The Snooper Report

Obama Youth: The Lame Stream Deafly Silent

The ongoing saga can be read at the following here at TOCB:

I took a 10-minute segment of the American Truth Warrior's Take Our Country Back BTR show from 12 JUL 08 and sent it to several of the Lame Stream Media outlets to see what would come of it. The previous emails haven't resulted in any coverage but, I shall not stop making a pest of myself.

Personally, I demand an answer from Barack Obama himself and not from some flunky staffer. Obama made the statements, not his staff. So far, I have only found three others blogging on this subject and they are listed in the articles linked above. Upon further discovery, there is one other called Cryptic Subterranean, and they list two others. Including us at A Newt One, that makes a total of six. Not enough. Now, when the limp minded blindly swallow that which Obama screeches on about, it is any wonder no one calls him on his crappola? For instance, there is one blogger that has opined about and agrees with Obama when it comes to "private armies". I didn't see anything over there about Obama's Private Army. Go figure. Appropriately so, the blog is called The Inside Dope. No doubt. (Since the poor thing hasn't a tenth of our traffic, I decided to send that one a bone.)

Now, granted, back in December of 2007, Fox News did run a piece on Barack's plan to expand AmeriCorps and the Peace Corps but there was no mention of bringing them to an equal par of the United States Military as he stated in the AARP piece. Simply amazing. He utilizes incremental posturing as he underwhelms Patriots like myself and overwhelms sycophants of the Leftinistra.

Real Clear Politics also wrote of the AmeriCorps and Peace Corps expansion back in March of 2008 but again, no mention of the $500B budget and like-military training.

Other posts here, here, and here also speak of the expansion but nothing of the militaristic version of the expansion, the last one listed being approximately 10 days before the verbiage that peeked my interest.

In my constant quest for Truth in this matter, I find it painfully obvious that no one is paying attention to this Obama Youth mantra. Let me throw his quote out there for you...

[...] Obama promised to increase AmeriCorps slots from 75,000 to 250,000 and pledged to double the size of the Peace Corps by 2011. [...]

[...]  "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set," he said Wednesday. "We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded." [...]

What is so damned puzzling is that the AARP is dated the same as all the other recent 02 JUL 08 articles in the Lame Stream but not ONE of them mentioned the "We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded" statement. All they say is that Obama is calling for more community service. Since when are community service folks trained, equipped and budgeted as the US Armed Forces?

What gives with that?

 The Obama Youth: The Saga Continues

Others are now demanding answers. It has taken a while but perhaps others are doing what we did initially...the willful suspension of disbelief?

Catch the wave and read these previous posts:

Here are the next smattering of folks blogging

My Pet Jawa: Obama Wants New National Civilian Security Force?
Protein Wisdom: Strange, You Can Believe It!
Free Republic: Obama Youth?
Instapundit

Watch our smoke, folks...

 Obama Youth: The Gift That Keeps On Taking

!!!FINALLY!!!

The Big Dogs at World Net Daily are getting on the Obama Youth Train.

Catch the wave and read previous posts.

Barack's Storm Troopers - The Obama Youth Corps

Simply unbelievable how the Lame Stream Media let this one slip right on by.

I found the video of this speech and I have captured the audio of the entire 26:44 speech given on 02 JUL 08 at Fort Carson, Colorado. I captured the audio because some of Barack's videos vanish if they become too controversial...like this one is going to be eventually. The You Tube is located here and it is too long to place in this blog space. Suffice it to say that one can spend hours and hours deciphering the coded messages therein.
When I captured the audio, I made note as to the location of this particular mention of the formation of his Civilian National Security Force that is going to be just as strong and just as well funded as our military. We will discuss this in my afternoon BTR show on 16 JUL 08 at 1300 hours CST (Texas time).

And yes, he did indeed say:

"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded."

Political Pistachio is also blogging and writing on this topic and this particular piece is very informative and well stated.

The image to the left is from Obama's web site but does not mention the Obama Storm Troopers except for a small blurb that mentions a Homeland Security Force - whatever that may be. He sure defined it in his speech in Fort Carson, CO.

This subject needs to be explained and exposed as to what it really means and I will not be spun. Neither should you. If you listen to the entire speech, taking notes as you go, the "offending" segment will become clearer and clearer. On 02 JUL 08, he not only abandoned the anti-war fruit loop brigades, he changed his positions several times and the sheeple clapped and applauded.

We live in Upside Down Land. It wouldn't surprise me if this section of his web site gets scrubbed in the near future.

Others:

Political Pistachio
World Net Daily
The Swamp
Soldier's Perspective

The Aspirants To The Presidency Say A Lot Of Things, But...

I haven't heard any politician in my years on this planet espouse the things that Barack Insane Obama has said in his trek to be First Czar. I once thought that Hillary was trying to be the first Czarina but, with all of Hillary's leftist sillygisms, she is as level-headed as a leftist can get.

I have an audio file that everyone needs to hear, heed and fight for answers. The audio clip is from a speech delivered on 02 JUL 08 by Insane Boy. The You Tube is here and this clip has been culled from 16:35 to 17:02. The clip is sandwiched between what I thought to be a very appropriate song snippet

The "prepared remarks" can be found here.

The offending verbiage is not in the text of the speech...I wonder why that is?

World Net Daily now notices it as well that the "offending verbiage" is AWOL from the prepared speech text. Such a sly one this would-be Czar.

[...] The stunning comments from Democrat Sen. Barack Obama that the United States needs a "civilian national security force" that would be as powerful, strong and well-funded as the half-trillion dollar United States Army, Marines, Navy and Air Force have mysteriously disappeared from published transcripts of the speech. [...]

Very interesting...wish I had a screen shot. The speech verbiage can also be found here.

Another update: CJ at Soldier's Perspective has identified the fellows on the stage with The Big Dummy are Colorado Vets Against The War - associates with the Winter Soldier frauds IVAW. Go figure. No wonder they have the Bobble Head Syndrome.

Trackposted to , Faultline USA, Democrat=Socialist, Right Truth, and The World According to Carl, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.

Obama's Brown Shirts Faux Pas Gains More Scrutiny

We posted on this topic on 09 JUL 08 and have refused to give up and will press forward relentlessly until Barack Hussein Czar Obama comes clean and "clears the muddy waters", as it were. Good luck on that but the crowd he was addressing were the gathering of the IVAW Winter Soldier frauds associates of the Colorado Vets Against the War. Imagine that.

Was Barack in a feeding frenzy because fellow anti-Americanists were in the room? And what about Mr Bobble Head to the right of Obama and the poor wee lad to his left? Amazing. Sometimes I hate being able to read body language.

Will all that said, I have encountered others writing on this in recent days, today and others about the same time frame we began writing about it. Baracks' apparent desire to start a Civilian National Security Force comprised of members of AmeriCorp and Peace Corp members is strikingly eerie.

The Confederate Yankee and now Hot Air are talking about it. I originally thought, "What took them so long" but, there is so much news to cover it is a wonder that we even caught the drift of this. I have sent approx 20 emails with the audio clips of Barack Obama announcing this new Force on an equal par with the military to the major Lame Stream Media outlets, including Faux News...I mean Fox News. To date, not one network or cable news outlet has discussed this to my knowledge.

Why is that? What are they afraid of? Or, what are they trying to hide? How about we have a Special Investigative Council look into this unconstitutional endeavor on the part of the would be First Czar Obama?

Again, we will not let this go until there are viable explanations, wafflings and backtrackings but most importantly, apologies to the American People.

There are five more to add that are now blogging on this...'bout time

Right Wing News
Knox News
Moonbattery
Blue Collar Muse
Power Line

The FIRST Moonbat Libtard Anti-Americanist site to mention it...ROFLMAO!!! Typical libtard.

Sadly,No!

Op-Ed: Sith Lord Obama and His Civilian National Security Force

On 02 JUL 08 in Colorado Springs, CO, the would be next POTUS Obama delivered a speech rife with empty platitudes and useless rhetoric. It was more feigned aplomb to an audience easily swayed with pretty talk void of substance.

