Navigation

DISSENT!

Defend Israel

The Patriots Call
The Black Robe Regiment - The Patriots Call

Democrats party of Racism
Racism of the Democrat Party
Herman Cain - The DNC has BRAINWASHED most of the Blacks of this Nation
Racism - the Nemesis of the Democrat Party
Democrats invented racism and democrats HATE all blacks
The Snooper Report articles on Democrat invention of racism

The March on DC
Callin’ All the Clans Together
Sick and tired - marching towards the Constitution of the United States
We. Are. Finished. With.  DC.
We. Are. Finished. With. DC. - Addendum Part 1

Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It
Civility: The Leftinistra Own None Of It Part 2(?)
Civility: Leftinistra Own None Part Three
Obama, Civility and The Clansmen of Dumb
Brain Dead Leftinistra: Their Stoic Civility
Libtards Have No Class - Civility Escapes Their Brain Deadness
The States Will Be the Next Battlefield in the Fight Over ObamaCare
War Is Coming: Blood On Our Own Streets - Thanks Democrats
Civil War…
We Are In The Midst of Chaos and Civil War
Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die Trying
State’s Sovereignty or Live Free Or Die
Live Free Or Die - The Movement Marches On
The Country Surrounds The City

When They Came
Is The Left Still “Proud To Be a Left-Wing Extremist”?
Be It Known - Attention Unconstitutional Congress
Obama: One Big Ass Mistake America
Do Birthers Rock and Roll or Stop and Drool?
Good vs Evil…It Is Your Choice
I Apologize For My Nation
Obama’s Civilian National Security Forces (CNSF)
Obama’s Brown Shirts - Civilian National Security Forces
What Is It About The American Liberal?
The Plan To Destroy America
Another Soldier Has Been Given the Haditha Treatment!
Callin’ All The Clans Together
Callin’ All The Clans Together Show
A History of the List of 45
Constitutionality: The Movement
Vindication: Iraq’s Saddam and Al Qaeda Links Revealed
Redefining The Center or the Moderate
The HIC (Hoax In Charge) Going To Copenhagen
We Didn’t Start This Goddamn War!

Copy Cat Frauds of the IAVA

Contract With America
Snooper’s Declaration of Independence
Thanks Obama

Contract From America

Timothy McVeigh
Thoughts To Ponder and Reflect Upon
Snooper Report Vindication: Al Qaeda, TWA Flight 800 and OKC Bombing
Clinton alludes to 1995 bombing, says words matter

Missing 13th Amendment
TITLES OF “NOBILITY” AND “HONOR” - The Missing 13th Amendment

The Coup
Military Coup Against Obama

The United States Constitution
Our founding document wasn’t set in stone for a reason

Deepwater Horizon
Did Hugo Chavez Sink the Deepwater Horizon Oil Platform?

MSLSD Lies
The New Right

Arizona Rising

Texas Wars







1980

1984

Wake Up GOP

Powered by Squarespace
Thursday
Sep192019

An Atlantic Magazine Liberal's Jaw-Dropping Attempt to Redefine 'Conservative'

FYI…hopefully “someone” will actually read this: ANDREW SULLIVAN IS NOT, NOT, NOT A CONSERVATIVE BY ANY STRETCH OF ANYONE”S IMAGINATION! Period. End of discussion. Now, if one is attempting to give some satanic grandure of being a “conservative”, then, Sullivan fits the bill. The dude is a NUTBAR!

Do YOU want to know the difference between a “liberal” or a “conservative”? Well, The Snooper Report did an article on that YEARS and YEARS ago (10.8.2011)! Did anyone give a damn? No, they did not. Anyway…

What does a Liberal want to be liberated from and what is a Conservative trying to conserve?

In the above article, the answer to the below post is answered completely and in totality…

From American Thinker

Andrew Sullivan is a “conservative,” which represents a virtuous mean between the extremes of “liberal” and “reactionary.”  He does not ever actually define “liberal,” but a “conservative” is content to “resist, slow, or even mock the nostrums of the left.”  To a “reactionary,” by contrast, “it is essential that they [the nostrums of the left] be attacked — and forcefully.”  What is more, reactionaries, like the Left, advocate “social engineering,” thereby abandoning something that Sullivan calls “liberal democratic moderation.”

A conservative, perusing the “social, cultural, and demographic changes of the last few decades” seeks only “to reform its [sic] excesses, manage its [sic] unintended consequences, but otherwise live with it [sic].”  The conservative, typified by Sullivan, is “more comfortable [than a reactionary] in a multicultural world, and see[s] many of the changes of the last few decades as welcome and overdue.”  These changes include “the triumph of women in education and the workplace; the integration of gays and lesbians; the emergence of a thriving black middle class; the relaxation of sexual repression; the growing interdependence of Western democracies; the pushback against male sexual harassment and assault.”

America is supposed to be an “ever-changing kaleidoscope,” if you weren’t certain.

Sullivan’s comfort with all these improvements apparently was consistent with his support of Hillary Clinton in 2016.  Although Clinton, in Sullivan’s estimation, would have been “a terrible president,” she was, nonetheless, a “defender of liberal democratic norms” (those, presumably, attained by the practice of “liberal democratic moderation”).  This made her, hands down, superior to Donald Trump, an “equivalent but even more deranged enemy of liberal democracy.”

This endorsement of Hillary Clinton is perhaps a little confusing — is Hillary Clinton a defender of “liberal democratic norms” or an enemy of them, but less “deranged” than Donald Trump?  Since he voted for her we must conclude that a “conservative” in Sullivan’s lexicon is someone who takes Hillary Clinton for a defender of liberal democratic norms, in some sense, at least.  Is a conservative, then, a fool?

No doubt, Clinton will escape indictment for her apparent violation of espionage laws while secretary of state — that is, for maintaining classified communications on an unsecured server, in order to conceal the corrupt intermingling of her official actions and the business of the Clinton Foundation.  No more did she suffer consequences for abetting her husband’s sexual predations, as she organized a campaign of character assassination against the female victims, or for the tragedy of Benghazi and its mendacious cover-up.  But the primary democratic norm is supremacy of law and its equal application to persons of every stature and wealth.  “Where law ends, tyranny begins,” wrote Locke, as much as any author responsible for modern liberal democracy.

