that can be considered a draw is the very first question. It was a draw in that McCain missed two opportunities to totally shred Obama. McCain waited until the third segment to eviscerate Obama and in the third segment, Obama began to lose his composure. I believe it was the constant smirk on McCain's face that got to Obama.

Several times, Obama debated himself and, as says, kicked his own butt. The NRO agrees; Obama clearly lost. Perhaps the smirk on McCain's face was due to the fact that for most of the evening, Obama insisted that McCain was right.

I will give Obama credit for a fine performance, however. The usual stammering and stuttering was not nearly as present as in other off-the-cuff caught-without-a-teleprompter moments but he did have several of those moments. Most of them came during the trouncing he received during the Commander In Chief tests but, don't tell these folks that he failed miserably.

In case one is wondering, John McCain has some substantiation. Please check out his web site here for the Debate Facts listings. Therein one will find just how many lies Obama stated as truth. For example, missile defense, bombing Pakistan and his many stands on the Troop Surge are indicative of one blowing with the wind. John McCain has said and done some things that just absolutely drive me crazy - just like GWB - but there is one thing you can be sure of; he most assuredly sticks by his guns and does not blow with the wind or pollsters. Obama on the other hand, well, he speaks to the moment to whomever he is trying to reach and has been known to hold every view on every issue in the same paragraph.

If you are interested in a Debate Score Card, Hugh Hewitt has one. His blog also has a postmortem review and a Master-Grasshopper analogy. Don't forget, Obama has a bracelet too.

Donald Douglas has a great review as well. Obama, if anything, proved that he is all about growing the government and not the country. He thinks government is the country whereas McCain sees and knows differently. And, on that point alone, the Leftinistra will drool all over themselves spinning the debate as an Obama victory. Naturally, the Marxists agree with each other. Of that there can be no doubt.

Obama had his Kissinger moment and was duly spanked. He was also schooled on Iraq. As we discussed this debate on my BTR show, we are not fighting 2 wars...we are fighting 1 war. Using Czarbie's pathetic rhetoric, we are fighting 80+ wars. What a silly man. The entire evening, Czarbie was schooled by The Teacher...the man with experience. Pretty much during the evening, Czarbie said that McCain was right and McCaiin said - rightfully - that Czarbie didn't understand.

Yes, Sir! The debate was handily won by Senator McCain, soon to be President Elect McCain. McCain may not have shredded Czarbie as we had hoped or wished that he would. However, perhaps he is acting Presidential and we are wanting blood.


Czarbie The Liar


I am having mixed emotions at the moment here. I don't know which emotion to express but utter and pure contempt comes to mind. Czarbie the Liar is quoted as saying:
[...] "Keep in mind House Democrats and Senate Democrats and me and the leadership are all pretty burned up about this thing," Obama said at a news conference after the TV interviews. "This wasn't happening on our watch. We weren't preventing some of the regulatory reforms that might have prevented us from getting here." [...]
The Democrat Party...culture of liars, fools and damned frauds.

More lies from Czarbie here at TWS...


Czarbie: Suppressor of Constitutional Rights


The following is yet one more example of Czarbie's unsportsmanlike conduct. Not only is he a sore loser, a liar and a racist, he tries to use the legal system to shut people down that he feels is being not him. I suppose if one were to agree with him, support him and vote for him, those folks would be free to do and say what they please no questions asked and would be considered as being nice. HT to Gateway Pundit, please visit the "Truth Squads" report here. They are uncannily reminiscent of the South American, Middle Eastern and Asian Death Squads.

Then again, his people sure do like that quack job Che Guacamole.

There are more examples of this but the above is the most recent.

PJM has a piece up on this as well from a while back.

More at Memeorandum...