However, there has been detected an ominous gaffe or a purposeful ad lib from being surrounded by supporters falling all over and prostrating themselves before a man that has accomplished nothing in his life on his own volition either in business or politically. His Illinois public service is nothing but a black hole of either disinformation, misinformation or right out missing information. I, for one, cannot trust a politician whose political record is held in secret or non existent.

Who is this man, Barack? Does anyone know? I'm not talking about the one we all hear and see as he parades himself before the cameras and teleprompters. We know what he is when we see and hear him but, who is he really? And, to add insult to injury, why is it that every time he is caught in a major gaffe or a lie, his web site is expunged and cleared of all damaging evidence?

In his speech which can be viewed here or at his official web site (before it is either edited or deleted), Barack is heard to say the following (among other things):

[...] "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded." [...]

Taken out of context, the Worry Alarms begin to wail. However, taken in context, the Worry Alarms cannot be heard or detected due to the Tornado Klaxons across the nation are wailing. The quote above can be heard at time stamp 16:35 and 17:10, approximately a little over half way through the video. In case one doesn't want to view the video, the audio capture can be heard here.

The portent of his words emphasized as they are in the video but cannot be found in his prepared speech, is not only ominous but frighteningly spooky. To fully understand the verbiage of what has become known as the beginning of The Obama Youth Brigades, one must fully view the nearly 24 minute video (if it hasn't been edited yet). In conjunction with that, one must at least try and understand what he means exactly by his mantra of Hope and Change that not one single person has been able to viably explain to its fullest intent.

Barack has also been heard to say in this same video the following:

[...] "Loving your country shouldn't just mean fireworks on the 4th of July. Loving your country must mean accepting your responsibility to do your part to change it. If you do, your life will be richer, our country will be stronger." [...]

That sounds pretty and noble. However, parsing the verbiage along with studying the body language including the tonal inflections - self emphasis of certain phrases - one discovers even more ominous and potentially threatening overtures. Where has the world heard these words of "your life will be richer, our country will be stronger" before? The intent and the verbiage, to the historian, sounds familiar.

 

Think back to the Hitler Youth and the Brown Shirts. Think back to the Black Shirts of the avant-garde of Italy's Mussolini. Think back to the now defunct USSR and the Red Chinese. They all spoke of the same ideology of "your life will be richer, our country will be stronger" and utilized the impressionable and indoctrinated youth of their society and time.

What are the changes that Barack hopes to make for and to the United States? How is he going to finance these grand schemes and noble plans that dreams are made of...and nightmares? What became of such governments and tyrannical and dictatorial regimes that espoused such changes and decrying "your life will be richer, our country will be stronger"? By whose estimations will our lives be richer and our country stronger? History reminds us and tells us that such regimes, in the end, failed and fell hard never to re-emerge from the quagmire, self-induced, of such magnitude that it is a wonder that one would even think of re-inventing that ugliness.

Think about the alleged "radical Islam" proponents that run to and fro reeking havoc among the population terrorizing the people and demanding devotion and loyalty...or else. What would Barack's Civilian National Security Forces be utilized for and what would their mission be? What are his plans for the nations' police forces? What are his plans for the FBI? Aren't the law enforcement agencies of this nation responsible for National Security on the Homefront? Why is Barack opining and announcing plans for a Civilian National Security Force? To what end?

So many questions and to date, not one single answer. World Net Daily has been frantically trying to ascertain answers or at least clarifications of Barack's uncanny comments. So eerie this is indeed. Barack's campaign has scrubbed these comments from the prepared speech and these same comments cannot be found on his web site either. Why is that? His web site does mention developing a Homeland Security Force but, as usual, the blandness and vagaries are ominously usual.

As Nazi Germany's Hitler used the Brown Shirts and the Hitler Youth as his personal guard, eyes and ears; as Mussolini did the same with his Black Shirts and the USSR did the same with the KGB, is this what Barack has planned? The answer might lie within his own uttered words and yes, Barack, words do mean something.

In his speech he said that he was going to increase the military by approx 65,000 Soldiers and 27,000 Marines. In the same breath or nearly so, he mentions an increase of 75,000 AmeriCorps workers to 250,000 and doubling the size of the Peace Corps of which, they will be on an equal par with the United States Armed Forces. Here is the quote once more:

[...] "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded." [...]

The "relying only on our military" comment needs to be explained. And, having a civilian security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded" needs to be explained. The United States Armed Forces have a budget of $500 Billion with a population of nearly 3 Million. Barack's proposal will have an additional 92,000 Troops in conjunction with nearly 500 Thousand civilian national security forces of which will be just as strong, powerful and funded. Where is he going with this? Is his 500 thousand strong civilian national security force going to be on a budget of $500 Billion? "Just as well funded" sounds like it to me.

In recent times, we have heard the members of the Leftinistra say that our military is already too big yet he wants to increase its size. In recent times, we have heard the Leftinistra say that the government is tool big yet Barack wants to have the largest Federal Employee Payroll in the history of this nation.

This could also lead to the largest voter base for the government hand-out recipients ever conceived - purchased votes as it were by awarding a government job to a loyal subject. In his speech he invoked the names of FDR, John F Kennedy and Martin Luther King, two of which he doesn't even come close to being molded after, especially Martin Luther King because he was a registered Republican. JFK was the last Conservative Democrat. FDR on the other hand was a socialist that knew the powers of persuasion and threats to stay in power...he served 31/2 terms as President. Do recall that FDR wanted to stack the court and eventually did to get his New Deal (Raw Deal) into place.

No. Barack Hussein Obama has some explaining to do and we shall not cease and desist until we have answers.

What Does Barack Obama Intend?

Thank you ever so kindly x_dhimmi (deb) for another fine video. The below video is a work still in progress but I thought to get this version up and running. For email subscribers, go here to view and vote.

NOTE: if the video does not play, that is because that You Tube took it down but it still plays sometimes.

.

Pat Dollard: Pissed Off And Wants Blood

I don't blame Pat Dollard one bit. But, who is Pat Dollard anyway? Well, go here and find out.

Some time ago I penned a few posts and within those posts I expressed the thought and opinion that the Democrat Party leadership (the CONgress Critters) and their cohorts and fellow conspirators within the Republican Party leadership were directly responsible for the deaths and wounding of American and Coalition Forces fighting both in Iraq and Afghanistan.

I have performed a lengthy study on my own volition and although I am not ready to publish the entire chronologically correct tome, I did in fact find a correlation. And, I have confirmed that the political leaders in the very dishonorable halls of CONgress, in their quest of and for power and control of all things in this nation, have contributed directly to the losses of life in a combat zone. Not all but more than half. I also found that the war, at least in Iraq, would have been over and that which we are witnessing in Iraq today, could have been realized in early 2007 or late to mid-2006. But, there was an election to be won and that is all that mattered to the Leftinistra - damn them all.

In a previous post: From an Army Rangers' Mouth About Iraq

[...] ... know this. I despise the likes of Nancy Pelosi. Taking it a few steps further, I actually hate her and would not bemoan her demise - from natural causes, naturally.

In more recent posts, I have called for the investigation in regards to the deaths of American Troops both in Iraq and Afghanistan which can be directly attributed to the defaming and blind hatred of President Bush and our Troops by the likes of Nancy Pelosi. She is the ring leader in the Lower House, after all and it is within her power to stop the nonsense. I have conducted a specific investigation of my own and there is a direct correlation to the spikes in attacks on American and Coalition forces fighting in this war. One of those spikes resulted in Spain removing their forces from Iraq which was repaid by yet another terrorist attack in Spain as a heart-felt thank you to Spain from Al Qaida.

Anyone within the construct of government service which conducts themselves such as Nancy Pelosi and her similar ilk in regards to this war, that, by the way, they all signed onto, are a disgrace to this nation and by the very definitions of treason, subversion and sedition, an investigation is in order and charges are required to be levied.

The Army Ranger that has originally called into a radio broadcast show was killed in action fighting a war Pelosi approved of in the first place. Thank you Nancy et al for prolonging this war and contributing to the deaths of the men and women that protect you and thank you Nancy et all for contributing to the deaths of my Brothers In Arms. May you rot in hell. The blood on your hands will never wash away. [...]