Returning to the topic of reactionaries and conservatives, Mr. Sullivan explicates the superiority of those he calls “conservatives.”  For “a conservative is worried about the scale and pace of change, its unintended consequences, and its excesses, but he’s still comfortable with change.”  Now, that is clear enough: a conservative is comfortable with change, whatever sort of change it is, subject only to scrutiny of its degree.  Sullivan extols “change.”  He is also a defender of “modernity,” we deduce, since he reproves the reactionary’s “hostility” to it.  He is much like what others today describe as a “progressive.”

Sullivan is unrelenting: “Nothing is ever fixed.  No nation stays the same.  Culture mutates and mashes things up.  And in America, change has always been a motor engine in a restless continent.”  A facility for emitting platitudes is another attribute of the conservative, it seems.  How about a “motor engine” that repeals Obergefell v. Hodges (same-sex “marriage”), Roe v. Wade, and all of the jurisprudence interpreting the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause for the past 75 years?  How comfortable would Sullivan be with that?  Or would it not be “change”?  Does change have to be in the direction of an augmented egalitarianism and politicized hedonism, the only commandments on the tablet that the modern liberal brings down from Sinai?

Obviously, no political position is vindicated or refuted by placing a label upon it.  And those who run around with white oak tag and a can of yellow paint, affixing a “conservative” sign upon positions and politicians that plainly are not (the presidential campaigns of John McCain here come to mind), tend to be fakers and courtesans, seeking either to ingratiate themselves with both sides or, by their very incoherence, to affect a disinterested wisdom.

Our business is preserving the republic bequeathed us by the American Founders.  When we have expounded views consistent with that objective, we entreat Mr. Sullivan to call them reactionary, radical, revanchist, rhomboidal, or raspberry-raisin, if it pleases him.  Certainly, he is correct about those of us who see the current advance of the Left as something to be resisted and driven back before it engulfs the nation. 

The change intended by the “progressive” movement now extant in this country is the obliteration of its constitutive institutions and characteristics: its republicanism, by which it differs from pure democracy and governance by the mob; the philosophy of natural right enunciated in its Declaration of Independence, which the Constitution as positive law effectuates; its majority religion and all morality derived from the Bible; the demography that it has always known; and its very way of life.  The “fundamental transformation” of America means nothing less than that.  It is no virtuous moderation that counsels acquiescence.

The author rightly acknowledged to be the morning star of modern conservatism writes that society is a “partnership not only between those that are living, but between those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are to be born” (Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France [Oxford: 1993; 1999], 95–96).  He uses the legal terminology of inheritance to uphold the intention of the “testators” (those who created and left us the country that we inherit).  He also reminds of our duty to take care that what we leave to our descendants is as good.

There must be a principle of respect for  what has previously been erected and sustained the nation, says Burke, “lest the temporary possessors and life-renters in it, unmindful of what they have received from their ancestors, or of what is due their posterity, should act as if they were the entire masters; that they should not think it among their rights to cut off the entail [the intentions and conditions of the testators], or commit waste on the inheritance, by destroying at their pleasure the whole fabric of society; hazarding to leave to those who come after them, a ruin instead of a habitation — and teaching these successors as little to respect their contrivances, as they had themselves respected the institutions of their forefathers.”

Let us, then, be reactionaries enough to keep faith with those who bequeathed us our republic and to turn back the tide that threatens to sweep it away, or to cast ourselves in the path of that tide when no more is left to us.

The first paragraph from American Thinker is, well, incorrect. Read my article. Thanks. One MUST K.I.S.S..

This video is what Satan LOVES…

This video is what Satan hates..

YOU DECIDE!

 

Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants

“Be still and know that I am God: …” Psalm 46:10

Thursday
Sep192019

NY Times Writers Who Tried To Smear Brett Kavanaugh Now Blaming FOX News For Their Mistakes

JUDAS H PRIEST! Can you believe this BS? Either yesterday or the day before I put into a post that the Bolsheviks ALWAYS blame someone else for their defective lives! They LIE LIE LIE; get caught LYING; blame ANYONE but themselves! These morons have been doing this for DECADES…I guess it is now in their blood! My Dad would say, “This all started with that IDIOT Walter the Commie Kronkite!”

Bolshevik-Burgers, or, bugers…From American Lookout

Is there anything that the left won’t blame on FOX News? Apparently not.

Even the writers of the most recent smear piece about Brett Kavanaugh are blaming FOX News, now that their story has backfired so badly.

Townhall reports:

Pathetic: NYT Writers Who Tried To Destroy Kavanaugh Blame Fox News For Their Screw Ups

 

It’s pathetic. That’s the only word that can be used to describe the fallout from The New York Times’botched Brett Kavanaugh story. To recap, the Times’ Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly decided to write a book attacking Kavanaugh, trying to reveal that all the allegations lobbed at the sitting Supreme Court justice were true.

Not the case. In fact, it’s pretty much a worthless book, but they did supposedly have some bombshell about a new accuser who alleged that Kavanaugh shoved his private parts in front of her, like Deborah Ramirez alleged, during a college party at Yale. Ramirez’s story was part of the Democrat-media complex’s coordinated political hit against Kavanaugh during his confirmation process.

Yet, there is a problem. This supposed new accuser doesn’t remember this ever happening. So, it’s a nothing burger.

[Two Tweets are below but go to the site for the “rest of the story”…]

I wish I had “someone else to blame” for my “mistakes”

@realDonaldTrump #AmericaFirst #usa #kag2020 #maga2020 #maga #tcot #tlot #gop #freedom #TrumpTrainDay1 #Prolife #Trump2020 #Qanon #TheGreatAwakening #WWG1WGA #BuildTheWall #AbortionIsMurder #Saveourbabies #WalkAway

How much more RETARDED does the world need to get?

Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants

“Be still and know that I am God: …” Psalm 46:10

Thursday
Sep192019

The Bolsheviks Introduce Bill To Give Special Protection To Their Favorite Constituents - Journalists

Oh PLEASE! Journalism went DOA under that Bolshevik MORON Walter Kronkite! Remember THAT pompous ass? I do. I remember my Dad picking up a TV and throwing out into the backyard because he was SICK and TIRED of Bolshevik Comrade Kronkite!

From American Lookout

“President” Swalwell?“Rep. Eric Swalwell of California and two other Democrats have introduced a bill which would give members of the media special protection. This is ridiculous.

The Hill reports:

Dem lawmakers unveil Journalist Protection Act amid Trump attacks on media

Three Democratic lawmakers reintroduced a Journalist Protection Act that intends to designate “certain attacks on those reporting the news” as a federal crime.

 

The bill was introduced by Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.).

It was originally introduced by Swalwell in February 2018 when the House was under Republican control. Democrats officially took back the House this January.

“The Journalist Protection Act makes it a federal crime to intentionally cause bodily injury to a journalist affecting interstate or foreign commerce in the course of reporting or in a manner designed to intimidate him or her from newsgathering for a media organization,” reads the Tuesday press release.

“It represents a clear statement that assaults against people engaged in reporting is unacceptable, and helps ensure law enforcement is able to punish those who interfere with newsgathering.”

The lawmakers said they were introducing the bill as a response to President Trump’s “climate of extreme hostility” toward the media.

“Both before and since taking office, President Trump has blatantly stoked a climate of extreme hostility toward the press,” the release said. “He has called the press ‘the enemy of the American people,’ and described mainstream media outlets as ‘a stain on America.’

Yeah, right. Journalists are under attack. That must be why the Covington teenager Nick Sandmann, who was targeted by the media is now suing CNN for $275 million dollars.

FOX News reports:

Sandmann, family sue CNN for $275M in Covington Catholic controversy

A lawsuit worth $275 million was filed against CNN on Tuesday over the network’s alleged “vicious” attack against Covington Catholic High School student Nick Sandmann.

The lawsuit, filed just after 3 p.m. in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, claims that CNN “elevated false, heinous accusations of racist conduct” against Sandmann and failed to adhere to “well-established journalistic standards and ethics.”

Sandmann and his family previously announced they were filing a lawsuit against The Washington Post for $250 million in compensatory and punitive damages after the paper’s coverage of an encounter that went viral on social media.

Co-counsel for Sandmann, Todd McMurtry, in an exclusive appearance on Fox News’ “The Story” Tuesday, said that his client’s “character has now been determined by the lies issued by CNN” following their widespread coverage of Sandmann.

But Democrats think the media is the real victim in America today. Unreal.

Why doesn’t “someone” go after the CRIMES of Media Malfeasance? Hello? This will NEVER get by President Trump and it more than likely will not even pass in the House!

Swalwell, Blumenthal, Menendez…3ea LOSER (criminal) Bolsheviks. Blumenthal LIED his ass off (just like LiarWatha) about his Vietnam Stolen Valor BS; Menendex just last month beat a wrap for CORRUPTION in his PATHETIC District. Swalwell? He’s just an IDIOT!

Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants

“Be still and know that I am God: …” Psalm 46:10

Thursday
Sep192019

Trump Signs New Section Of Border Wall In California (VIDEO)

OUTSTANDING PRESIDENT TRUMP! Be gone, Bolsheviks, be gone!

From American Lookout

Trump is in California this week and decided to check out a new portion of the border wall.

He even signed it.

Breitbart reports:

Donald Trump Signs, Shows Off Newly Constructed Wall on San Diego Border

 

President Donald Trump visited the San Diego border on Wednesday to show off a newly constructed portion of the wall after a fundraising trip in California.

“It’s an amazing project,” Trump said, pointing to the 30-foot high barrier constructed with steel and concrete, noting that it also went six feet underground.

“If you think you’re going to cut it with a blow torch, that doesn’t work, because you hit the concrete, and then if you think you’re going to go through the concrete, that doesn’t work because we have very powerful rebar inside,” Trump said

The president traveled via motorcade after a fundraiser to Otay Mesa, a community outside San Diego on the United States -Mexico border to review the latest constructed physical barrier.

He pointed out the new wall structure to the press, which was 24 miles of primary and secondary wall at the border.

“We have it covered underground, we have it covered overground,” Trump said.
The president was joined by acting Department of Homeland security Kevin McAllen and several other border security officials.

See the video below:

Go to the site and read the “good” comments, not the Bolshevik satanic asshat comments… 

Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants

“Be still and know that I am God: …” Psalm 46:10

Thursday
Sep192019

Progressive Arizona Democrats (the Bolsheviks) Tell Sen. Kyrsten Sinema to Toe the Party Line or Face Censure

From Legal Insurrection

“Democratic Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema has been one of the few pleasant surprises in Washington, DC.

But Sinema has strayed too far away for her fellow Arizona Democrats [the Bolsheviks]. The [Bolshevik] Progressive Caucus of the Arizona Democratic [Bolshevik] Party wants to censure “Sinema for failing to support the tenets of the 2016 Democratic [Bolshevik] Party Platform.”

ABC15 in Phoenix has a copy of the resolution. The caucus wants a vote on the resolution at a meeting this weekend.

The caucus accused Sinema of these crimes against the party:

  • Sinema voted to confirm Attorney General William Barr [AND?]
  • Sinema did not co-sponsor the Save the Internet Act [AND?]
  • Sinema voted to confirm Interior Secretary David Bernhardt [AND?]

[Bolshevik] Progressive Caucus leader Dan O’Neal told ABC15 that they have concerns over her voting record. He insisted they love her, but “want her to vote like a Democrat [Bolshevik] rather than supporting Trump half the time.”