In this post entitled, Pelosi IS Guilty of Killing American Troops and Innocent Iraqi Civilians, we hear Nancy Pelosi herself thanking the government in Iran for, in essence, killing our Troops in and around Iraq. After all, it was Iran that has brought about the peace we are seeing now. (NOTE: our friend x_dhimmi (deb) made a You Tube video of Her Stretchness.)

 

In this post entitled, A Victory In Iraq Equates To A Defeat To Pelosi, one will find these quotes:

[...] Expect Pelosi to continue her efforts to discredit our military, since an American victory on the battlefield amounts to a Pelosi defeat at home. [...]

[...] So why any thoughtful American with any common sense would continue to support or vote for today's Democratic Party is beyond me. [...]

[...] Thinking as far back as the Eisenhower administration, I don't remember any politician, on either side of the aisle, hating America and praising the enemy as much as Pelosi does. [...]

[...] Once again, the Democrats prove that the word "Democrat" is synonymous with "traitor." Pelosi is the latest Democrat to verge on committing treason.

Her comments about Iran prove that Democrats do indeed hate the military and their country.

What other conclusion can you come up with when she praises Iran, but not Gen. David Petraeus? [...]

As the nation is ravaged by rising fuel costs across the country; as the approval ratings of the DNC led CONgress plummet like an F4 with dual engine failures; as each and every Leftinistra "program" and thought process is proven to be dismal failures; instead of accepting the personal and professional responsibility that adults would do for their own shortcomings, what does Nancy do? She blames President Bush and the Republican Party.

I said all of the above at the risk of repeating myself to acknowledge that I am not the only one that feels the way I do. Below are screen shots that I took earlier today with the sole purpose of raking the scab off of an old would that will not heal.

This screen shot was taken from this page. When you go there or click the image to enlarge it, you will find this caption: "Humvee blown up by Al Qaeda, Barack Hussein Obama and the rest of the Democrat Party, and the American Media. 2 KIA, 2 wounded." Pat Dollard was in this vehicle. He was wounded in this vehicle. He fought his way back to this vehicle. He crawled his way back to this vehicle with broken leg and other wounds. He was blown OUT of this vehicle by an IED. He isn't happy that Barack Obama is visiting the Troops because Barack Obama doesn't deserve to be in the presence of the Troops. "As I was flying through the sky, instead of being in a blackout as I should be, my mind was a perfectly focused computer: I realized that Conley had stepped directly onto a bomb, I realized he was dead, and I hoped as I landed that my wounds would not be so bad, and that I indeed might even survive. And somehow, I was able to wonder why I was completely free of the shock that 95% of the others told me they experienced. I wondered why I was so locked into the reality of what was happening."

This screen shot was taken from this page. There is another picture that I took a screen shot of on that same page and for a particular reason an d I will explain shortly. However, when enlarge the image, you will find the proper sentiment. He ends his sentiment as we at A Newt One have often expressed in no uncertain terms: "We have serious work to do here at home."

We have an electorate that has been brainwashed into believing that Democrats are Republicans and Republicans are Democrats. They are being taught this in our schools and colleges across this nation. I met hundreds of them in my quest across Michigan. I was astounded and flabbergasted. The indoctrination of impressionable youths in our schools is unconscionable. It is unacceptable and it is our fault - the movers and shakers of the Conservative Movement. We have fallen down and we cannot get back up. Shame on us and shame on the Conservative leaders in CONgress for being the cowards they have turned out to be. Now, for the last screen shot. Pay attention.

Again, this was taken of this page. It took me approximately .0000001 nano-seconds to discover the "problem" presented in this image. A basic student of body language will pick it out immediately. Those that know nothing of body language will miss it totally and will be lost in the discussion.

So, for those of you that see it, please let us know what you see in the comments section of this post. Either enlarge the image or visit the web site. In case you are wondering, more than likely, the cause for Pat's rant in the caption for the photo just above this one, is due to what he also noticed.

Yes, we have some serious work to do. But, do we have leaders that will do that which needs to be done? Are we going to wait for someone else to do it or, are we going to take the bull by the horns and do it ourselves?

As for me, I am way ahead of most so, watch my smoke.

Baracks' Civilian National Security Force - Continuing Saga Unfolding

As you all know, we here at TOCB will not let this subject die off as the Obama Camp would like. We have been receiving comments here and there and posts have been made in rebuttal but have vanished before I could memorialize them via screen shots.

However, at The American Thinker, there are two articles, one written by Thomas Lifson on 17 JUL 08 entitled, Another inconvenient truth down the Obama Memory Hole and one written by Lee Cary on 20 JUL 08 entitled, Obama's Civilian National Security Force. Thomas Lifson expresses the same concerns that we do and a host of others and Lee Cary has the closest and most palatable "explaining away" scenario as to what Barack actually meant that I have seen to date.

I do have one correction, however. In the Thomas Lifson piece, he mentions that WND "broke the story" which is in error. I wish that I could say that ANO broke the story but, we did not. We are merely picking up the Guidon that was dropped and carrying on forward into battle. Actually, in our first post here, one will find the only two that I know of that spoke of this before we did. Our first post on this was 09 JUL 08 (I originally read the story at AARP forum on 07 JUL 08). Exurban League was the first followed by Little Green Footballs. The running list of others since are listed in previous posts, chronicled at the end of this post.

Regardless, the Lee Cary piece states that all Barack's verbiage is nothing to be concerned about in regards to the Obama Youth conundrum but the words he spoke are potentially ominous and will have far-reaching affects on the tax collections required to carry this out. That is all fine and dandy but his body language in the video says something else all together. Until Barack Hussein Obama comes forth and explains this out in the open and not through one of his campaign flunkies (spokesman) in his own non teleprompter mannerisms will I begin to not suspect his Marxist Ideologies shining through - on the cuff. In part:

[...] The entire plan is breathtaking in its scope. But it does not, as at least one internet writer has suggested, portend a "giant police force." It would be easier to rebut if it did. As it is, it's silly stuff born of naively fanciful dreams.

 

Senator Obama aims to tap into the already active volunteerism of millions of Americans and recruit them to become cogs in a gigantic government machine grinding out his social re-engineering agenda. It's Orwellian-like, with a novice social activist's mentality at the helm. ... [...]

To me, these two paragraphs contradict. It may be my imagination running away with myself but I don't think so. The "silly stuff born of naively fanciful dreams" in one paragraph followed by "It's Orwellian-like, with a novice social activist's mentality at the helm" statement is a portent in and of itself.

Either way, whether it be a Civilian National Security Force equipped, just as powerful, just as strong and just as well funded as the United States Armed Forces or a gigantic play-pen for young people, the tax burden will be astronomical in scope. Both scenarios should be bringing down the roofs across America with a hearty "WHAT THE HELL IS HE TALKING ABOUT NOW!" sentiment.

Again, when I listen to the audio clips and then view the video paying close attention to the body language, methinks he doesn't want a play-pen for young people. The man is a Marxist-Communist the likes Mark and Engles would be proud of, let alone Saul Alinsky. In the same topical paragraph in his speech, he talked about increasing military strength by nearly 92,000 Troops and creating an equally expansive Civilian Force.

Lee Cary wrote a great article but I'm not buying it. Not yet.

Our friend x_dhimmi (deb) made us a video of the section of the main video in question. Watch his body language. All through the nearly 25-minute video, this is the only time his tonal inflections rose to the peak in which it did as he leaned into the microphone when he berated the military like he did. Nope. Not buying the Lee Cary piece at all.

Previous posts in regards to the Enemy of The State running for President of the USA

Others I have found writing of this:

Obama Leftist Democrats Police State
Photo: Stasi
The Brown Skirts
Obama WTF
Knox News
Dakota Voice

Just found some more

The Volokh Conspiracy 19 JUL 08
Malize at Townhall

Sith Lord Obama: Another Gaffe?

I suggest that we all join up a swiftboat this presumptive First Czar of the United Socialist States of Amerika. This guy is a Gaffe-omatic second to none.