According to [Bolshevik] FiveThirtyEight, Sinema has voted with Trump 54.5% of the time:

The caucus [Bolsheviks] seems to forget that while a politician belongs to a party, they are in office to represent a district or state. If Sinema chooses to vote based on the wishes of those in Arizona then the [Bolshevik] caucus needs to pipe down. [Or just STFU and STFD!]

I reached out to Sinema’s office. I asked her press secretary if that is how the senator chooses to vote. If she responds I will update this post.

Here’s the thing. Sinema served in the US House of Representatives before she won the Senate seat in 2018. She voted more with Trump during her tenure in the House than she has so far in the Senate.

In other words, Arizonans knew exactly how Sinema votes in Congress. They still elected her.

President Donald Trump won Arizona in 2016, 48.1% to Hillary’s 44.6%. Yes, he barely won the state, but the state still elected him.

ABC15 reported the latest polls show Sinema with a 54% favorable rating while “favorability within her own party is at 85%.”

Plus, Sinema has never kept it a secret that she hates [Bolshevik] partisan politics:

In past interviews, Sinema has brushed aside calls that she is insufficiently partisan and that she should speak out against Trump’s more inflammatory comments or policies.

“As everyone knows, I am 100% focused on the needs of everyday Arizonans, and I refuse to be distracted by the pettiness and the partisanship that has invaded Washington,” she said during a July interview. “… I promised Arizonans that I would never be a part of that typical [Bolshevik] Washington chaos and drama and I’m going to continue to stay focused, just like a laser, on the stuff that actually matters to the people in their everyday lives.”

This might come back to bite the [Bolshevik] progressive wing in the Arizona [Bolshevik] Democratic Party. Arizona Democratic Party Chairwoman [Bolshevik] Felecia Rotellini does not know if they will pass the resolution.

[Bolshevik] Rotellini said that the Arizona Democratic [Bolshevik] Party is “a very diverse group and that means diversity of thought, as well.” However, she also dismissed any suggestions that a censor proves a problem within the party. She described a censure resolution as “an indication of a group of people who think differently and have a different perspective on the same topic.”

Sinema Censure by Washington Examiner on Scribd

SuperCaluFragaListicExpealoDocious!

Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants

“Be still and know that I am God: …” Psalm 46:10

Thursday
Sep192019

Usual Suspects Cry Foul as GOP Makes ‘Squad’ the Focus of Campaign Ads Going Into 2020

From Legal Insurrection

And THIS settles THAT!! By God and Sister Toldjah so!

If YOU select either one of these satanic morons, YOU are worse off in the spiritual realm than they are!

For years, Republicans have made House Speaker Nancy Pelosi the face of the Democratic party in campaign advertising, whether her party was in the majority or not. But the 2019-2020 election cycle is seeing a different cast of Democrat characters emerge front and center in GOP ads:

The Squad.

Roll Call reports on how Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and Ayanna Pressley are featuring prominently in ads for state elections in 2019:

But as Republicans work to keep control of key statehouses this fall ahead of the all-important redistricting process that comes with the 2020 census, state and local GOP politicians are building a robust negative campaign strategy against Democratic opponents using a new set of boogeywomen that includes Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Ilhan Omar of Minnesota.

The Republican State Leadership Committee, the organization that helps GOP candidates in state legislative races, unveiled its “Right Lines” initiative for the 2020 cycle last week to support “Republicans in key states where holding legislative majorities matters most” for federal congressional boundaries.

Images of Ocasio-Cortez, Omar and House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler of New York feature front and center on the Right Lines webpage’s banner photo.

Alongside their faces, a message: “Socialism starts in the states. Let’s stop it there, too.”

Further down the page are images of former Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., who is spearheading a Democratic effort to win back control of statehouses ahead of redistricting; former President Barack Obama; 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton; and billionaire liberal donor George Soros.

Every person pictured on the page is either Jewish, a woman, an ethnic minority, or some combination of the three.

Predictably, Rep. Omar told Roll Call that she was “not surprised that a racist party is running racist campaign ads” which, sadly, is the theme Roll Call ran with throughout the piece. They also made sure to include a quote from an anonymous aide suggesting that the ads will put Squad members in danger:

Aides for the squad have expressed concern that such negative attention on the freshman congresswomen has jeopardized their personal safety.

“It’s different from verbally attacking a presidential candidate, who has Secret Service, or leaders of the parties, who have [U.S. Capitol Police] security details,” one aide said. “They’re specifically targeting freshman members of Congress who don’t have those safety precautions in place.”

In other words, Republicans should simply shut up talking about the Squad.

What Omar, her fellow Squad members who also frequently play the Women of Color card, and Roll Call all conveniently ignore is the fact that these four women are among the loudest and out front members of the party. They make the most noise.

Of course Republicans all the way up to President Trump are going to give them the attention they clearly crave. This would be the case even if the Squad were a group of white male Democrats.

The Squad all use Twitter and other social media platforms as a weapon to mobilize their followers and demonize their opponents. Ocasio-Cortez does this more often than the rest, in addition to tweeting and Instagramming support for socialistic policies like the Green New Deal and presidential candidates like Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.

AOC has over 5 million followers on Twitter alone, which she uses to her advantage daily. That’s a very loud megaphone.

What Roll Call also leaves out of their reporting is that right under the picture of Holder, Obama, Clinton, and Soros on the Right Lines website are excerpts from an Associated Press article noting their heavy involvement in efforts to “take back statehouses.” Here’s the article they quote from (bolded emphasis added):

And Democratic donors who gave little to nothing to down-ballot races in the past are cutting large checks to groups focused on state races, the AP’s analysis shows. Among them are billionaire George Soros (at least $5.4 million), hedge fund billionaire Donald Sussman (at least $4.8 million) and billionaire investor and entrepreneur Fred Eychaner (at least $4.2 million).

[…]

Priorities USA, the largest Democratic outside group, and EMILY’s List recently announced they would spend $600,000 on voter mobilization for Virginia’s fall elections. For the first time, the Democratic opposition research group American Bridge is digging into the pasts of Republican statehouse candidates.

[…]

New groups that are focused on state races have sprung up, including the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, which is led by former Attorney General Eric Holder and endorsed by former President Barack Obama.

Priorities USA and the pro-abortion group Emily’s List have been big backers of Hillary Clinton and teamed up in 2016 during her run against Trump to help motivate women voters “in key battleground states.”

The Right Lines page also referenced a Washington Post article from August that noted “The Democratic Party’s future is at stake in state legislative races”:

To that end, Democrats’ state legislative campaign arm, the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, is racing to pick up as many as eight to 10 chambers to add to the eight they flipped from Republicans in the 2018 election cycle. They’ve raised $10 million already, which is a record for them and more than they spent in the whole 2010 cycle, when Democrats got wiped out of power in many states. What’s more, Democrats are set up well not to lose any chambers for the second election cycle in a row.

So, yes, a website that is focused on key state legislative races throughout the country is going to include information about the major Democrat players involved in trying to flip the balance of power in those states. They’re also going to use the words and images of the Squad to remind people in those states of just how far left the Democratic party has swung in recent years.

This is bigoted, racist, and anti-Semitic only in the fever swamps of the left where actual bigotry, racism, and anti-Semitism are all allowed to take place largely unchecked.

The 2019 state races are not the only races in which voters are going to see The Squad play starring roles in Republican advertising, either.

The same will be true of U.S. House and Senate races as well going into 2020, as we saw play out here in the North Carolina 9th congressional district race(where Republican Dan Bishop won last week).

My response to Democrats and journalists fretting about the use of the Squad’s faces and words in state and national campaign ads: Get used to it.” [I SO LOVE THAT EXPRESSION…USE IT ALL THE TIME!!!]

- Stacey Matthews has also written under the pseudonym “Sister Toldjah” and can be reached via Twitter. -

I was always wondering who “Sister Toldjah” really was!

OUTSTANDING ARTICLE!!

Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants

“Be still and know that I am God: …” Psalm 46:10

Thursday
Sep192019

Corey Lewandowski Trolls Befuddled Democrats (Bolsheviks actually) on House Judiciary Committee

The Jokester Nadler the Hate-Filled AssClown!On 9.17 and 9.18, The Snooper Report posted:

Corey Lewandowski Mops The Floor With Democrats At Congressional Hearing When He Lets Loose And Drops The Hammer On Them

AND

Republican Doug Collins Tears Into Democrats At Lewandowski Testimony: ‘They can’t sell the product!’ (VIDEO)

On 9.18, Legal Insurrection posted:

Corey Lewandowski Trolls Befuddled Democrats on House Judiciary Committee

The three articles listed above are GREAT articles in that the Bolsheviks ARE, as Legal Insurrection has annotated, BEFUDDLED! (The guy talks like me!)

…As I said, this is no longer about impeaching Trump, as much as it is about these Democrats trying to appear as if they’re trying to impeach Trump.

They’re all terrified of angering the far-left base and getting primaried by candidates supported by AOC and the Squad.

Lewandowski treated them like a joke because that’s what they are. A joke.

And, the Bolsheviks ARE a joke but the real deal is this: the Bolsheviks are a real tired, old-hat, POS “joke”…one can’t even laugh at their “jokisms” because the Bolsheviks are TRULY retarded!

The “joke” is so bad, that Nancy Pelosi has told the Jokester Nadler to cease and desist because the House hasn’t the votes to continue. The entire Nation knows this Witch Hunt BS about impeaching a President is indeed a farce because the current President SLAMMED Hillary the Rotten Budding Leninist in 2016. And that and only that is The Reason for this Witch Hunt BS! Even Pelosi knew that LONG ago! Pelosi ALSO stated to cease and desist on the Kavanaugh “impeachment”! When the “jokes” get so rotten, I believe charges of TREASON are in order!

What has happened in all of this is as follows: NO WHERE in the United States Constitution state that this “Witch Hunt” BS of “impeachment inquiry” is mentioned. You either charge the President in a LEGAL MANNER and then IMPEACH. Period. End of discussion.

From The Hill in one of The Snooper Report posts:

Even Jerry Nadler himself is admitting this all complete baloney.

The Hill reports:

Nadler: Impeachment inquiry a ‘made-up term’ but it’s essentially ‘what we are doing’

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) on Friday defended Democrats’ impeachment efforts against President Trump, despite mixed messages from lawmakers describing what his panel is doing on the issue.

In an appearance on CNN, prime-time host Chris Cuomo asked Nadler, “If a head of a committee such as yours believes what you obviously believe, your duty in the Constitution is to start investigating to see if you have the facts for grounds for impeachment, and it is called an impeachment inquiry. Is that what you are doing right now?”

“It is not necessarily called an impeachment inquiry. That’s a made-up term without legal significance. It is, however, what we are doing,” Nadler said.

The Democrats are putting on a clown show and it’s all just to placate their delusional supporters.

What are these people going to do if Trump wins again in 2020? 

If The Jokester Nadler KNOWS there is no “legalities” in this, then, WTF?

Praise the Lord Above we FINALLY have a REAL President at The Helm!

Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants

“Be still and know that I am God: …” Psalm 46:10

Wednesday
Sep182019

President Trump Delivers Impromptu Remarks From LAX Introducing NatSec Advisor Robert O’Brien…

Chopper pressers are the best pressers; even when they are from the tarmac at LAX in California.  Moments ago President Donald Trump talked to the press pool with his newly named national security adviser, Robert O’Brien.

2ea videos below…The Conservative Treehouse has the transcripts printed on their page.

President Trump begins his take-over of Bolshevik California…

Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants

“Be still and know that I am God: …” Psalm 46:10

Wednesday
Sep182019

Kavanaugh Drama Highlights Dem Divide

The Fraud/Fake/Lame Stream Media, according to Nancy Pelosi, has GONE TOO FAR in their HATRED of President Trump and more than likely 2/3 of the American population! There is a MAJOR riff going on amongst the Bolshevik Klans of ignorance, ugliness and HATRED - for each other!