Most of us know beyond a shadow of a doubt that each term of the presidency is 4 years. We also know that if a sitting president is re-elected, his total term - barring removal via impeachment - will be 8 years. Apparently, Barack doesn't know that.

I ran across this post at STACLU and it only solidified my concerns over Obama's Civilian National Security Force. The guy speaks out of both sides of his butt cheeks and carries on as if he is an intelligent member of society. He may be a smart fellow but not only do I doubt his patriotism to THIS nation, I seriously call into question his viable intelligence. Someone is pulling his strings and he is one confused fellow - or, he is announcing to the world his ultimate intentions. Behold:

[...] Today on CBS's Face the Nation, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., in Afghanistan, told the paparazzi-pursued correspondent Lara Logan that "the objective of this trip was to have substantive discussions with people like President Karzai or Prime Minister Maliki or President Sarkozy or others who I expect to be dealing with over the next eight to 10 years." [...]

Eight to ten years, Barack? Where did that extra two years come from? One more thing, Barack. Why is it that you Democrats seem to think that you can violate the Logan Act at will? Oh. Wait. Don't answer that one. No one in DC has the cajones to enforce the law. What am I talking about? Glad you asked.

"And it's important for me to have a relationship with them early, that I start listening to them now, getting a sense of what their interests and concerns are."

AHEM! You are a United States Senator at the moment, Barack. You are not the president yet and you have no authority whatsoever to be making American Foreign Policy on a campaign/photo-op trip to anywhere, let alone the Middle East.

What if McCain or any other GOP type said such things? What would be the leading story in the lame Stream Media?

For an alleged constitutional scholar, Barack sure is an idiot.

More at Memeorandum...catch the wave...

Obama: The Subtleties of A Dictatorial Tyrant

He sure looks pretty, doesn't he? All dressed up and well groomed and all. Pearly whites all aglow pounding out verbiage not of his own, spouting of things he knows nothing of. Teleprompters not withstanding, isn't he all dashing, smiling and a champion of all of the oppressed? WOW! He doesn't fool me for a nano-second. What a fraud this Obama is.

There is a must read over at Roger Guy's Radar Site blog entitled, The Fouse Report: 20 Jul 08 with a sub-title of, The New Nazis. It describes, in part, via a brief summary of known historical facts the rise of Hitler's Nazi Germany and the more than "coincidental" commonalities of Nazism and Islamofascism. Those of us that have studied Islam at length see the parallels of both.

Barack Obama has said more than once that we have to talk to those that have sworn to destroy us. Not only is he lost and out of his element, he now decides, coincidentally or not, to give a speech in Germany in a location rife with Nazi symbolism. So, tell me, again, why I shouldn't be concerned about...

[...] "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded." [...]

...and why I should not be concerned when he mentions his presidency of 8 to 10 years?

Hell! Even "real" liberals are starting to catch on to the flaming communist that is Obama. They also recognize other issues with this lame fellow that tries to project his manhood. We all know that he is no man but a mouse and I oftne wish that he would at least squeak up and admit it.

I have written about this topic of America's enemies within for decades now all culminating within The List 0f 45 until I have become blue in the face. I distribute the list as often as I can and as many as I can far and wide. The enemies within are people like Barack Obama and other socialist liberals within both political parties of our nation.

On 10 MAY 08, Sheik Muhammad Abu Al-Qat' had this to say: (video here)

[...] ... let me bring good tidings to the Muslims: Allah willing, the American empire will very soon collapse. They object to any talk about the destruction of the state of Israel. ...

 

That's not the issue. We say that Allah willing, within 20 to 12 years, America will collapse. This won't happen as a result of war. Not at all. Allah will send to America an American Gorbachev, from within. Gorbachev, who brought about the USSR collapse, was one of them. Everybody knows this story. An American Gorbachev will surface in America, and he will destroy this empire. [...]

Enter Barack Obama with his 10-year presidency, (video here) his Civilian National Security Force, and his plethora of gigantic government entitlement programs under the influences of Karl Marx, Engles and Saul Alinsky. It is no wonder, then, that he so sympathizes with people of his like-minded principles of dictatorial tyranny such as Islamofascism. And, no, 4 years of Barack Obama is not what we need to wake this country up from its self-induced stupor of idiocy and complacency. What we need is for the Silent Majority to get up off their lazy asses. That will only take place if they have the motivation to do so which will require hitting the streets with a Man On The Street grassroots effort on our part. I am actively involved in this effort. Are you?

Purple People Vote blog has also noticed Barack's dangerous antics and refuses to acquiesce.

In regards to Iraq, 16 of the 18 Iraqi Benchmarks have been met thanks to the American and Coalition forces that have wiped out Al Qaida from Iraq. Yet, Barack and his whore Pelosi still yammer on and on with known lies for political power. The Iraqi people are looking forward now to a peaceful time in which to rebuild their country and stand on their own two feet with their own very capable and trustworthy Iraqi Army and Iraqi Police Force. Yet, Barack refuses to accept that and neither do all of the other socialist twits in DC.

We also know that many of our enemies are routing for Barack's victory and that alone should frighten all Americans. He panders and caters to them at our expense because he is an enemy within. And, let us not forget the ongoing collections of posts in regards to Obama's Civilian National Security Force.

This JUST in from World Net Daily...the full transcript of Obama's 02 JUL 08 speech includiing the verbiage seemingly AWOL fro the "official versions

WND WORD-FOR-WORD
Obama on 'civilian national security force'
Transcript of senator's controversial remarks in Colorado July 2

Others blogging the Obama Yoots Issue

Maggie's Notebook

Barack Obama To Be Protected By Terror Group

The al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades are Palestinian militias in the West Bank that have been officially listed as a terror group by Canada, the European Union, Japan, Israel and the United States. This group has been assigned to protect Barack Obama.

Israel, via their Defense Forces, working in conjunction with U.S. Security coordinators, will protect the main West Bank highway that Obama will be traveling on to approach Ramallah, then his security will be turned over to the Palestinians with security being planned with the U.S. security forces.

According to security officials coordinating deployments of forces with the PA for Obama's Ramallah visit, members of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, Fatah's declared military wing, have been called upon by the PA to participate in the protection of Obama, particularly in securing the perimeter during a scheduled meeting with PA President Mahmoud Abbas.

The Brigades is listed as a terror organization by the U.S. State Department. The group took credit along with the Islamic Jihad terror organization for every suicide bombing in Israel between 2005 and 2006 and is responsible for thousands of shootings and rocket firings. Statistically, the Al Aqsa Brigades perpetuated more terrorism from the West Bank than Hamas, according to the Israeli Defense Forces.

Brigades leaders, speaking to WND on condition of anonymity, confirmed they will participate in protecting Obama as official members of the PA's security forces.

I wonder if standing side by side with members of al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades will be included in the "photo ops" that the media has been publishing about Obama's trip.

Terrorists guarding the Democratic presumptive nominee.... now that is change I can believe in.

When A Duck Wadddles, Does It Look Like A Barack?

If a critter looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, walks like a duck and smells like a duck, the logical conclusion (if you haven't eaten it yet) is that what you have, is a duck. And, Barack is indeed that said same duck.

Barack is King of Gaffe. Barack is King of Arrogance. Barack is King of Dumb. Barack is the Prince of Stupid. He panders to the Fruit Loop Brigades of the likes of the Code Pinktites and that is evidential given that he made an appearance via video at the KOSmonoffs At Austin where he repeated the known and shown to be lies from the very ones he licks at the laps thereof.

Barack is a troll, simply stated. And, this is The Barack:

 

If he was a man, I would have to say that this man makes me sick. Alas, I will just have to say that this troll makes me sick.

While he contemplates building his Civilian National Security Forces and being president for 10 years - give or take - the rest of the world gazes upon the fool and laughs. After all, the real liberals want nothing to do with him because he is just too far left for their liking and THAT is an astonishing indictment for the would-be First Czar of the United Socialist States of Amerika. No one knows if he is even eligible to be president basing this on his fraudulent COLB. (He could dispell that by producing the real one).