Pelosi has stated, “KNOCK IT OFF!” on President Trump and Justice Kavanaugh but her mutant Little Ones aren’t “listening”. They “think” they’ve “won”. Won what I might ask.

Justice KavanaughThe latest issue dividing Democratic moderates from the party’s progressive wing is whether to press for the impeachment of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

A fresh allegation of sexual assault unveiled by a pair of New York Timesreporters has renewed calls for Kavanaugh’s impeachment from the vast majority of the party’s 2020 contenders. It would be an extraordinary step. Just one Supreme Court justice in history, Samuel Chase, has been impeached, and Chase, who served on the bench from 1796 to 1811, was ultimately acquitted by the Senate and never removed from the bench.

That’s perhaps why moderate Democrats are pumping the brakes on the effort. Two candidates who have also resisted the leftward lurch of the party on issues such as health care, former vice president Joe Biden and Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D., Minn.), are staying away from calls to impeach Kavanaugh. While most of the field used the latest allegation against Kavanaugh to call for impeachment, Biden and Klobuchar both said they needed more information.

First to say Kavanaugh “should be impeached” following the latest allegation was Julián Castro, who made the call on Twitter Saturday evening. Sen. Kamala Harris (D., Calif.) joined in on impeachment the next morning. Both then touted their impeachment calls in fundraising appeals to supporters.

Most of the field quickly followed suit, but Biden, the candidate atop the polls, and Klobuchar notably stopped short.

In a Sunday statement, Biden said the Times report raises “profoundly troubling questions” about Kavanaugh’s confirmation but did not call for impeachment.

“We must follow the evidence to wherever it leads,” Biden’s statement said. “Doing this the right way is critically important in getting the truth and restoring the American people’s faith in their government.”

Klobuchar told a group of voters on Sunday that “the most important thing to do first is to get the documents so you can actually look at them to make a decision about impeachment.”

“You can’t make that decision on just news reports, you have to actually get those documents,” Klobuchar said.

Candidates are already split on a number of polarizing issues including health care and the question of whether to impeach President Donald Trump. Political scientist Larry Sabato, who heads the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics, said the divide boils down to some candidates vying for support from liberal activists, and others already with their eye on the general election.

“A big primary field means the candidates are battling one another for the votes of liberal activists,” Sabato said, “and some candidates just won a gold star for calling for Kavanaugh’s impeachment.”

“Others have said nothing or at least not endorsed impeachment. Why? They are thinking about the broader body of voters that one finds in a general election.”

Sabato believes that calls for Kavanaugh’s impeachment will wind up being a losing issue for Democrats.

“Practically speaking, this is much like the impeachment talk for Trump,” he said. “Even if you could get impeachment for Trump or Kavanaugh through the House, and I don’t think you could, it is a complete nonstarter in the Senate.”

“Democrats will be seen as spinning their wheels for a gain of nothing.”

Arguments over the feasibility of impeachment have divided the Democratic caucuses in the House and Senate.

An impeachment resolution introduced by Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D., Mass.) won the support of fellow Democratic House freshmen such as Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.) and Ilhan Omar (Minn.), but veteran lawmakers are urging them to “get real,” according to Politico.

“We’ve got to get beyond this ‘impeachment is the answer to every problem,’” said Sen. Dick Durbin (D., Ill.). “It’s not realistic.”

House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler said Kavanaugh couldn’t be impeached because his committee’s resources are all focused on “determining whether to impeach the president.”

Republicans, including President Donald Trump’s reelection campaign, told the Washington Free Beacon they welcome the reemergence of Kavanaugh as a political issue in 2020. “There is no lost battle that Democrats won’t revisit in order to satisfy the extremists in their party,” said the Trump campaign’s Tim Murtaugh.

Sabato concurred that relitigating the Kavanaugh fight won’t help Democrats beat Trump, but said that reason doesn’t often prevail in today’s politics.

“Rationality doesn’t govern politics now,” Sabato said. “Maybe it never did.”

Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants

“Be still and know that I am God: …” Psalm 46:10

Wednesday
Sep182019

Authors of new Kavanaugh book blame editors and social media team for mistakes

Yep. The Bolsheviks ALWAYS blames everyone else for their own blatant stupidities.

NYT Reporters: It Wasn’t Us

Now that Nancy Pelosi has issued ORDERS to cease and desist with the “impeachments” of Trump AND Justice Kavanaugh, WHO is going to blame whom for what now?

New York Times reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly defended themselves in a series of interviews during their promotion for their new book about Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Over the weekend, the Times published an excerpt from their new book, The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation, which included a previously unreported sexual misconduct accusation against Kavanaugh. The allegation is from a Yale classmate who alleges he witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself at a dorm party and his penis was shoved into a woman’s hands. The Times excerpt omitted a key detail: The alleged victim had no memory of the incident.

After backlash, the Times added an editor’s note that said:

An earlier version of this article, which was adapted from a forthcoming book, did not include one element of the book’s account regarding an assertion by a Yale classmate that friends of Brett Kavanaugh pushed his penis into the hand of a female student at a drunken dorm party. The book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say that she does not recall the incident. That information has been added to the article.

Pogrebin and Kelly claim the draft they sent to their editors included this detail but it was removed during the editing process.

“I think what happened actually was that we had her name, and the Times doesn’t usually include the name of the victim, and so I think, in this case, the editors felt like it was probably better to remove it,” Pogrebin said. “And in removing her name, they removed the other reference to the fact that she didn’t remember.”

Pogrebin also appeared to blame the New York Times social media team for sending out an offensive tweet in promoting the excerpt.

The now-deleted tweet said, “Having a penis thrust in your face at a drunken dorm party may seem like harmless fun. But when Brett Kavanaugh did it to her, Deborah Ramirez says, it confirmed that she didn’t belong in Yale in the first place.”

Pogrebin admitted to writing the tweet but insisted she thought the tweet would be changed or not used by the Times‘s social media team.

“It was a misworded tweet,” Pogrebin responded. “But what happens at the Times is the reporters are asked to draft tweets, we’re also asked to draft suggested headlines. They don’t always get used, they don’t always get sent out, they often don’t.”

Retarded Bolsheviks…

Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants

“Be still and know that I am God: …” Psalm 46:10

Wednesday
Sep182019

Pelosi Wants Nadler to STOP Impeachment Proceedings

ARE THE WITCH HUNTS 3 AND 4 OVER YET? Hell! They were over 2.5 years ago when they first started this crap!

OompaLoomPelosi has had enough! The Bolsheviks have gone too far…as they always do. Who are they going to blame for their apparent lunacy? Even the run-of-the-mill Democrat Voters have had ENOUGH Witch Hunt BS! Pelosi knows it. The MORONS of the DNC knows it! All these mutants are doing is creating a situation where President Trump does not need rallies anymore! He’s already got MOST of the American Citizens ALREADY voting in his direction!Yet, Nadler and the rest of the Bolsheviks just don’t get it. I wonder how many will OPENLY rebel against Pelosi?

BEHOLD!

One each Bolshevik Loser…Democrat Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is not happy with Jerry Nadler’s impeachment proceedings and wants them to stop.

According to The New York Post:

WASHINGTON — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wants Chairman Jerry Nadler and other fellow Democrats on the Judiciary Committee to know she is not happy with them pursuing impeachment proceedings against President Trump.

In a closed-door meeting last week, Pelosi sternly warned members and aides that she didn’t have the floor votes for an impeachment –and that Nadler (D-N.Y.) had taken it too far.

Politico first reported Pelosi’s warning, with the speaker telling members in the session, “And you can feel free to leak this.”

They did.

Pelosi has also shut down the Dems new crusade to impeach Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Too bad, Nanna. Your kind have gone TOO far and now “our side” HAS the ammo in which we needed. Thanks.

Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants

“Be still and know that I am God: …” Psalm 46:10

Wednesday
Sep182019

Pompeo: Saudi Attacks an 'Act of War'

Previously, The Snooper Report posted 4ea articles on this attack of our theoretical allies by Iran. Truly they must be read. Thanks. Do we need boots on the ground? Well, they are already there.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has classified the attacks on a Saudi oil refinery as an “act of war” by Iran.

According to Fox News:

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Wednesday doubled down on accusations Iran is responsible for the weekend bombing on Saudi Arabia’s oil facilities, telling reporters that the strike was “an act of war.”

Pompeo, speaking from Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, added that even if the “fraudulent claims” of responsibility by the Yemen Houthi rebels were true, “it doesn’t change the fingerprints of the Ayatollah as having put at risk the global energy supply.”

His comments come hours after President Trump tweeted that he had ordered Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin to “substantially increase sanctions” on Iran, amid escalating tensions between the two countries.

“Well, it’s looking that way,” the president told reporters at the White House on Monday when asked if Iran was responsible. “We’ll let you know definitively.” He added: “That’s being checked out right now.”

Iran has denied involvement in the attacks but has promised to immediately retaliate if Tehran is targeted.

Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants

“Be still and know that I am God: …” Psalm 46:10

Wednesday
Sep182019

Trey Gowdy Slams Democrats Over ‘Disaster’ Effort To Impeach Trump

Nadler. The Bolshevik that got TROUNCED by Trump YEARS ago in NYC over a building “spree” that Nadler wanted to build for his own pockets. Too bad he didn’t know about Trump’s book, The Art of the Deal!

The Democrats’ effort to impeach Trump has gone to the point of beyond parody.

They no longer have the Russia hoax to talk about so they’re just grasping at anything they can think of to keep their ridiculous dream alive.

Former congressman Trey Gowdy recently ripped their efforts.

FOX News reports:

Trending: Biden Claims His Plan Would Put 720 Million Women To Work – In A Country Of 330 Million People (VIDEO)

Trey Gowdy rips House Dems’ investigation into Trump: ‘Disaster from day one’

Former House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., lambasted Democratic attempts to investigate the president as one of the party’s leading committees advanced closer to formal impeachment proceedings.

“This has been a disaster from day one and I don’t expect that to change,” Gowdy said while appearing on “Your World” on Saturday.

His comments came after months of House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., pressing for more answers in the Russia investigation. Nadler, who favored impeachment, previously faced pushback from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., on pursuing formal impeachment proceedings.

But on Thursday, Nadler announced that his committee set the ground rules for official proceedings.

Gowdy balked at Nadler’s efforts, arguing that the Democrats had already lost in their attempt to take the president down through the Russia investigation.

Even Jerry Nadler himself is admitting this all complete baloney.

The Hill reports:

Nadler: Impeachment inquiry a ‘made-up term’ but it’s essentially ‘what we are doing’

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) on Friday defended Democrats’ impeachment efforts against President Trump, despite mixed messages from lawmakers describing what his panel is doing on the issue.

In an appearance on CNN, prime-time host Chris Cuomo asked Nadler, “If a head of a committee such as yours believes what you obviously believe, your duty in the Constitution is to start investigating to see if you have the facts for grounds for impeachment, and it is called an impeachment inquiry. Is that what you are doing right now?”

“It is not necessarily called an impeachment inquiry. That’s a made-up term without legal significance. It is, however, what we are doing,” Nadler said.

The Democrats are putting on a clown show and it’s all just to placate their delusional supporters.

What are these people going to do if Trump wins again in 2020?

Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants

“Be still and know that I am God: …” Psalm 46:10

Wednesday
Sep182019

Trump Making Play To Flip New Mexico Red In 2020, Starting With Massive Rally In Rio Rancho (VIDEO)

Trump lost New Mexico in 2016. From this particular rally, I do believe that Trump will handily take New Mexico.

Trump held a massive rally in Rio Rancho, New Mexico on Monday night.