A wise man once said of Barack: "I have never seen a presidential candidate with less to offer this nation, yet with more arrogance and self-delusion than Barack Obama." Just so. Hell! He doesn't even know what his own stand is on Iraq because he has never had an original thought in his head unless it was to calculate just how he could hood-wink easily led and indoctrinated idiots to lick his lap. As for his trip to "visit the troops", there are now reports that they were all set up. It could be that his string pullers didn't want the Troops to treat him like they did with John F'n Kerry, Nancy "Logan Act" Pelosi and Hillary Clinton.

With Barack, Shift Happens. And, in a Quote of The Day: "Obama On Iraq: If we hadn't lit a fire under Bush's ass, you see, he wouldn't have been motivated to do exactly the opposite of what we wanted him to do." Let that one sink in a bit before you press on. OK?

With his confusion as to how many States are in the Union - due to an alleged lack of sleep - perhaps his true allegiance(s) once in a while squeak out from the primordial ooze from which he emerged. Every time this sorry excuse of a leader opens his yapper, he proves to the world just how foolish he really is...perhaps it is beginners' luck? It could be his father's fault, if he knew who he was:

Barack Obama was born Steven Urkel in a log cabin near Springfield, Illinois. His father was a militant piano tuner from one of those African countries where they change the national boundaries every other week. His mother was a loan officer at the Oppressed Proletariat Bank and Trust Company where she spent her days rejecting loans to people who had little more to cling to than God and guns. As a communist, she hated that her job forced her to oppress the poor and disenfranchised; but, also as a communist, she loved power and control so she threw herself into her work with alacrity. His father, not finding a large number of militant pianos in the American Great Plains, left the fledgling family for places with more bellicose musical tastes, leaving young Steven and his mom to fight capitalism alone. [...]

One never knows one evil lurks in the hearts of men.

With the Lame Stream Media fully nestled in his Marxist Crotch, the Sheeple wail and gnash their teeth upon every criticism of the Black Hole of Dumb that is Obama as he sucks the life force from this Nation each and every step he takes. As he and the media milk his mistakes, gaffes, errors, failures and misspeaks, we will continue the fight to utterly expose this cretin for what he indeed is...A Clear and Present Danger. Remember, the Lame Stream Media is now the 4th Branch of Government.

And All The People Said?

Well, it all depends, doesn't it?

I am not all that positive that Obama's upbringing is a cause as to his communist ideologies but whatever brought about his propensities to be a die hard Marxist, the fact remains is that he is indeed a die hard Marxist. It really doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things The Why The Big O is a Marxist. The Why is immaterial. What is relevant is that he continually aligns himself and identifies himself with known historical fascist/dictatorial/communist/socialist leaders. For others agreeing and disagreeing on this, join the fray at Memeorandum. After all, when a particular candidate draws the support of people which would stoop to the levels of collecting human excrement to throw at police at a particular political party's convention, isn't it time to question the particular candidate as to why they do not publicly denounce such supporters?

As the Big O prostitutes himself before the world, pretending to give the impression that he actually cares about Israel and the Israelis see right through him, isn't it time for the Big O to address the issues in which and of which concerns the Israelis? The Israelis protested his visit yet he ignores them. We should be wondering why.

One of the reasons why the Israelis are protesting the Big O is his incessant catering and pandering to not only our enemies but to the enemies of Israel as well. The enemy we share have historically aligned themselves with fascist/communist/socialist dictators. Given that known historical and recorded fact, we have American Muslims chanting - in the typical Muslim mannerism - for the rise of the Big O. Visit this site and view the video. The only thing missing is the gun fire at the end. The Big O enraged the Israelis when he said that the Israelis are the friends of the Israelis...gaffe or subliminal?

The Big O's supporters have issues with facts and it is no wonder...so does the Big O. They all recreate history to suit their dementia and expect others to tag along. If anyone questions their "fact-finding", all hell breaks loose. For example, it was said that the Big O gathered approx 200K supporters in Germany and it has since been shown that there were only 20K and the majority of them were either bussed in or were there for the free beer and brats after a concert just before the Big O's appearance. Amazing.

Witnessing this as we do every day, is it any wonder why those with the powers of discernment go elsewhere for news and information? And our opposition gaffe, gag and choke on their own vomit of hatred, despair and willful suspension of disbelief.

There are those that have, are and will fall and falling out of love with the Big O. The would-be Fuhrer - the would-be or, presumptuous First Czar of the USSA (with a K), with his clarifications of his intent of his Civilian National Security Forces, is indeed the warning flag which needs to be deployed. When Howard Stern says that the DNC are packed full of closet communists, isn't it time for the communists to come clean? Yes, that was a rhetorical question.

The world knows beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Troop Surge has indeed worked but the world citizen Big O doesn't have the moral fortitude to admit it himself - it doesn't mesh with his agenda. For a lad that so lusts for the world to accept him as the "friend of the universe", he sure does misspeak quite a bit and it makes him an international embarrassment. When the Lame Stream Media acknowledges - reluctantly, naturally - that the Troop Surge has succeeded, who does the Big O think he is fooling? His android following? Please.

As the fraud that is the Big O attempts to steal an image not his to claim or own; as reports come in from the battlefields that the Big O staged Troop Appearances and blew others off (the vast majority of them); as the Big O makes pathetic and ever morphing and "changing" excuses why he didn't stop in to visit those he hopes to lead; many are wondering just who or what this would-be First Czar is all about.

Nobama's Civilian National Security Forces Explained?

HT goes to the JPA Live BTR Show and Danger Girl for an article in Military Times, which is owned by Gannett which also publishes the USA Today newspaper. I called your attention to the MT's affiliation because the MT in no way and by no means whatsoever is linked to the "official" military news outlets. All "official" news outlets of the military are either .org or .gov. Any alleged military news outlet which has a .com or a .net designator should be taken with a grain of salt - or something of a lesser value. This, however, does not apply to blogs or bloggers for the obvious - even to the oblivious - reasons. To perform a back-check, please visit this site.

Now that the disclaimer has been provided, we will now take a look at this interview by USA Today staffers with Barack Obama, giving the inference that the military is interviewing Barack Insane Hussein Obama. Scurrilous does not even come close to the implications here, does it?

In this interview the following question was asked:

Q: You said you don't want to rob Peter to pay Paul, so how are you going to pay Paul? Troop increases are an enormous expense.

To arrive at the full intent and the presented answer - if you can call it that - one will have to read the entire interview. This interview is a near prefect case study for a pretty verbiage explanation as to how the would-be First Czar of the newly formed USSA (with a "k") will decimate the now United States Armed Forces. He claims that he wants to expand the military but what he doesn't say is that he intends on taking the punch our military has away from them. We will have a bigger military with a lesser punch. This sounds counter productive to me.

In conjunction with this and before we continue with this interview by USA Today staffers, please recall this statement: (where he mentions AmeriCorps and Peace Corps as the "civilians")

"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded."

That statement alone is scary but having it placed in context is frightening. Barack, in this interview, has placed it in context. One of the partners here at A Newt One, Loki, has stated that if Barack intends to utilize AmeriCorps and Peace Corps personnel to fill vacancies in embassies and missions "that have been boarded up", he certainly doesn't understand the United States Constitution that her has purported to have once been an instructor thereof. However, it gets worse than that. This has grown beyond the pale of frightening. Behold:

[...] I should add, by the way, that part of the change that I want when it comes to Army and Marine structures is the mix of training that we're providing and mix of personnel that are in these forces. One of the things I have been so impressed with is the heroic job that our men and women in uniform have done basically on the fly having to train themselves on the spot to function as engineers or function as social workers or function as translators or political consultants. There's just been a whole bunch of work that has been done that we haven't prepared people for. They learn on the job, but if anything Iraq should have given us a template for the kinds of skill sets that we're going to have to provide to our military. And that's true in Iraq. That's true in Afghanistan. That also means, by the way, that we're going to have to, I believe, reconfigure our civilian national security force. In a way that just hasn't been done.

 

I mean, we still have a national security apparatus on the civilian side in the way the State Department is structured and [Agency for International Development] and all these various agencies. That hearkens back to the Cold War. And we need that wing of our national security apparatus to carry its weight. When we talk about reinventing our military, we should reinvent that apparatus as well. We need to be able to deploy teams that combine agricultural specialists and engineers and linguists and cultural specialists who are prepared to go into some of the most dangerous areas alongside our military. [...]

Parse that.

This interview was published on 08 JUL 08, 6 days after his speech in Colorado Springs. However, he makes no mention of AmeriCorps or Peace Corps personnel but he does say this:

[...] Absolutely, but the only problem with soft power is the term itself makes people think it's not as strong as hard power. And my point is that if we've got a State Department or personnel that have been trained just to be behind walls, and they have not been equipped to get out there alongside our military and engage, then we don't have the kind of national security apparatus that is needed. That has to be planned for; it has to be paid for. Those personnel have to be trained. And they all have to be integrated and that is something that we have not accomplished yet, but that's going to be what's increasingly important in our future to make sure that our military has the support that it needs to do what it does the best, which is fight wars. [...]

And there you have it. He is going to arm State Department Personnel so they can fight along side the United States Military. He is going to utilize AmeriCorps and Peace Corps Personnel to go into areas the US Military does to be the Agents of Change. Case closed and checkmate.

Excuse me Barack but the US Military Special Forces already handle such activities. Does the Anbar Awakening ring a bell? Our military, in special detail, has the training you are babbling about and making it sound like this is a new concept and making it sound like a good idea because you thought of it. Sorry. The US Military has already been doing this for years and decades.

Czarbama and the Civilian National Security Forces

This is getting even more and more curious and outrageous by the nanosecond.

In my previous post here (one of 19 including this one) on this subject of Barack Insane Hussein Nobama's Civilian National Security Forces, as shown here, I explained Obama's intentions utilizing his own verbiage as expressed in the USA Today interview in the Military Times on 08 July 08. His intentions are clear but the Lame Stream Media including Fox News are too busy licking the seats that Barack rises from.

Now, today, just a few moments ago, I noticed a Gateway Pundit post entitled, Obama Caught Stealing Ideas From Cuban Communist Regime. Sounds about right but to my surprise, it was in reference to Barack's Yoots Brigades. As Gateway has done, so will I.

In order to get the full import of the following blog post, one must actually click the link to Babalu Blog and read what someone that used to live under a regime that actually had a Civilian National Security Force. I might add that Gusana is very, very, very angry.

Our You Tube entry on this subject is here, major HT to x_dhimmi (deb). And yes, we are correct in our conclusions. Why else is Barack and his press moppets so silent?

Joining the fray:

Gateway Pundit
Babalu Blog

National Service Act: Czarbama's CNSF?

Who is your favorite communist? Check out Yid With Lid to find out who Czarbama's favorite pinko was/is:

I mentioned the above to tie into that which is below.

The Volokh Conspiracy has an interesting piece (HT Gateway Pundit) which is a must read and it dove-tails neatly into Czarbama's Civilian National Security Forces he rambled on about on 02 JUL 08 in Colorado. Apparently, sometime in September 2008, there is going to be a Hope and Change debacle which will attempt to "change society". A "Change" group will try and get the government involved in transforming our society.

A relatively new group, Service Nation, is planning to kick off a campaign with a Summit for "National Service" on September 11. Time Magazine has signed on to promote the effort. The website trumpets its training of "Change Agents" in cooperation with "Change, Inc." Its blog is called ChangeWire. Does this theme sound familiar? [...] [...] The website makes it clear that it is not just calling for individuals to get involved, but it is calling for a new National Service Act that will involve the government in transforming American society: [...]

This group is going to kick this off on 91108? That is 11 SEP 08 folks. I have taken a screen shot of a particular segment of the entry and any Leftinistra hack that tries to explain this all away as they have been doing for the last 3 weeks or so can drop dead. The entire article must be printed out and framed as well as get spread far and wide. This SHOULD be a rallying call for everyone that is staying home for some self-righteous motive. The self-righteousness needs to vanish and if this confirmation of that which I have been writing about for the last 3 weeks doesn't wake you all up, nothing will. This is the precursor to forced military service wrapped up in pretty verbiage. The Act can be found here and if you read it - study it - it amounts to a draft such as we have never seen in this Nation. Say what you will about McCain; his name is no where near this Act except for mention of a donor to him in 1999.

If Barack Insane Hussein Czarbama actually makes it into the White House, you can forget a Carter-Reagan inspired Conservative Movement winning back the Nation. It will be pitch forks at dawn and do not ask me to help you...I'll be busy helping those that got it.

What we need to do - 20 years ago - NOW is re-educate the populace and in a damned hurry. As for myself and about 60+ other Texicans, we visit college campuses DAILY, Mon thru Fri explaining all of this and we are getting more converts than not. What are YOU doing? Whining? Wishing? Hoping? Pining? Running into your comfort zones? WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO? And, when are you going to do it? Turn the damn TVs off, damn it!

Since the Volokh article was posted on 23 JUL 08, the Service Nation web site has been scrubbed clean. Sound familiar? Go ahead and stay home and keep your self-righteous pious ignorance in the closet and let Czarbama win. You will deserve everything that befalls you and your family. I know that stings but, too damn bad. This DAVFW grows weary of whiners amongst the populace that has no idea what battle looks like up front and personal. I do. And it is coming your way. Get over it.

That is all.
DISMISSED
MOVE OUT AND DRAW FIRE

Barack's Storm Troopers - The Obama Youth Corps

Simply unbelievable how the Lame Stream Media let this one slip right on by.

I found the video of this speech and I have captured the audio of the entire 26:44 speech given on 02 JUL 08 at Fort Carson, Colorado. I captured the audio because some of Barack's videos vanish if they become too controversial...like this one is going to be eventually. The You Tube is located here and it is too long to place in this blog space. Suffice it to say that one can spend hours and hours deciphering the coded messages therein.
When I captured the audio, I made note as to the location of this particular mention of the formation of his Civilian National Security Force that is going to be just as strong and just as well funded as our military. We will discuss this in my afternoon BTR show on 16 JUL 08 at 1300 hours CST (Texas time).

And yes, he did indeed say:

"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded."

Political Pistachio is also blogging and writing on this topic and this particular piece is very informative and well stated.

The image to the left is from Obama's web site but does not mention the Obama Storm Troopers except for a small blurb that mentions a Homeland Security Force - whatever that may be. He sure defined it in his speech in Fort Carson, CO.

This subject needs to be explained and exposed as to what it really means and I will not be spun. Neither should you. If you listen to the entire speech, taking notes as you go, the "offending" segment will become clearer and clearer. On 02 JUL 08, he not only abandoned the anti-war fruit loop brigades, he changed his positions several times and the sheeple clapped and applauded.

We live in Upside Down Land. It wouldn't surprise me if this section of his web site gets scrubbed in the near future.

Others:

Political Pistachio
World Net Daily
The Swamp
Soldier's Perspective

Even Czarbama's Following Knows Something Ain't Quite Kosher

Buffoon from Fort Hard Knox:

The implication of the Edwards scandal is that, if ABC News's top investigative reporter could take Edwards' side, without any serious checking of the facts, then other candidates may be concealing scandals and hoping and planning to get away with it. That is certainly the case with Obama, who is far more of a media favorite than Edwards ever was and has, with the help of the influential Associated Press (AP), carefully concealed his relationship with an identified CPUSA member. [...]

And, while we are at it, let's not forget about the Czarbama Civilian National Security Force...I have often wondered (not really) why the Lame Stream Media didn't pick up on that but in light of the Edwards media scandal, this proves way beyond a reasonable doubt that the Lame Stream is in bed with The One Marxist Czarbama. No wonder he ran away to Hawaii.

Just curious...how many presidential aspirants have gone on vacation during a campaign circuit?