Surrounded by supporters waving signs that read “Latinos for Trump” and “Women for Trump” the president talked about improvements that have been made in the state and for the Hispanic community since he became president.

Trump is trying to flip New Mexico red in 2020, and he just might.

Here’s a report from CBS News:

 

Trump rallies in New Mexico in hopes of turning state red in 2020

President Trump rallied supporters Monday night in New Mexico — a state he lost to Hillary Clinton by eight points in 2016. The Trump campaign is targeting some unexpected states like New Mexico ahead of 2020, with the hopes of besting a Democratic candidate he can portray as too far left for the American mainstream.

“It’s been quite a while since a Republican won this state,” Mr. Trump told supporters, who greeted him with chants of “USA, USA.” ”I think we’re going to do great here. We’re here because we really think we’re going to turn this state and make it a Republican state.”

The president’s rally in Rio Rancho, in suburban Albuquerque, is the first stop on a three-day swing that will also take him to California for fundraisers expected to raise more than $15 million.

You can watch the whole thing below. Trump enters at the 1 hour and 12 minute mark:

The below are a couple of Tweets. Click the picture above to visit where all the Tweets are! The crowds at this New Mexico Rally tells the tale…he didn’t have half as many in 2016!

Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants

“Be still and know that I am God: …” Psalm 46:10

Wednesday
Sep182019

Arizona Gun Store Offers ‘Beto Special’ On AR15s And AK47s – Sells Out In ONE DAY

Keep it up Bolsheviks. Keep it up. What will you do when the Nation turns RED on you! Cry? Snowflakes…Satan’s play toys.

When Obama was president, people called him America’s greatest gun salesman because every time he talked about gun control, sales would go through the roof.

Now Beto O’Rourke is getting in on that action. After Beto declared his intentions to confiscate guns at the last Democrat debate, one Arizona gun store decided to do a sale in his name.

It worked out pretty well for them.

CNS News reports:

 

‘SOLD OUT’: Arizona Gun Store Offers ‘Beto Specials’ on AR15s and AK47s

In response to Beto O’Rourke’s “Hell, yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47” threat, a Tempe, Arizona gun store owner ran a “Beto Specials” promotion the next morning – selling out of both types of rifles by that afternoon.

When O’Rourke made the claim during Thursday night’s Democrat presidential candidate debate, Alpha Dog Firearms Owner Matt Boggs was outraged, he says in an interview with The HolloNet:

“I saw the comments that he made, and I was kinda like, ‘You know what: the Hell with this guy.’”

Boggs said O’Rourke’s made determined to sell more guns – even if it meant losing money on them. So, the next morning he announced his “Beto Specials” on AR15 and AK47 rifles on his store’s Facebook page…

Later that day, they were sold out:

UPDATE: SOLD OUT. More deals will be on the website soon. Y’all broke our internet today!!!

Beto O’Rourke finally ripped the mask off his own party and told us what they’ve wanted to do all along.

From National Review:

Yes, They Are Coming for Your Guns

At the Democratic-primary debate in Houston last night, Beto O’Rourke formally killed off one of the gun-control movement’s favorite taunts: The famous “Nobody is coming for your guns, wingnut.” Asked bluntly whether he was proposing confiscation, O’Rourke abandoned the disingenuous euphemisms that have hitherto marked his descent into extremism, and confirmed as plainly as can be that he was. “Hell yes,” he said, “we’re going to take your AR-15.”

O’Rourke’s plan has been endorsed in full by Cory Booker and Kamala Harris, and is now insinuating its way into the manifestos of gun-control groups nationwide. Presumably, this was O’Rourke’s intention. But he — and his party — would do well to remember that there is a vast gap between the one-upmanship and playacting that is de rigueur during primary season, and the harsh reality on the ground. 

Democrats really shot themselves in the foot on this one.

Pun intended.

One error to make an amends to the above article. Obama was NOT our President. It was our very FIRST Jihadi Rezident!

Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants

“Be still and know that I am God: …” Psalm 46:10

Wednesday
Sep182019

The 80 year-old Bolshevik Nancy Pelosi: If There Is Collateral Damage For People Who Don’t Share Our View SO BE IT (VIDEO)

Question: back in Prussia, I mean Russia, I mean the beginnings of the USSR, didn’t the Bolsheviks kill off their aged? Just asking.

Poor sad Bolshevik…say hello to Satan when you see it…Nancy Pelosi was recently at an event with the far left economist Paul Krugman and said something rather revealing about her party. Democrats apparently don’t care if they hurt some people with their wrong-headed economic plans.

Townhall reports:

Pelosi: Yeah, Our Economic Agenda Might Screw Over Some People…So Be It

Well, maybe we can give some points for honesty, though it’s still a pretty crappy thing to say. Who are we kidding? These are Democrats we’re talking about. With the 2018 midterms less than 20 days away, Democrats are feeling good about their chances to retake the House. The Senate is cooked for them. The field is simply too unfavorable. Yet, if they’re successful in retaking the lower chamber, we could see the return of Speaker Nancy Pelosi. The thought makes me want to commit ritual suicide, but here we are. With House Democrats in charge, expect insanity.

I mean, we’ve seen it hardcore this year, but jack it up to eleven, with endless subpoenas, investigations, and the grand resurgence of the red scare. Yes, Russian collusion nonsense will reach an ever greater fever pitch than it is now. As for the economy, well, high taxes and regulations are going to try and make a comeback. The economy is booming right now. Just watch what happens when you put a Democrat in charge, especially since this party is undergoing a far left facelift. For those who disagree with this route and might get screwed over with this lurch to the Left approach to the economy, Rep. Pelosi was frank: “so be it”…

They sure seem like nice people don’t they?

What we are ALL seeing, except for the truly satanic nit-wits of the New ameriKans, is a complete and total breaking from reality OLD sort-of-useful-up-until-now political party that cares not for anyone except themselves.

Sic vis pacem para bellum
Fight Accordingly

Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
Sic Semper Tyrannis!
Death to Tyrants

“Be still and know that I am God: …” Psalm 46:10