Anyway, Czarbama's close to ties to known anti-Americanists are many so it is indeed up to the Main Street Media to expose him no matter the idiocy from his die-hard socialist supporters. Yid With Lid has been on top of this since the very beginning so it is required reading to visit and go through the archives on this subject. Apparently, the CPUSA states that Czarbama will end 30 years of Freedom. Amazing. And the Lame Stream is obviously going along with it - ergo the List of 45 becomes more and more scary.

Radio Patriot has more.

Oh. Before I forget. You are not aware of the Czarbama CNSF? Well, fear not. The collection is here on this web site.

We Live In Upside Down Land

According to the Rasmussen Poll, 9% of Americans think that the current CONgress is doing a good to great job. That means that 81% of Americans think that the current CONgress is doing a fair to poor job. Most of you know that I don't hold polls in high esteem when it comes to elections, especially the current presidential elections. However, it is painfully obvious to all that the 110th CONgress has been a pathetic one from the beginning primarily because the current crop of leadership and majority lied to get into office in the first place.

Now, having said all of the above, what is so perplexing is this. If you ask folks, as we did in my latest trek through Michigan on the Man On The Street Campaign we conducted, what they thought of the CONgress Critters, the vast majority said they would vote for Democrats.

So, learning that from these people, we asked certain key questions. (At the time the DNC led CONgress was at 11%.) We asked and stated that the Democrat led CONgress is at 11% approval rating. The DNC leadership through the years has created a circumstance that has forced the USA to be nearly totally dependent on foreign oil thus driving the costs to all time highs. The DNC leaders have the worst records of corruption in the history of this nation. The DNC leaders have violated the Logan Act continually "negotiating" their version of Foreign Policy in direct violation of the laws on the books because of their hatred of President Bush. Who are you voting for this year when 79% of the country thinks that the DNC led CONgress is pathetic and not doing what they promised the people they would do? Most of them said Democrats.

Someone please explain that to me.

And yes, we do in fact live in upside down land.

Now, after hearing this, we performed an operation that took courage and chutzpah. We took laptops and went where there was free WIFI (sometimes not) in various eateries and hotel lobbies and began a re-education process and were highly successful. We targeted college students in college towns at facilities either on the premises of colleges or at least near by where the Young Ones hung out.

The Bottom Line we discovered is as follows: the students ALL had the "understanding" that the country was in such sad shape because of the Republican Party whose leaders were Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and John Jerk Off Jack Murtha.

HUH??

This is pure craziness. We have Academia purposefully misleading their captured audiences?

WHAT??

And now, on top of that, we have Obama the Marxist, wanting to have an armed Civilian Force so we don't have to fully rely on the military for our National Security? My first impression upon first hearing of this was an image of the Hitler Youth. I first ran into this over at the pathetic AARP. Why? Because I am a member of the Senile Citizen Club, that's why and I was reading their indoctrination crap.

Afterwards, I read this at Little Green Footballs and we discussed it on the JPA Live show. Simply amazing this is. Why is this not FULLY attacked by the lazy - well, I answered that with the lazy word. This is another example as to where the GOP/RNC people need to go an a tear and rant to ask this Marxist idiot just what in the hell he is planning and just how in the hell he is planning to finance such a project.

[...] Obama promised to increase AmeriCorps slots from 75,000 to 250,000 and pledged to double the size of the Peace Corps by 2011. [...]

 

"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set," he said Wednesday. "We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded." [...]

Naturally, there is always this bit of lame rhetoric...another touchy-feely sound good idiotic tenet...

[...] "Our destiny as Americans is tied up with one another," he said. "If we are less respected in the world, then you will be less safe." [...]

LGF:

[...] Is he even aware that the Department of Defense's current base budget is close to $500 billion? Obama is going to create a civilian force with this level of funding and equipment? To do what? [END]

Great questions, yes? We live in odd times where we are watching the List of 45 unfold and the Sheeple laugh and watch American Idol.

Lock and load people.

The Obama Youth: What's Next?

Way back on 09 JUL 08, I penned a piece entitled, We Live In Upside Down Land, where we discussed the initial findings of the Obama Civilian Army. Since then, it has become even more clear the true intent. In the process of looking for this in the Lame Stream Media, I ran across these two pieces by observing links placed in several BTR chat rooms. One link is at Exurban League, Arizona's leading political blog and the other is The American Pundit. I originally read the initial data at the AARP site here.

[...] LOL WUT? Obama's going to create a civilian national security force as strong as the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines - combined? With the same budget? And hardware, apparently? Holy %^&*! [...]

I am curious as to what the hieroglyphics mean? ROFLMAO!

WE cannot afford to NOT demand an explanation to this. Some seem to think that the Obama premise would be a good idea to free up our military from duties that the Obama Civilian Army could do. I would sort of kind of maybe or maybe not could be might sort of go along with that IF it wasn't so painfully obvious that the Leftinistra are currently whining that our CURRENT military is being used as the world's police force. If Obama gets this "program" active, wouldn't they be doing the same thing that our military does? If so, then what is the difference? If not, what is the purpose of the Obama Civilian Army?

Just sayin'.

Barack's Civilian Army Just Keeps Getting More and More Interesting

In my massive and on-going data stream collection depot on everything I can find Obama, I have decided that it really is scary in there. I know I haven't collected all there is on Obama because that would require a full time staff of an unknown-at-this point number of people and all I have is me. With that said, there is enough data RIGHT HERE, that I add to on a daily basis, where one can go and read and study the subject Obama. And, I am forewarning you, it is scary in there.

We have been writing about the topic of Barack's opining on how he wants to nearly quadruple AmeriCorps and double the Peace Corps. In his own words, and I wish there was audio of this somewhere, he wants this new civilian force to be on an equal par with the United States Military. That is not a paraphrase. And, I quote:

[...] Obama promised to increase AmeriCorps slots from 75,000 to 250,000 and pledged to double the size of the Peace Corps by 2011. [...]

 

"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set," he said Wednesday. "We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded." [...]

For those of you that make the claim that this doesn't really mean what it says, I will ask someone to please explain to our readers and myself just exactly what the above quote does mean. Is this yet another typical Leftinistra gimmick topic such as the "IS" issue a few years ago that crops up from time to time? I ask because inquiring minds demand answers from the man Obama as he aspires to be President. Take note of the following, if you are able to follow.

In an interview on MSLSD back in July 0f 2007, Barack said the following in regards to Troops in Iraq:

[...] The United States cannot use its military to solve humanitarian problems and that preventing a potential genocide in Iraq isn't a good enough reason to keep U.S. forces there. [...]

Oh? We won't go into the issues that "some folks" sent US Troops to do just that in Somalia and Kosovo and have, in the past, demanded the same action in Darfur - utilizing US Troops in this manner. Was he beginning to lead up to his Civilian Forces program back then? If we cannot utilize our military to stem the tide of injustices amongst the tyrannical and dictatorial regimes to prevent genocidal activity - namely - pulling out of Iraq, will his Civilian Army take their place? And, if so, will we then even need the United States Military at that point?

If Obama gets his Civilian Army "up to par" with the current United States Military, as he so stated that they would be, does this mean that they will have the exact same training and equipment? He says so. Doesn't he?

If you have any doubts, read his words again. In addition, is he prepared to reform AmeriCorps from what it is at this moment in time? Is he going to have these kids - and I mean kids - as in teenagers - routed through Marine, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard or Army Boot Camps and teach them the art of Making War and defending the Nation against both foreign and domestic enemies? If the military is not to be used to curtail genocide or to defend the nation anymore, who, then, will? AmeriCorps? Read his words again and let me know where I am wrong here. Please? Better yet, have Obama explain this "program". OK? Just remember what the organization AmeriCorps is currently operating as. Click the image above or visit their web site. It most certainly is not any where near capable to either add to tghe functionality of or to replace the United States Military.

Now, about the Peace Corps. In the image to the left, one can see the Mission of the Peace Corps and it is primarily an educational tool to "teach others about America". This organization, much like AmeriCorps is comprised of young kids. They don't have the training that the United States Military does. Is Barack Obama set to send these kids to Marine, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard or Army Boot Camps and teach them the art of Making War and defending the Nation against both foreign and domestic enemies? Is he truly serious about this or is this merfely yet another example of pandering and catering to an emotional electorate - the kinds that have been indoctrinated into the America Bashing crowds? The more I study this subject, the more eerie it becomes.

If this is the case, who then is going to replace the kids in these organizations to perform the work, duties and the stated Missions of these organizations? Also, what does he plan on doing with the United States Military that is already trained to do the very jobs that his proposed Civilian Army will do?

This is absurdly insane. The image to the left just may be a portent to come. I have always and long believed and vocally stated in times past that the United States Military has stood in the path of the Leftinistra as they try to take this nation over from within. Perhaps this is Barack's way to ensure that the United States Military is so marginalized and dysfunctional that it is rendered ineffective to uphold their member's Oaths of Service in regards to defending the United States Constitution against both foreign and domestic enemies. We all know that the American Communist organizations openly state and, frankly, are quite vocal about supporting Barack Obama and hope that he gains the position he so lusts after...President of the United Socialist States of America.

Who are the people behind this Poster Child of Wander Lust, one Barack Hussein Obama, that so aspires to be First Czar of America? Having studied and investigated this man, it is becoming more and more evident each and every day that he is certainly unfit for or to be in command of a jelly bean eating contest, let alone CIC of American Armed Forces. Especially if he truly believes that his Civilian National Security Forces can do the job of America's Finest.

Stop the world! I want to get off now.

Also remember, please, if you will, that Barack Hussein Obama, stands with and supports Code Pink.

National Service Act: Amerika's Newest Conscript Nation

The National Service Act: Universal National Service Act of 2007 (Introduced in House)

To require all persons in the United States between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform national service, either as a member of the uniformed services or in civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, to authorize the induction of persons in the uniformed services during wartime to meet end-strength requirements of the uniformed services, to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the favorable treatment afforded combat pay under the earned income tax credit, and for other purposes.

To REQUIRE? Forced servitude? To AUTHORIZE THE INDUCTION? Forced servitude? I am detecting a pattern here. And for OTHER PURPOSES? What might those other purposes be..prey tell?

Short Title - This Act may be cited as the 'Universal National Service Act of 2007'

There's that "universal" term again. Reps Charles B Rangel, Yvette D Clark and Jim McDermott are responsible for this crap. Yes, it was introduced months and months ago but it hasn't died yet and is still in committee. The fact remains that it is being brought up again this coming September, on the 7th anniversary of 91101. Coincidence? Not hardly. I don't believe in coincidences at all - never, ever. There is no such thing as a coincidence in my book. At least not when it involves the Marxist Leftinistra in this country.

This bill is in the following committees: Committee of Armed Services, Committee On Ways and Means, House Armed Services and Subcommittee On Military Personnel. Now, why would this bill for "inducing" servitude of "civilians" go to the military? Remember Czarbama's words?

We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded.

Did Czarbama jump the shark on this one? Was he informed of this September "convention" in which this EXACT issue was scheduled to take place? Is this why the Service Nation web site was scrubbed, just like Czarbama's web site often is? Is this why at this moment there are folks on his web site arguing over who is a better communist? Once again, so many questions and yet, no answers.

This bill is rife with oddities. One of the most notable, at least to myself, is the forced induction to volunteer. In my military service, I was volunteered quite often to perform one duty or another. "You are ordered to volunteer" was a common expression. Here is another gem on this bill...

(3) The term 'national service' means military service or service in a civilian capacity that, as determined by the President, promotes the national defense, including national or community service and service related to homeland security.

There's that reference to the AmeriCorps 250K strong and the doubling the size of the Peace Corps. Here is yet another poser...

(d) Selection for Induction -

(1) RANDOM SELECTION FOR MILITARY SERVICE - When the induction of persons for military service is authorized by subsection (b), the President shall utilize a mechanism for the random selection of persons to be inducted to perform military service.

 

(2) CIVILIAN SERVICE - Persons described in section 102(a) who do not volunteer to perform military service or are not inducted for military service shall perform their national service obligation in a civilian capacity pursuant to section 102(b)(2).

(e) Voluntary Service - A person subject to induction under this title may--

(1) volunteer to perform national service in lieu of being inducted; or

 

(2) request permission to be inducted at a time other than the time at which the person is otherwise called for induction.

Someone explain something to me, please. If this is a voluntary thing, why would they be classified as being subject to induction? I smell a Marxist Leftinistra in the midst. Yep. And we cannot leave out the ladies...

SEC. 111. REGISTRATION OF FEMALES UNDER THE MILITARY SELECTIVE SERVICE ACT.

There ya go! We will now be registering the ladies for the New Amerikan Conscript Army. Nice.

I hardly think that this is all a fabrication. We remember when a draft was voted on several times during the GWOT. They were sore;y defeated and even the ones introducing the bills voted against them. It was all smoke and mirrors for the Fruit Loop Brigades, aka anti-war or peace thug groups, and other insignificant twits such as Code Skank.

Also, with Barack's apparent shark jumping in Colorado and the scrubbing of the Service Nation web site prior to their 91108 "convention" and the deafly silent alleged main stream (ripple) media, my pinger and palsy detectors are in full swing and the danger meter needle is not only pegged, it is wrapped around the spindle a few times.

In light of Czarbama's "moment", relaying his One World vomitorium, his abasing of my country on foreign soil that he said he would never do, his lust of power for the presidency of the world, the Chief Obfuscator pisses me off.

With his profile set as Lenin, and his campaign staff in tow along with his 300+ advisors all bent on "fact finding", where in the hell were his Senate Staffers? And, who paid the tab on this non-campaign campaign fact-finding tour?

With his bald faced lies as to why he dissed our gravely wounded Troops in Germany, is it any wonder at all why this guy Czarbama creeps so many people out and why even Al Jazeera says he is a twit? Even the Germans that he wasn't able to bribe to attend with free beer, brats and concerts think he is an idiot.

Czarbama: the very definition of Clear and Present Danger if there ever was a definition...

From Chandlers' Watch: Obama Volunteers Recruit “Army”

[...] “We’re looking for supporters,” said DeHaven of Hoover, one of the event’s organizers. “We’re not looking for a fight. That will come later, when we have an army.” [...]

Dear. DeHaven...you libtards will soil yourselves when the Fight comes to you.  Get used to running and looking over your cowardly libtard shoulder, punk.

Obama's Civilian National Security Forces Came Up Again

My very first post on this subject was 09 JUL 08, 7 days after the infamous words were spoken at a rally where Winter Soldiers hung out to dry and do whatever it is that they do when they are betraying their Oaths of Service.

Either a brave soul or someone with more time on their hands than they should have actually watched the Infomercial First Czar put out tonight. In that Infomercial, Czarbie mentioned that he was going to "rebuild the military." I doubt it but, several times, Obama has stated that he was going to "increase the size" of the military which flies in the face of recent statements by his fellow socialists that they intend on CUTTING the military by 25%. One of them is lying. I am banking on Obama being the liar...because he is good at it and does it quite frequently.

Little Green Footballs also reported on this Obama Civilian National Security Force way back then also and made reference to it in the above link. Makes me wonder what he was alluding to when he mentioned the "coalition of powers to bring about redistributive change" in that 2001 interview. Doesn't it make you wonder?

Gateway Pundit evidently also watched the Infomercial and is wondering the same about this CNSF of Obama's. Gateway also mentions that the Infomercial was foreign funded. Go figure. Yep. Just like a socialist democrat to lie, cheat and steal their way to an election victory. As we all have seen and perhaps more need to see it, Babalu Blog knows exactly what Barack is up to.

Sister Toldjah watched it and she said that Obama lost her at "Hello".

Sorry Czarbie. It ain't gonna work for you this time around.

Melissa at RWN says it was overkill and was not impressive...glad I didn't waste my time.

For me, there are two main issues that cloud the Fraud Obama - his Civilian National Security Forces and his AWOL birth certificate. His medical records and college records and other things are neatly and safely tucked away sealed against scrutiny while McCain has been open and has presented all there is to present.

So. what is he hiding?

Anyway, to learn more about the Civilian National Security Forces, check below and be sure to check out the audio and You Tube.